Identification of a reliable subset of process indicators for clinical audit in stroke care: an example from Australia

References

• Senes S. How we manage stroke in Australia. AIHW cat no CVD 31. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. 3303.0 Causes of death 2206: Australia. Canberra: ABS; 2008. 3303.0.
   Google Scholar
• Strong K, Mathers C, Leeder S, Beaglehole R. Preventing chronic diseases: how many lives can we save? Lancet. Published online October 5 2005;DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)657341-2:5.
   Google Scholar
• Cadilhac DA, Pearce DC, Levi CR, Donnan GA. Improvements in the quality of care and health outcomes with new Stroke Care Units following implementation of a clinician-led, health-system redesign programme in New South Wales, Australia. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17:329–333.
   Google Scholar
• Cadilhac DA, Ibrahim J, Pearce DC, et al. Multicenter comparison of processes of care between Stroke Units and conventional care wards in Australia. Stroke. 2004;35(5): 1035–1040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroke Unit Trialists’ Collaboration. Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke (Cochrane Review). Oxford: Update Software. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(1):CD000197.
   Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. Clinical guidelines for acute stroke management. Melbourne: National Stroke Foundation; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Physicians of London. National Sentinal Audit of Stroke Phase I (organisational audit) 2006 Phase II (clinical audit) 2006. Report for England Wales and Northern Ireland. United Kingdom: Royal College of Physicians of London; April 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Mainz J, Krog BR, Bjornshave B, Bartels P. Nationwide continuous quality improvement using clinical indicators: the Danish National Indicator Project. Int J Qual Health Care. 2004;16 Suppl 1: i45–50.
   Google Scholar
• Heuschmann PU, Kolominsky-Rabas PL, Kugler C, et al. [Quality assurance in treatment of stroke: basic module of the German Stroke Registry Study Group]. Gesundheitswesen. 2000;62(10): 547–552.
   Google Scholar
• Rudd A, Lowe D, Hoffman A, Irwin P. Potential indicators for the quality of care for stroke patients: results of statistical analysis February 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Physicians of London. National Sentinel Stroke Audit Phase II clinical audit 2008. Report for England, Wales and Northern Ireland 2008. London: Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit, Royal College of Physicians of London; April 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Wattigney WA, Croft JB, Mensah GA, et al. Establishing data elements for the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Registry: Part 1: proceedings of an expert panel. Stroke. 2003;34(1):151–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mant J. Process versus outcome indicators in the assessment of quality of health care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2001;13(6):475–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mainz J. Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvement. Int J Qual Health Care. 2003;15(6):523–530.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purvis T, Cadilhac D, Donnan G, Bernhardt J. Systematic review of process indicators: including early rehabilitation interventions used to measure quality of acute stroke care. Int J Stroke. 2009;4(2): 72–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. National guidelines for acute stroke management. Melbourne: National Stroke Foundation; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• National Health and Medical Research Council. How to use the evidence: assessment and application of scientific evidence: Handbook series on preparing clinical practice guidelines. Canberra: NHMRC; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. National Stroke Audit Clinical Report: Acute Services. Melbourne: National Stroke Foundation; November 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Collopy BT. Developing clinical indicators: the ACHS Care Evaluation Program. Aust Clin Rev. 1990;10(2):83–85.
   Google Scholar
• Barraclough B. The role of safety and quality councils in improving the quality of healthcare: an Australian perspective. Health Pap. 2006;6(3):24–32; discussion 58–61.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. Operating Principles and Technical Standards for Australian Clinical Quality Registries. Sydney: ACS&QHC; November 2008.
   Google Scholar
• O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Why, and how, mixed methods research is undertaken in health services research in England: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunink M, Glasziou P, Siegel J, et al. Decision making in health and medicine: integrating evidence and values. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Harris D, Cadilhac D, Hankey GJ, Hillier S, Kilkenny M, Lalor E. National Stroke Audit: The Australian Experience. Clinical Audit. 2010;2:25–31.
   Google Scholar
• Betteridge DJ, Belch J, Brown MM, et al. Guidelines on the management of secondary prophylaxis of vascular events in stable patients in primary care. Int J Clin Pract. 2004;58(2):153–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burn JPS. Reliability of the modified rankin scale. Stroke. 1992;23(3):438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Counsell C, Dennis M, McDowall M, Warlow C. Predicting outcome after acute and subacute stroke: development and validation of new prognostic models. Stroke. 2002;33(4):1041–1047.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg D, Phillip C. CART-Classification and Regression Trees. San Diego, CA: Salford Systems; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Ridley S, Jones S, Shahani A, Brampton W, Nielsen M, Rowan K. Classification trees. A possible method for iso-resource grouping in intensive care. Anaesthesia. 1998;53(9):833–840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics. 1989;45(1):255–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway RG, Vickrey BG, Benesch C, Hinchey JA, Bieber J. Development of performance measures for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2001;32(9):2058–2074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuschmann PU, Biegler MK, Busse O, et al. Development and implementation of evidence-based indicators for measuring quality of acute stroke care: the Quality Indicator Board of the German Stroke Registers Study Group (ADSR). Stroke. 2006;37(10):2573–2578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandercock P, Counsell C, Gubitz GJ, Tseng MC. Antiplatelet therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(3): CD000029.
   Google Scholar
• Lingsma HF, Dippel DW, Hoeks SE, et al. Variation between hospitals in patient outcome after stroke is only partly explained by differences in quality of care: results from the Netherlands Stroke Survey. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79(8):888–894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asplund K, Hulter Asberg K, Norrving B, Stegmayr B, Terent A, Wester PO. Riks-stroke – a Swedish national quality register for stroke care. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003;15 Suppl 1:5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves MJ, Arora S, Broderick JP, et al. Acute stroke care in the US: results from 4 pilot prototypes of the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Registry. Stroke. 2005;36(6):1232–1240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar