294
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Assessment of Mesiobuccal Canal Configuration, Prevalence and Inter-Orifice Distance at Different Root Thirds of Maxillary First Molars: A CBCT Study

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 105-111 | Published online: 24 Mar 2021

References

  • Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984;58(5):589–599. doi:10.1016/0030-4220(84)90085-9
  • Weine FS, Healey HJ, Gerstein H, Evanson L. Canal configuration in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar and its endodontic significance. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1969;28(3):419–425. doi:10.1016/0030-4220(69)90237-0
  • Pecora JD, Woelfel JB, Sousa Neto MD, Issa EP. Morphologic study of the maxillary molars. Part II: internal anatomy. Braz Dent J. 1992;3(1):53–57.
  • Baratto Filho F, Zaitter S, Haragushiku GA, de Campos EA, Abuabara A, Correr GM. Analysis of the internal anatomy of maxillary first molars by using different methods. J Endod. 2009;35(3):337–342. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2008.11.022
  • Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Subbarao CV. Comparative evaluation of modified canal staining and clearing technique, cone-beam computed tomography, peripheral quantitative computed tomography, spiral computed tomography, and plain and contrast medium-enhanced digital radiography in studying root canal morphology. J Endod. 2010;36(9):1547–1551. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2010.05.008
  • Zheng QH, Wang Y, Zhou XD, Wang Q, Zheng GN, Huang DM. A cone-beam computed tomography study of maxillary first permanent molar root and canal morphology in a Chinese population. J Endod. 2010;36(9):1480–1484. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2010.06.018
  • Omer OE, Al Shalabi RM, Jennings M, Glennon J, Claffey NM. A comparison between clearing and radiographic techniques in the study of the root-canal anatomy of maxillary first and second molars. Int Endod J. 2004;37(5):291–296. doi:10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00731.x
  • Al Shalabi RM, Omer OE, Glennon J, Jennings M, Claffey NM. Root canal anatomy of maxillary first and second permanent molars. Int Endod J. 2000;33(5):405–414. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2591.2000.00221.x
  • de Carvalho MC, Zuolo ML. Orifice locating with a microscope. J Endod. 2000;26(9):532–534. doi:10.1097/00004770-200009000-00012
  • Gilles J, Reader A. An SEM investigation of the mesiolingual canal in human maxillary first and second molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1990;70(5):638–643. doi:10.1016/0030-4220(90)90415-O
  • Imura N, Hata GI, Toda T, Otani SM, Fagundes MI. Two canals in mesiobuccal roots of maxillary molars. Int Endod J. 1998;31(6):410–414. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.1998.0169.x
  • Martins JNR, Alkhawas MAM, Altaki Z, et al. Worldwide analyses of maxillary first molar second mesiobuccal prevalence: a Multicenter Cone-Beam Computed Tomographic Study. J Endod. 2018;44(11):1641–1649.e1641. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2018.07.027
  • Seidberg BH, Altman M, Guttuso J, Suson M. Frequency of two mesiobuccal root canals in maxillary permanent first molars. J Am Dent Assoc. 1973;87(4):852–856. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.1973.0489
  • Yoshioka T, Kikuchi I, Fukumoto Y, Kobayashi C, Suda H. Detection of the second mesiobuccal canal in mesiobuccal roots of maxillary molar teeth ex vivo. Int Endod J. 2005;38(2):124–128. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00918.x
  • Wolcott J, Ishley D, Kennedy W, Johnson S, Minnich S, Meyers J. A 5 yr clinical investigation of second mesiobuccal canals in endodontically treated and retreated maxillary molars. J Endod. 2005;31(4):262–264. doi:10.1097/01.don.0000140581.38492.8b
  • Nascimento EHL, Gaêta-Araujo H, Andrade MFS, Freitas DQ. Prevalence of technical errors and periapical lesions in a sample of endodontically treated teeth: a CBCT analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2018;22(7):2495–2503. doi:10.1007/s00784-018-2344-y
  • Do Carmo WD, Verner FS, Aguiar LM, et al. Missed canals in endodontically treated maxillary molars of a Brazilian subpopulation: prevalence and association with periapical lesion using cone-beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig. 2020. doi:10.1007/s00784-020-03554-4
  • Abuabara A, Baratto-Filho F, Aguiar Anele J, Leonardi DP, Sousa-Neto MD. Efficacy of clinical and radiological methods to identify second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first molars. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71(1):205–209. doi:10.3109/00016357.2011.654262
  • Wolcott J, Ishley D, Kennedy W, Johnson S, Minnich S. Clinical investigation of second mesiobuccal canals in endodontically treated and retreated maxillary molars. J Endod. 2002;28(6):477–479. doi:10.1097/00004770-200206000-00016
  • Patel S. New dimensions in endodontic imaging: part 2. Cone beam computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2009;42(6):463–475. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01531.x
