References
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal 2013London, UKNICE2013 Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/media/D45/1E/GuideToMethodsTechnologyAppraisal2013.pdfAccessed October 12, 2013
- DrummondMFSculpherMJTorranceGWO’BrienBJStoddartGLMethods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes3rd edNew York, NYOxford University Press2005
- BrazierJEYangYTsuchiyaARowenDLA review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measuresEur J Health Econ201011221522519585162
- ToshJCLongworthLJGeorgeEUtility values in National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) Technology AppraisalsValue Health201114110210921211492
- HjermstadMJFayersPMHaugenDFEuropean Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC)Studies comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature reviewJ Pain Symptom Manage20114161073109321621130
- WilliamsonAHoggartBPain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scalesJ Clin Nurs200514779880416000093
- McDowellIMeasuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires3rd edNew York, NYOxford University Press2006
- KiaiiBMoonBCMasselDA prospective randomized trial of endoscopic versus conventional harvesting of the saphenous vein in coronary artery bypass surgeryJ Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2002123220421211828277
- Wittrup-JensenKULauridsenJGudexCPedersenKMGeneration of a Danish TTO value set for EQ-5D health statesScand J Public Health200937545946619411320
- BrazierJUsherwoodTHarperRThomasKDeriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 Health SurveyJ Clin Epidemiol19985111111511289817129
- RowenDBrazierJRobertsJMapping SF-36 onto the EQ-5D index: how reliable is the relationship?Health Qual Life Outcomes200972719335878
- FeenyDFurlongWTorranceGWMultiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 systemMed Care200240211312811802084
- LongworthLRowenDMapping to obtain EQ-5D utility values for use in NICE health technology assessmentsValue Health201316120221023337232
- SullivanPWAre utilities bounded at 1.0? Implications for statistical analysis and scale developmentMed Decis Making201131678778922067428
- PullenayegumEMTarrideJEXieFO’ReillyDCalculating utility decrements associated with an adverse event: marginal Tobit and CLAD coefficients should be used with cautionMed Decis Making201131679079922067429
- SullivanPWGhushchyanVMapping the EQ-5D index from the SF-12: US general population preferences in a nationally representative sampleMed Decis Making200626440140916855128
- PowellJLLeast absolute deviations estimation for the censored regression modelJ Econom1984253303325
- JolliffeDKrushelnytskyyBSemykinaACensored least absolute deviations estimator: CLADStata J200010581316
- GoldsmithKADyerMTBuxtonMJSharplesLDMapping of the EQ-5D index from clinical outcome measures and demographic variables in patients with coronary heart diseaseHealth Qual Life Outcomes201085420525323
- LongworthLBuxtonMJSculpherMSmithDHEstimating utility data from clinical indicators for patients with stable anginaEur J Health Econ20056434735316193322
- RaoCAzizODeebaSIs minimally invasive harvesting of the great saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass surgery a cost-effective technique?J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg2008135480981518374760
- OddershedeLAndreasenJJBrockiBCEhlersLEconomic evaluation of endoscopic versus open vein harvest for coronary artery bypass graftingAnn Thorac Surg20129341174118022450070
- OddershedeLPetersenSSKristensenAKPedersenJFReesSEEhlersLThe cost-effectiveness of venous-converted acid-base and blood gas status in pulmonary medical departmentsClinicoecon Outcomes Res201131721935326