559
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

The Occlusal Plane Inclination Analysis for Determining Skeletal Class III Malocclusion Diagnosis

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 163-171 | Published online: 24 Apr 2020

References

  • Burns NR, Musich DR, Martin C, Razmus T, Gunel E, Ngan P. Class III camouflage treatment: what are the limits? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137:1–13.
  • Mi KB, Kang B, Hong G, Baek S. Prognosis prediction for class III malocclusion treatment by feature wrapping method. Angle Orthod. 2009;79(4):683–691. doi:10.2319/071508-371.1
  • Dwight H. Prevalence of angle class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta analysis. Open J Epidemiol. 2012;2(4):75–82.
  • Fang N, Yinzhong D. Camouflage treatment in adult skeletal class III case by extraction of two lower premolars. Korean J Orthod. 2010;40(5):349–357. doi:10.4041/kjod.2010.40.5.349
  • Jin-le L, Chen F, Chen S. Changes of occlusal plane inclination after orthodontic treatment in different dentoskeletal frames. Prog Orthod. 2014;15:41. doi:10.1186/s40510-014-0041-1
  • Parente E, Lazerda G, Silvares MG. Surgical manipulation of the occlusal plane in classical III deformities: 5 features to help planning. Open J Stomatol. 2014;4(5)238–242.
  • Ju BE, Kwon HJ, Kwon O. Changes in longitudinal craniofacial growth in subjects with normal occlusions using the ricketts analysis. Korean J Orthod. 2014;44(2):77–87. doi:10.4041/kjod.2014.44.2.77
  • Ngan P, Moon W. Evolution of class III treatment in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015;4(12):22–33.
  • Edlira Z, Chaudhari PK, Sharan J, Dhingra K, Tiwari N. Developing class III malocclusions: challenges and solutions. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2018;10:99–116. doi:10.2147/CCIDE.S134303
  • Vukusic N, Lapter M, Muretic Z. Change in the inclination of the occlusal plane during craniofacial growth and development. Coll Antropol. 2000;24:145–150.
  • Motonori S, Motoyoshi M, Hirabayashi M, Kouhei H, Mitsui N, Shimizu N. Inclination of the occlusal plane is associated with the direction of the masticatory movement path. Eur J Orthod. 2007;29:21–24. doi:10.1093/ejo/cjl036
  • Senisik NE, Hasipek S. Occlusal cant: etiology, evaluation, and management. Turkish J Orthod. 2015;27(4):174–180.
  • Profit WR, Fields HW. Contemporary orthodontics, 6th, Mosby. Philadelphia. 2019;145–294.
  • Jacobson A, Jacobson R. Radiographic Cephalometry from Basic to 3-D Imaging. 2nd ed. Quintensence Publishing Co Inc Chicago; 2006:137–144.
  • Ricketts RM. The influence of orthodontics treatment on facial growth and development. Angle Orthod. 1960;30:103.
  • Kumar V, Sundareswaran S. Cephalometric assessment of sagittal dysplasia: a review of twenty one methods. J Indian Orthod Soc. 2014;48(1):33–41.
  • Jae HY, Huh KH, Hong KK, et al. Constancy of the angle between the Frankfort horizontal plane and the sella-nasion line A nine-year longitudinal study. Angle Orthod. 2014;84(2):286–289. doi:10.2319/062013-464.1
  • Shamlan MA, Aldreess AM. Hard and soft tissue correlation in facial profiles: a canonical correlation study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2015;9–14.
  • Yassir A. Saddle angle and its relationship with maxillary and mandibular lengths. Iraqi Orthod J. 2009;5:14–16.
  • Reyneke JP. Essentials of Orthognathic Surgery. Quintessence Publishing Co Inc Chicago; 2003:188–213.
  • Hayes JL. A modification of the Wits appraisal is proposed for patients with high FMA or with long lower face height – a supplementary assessment. Orthod Pract. 2018;9(2):10–20.
  • Ferrara V, De Santis S, Silvestri A, Staffoli C. Art and medicine: from anatomic studies to visual thinking strategies. Senses Sci. 2015;40–44.