  • Blattner TC, George N, Lee CC, Kumar V, Yelton CD. Efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography as a modality to accurately identify the presence of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first and second molars: a pilot study. J Endod. 2010;36(5):867–870. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.023
  • Bauman R, Scarfe W, Clark S, Morelli J, Scheetz J, Farman A. Ex vivo detection of mesiobuccal canals in maxillary molars using CBCT at four different isotropic voxel dimensions. Int Endod J. 2011;44(8):752–758. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01882.x
  • Ibarrola JL, Knowles KI, Ludlow MO, McKinley IB Jr. Factors affecting the negotiability of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary molars. J Endod. 1997;23(4):236–238. doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80054-4
  • Fayad MI, Nair M, Levin MD. AAE and AAOMR joint position statement: use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics 2015 update. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015;120(4):508–512. doi:10.1016/j.oooo.2015.07.033
  • Al-Nazhan S. The prevalence of two canals in mesial root of endodontically treated maxillary first molars among a Saudi Arabian sub-population. Saudi Dent J. 2005;17:24–28.
  • Al-Shehri S, Al-Nazhan S, Shoukry S, et al. Root and canal configuration of the maxillary first molar in a Saudi subpopulation: a cone-beam computed tomography study. Saudi Endod J. 2017;7(2):69–76.
  • Al-Fouzan KS, Ounis HF, Merdad K, Al-Hezaimi K. Incidence of canal systems in the mesio-buccal roots of maxillary first and second molars in Saudi Arabian population. Aust Endod J. 2013;39(3):98–101. doi:10.1111/j.1747-4477.2010.00289.x
  • Alrahabi M, Sohail Zafar M. Evaluation of root canal morphology of maxillary molars using cone beam computed tomography. Pak J Med Sci. 2015;31(2):426–430. doi:10.12669/pjms.312.6753
  • Ahmad I. Root and root canal morphology of Saudi Arabian permanent dentition. Saudi Endod J. 2015;5(2):99–106. doi:10.4103/1658-5984.155446
  • Al-Saedi A, Al-Bakhakh B, Al-Taee RG. Using cone-beam computed tomography to determine the prevalence of the second mesiobuccal canal in maxillary first molar teeth in a sample of an Iraqi population. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2020;12:505–514. doi:10.2147/CCIDE.S281159
  • Matherne RP, Angelopoulos C, Kulild JC, Tira D. Use of cone-beam computed tomography to identify root canal systems in vitro. J Endod. 2008;34(1):87–89. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2007.10.016
  • Reis AG, Grazziotin-Soares R, Barletta FB, Fontanella VR, Mahl CR. Second canal in mesiobuccal root of maxillary molars is correlated with root third and patient age: a cone-beam computed tomographic study. J Endod. 2013;39(5):588–592. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2013.01.003
  • Pattanshetti N, Gaidhane M, Al Kandari AM. Root and canal morphology of the mesiobuccal and distal roots of permanent first molars in a Kuwait population–a clinical study. Int Endod J. 2008;41(9):755–762. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01427.x
  • Zhang R, Yang H, Yu X, Wang H, Hu T, Dummer PM. Use of CBCT to identify the morphology of maxillary permanent molar teeth in a Chinese subpopulation. Int Endod J. 2011;44(2):162–169. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01826.x
  • Kim Y, Lee SJ, Woo J. Morphology of maxillary first and second molars analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography in a korean population: variations in the number of roots and canals and the incidence of fusion. J Endod. 2012;38(8):1063–1068. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2012.04.025
  • Su CC, Wu Y-C, Chung MP, et al. Geometric features of second mesiobuccal canal in permanent maxillary first molars: a cone-beam computed tomography study. J Dent Sci. 2017;12(3):241–248. doi:10.1016/j.jds.2017.03.002
  • Moidu NP, Sharma S, Kumar V, Chawla A, Logani A. Association between the mesiobuccal canal configuration, interorifice distance, and the corresponding root length of permanent maxillary first molar tooth: a Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Study. J Endod. 2021;47(1):39–43. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2020.08.025
  • Faraj BM. The frequency of the second mesiobuccal canal in maxillary first molars among a sample of the Kurdistan Region-Iraq population - A retrospective cone-beam computed tomography evaluation. J Dent Sci. 2021;16(1):91–95. doi:10.1016/j.jds.2020.06.021
  • Ratanajirasut R, Panichuttra A, Panmekiate S. A cone-beam computed tomographic study of root and canal morphology of maxillary first and second permanent molars in a Thai population. J Endod. 2018;44(1):56–61. doi:10.1016/j.joen.2017.08.020
  • Fogel HM, Peikoff MD, Christie WH. Canal configuration in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar: a clinical study. J Endod. 1994;20(3):135–137. doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80059-2