Microleakage Evaluation in Class V Cavities Restored with Five Different Resin Composites: In vitro Dye Leakage Study

References

• Dionysopoulos D, Gerasimidou O. Wear of contemporary dental composite resin restorations: a literature review. Restor Dent Endod. 2021;46(2):e18. doi:10.5395/rde.2021.46.e18
   Google Scholar
• Hussain S, Raza Khan F. In-vitro comparison of micro-leakage between nanocomposite and micro hybrid composite in class v cavities treated with the self-etch technique. J Ayub Med Coll Abbot. 2016;28(3):445–448.
   Google Scholar
• Nematollahi H, Bagherian A, Ghazvini K, Esmaily H, Azadegan M. Microbial microleakage assessment of class V cavities restored with different materials and techniques: a Laboratory Study. Dent Res J. 2017;14(5):344–350. doi:10.4103/1735-3327.215958
   Google Scholar
• Jawaed NU, Abidi SY, Qazi FU, Ahmed S. An in-vitro evaluation of microleakage at the cervical margin between two different class II restorative techniques using dye penetration method. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2016;26(9):748–752. PMID: 27671178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swapna M, Koshy S, Kumar A, Nanjappa N, Benjamin S, Nainan M. Comparing marginal microleakage of three bulk fill composites in class II cavities using confocal microscope: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2015;18(5):409–415. doi:10.4103/0972-0707.164058
   Google Scholar
• Rengo C, Goracci C, Ametrano G, Chieffi E, Spagnuollo G, Ferrari M. Marginal leakage of class V composite restorations assessed using microcomputed tomography and scanning electron microscope. Oper Dent. 2015;40(4):440–448. doi:10.2341/14-022-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ameri H, Chasteen J, Ghavamnasiri M, Maghami A. Effect of load cycling on nanoleakage of butt joint and bevelled occlusal enamel margins in class V composite resin restorations. Rev Clin Odontol. 2010;6(3):231–237. doi:10.7213/aor.v6i3.23160
   Google Scholar
• Emir F, Ayyildiz S, Sahin C. What is the changing frequency of diamond burs? J Adv Prosthodont. 2018;10(2):93–100. doi:10.4047/jap.2018.10.2.93
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Tavane P, Gupta P, et al. Evaluation of microleakage with total etch, self-etch and universal adhesive systems in class V restorations: an in vitro study. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research. JCDR. 2017;11(4):ZC53. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2017/24907.9680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shetty C, Khanna N, Mithra N. To evaluate and compare the microleakage in class five cavities restored by a nanohybrid and a nanofilled composite resin by dye penetration method―an in vitro study. Indian J Public Health Res Dev. 2019;10(9):504–508. doi:10.5958/0976-5506.2019.02479.3
   Google Scholar
• Phanombualert J, Chimtim P, Heebthamai T, Weera-Archakul W. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in class V cavities etched by Er: yAGLaser with different pulse modes. Photomed Laser Surg. 2015;33(9):467–472. doi:10.1089/pho.2015.3926
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naves L, Gerdolle A, de Andrade S, Gresnigt M. Seeing is believing? When scanning electron microscopy (SEM) meets clinical dentistry: the replica technique. Micro Res Tech. 2020;83(9):1118–1123. doi:10.1002/jemt.23503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magni E, Zhang L, Hickel R, Bossù M, Polimeni A, Ferrari M. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing. J Dent. 2008;36(11):885–891. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2008.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheintz S. Clinical relevance of tests on bond strength, microleakage and marginal adaptation. Dent Mat J. 2013;29(1):59–84. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2012.07.158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alavi A, Kianimanesh N. Microleakage of direct and indirect composite restorations with three dentin bonding agents. Oper Dent. 2002;27(1):19–24. PMID: 11817466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacker-Guhr S, Ibarra G, Oppermann L, Lührs A, Rahman A, Geurtsen W. Evaluation of microleakage in Class V composite restorations using dye penetration and micro-CT. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20(7):1709–1718. doi:10.1007/s00784-015-1676-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalli M, Bahsi E, Sahbaz C, et al. A comparison of microleakage scores of five types of composite resins. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2014;24:2022–2026. doi:10.2478/V10133-010-0072-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivakumar J, Prasad A, Soundappan S, Ragavendran N, Ajay R, Santham K. A comparative evaluation of microleakage of restorations using silorane-based dental composite and methacrylate-based dental composites in class II cavities: an in vitro study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2016;8:81–85. doi:10.4103/0975-7406.191975
   Google Scholar
• Shah K, Mankar N, Bajaj P, Nikhade P, Chandak M, Gilani R. Comparative evaluation of microleakage in cavities restored with nanohybrid and microfilled composites using oblique incremental technique- an in vitro- study. J Evol Med Dent. 2020;13(9):1087–1090. doi:10.14260/jemds/2020/234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegde M, Vyapaka P, Shetty S. A comparative evaluation of microleakage of three different newer direct composite resins using a self-etching primer in class V cavities: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2009;12(4):160–163. doi:10.4103/0972-0707.58340
   Google Scholar
• Wahab F, Shaini F, Morgano S. The effect of thermocycling on microleakage of several commercially available composite class V restorations in vitro. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;90(2):168–174. doi:10.1016/s0022-3913(03)00300-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhabdan A. Review of microleakage evaluation tools. J Int Oral Health. 2017;4(9):141–145. doi:10.4103/jioh.jioh_160_17
   Google Scholar
• Scotti N, Comba A, Gambino A. Microleakage at enamel and dentin margins with a bulk fills flowable resin. Euro J Dent. 2014;8(1):1–8. doi:10.4103/1305-7456.126230
   Google Scholar
• Dwiandhono I, Logamarta S, Hanurdara T. The difference in microleakage levels of nanohybrid composite resin using eighth-generation ethanol and isopropanol solvent bonding materials under moist and dry conditions (in vitro study). Dent J Maj Kedo Gigi. 2019;52(1):41–44. doi:10.20473/j.djmkg.v52.i1.p41-44
   Google Scholar
• Valizadeh S, Hashemi SF, Hashemikamangar S, Kharazifard M. Microleakage of a self-adhesive composite of class V cavities: effect of surface treatment and thermocycling. J Cont Dent Pract. 2020;21(7):781–786. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2878
   Google Scholar
• Eltoum N, Bakry S, Talaat D, Elshabrawy S. Microleakage evaluation of bulk-fill composite in class II restorations of primary molars. Alex Dent J. 2019;1(44):111–116. doi:10.21608/ADJALEXU.2019.57614
   Google Scholar
• Yazici R, Celik C, Ozgünaltay G. Microleakage of different resin composite types. Quintessence Int. 2004;35(10):790–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falconí-Borja G, Molina-Pule C, Velásquez-Ron B, Armas-Vega A. Evaluation of microleakage degree in composite resin restorations by comparing two adhesives systems after different aging periods. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq. 2016;27:281–295.
   Google Scholar