Friends from the Future: A Scoping Review of Research into Robots and Computer Agents to Combat Loneliness in Older People

References

• Cacioppo JT, Cacioppo S. The growing problem of loneliness. Lancet. 2018;391(10119):426. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30142-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerst-Emerson K, Jayawardhana J. Loneliness as a public health issue: the impact of loneliness on health care utilization among older adults. Am J Public Health. 2015;105(5):1013–1019. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2014.30242725790413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolaisen M, Thorsen K. Who are lonely? Loneliness in different age groups (18–81 years old), using two measures of loneliness. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2014;78(3):229–257. doi:10.2190/AG.78.3.b25265679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masi CM, Chen H, Hawkley LC, Cacioppo JT. A meta-analysis of interventions to reduce loneliness. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2011;15(3):219–266. doi:10.1177/108886831037739420716644
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peplau LA. Perspective on Loneliness. Loneliness: A Sourcebook of Current Theory, Research and Therapy. John Wiley; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo JT, Hawkley LC, Ernst JM, et al. Loneliness within a nomological net: an evolutionary perspective. J Res Pers. 2006;40(6):1054–1085. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victor CR, Bowling A. A longitudinal analysis of loneliness among older people in Great Britain. J Psychol. 2012;146(3):313–331. doi:10.1080/00223980.2011.60957222574423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krendl AC, Perry BL, Isaacowitz DM. The impact of sheltering in place during the COVID-19 pandemic on older adults’ social and mental well-being. J Gerontol B. 2021;76(2):e53–58. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbaa110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss RS. Loneliness: The Experience of Emotional and Social Isolation. The MIT Press; 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Hackett RA, Hamer M, Endrighi R, Brydon L, Steptoe A. Loneliness and stress-related inflammatory and neuroendocrine responses in older men and women. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2012;37(11):1801–1809. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.03.01622503139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole SW. Social regulation of leukocyte homeostasis: the role of glucocorticoid sensitivity. Brain Behav Immun. 2008;22(7):1049–1055. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2008.02.00618394861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole SW, Hawkley LC, Arevalo JM, Sung CY, Rose RM, Cacioppo JT. Social regulation of gene expression in human leukocytes. Genome Biol. 2007;8(9):1–13. doi:10.1186/gb-2007-8-9-r189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressman SD, Cohen S, Miller GE, Barkin A, Rabin BS, Treanor JJ. Loneliness, social network size, and immune response to influenza vaccination in college freshmen. Health Psychol. 2005;24(3):297–306. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.24.3.29715898866
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser R, Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Speicher CE, Holliday JE. Stress, loneliness, and changes in herpesvirus latency. J Behav Med. 1985;8(3):249–260. doi:10.1007/BF08703123003360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valtorta NK, Kanaan M, Gilbody S, Ronzi S, Hanratty B. Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for coronary heart disease and stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal observational studies. Heart. 2016;102(13):1009–1016. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2015-30879027091846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boss L, Kang D, Branson S. Loneliness and cognitive function in the older adult: a systematic review. Int Psychogeriatr. 2015;27(4):541. doi:10.1017/S104161021400274925554219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lara E, Caballero FF, Rico‐Uribe LA, et al. Are loneliness and social isolation associated with cognitive decline? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2019;34(11):1613–1622. doi:10.1002/gps.517431304639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson RS, Krueger KR, Arnold SE, et al. Loneliness and risk of Alzheimer disease. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64(2):234–240. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.64.2.23417283291
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beutel ME, Klein EM, Brähler E, et al. Loneliness in the general population: prevalence, determinants and relations to mental health. BMC Psychiatr. 2017;17(1):97. doi:10.1186/s12888-017-1262-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB. Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLoS Med. 2010;7(7):e1000316.20668659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardiner C, Geldenhuys G, Gott M. Interventions to reduce social isolation and loneliness among older people: an integrative review. Health Soc Care Commun. 2018;26(2):147–157. doi:10.1111/hsc.12367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen-Mansfield J, Perach R. Interventions for alleviating loneliness among older persons: a critical review. Am J Health Promot. 2015;29(3):e109–125. doi:10.4278/ajhp.130418-LIT-18224575725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegel F, Muhl C, Wrede B, Hielscher-Fastabend M, Sagerer G. Understanding social robots. 2009 Second International Conferences on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions; 2009; 169–174.
