573
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Aesthetic Dentistry, How You Say and How You See: A 500-People Survey on Digital Preview and Color Perception

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 377-389 | Published online: 21 Sep 2020

References

  • Garcia PP, da Costa RG, Calgaro M, et al. Digital smile design and mock-up technique for esthetic treatment planning with porcelain laminate veneers. J Conserv Dent. 2018;21(4):455–458. doi:10.4103/JCD.JCD_172_18
  • Abduo J. Morphological symmetry of maxillary anterior teeth before and after prosthodontic planning: comparison between conventional and digital diagnostic wax-ups. Med Princ Pract. 2016;25(3):276–281. doi:10.1159/000444323
  • Jafri Z, Ahmad N, Sawai M, Sultan N, Bhardwaj A. Digital smile design-an innovative tool in aesthetic dentistry. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2020;10(2):194–198. doi:10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.04.010
  • Ferrini F, Cappare P, Vinci R, Gherlone EF, Sannino G. Digital versus traditional workflow for posterior maxillary rehabilitations supported by one straight and one tilted implant: a 3-year prospective comparative study. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018. doi:10.1155/2018/4149107
  • Ferrini F, Sannino G, Chiola C, Cappare P, Gastaldi G, Gherlone EF. Influence of Intra-Oral Scanner (I.O.S.) on the marginal accuracy of CAD/CAM single crowns. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(4):544. doi:10.3390/IJERPH16040544
  • Cappare P, Sannino G, Minoli M, Montemezzi P, Ferrini F. Conventional versus digital impressions for full arch screw-retained maxillary rehabilitations: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(5):829. doi:10.3390/ijerph16050829
  • Gherlone E, Mandelli F, Capparè P, Pantaleo G, Traini T, Ferrini F. A 3 years retrospective study of survival for zirconia-based single crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions. J Dent. 2014;42(9):1151–1155. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2014.06.002
  • Gherlone EF, Ferrini F, Crespi R, Gastaldi G, Capparé P. Digital impressions for fabrication of definitive “all-on-four” restorations. Implant Dent. 2015;24(1):125–129. doi:10.1097/ID.0000000000000206
  • Gherlone E, Cappare P, Vinci R, Ferrini F, Gastaldi G, Crespi R. Conventional versus digital impressions for “all-on-four” restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31(2). doi:10.11607/JOMI.3900
  • Cattoni F, Teté G, Calloni AM, Manazza F, Gastaldi G, Capparè P. Milled versus moulded mock-ups based on the superimposition of 3D meshes from digital oral impressions: a comparative in vitro study in the aesthetic area. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):230. doi:10.1186/s12903-019-0922-2
  • Charavet C, Bernard J-C, Gaillard C, Le Gall M. Benefits of digital smile design (DSD) in the conception of a complex orthodontic treatment plan: a case report-proof of concept. Int Orthod. 2019;17(3):573–579. doi:10.1016/j.ortho.2019.06.019
  • Cervino G, Fiorillo L, Arzukanyan AV, Spagnuolo G, Cicciù M. Dental restorative digital workflow: digital smile design from aesthetic to function. Dent J. 2019;7(2):30. doi:10.3390/dj7020030
  • Omar D, Duarte C. The application of parameters for comprehensive smile esthetics by digital smile design programs: a review of literature. Saudi Dent J. 2018;30(1):7–12. doi:10.1016/j.sdentj.2017.09.001
  • Boparai JK, Singh S, Kathuria P. How to design and validate a questionnaire: a guide. Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2018;13(4):210–215. doi:10.2174/1574884713666180807151328
  • Nocini R, Capocasale G, Marchioni D, Zotti F. A snapshot of knowledge about oral cancer in Italy: a 505 person survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(13):13. doi:10.3390/ijerph17134889
  • Sharpe D. Chi-square test is statistically significant: now what? Pract Assess Res Eval. 2019;20(1). doi:10.7275/tbfa-x148
  • Blatz MB, Chiche G, Bahat O, Roblee R, Coachman C, Heymann HO. Evolution of aesthetic dentistry. J Dent Res. 2019;98(12):1294–1304. doi:10.1177/0022034519875450
  • Kelleher MGD, Djemal S, Lewis N. Ethical marketing in ’aesthetic’ (’esthetic’) or ’cosmetic dentistry’. Part 1. Dent Update. 2012;39(5):313–316, 318–320, 323–4 passim. doi:10.12968/denu.2012.39.5.313
  • Peek STM, Wouters EJM, Luijkx KG, Vrijhoef HJM. What it takes to successfully implement technology for aging in place: focus groups with stakeholders. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18(5):e98. doi:10.2196/jmir.5253
  • Collecchia G. The doctor-patient relationship in the digital world: a Babylon?. Recenti Prog Med. 2019;110(9):397–400. doi:10.1701/3215.31932
  • Evans J, Henderson A, Johnson N. The future of education and training in dental technology: designing a dental curriculum that facilitates teamwork across the oral health professions. Br Dent J. 2010;208(5):227–230. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.208
  • Brucoli M, Boffano P, Pezzana A, Sedran L, Boccafoschi F, Benech A. The potentialities of the anatomage table for head and neck pathology: medical education and informed consent. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;24(2):229–234. doi:10.1007/s10006-019-00821-x
  • De Santis D, Malchiodi L, Cucchi A, Canton LC, Trevisiol L, Nocini PF. Computer-assisted surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21(6):1781–1785. doi:10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181f40474
  • Lazzarotto A, Franz L, Stella E, et al. Volumetric analysis of fat injection by computerized tomography in orthognathic surgery: preliminary report on a novel volumetric analysis process for the quantification of aesthetic results. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30(3):771–776. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000005305
  • Johnstone P. Dento-legal implications in digital dentistry. Prim Dent J. 2018;7(2):20–23. doi:10.1177/205016841800700202
  • Tjan AH, Miller GD, The JG. Some esthetic factors in a smile. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;51(1):24–28. doi:10.1016/s0022-3913(84)80097-9
  • Eggerstedt M, Rhee J, Urban MJ, Mangahas A, Smith RM, Revenaugh PC. Beauty is in the eye of the follower: facial aesthetics in the age of social media. Am J Otolaryngol. 2020;41(6):102643. doi:10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102643
  • Saha MK, Khatri M, Saha SG, et al. Perception of acceptable range of smiles by specialists, general dentists and lay persons and evaluation of different aesthetic paradigms. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(2):ZC25–ZC28. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2017/23359.9274
  • Samorodnitzky-Naveh GR, Grossman Y, Bachner YG, Levin L. Patients’ self-perception of tooth shade in relation to professionally objective evaluation. Quintessence Int. 2010;41(5):e80–e83.
  • da Silva FMF, Magno MB, Neves AB, et al. Aesthetic perceptions and social judgments about different enamel opacities. Braz Oral Res. 2020;34:e049. doi:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2020.vol34.0049
  • Sakellaropoulos O, Lagouvardos P. Influence of lightness of teeth and lip position of a posed smile on the perception of its attractiveness. Int J Esthet Dent. 2020;15(2):158–172.
  • Di Lorenzo P, Casella C, Capasso E, et al. Aesthetic dental procedures: legal and medico-legal implications. Open Med. 2018;13:96–100. doi:10.1515/med-2018-0015