Effects of the Incorporation of Bioactive Particles on Physical Properties, Bioactivity and Penetration of Resin Enamel Infiltrant

References

• Kielbassa AM, Muller J, Gernhardt CR. Closing the gap between oral hygiene and minimally invasive dentistry: a review on the resin infiltration technique of incipient (proximal) enamel lesions. Quintessence Int. 2009;40(8):663–681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris S, Meyer-Lueckel H, Kielbassa AM. Resin infiltration of natural caries lesions. J Dent Res. 2007;86(7):662–666. doi:10.1177/154405910708600715
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nedeljkovic I, De Munck J, Slomka V, Van Meerbeek B, Teughels W, Van Landuyt KL. Lack of buffering by composites promotes shift to more cariogenic bacteria. J Dent Res. 2016;95(8):875–881. doi:10.1177/0022034516647677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrade Neto DM, Carvalho EV, Rodrigues EA, et al. Novel hydroxyapatite nanorods improve anti-caries efficacy of enamel infiltrants. Dent Mater. 2016;32(6):784–793. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2016.03.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jardim RN, Rocha AA, Rossi AM, et al. Fabrication and characterization of remineralizing dental composites containing hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020;109:103817. doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memarpour M, Shafiei F, Rafiee A, Soltani M, Dashti MH. Effect of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on enamel remineralization and estimation of fissure sealant bond strength to remineralized tooth surfaces: an in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):1–13. doi:10.1186/s12903-019-0785-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang SY, Kwon JS, Kim KN, Kim KM. Enamel surface with pit and fissure sealant containing 45s5 bioactive glass. J Dent Res. 2016;95(5):550–557. doi:10.1177/0022034515626116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hench LL, Splinter RJ, Allen WC, Greenlee TK. Bonding mechanisms at the interface of ceramic prosthetic materials. J Biomed Mater Res. 1971;5(6):117–141. doi:10.1002/jbm.820050611
   Google Scholar
• Vallittu PK, Boccaccini AR, Hupa L, Watts DC. Bioactive dental materials—do they exist and what does bioactivity mean? Dent Mater. 2018;34(5):693–694. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2018.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhamed M, Almalki F, Alselami A, Alotaibi T, Elkwatehy W. Effect of different remineralizing agents on the initial carious lesions – a comparative study. Saudi Dent J. 2020;32(8):390–395. doi:10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinelatti MA, Tirapelli C, Corona SAM, et al. Effect of a bioactive glass ceramic on the control of enamel and dentin erosion lesions. Braz Dent J. 2017;28(4):489–497. doi:10.1590/0103-6440201601524
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pintado-Palomino K, Tirapelli C. The effect of home-use and in-office bleaching treatments combined with experimental desensitizing agents on enamel and dentin. Eur J Dent. 2015;09(01):066–73. doi:10.4103/1305-7456.149645
   Google Scholar
• Tirapelli C, Panzeri H, Lara EHG, Soares RG, Peitl O, Zanotto ED. The effect of a novel crystallised bioactive glass-ceramic powder on dentine hypersensitivity: a long-term clinical study. J Oral Rehabil. 2011;38(4):253–262. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02157.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochrane NJ, Cai F, Huq NL, Burrow MF, Reynolds EC. Critical review in oral biology & medicine: new approaches to enhanced remineralization of tooth enamel. J Dent Res. 2010;89(11):1187–1197. doi:10.1177/0022034510376046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannig M, Hannig C. Nanomaterials in preventive dentistry. Nat Nanotechnol. 2010;5(8):565–569. doi:10.1038/nnano.2010.83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamagishi K, Onuma K, Suzuki T, et al. A synthetic enamel for rapid tooth repair. Nature. 2005;433(7028):819. doi:10.1038/433819a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossù M, Saccucci M, Salucci A, et al. Enamel remineralization and repair results of Biomimetic Hydroxyapatite toothpaste on deciduous teeth: an effective option to fluoride toothpaste. J Nanobiotechnology. 2019;17(1):1–13. doi:10.1186/s12951-019-0454-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scribante A, Dermenaki Farahani MR, Marino G, et al. Biomimetic Effect of Nano-Hydroxyapatite in Demineralized Enamel before Orthodontic Bonding of Brackets and Attachments: visual, Adhesion Strength, and Hardness in in Vitro Tests. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:1–9. doi:10.1155/2020/6747498
