Conservative Composite Resin Restoration for Proximal Caries – Two Case Reports

References

• Kassebaum N, Bernabé E, Dahiya M, Bhandari B, Murray C, Marcenes WJ. Global burden of untreated caries: a systematic review and metaregression. J Dent Res. 2015;94(5):650–658. doi:10.1177/0022034515573272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne JW, Summitt JB. Extension for prevention: is it relevant today? Am J Dent. 1998;11(4):189–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter AV, Boushell LW, Walter R. Sturdevant’s Art and Science of Operative Dentistry. 7th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Schwendicke F, Lamont T, Innes N. Removing or controlling? How caries management impacts on the lifetime of teeth. In: Schwendicke F, Frencken J, Innes N, editors. Caries Excavation: Evolution of Treating Cavitated Carious Lesions. Vol. 27. Karger Publishers; 2018:32–41.
   Google Scholar
• Brantley CF, Bader JD, Shugars DA, Nesbit SP. Does the cycle of rerestoration lead to larger restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1995;126(10):1407–1413. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.1995.0052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frencken JE, Peters MC, Manton DJ, Leal SC, Gordan VV, Eden E. Minimal intervention dentistry for managing dental caries - a review: report of a FDI task group. Int Dent J. 2012;62(5):223–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black GV. The Pathology of the Hard Tissues of the Teeth. Vol. 1. Medico-Dental Publishing Company; 1914.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin SO, Oong E, Kohn W, et al. The effectiveness of sealants in managing caries lesions. J Dent Res. 2008;87(2):169–174. doi:10.1177/154405910808700211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontana M, Platt JA, Eckert GJ, et al. Monitoring of sound and carious surfaces under sealants over 44 months. J Dent Res. 2014;93(11):1070–1075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oong EM, Griffin SO, Kohn WG, Gooch BF, Caufield PW. The effect of dental sealants on bacteria levels in caries lesions: a review of the evidence. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139(3):271–278. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0156
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie KX, Wang XY, Gao XJ, Yuan CY, Li JX, Chu CH. Fracture resistance of root filled premolar teeth restored with direct composite resin with or without cusp coverage. Int Endod J. 2012;45(6):524–529. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.02005.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji W, Chen Z, Frencken JE. Strength of tunnel-restored teeth with different materials and marginal ridge height. Dent Mater. 2009;25(11):1363–1370. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2009.06.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palamara JE, Palamara D, Messer HH. Strains in the marginal ridge during occlusal loading. Aust Dent J. 2002;47(3):218–222. doi:10.1111/j.1834-7819.2002.tb00332.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covey D, Schulein TM, Kohout FJ. Marginal ridge strength of restored teeth with modified Class II cavity preparations. J Am Dent Assoc. 1989;118(2):199–202. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.1989.0226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahrbaf S, Mirzakouchaki B, Oskoui SS, Kahnamoui MA. The effect of marginal ridge thickness on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated, composite restored maxillary premolars. Oper Dent. 2007;32(3):285–290. doi:10.2341/06-83
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu CH, Mei ML, Cheung C, Nalliah RP. Restoring proximal caries lesions conservatively with tunnel restorations. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2013;5:43–50. doi:10.2147/CCIDE.S48567
   Google Scholar
• Chalker SA, Lumley PJ. An in vitro assessment of cavity margin finishing and marginal adaptation of tunnel restorations. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 1993;1(4):151–156.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kinomoto Y, Inoue Y, Ebisu S. A two-year comparison of resin-based composite tunnel and Class II restorations in a randomized controlled trial. Am J Dent. 2004;17(4):253–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand GV, Tveit AB, Eide GE. Cavity design and dimensions of tunnel preparations versus composite resin Class-II preparations. Acta Odontol Scand. 1995;53(4):217–221. doi:10.3109/00016359509005975
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilebro CE, van Dijken JW. Analysis of factors affecting failure of glass cermet tunnel restorations in a multi-center study. Clin Oral Investig. 2001;5(2):96–101.
   Google Scholar
• Wiegand A, Attin T. Treatment of proximal caries lesions by tunnel restorations. Dent Mater. 2007;23(12):1461–1467. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2006.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keys W, Carson SJ. Rubber dam may increase the survival time of dental restorations. Evidence-Based Dent. 2017;18(1):19. doi:10.1038/sj.ebd.6401221
   Google Scholar
• James T, Gilmour AS. Magnifying loupes in modern dental practice: an update. Dent Update. 2010;37(9):633–636. doi:10.12968/denu.2010.37.9.633
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Pelka M, Petschelt A. Internal adaptation and overhang formation of direct Class II resin composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig. 1999;3(4):208–215. doi:10.1007/s007840050103
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kielbassa AM, Ulrich I, Werth VD, Schuller C, Frank W, Schmidl R. External and internal resin infiltration of natural proximal subsurface caries lesions: A valuable enhancement of the internal tunnel restoration. Quintessence Int. 2017;48(5):357–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter AV, Swift EJ JR. Current restorative concepts of pulp protection. Endodontic Topics. 2003;5(1):41–48. doi:10.1111/j.1601-1546.2003.00022.x
   Google Scholar
• Alomari QD, Reinhardt JW, Boyer DB. Effect of liners on cusp deflection and gap formation in composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2001;26(4):406–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrera CA, Lan C, Escobar-Sanabria D, et al. The use of micro-CT with image segmentation to quantify leakage in dental restorations. Dent Mater. 2015;31(4):382–390. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2015.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soares CJ, Bicalho AA, Tantbirojn D, Versluis A. Polymerization shrinkage stresses in a premolar restored with different composite resins and different incremental techniques. J Adhes Dent. 2013;15(4):341–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han SH, Park SH. Incremental and bulk-fill techniques with bulk-fill resin composite in different cavity configurations. Oper Dent. 2018;43(6):631–641. doi:10.2341/17-279-LR
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter AV. Sturdevant’s Art & Science of Operative Dentistry-E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Moazzami SM, Sarabi N, Hajizadeh H, et al. Efficacy of four lining materials in sandwich technique to reduce microleakage in class II composite resin restorations. Oper Dent. 2014;39(3):256–263. doi:10.2341/11-495-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon OH, Kim DH, Park SH. The influence of elastic modulus of base material on the marginal adaptation of direct composite restoration. Oper Dent. 2010;35(4):441–447. doi:10.2341/09-372-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar