National Stroke Audit: The Australian experience

References

• Senes S. How We Manage Stroke in Australia. AIHW cat no CVD 31. Canberra, Australia: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Thrift AG, Dewey HM, Macdonell RA, McNeil JJ, Donnan GA. Stroke incidence on the east coast of Australia: the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Stroke. 2000;31(9):2087–2092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s Health 2008. Canberra, Australia: AIHW; AIHW cat. no. AUS 99; 2009
   Google Scholar
• Cadilhac DA, Carter R, Thrift AG, Dewey HM. Estimating the long-term costs of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke for Australia: new evidence derived from the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Stroke. 2009;40(3):915–921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadilhac DA, Carter RC, Thrift AG, Dewey HM. Why invest in a national public health program for stroke? An example using Australian data to estimate the potential benefits and cost implications. Health Policy. 2007;83(2–3):287–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. Clinical Guidelines for Acute Stroke Management. Melbourne, Australia: National Stroke Foundation; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. Clinical Guidelines for Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery. Melbourne, Australia: National Stroke Foundation; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. Clinical Guidelines for Acute Stroke Management. Melbourne, Australia: National Stroke Foundation; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Physicians of London. National Sentinel Stroke Audit Phase 1 Organizational Audit 2008. London, UK: Royal College of Physicians of London; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Physicians of London. National Sentinel Stroke Audit Phase II (Clinical Audit) 2008. London, UK: Royal College of Physicians of London; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. National Stroke Audit Acute Services: Organizational Survey Report. Melbourne, Australia: National Stroke Foundation; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Cadilhac DA, Pearce DC, Levi CR, Donnan GA. Improvements in the quality of care and health outcomes with new stroke care units following implementation of a clinician-led, health system redesign programme in New South Wales, Australia. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17(5):329–333.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Irwin P, Hoffman A, Lowe D, Pearson M, Rudd AG. Improving clinical practice in stroke through audit: results of three rounds of National Stroke Audit. J Eval Clin Pract. 2005;11(4):306–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamtvedt G, Young JM, Kristoffersen DT, O’Brien MA, Oxman AD. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(2):CD000259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwamm LH, Fonarow GC, Reeves MJ, et al. Get With the Guidelines-Stroke is associated with sustained improvement in care for patients hospitalized with acute stroke or transient ischemic attack. Circulation. 2009;119(1):107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadilhac DA, Lalor EE, Pearce DC, Levi CR, Donnan GA. Access to stroke care units in Australian public hospitals: facts and temporal progress. Intern Med J. 2006;36(11):700–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Microsoft Corporation. Excel [computer program]. Version 2003. Redmond, WA: Microsoft; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Physicians of London. National Sentinel Audit of Stroke 2006. Organizational Audit Report. London, UK; Royal College of Physicians of London; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Indredavik B. Stroke unit care is beneficial both for the patient and for the health service and should be widely implemented. Stroke. 2009;40(1):1–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaste M, Boysen G, Indredavik B, Norrving B. Stroke unit care in Scandinavian countries. Int J Stroke. 2006;1(1):44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzan IL, Graber TM, Furlan AJ, et al. Cuyahoga County Operation Stroke speed of emergency department evaluation and compliance with National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke time targets. Stroke. 2003;34(4):994–998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qureshi AI, Kirmani JF, Sayed MA, et al. Time to hospital arrival, use of thrombolytics, and in-hospital outcomes in ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2005;64(12):2115–2120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadilhac DA, Ibrahim J, Pearce DC, et al. Multicenter comparison of processes of care between Stroke Units and conventional care wards in Australia. Stroke. 2004;35(5):1035–1040.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardie K, Hankey GJ, Jamrozik K, Broadhurst RJ, Anderson C. Ten-year risk of first recurrent stroke and disability after first-ever stroke in the Perth Community Stroke Study. Stroke. 2004;35(3):731–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. Walk in our Shoes. Stroke survivors and carers report on support after stroke. Melbourne, Australia: National Stroke Foundation; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. BMJ. 2002;324(7329):71–86.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amarenco P, Bogousslavsky J, Callahan A 3rd, et al. High-dose atorvastatin after stroke or transient ischemic attack. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(6):549–559.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashid P, Leonardi-Bee J, Bath P. Blood pressure reduction and secondary prevention of stroke and other vascular events: a systematic review. Stroke. 2003;34(11):2741–2748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadilhac D, Pearce D, Donnan G. Evaluation of the New South Wales Greater Metropolitan Transition Taskforce Stroke Unit Initiative 2003/2004: Final Report. Melbourne, Australia: National Stroke Research Institute; 2004.
   Google Scholar