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Xu C, Wang Y, Shi J, Yu Q, Li H. BisGMA/TEGDMA dental nanocomposites containing glyoxylic acid-modified high-aspect ratio hydroxyapatite nanofibers with enhanced dispersion. Biomed Mater. 2012;7(4):045014. doi:10.1088/1748-6041/7/4/045014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang SY, Piao YZ, Kim SM, Lee YK, Kim KN, Kim KM. Acid neutralizing, mechanical and physical properties of pit and fissure sealants containing melt-derived 45S5 bioactive glass. Dent Mater. 2013;29(12):1228–1235. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2013.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ubaldini ALM, Pascotto RC, Sato F, Soares VO, Zanotto ED, Baesso ML. Effects of bioactive agents on dentin mineralization kinetics after dentin bleaching. Oper Dent. 2020;45(3):286–296. doi:10.2341/18-272-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins CHG, Carvalho TC, Souza MGM, et al. Assessment of antimicrobial effect of Biosilicate ® against anaerobic, microaerophilic and facultative anaerobic microorganisms. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2011;22(6):1439–1446. doi:10.1007/s10856-011-4330-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sfalcin RA, Correr AB, Morbidelli LR, et al. Influence of bioactive particles on the chemical-mechanical properties of experimental enamel resin infiltrants. Clin Oral Investig. 2017;21(6):2143–2151. doi:10.1007/s00784-016-2005-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho EM, Ferreira PVC, Gutiérrez MF, et al. Development and characterization of self-etching adhesives doped with 45S5 and niobophosphate bioactive glasses: physicochemical, mechanical, bioactivity and interface properties. Dent Mater. 2021;37(6):1030–1045. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2021.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathias C, Gomes RS, Dressano D, Braga RR, Aguiar FHB, Marchi GM. Effect of diphenyliodonium hexafluorophosphate salt on experimental infiltrants containing different diluents. Odontology. 2019;107(2):202–208. doi:10.1007/s10266-018-0391-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S. Infiltration of natural caries lesions with experimental resins differing in penetration coefficients and ethanol addition. Caries Res. 2010;44(4):408–414. doi:10.1159/000318223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis HC, Zhang YR, Lee CY, Kent RL, Moreno EC. Kinetics of enamel demineralization in vitro. J Dent Res. 1999;78(7):1326–1335. doi:10.1177/00220345990780070701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kokubo T, Takadama H. How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials. 2006;27(15):2907–2915. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elembaby A, AlHumaid J, El Tantawi M, Akhtar S. The impact of nano-hydroxyapatite resin infiltrant on enamel remineralization: an in vitro study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2022;42(2):e43–e50. doi:10.11607/prd.5599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca ASQS, Labruna Moreira AD, De albuquerque PPAC, de Menezes LR, Pfeifer CS, Schneider LFJ. Effect of monomer type on the C[dbnd]C degree of conversion, water sorption and solubility, and color stability of model dental composites. Dent Mater. 2017;33(4):394–401. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2017.01.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujita K, Ikemi T, Nishiyama N. Effects of particle size of silica filler on polymerization conversion in a light-curing resin composite. Dent Mater. 2011;27(11):1079–1085. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2011.07.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng L, Suh BI, Shortall AC. Formation of gaps at the filler-resin interface induced by polymerization contraction stress. Gaps at the interface. Dent Mater. 2010;26(8):719–729. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2010.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra SK, Mohn D, Brunner TJ, et al. Comparison of nanoscale and microscale bioactive glass on the properties of P(3HB)/Bioglass® composites. Biomaterials. 2008;29(12):1750–1761. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.12.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferracane JL. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dent Mater. 2006;22(3):211–222. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2005.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hench LL. Third-generation biomedical materials. Science. 2002;295(5557):1014–1017. doi:10.1126/science.1067404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inagaki LT, Dainezi VB, Alonso RCB, et al. Evaluation of sorption/solubility, softening, flexural strength and elastic modulus of experimental resin blends with chlorhexidine. J Dent. 2016;49:40–45. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2016.04.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastos NA, Bitencourt SB, Martins EA, De Souza GM. Review of nano-technology applications in resin-based restorative materials. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;2020:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Beun S, Bailly C, Dabin A, Vreven J, Devaux J, Leloup G. Rheological properties of experimental Bis-GMA/TEGDMA flowable resin composites with various macrofiller/microfiller ratio. Dent Mater. 2009;25(2):198–205. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2008.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Askar H, Lausch J, Dörfer CE, Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S. Penetration of micro-filled infiltrant resins into artificial caries lesions. J Dent. 2015;43(7):832–838. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2015.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G. Effect of chemical structure on degree of conversion in light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Biomaterials. 2002;23(8):1819–1829. doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00308-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar