Advanced search
Publication Cover
Clinical Audit Volume 5, 2013 - Issue
Submit an article Journal homepage
26
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Factors associated with patient selection for inpatient rehabilitation: an audit of decision-making in the rehabilitation assessment

Joanne Lim1 Rehabilitation Unit, St Vincent’s Health, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
,
Leonid Churilov2 Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
,
Penelope Smith1 Rehabilitation Unit, St Vincent’s Health, Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia
&
Irina Churilov1 Rehabilitation Unit, St Vincent’s Health, Fitzroy, Victoria, AustraliaCorrespondence[email protected]
Pages 1-9 | Published online: 20 Jan 2013

References

  • Haas JF. Admission to rehabilitation centres: selection of patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988;69:329–332.
  • International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) [webpage on the Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/. Accessed January 10, 2012.
  • Caplan A, Callahan D, Haas J. Ethical and policy issues in rehabilitation medicine. Hastings Cent Rep. 1987;17:1–20.
  • Hersh D. I can’t sleep at night with discharging this lady: the personal impact of ending therapy on speech-language pathologists. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2010;12(4):283–291.
  • Montgomery K. How Doctors Think: Clinical Judgement and the Practice of Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
  • New PW The assessment and selection of potential rehabilitation patients in acute hospitals: a literature review and commentary. Open Rehabil J. 2009;2:24–34.
  • Poulos JP, Eagar K. Determining appropriateness for rehabilitation or other subacute care: is there a role for utilisation review? Aust New Zealand Health Policy. 2007;4:3.
  • Wade DT. Selection criteria for rehabilitation services. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17:115–118.
  • Cunningham C, Horgan F, O’Neill D. Clinical assessment of rehabilitation potential of the older patient: a pilot study. Clin Rehabil. 2000;14:205–207.
  • Cooper G, editor. Essential Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. New York: Humana Press Inc; 2006.
  • O’Young BJ, Young MA, Stiens SA. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Secrets, 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Hanley and Belfus Inc; 2001.
  • Association of Academic Physiatrists [homepage on the Internet]. Hanover, MD: Association of Academic Physiatrists (AAP); 1999 through 2012. Available from: http://www.physiatry.org. Accessed November 12, 2012.
  • British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine [homepage on the Internet]. London: BSRM; 2012. Available from: http://www.bsrm.co.uk. Accessed November 12, 2012.
  • Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre. Report July 2009-June 2010. Wollongong, NSW: Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre, University of Wollongong; 2010.
  • Evans RL, Haselkorn JK, Bisop DS, Hendricks RD. Characteristics of patients receiving medical rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991;72:685–689.
  • Brooks GP, Barcikowski RS. Precision power method for selecting regression analysis sample sizes. Proceedings of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association Annual Meeting; Oct 1995; Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Long JS, Freese J. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables, 2nd ed. College Station, TX: Stata Corp; 2006.
  • Long JS. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1997.
  • Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49:1373–1379.
  • Lawley DN, Maxwell AE. Factor Analysis as a Statistical Method. London, UK: Butterworth and Co; 1971.
  • Marascuilo LA, Levin JR. Multivariate Statistics in the Social Sciences: A Researcher’s Guide. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole; 1983.
  • Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics, 3rd ed. New York, CA: Harper Collins; 1996.
  • Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics, 4th ed. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 2001.
  • Wade DT. Evidence relating to assessment in rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 1998;12:183–186.
  • Baztan JJ, Arias E, Gonzalez N, Rodríguez de Prada MI. New-onset urinary incontinence and rehabilitation outcomes in frail older patients. Age Ageing. 2005;34:172–175.
  • Gross JC. Urinary incontinence and stroke outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:22–27.
  • Johnson MF, Kramer AM, Lin M, Kowalsky JC, Steiner JF. Outcomes of older persons receiving rehabilitation for medical and surgical conditions compared with hip fracture and stroke. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:1389–1397.
  • Hakkennes S, Hill KD, Brock K, Bernhardt J, Churilov L. Access to rehabilitation following severe stroke: what factors influence the assessor’s decision making? J Rehabil Med. Epub 2012.
  • Hakkennes S, Hill KD, Brock K, Bernhardt J, Churilov L. Accessing inpatient rehabilitation following severe stroke: age, mobility, pre-stroke function and hospital unit are associated with discharge to rehabilitation. Int J Rehabil Res. Epub 2012.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.