   Google Scholar
• Banks MR, Willoughby LM, Banks WA. Animal-assisted therapy and loneliness in nursing homes: use of robotic versus living dogs. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2008;9(3):173–177. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2007.11.00718294600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Moyle W, Jones C, Petsky H. A social robot intervention on depression, loneliness, and quality of life for Taiwanese older adults in long-term care. Int Psychogeriatr. 2020;32(8):981–991. doi:10.1017/S104161022000045932284080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orejana JR, MacDonald BA, Ahn HS, Peri K, Broadbent E. Healthcare robots in homes of rural older adults. International Conference on Social Robotics; Springer; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Boumans R, van Meulen F, van Aalst W, et al. Quality of care perceived by older patients and caregivers in integrated care pathways with interviewing assistance from a social robot: noninferiority randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(9):e18787. doi:10.2196/1878732902387
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers A, Kiesler S, Fussell S, Torrey C. Comparing a computer agent with a humanoid robot. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 2007; 145–152.
   Google Scholar
• Cassell J, Sullivan J, Churchill E, Prevost S. Embodied Conversational Agents. MIT Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Youssef AB, Chollet M, Jones H, et al. Towards a socially adaptive virtual agent. In: Brinkman A, editor. International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents. Cham: Springer; 2015:3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Ring L, Shi L, Totzke K, Bickmore T. Social support agents for older adults: longitudinal affective computing in the home. J Multimodal User Interf. 2015;9(1):79–88. doi:10.1007/s12193-014-0157-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bott N, Wexler S, Drury L, et al. A protocol-driven, bedside digital conversational agent to support nurse teams and mitigate risks of hospitalization in older adults: case control pre-post study. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(10):e13440. doi:10.2196/1344031625949
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis M, Padmanabhanunni A, Balakrishna Y, Chipps J. The effectiveness of interventions addressing loneliness in older persons: an umbrella review. Int J Africa Nurs Sci. 2020;12:100177. doi:10.1016/j.ijans.2019.100177
   Google Scholar
• Abdi J, Al-Hindawi A, Ng T, Vizcaychipi MP. Scoping review on the use of socially assistive robot technology in elderly care. BMJ Open. 2018;8(2):e018815. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pu L, Moyle W, Jones C, Todorovic M. The effectiveness of social robots for older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Gerontologist. 2019;59(1):e37–51. doi:10.1093/geront/gny04629897445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bemelmans R, Gelderblom GJ, Jonker P, de Witte L. socially assistive robots in elderly care: a systematic review into effects and effectiveness. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2012;13(2):114, 120.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2010.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kachouie R, Sedighadeli S, Khosla R, Chu M. Socially assistive robots in elderly care: a mixed-method systematic literature review. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2014;30(5):369–393. doi:10.1080/10447318.2013.873278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broekens J, Heerink M, Rosendal H. Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review. Gerontechnology. 2009;8(2):94–103. doi:10.4017/gt.2009.08.02.002.00
   Google Scholar
• Levac D, Colquhoun H, O’Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):1–9. doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-6920047652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O’Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong R, Hall BJ, Doyle J, Waters E. ‘Scoping the scope’ of a Cochrane review. J Public Health. 2011;33(1):147–150. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdr015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paré G, Trudel M, Jaana M, Kitsiou S. Synthesizing information systems knowledge: a typology of literature reviews. Inf Manag. 2015;52(2):183–199. doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473. doi:10.7326/M18-085030178033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covidence, Systematic review software, Melbourne, Australia: Veritas Health Innovation; 2021. Available from: www.covidence.org. Accessed 420, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Lee SL, Pearce E, Ajnakina O, et al. The association between loneliness and depressive symptoms among adults aged 50 years and older: a 12-year population-based cohort study. Lancet Psychiatr. 2020;8(1):48–57. doi:10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30383-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong QN, Fàbregues S, Bartlett G, et al. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Educ Info. 2018;34(4):285–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi NC, Sparks O, Lin SY, Lazar A, Thompson HJ, Demiris G. Pilot testing a digital pet avatar for older adults. Geriatr Nurs. 2017;38(6):542–547. doi:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2017.04.00228479082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Onofrio G, Sancarlo D, Raciti M, et al. MARIO project: validation and evidence of service robots for older people with dementia. J Alzheimers Dis. 2019;68(4):1587–1601. doi:10.3233/JAD-18116530958360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross H, Scheidig A, Müller S, Schütz B, Fricke C, Meyer S. Living with a mobile companion robot in your own apartment-final implementation and results of a 20-weeks field study with 20 seniors. 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA); IEEE; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Gross H, Mueller S, Schroeter C, et al. Robot companion for domestic health assistance: implementation, test and case study under everyday conditions in private apartments. 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS); IEEE; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson J, Ungar R, Albright L, Tkatch R, Schaeffer J, Wicker ER. Robotic pet use among community-dwelling older adults. J Gerontol B. 2020;75(9):2018–2028. doi:10.1093/geronb/gbaa119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jøranson N, Pedersen I, Rokstad AMM, Aamodt G, Olsen C, Ihlebæk C. Group activity with Paro in nursing homes: systematic investigation of behaviors in participants. Int Psychogeriatr. 2016;28(8):1345–1354. doi:10.1017/S104161021600012027019225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanamori M, Suzuki M, Oshiro H, et al. Pilot study on improvement of quality of life among elderly using a pet-type robot. Proceedings 2003 IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation. Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation for the New Millennium. IEEE; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Khosla R, Chu M. Embodying care in Matilda: an affective communication robot for emotional wellbeing of older people in Australian residential care facilities. ACM Transact Manag Info Syst. 2013;4(4):1–33. doi:10.1145/2544104
   Google Scholar
• Khosla R, Chu M, Khaksar SMS, Nguyen K, Nishida T. Engagement and experience of older people with socially assistive robots in home care. Assist Technol. 2019;1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemelä M, Van Aerschot L, Tammela A, Aaltonen I, Lammi H. Towards ethical guidelines of using telepresence robots in residential care. Int J Soc Robot. 2019;1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang RH, Sudhama A, Begum M, Huq R, Mihailidis A. Robots to assist daily activities: views of older adults with Alzheimer’s disease and their caregivers. Int Psychogeriatr. 2017;29(1):67–79. doi:10.1017/S104161021600143527660047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coşar S, Fernandez-Carmona M, Agrigoroaie R, et al. ENRICHME: perception and interaction of an assistive robot for the elderly at home. Int J Soc Robot. 2020;12(3):779–805. doi:10.1007/s12369-019-00614-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdollahi H, Mollahosseini A, Lane JT, Mahoor MH. A pilot study on using an intelligent life-like robot as a companion for elderly individuals with dementia and depression. 2017 IEEE-RAS 17th International Conference on Humanoid Robotics (Humanoids); IEEE; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Fields N, Xu L, Greer J, Murphy E. Shall I compare thee … to a robot? An exploratory pilot study using participatory arts and social robotics to improve psychological well-being in later life. Aging Men Health. 2019;1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyle W, Jones C, Cooke M, O’Dwyer S, Sung B, Drummond S. Connecting the person with dementia and family: a feasibility study of a telepresence robot. BMC Geriatr. 2014;14(1):1–11. doi:10.1186/1471-2318-14-724393272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vardoulakis LP, Ring L, Barry B, Sidner CL, Bickmore T. Designing relational agents as long term social companions for older adults. International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents; 2012;289–302.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett E, Burke M, Whelan S, et al. Evaluation of a companion robot for individuals with dementia: quantitative findings of the MARIO project in an Irish residential care setting. J Gerontol Nurs. 2019;45(7):36–45. doi:10.3928/00989134-20190531-0131237660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broadbent E, Peri K, Kerse N, et al. Robots in older people’s homes to improve medication adherence and quality of life: a randomised cross-over trial. International Conference on Social Robotics; Springer; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Liang A, Piroth I, Robinson H, et al. A pilot randomized trial of a companion robot for people with dementia living in the community. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017;18(10):871–878. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2017.05.01928668664
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidner CL, Bickmore T, Nooraie B, et al. Creating new technologies for companionable agents to support isolated older adults. ACM Trans Interact Intell Syst. 2018;8(3):1–27. doi:10.1145/3213050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman O, Walker D, Grishko A, et al. Companionship is not a function: the effect of a novel robotic object on healthy older adults’ feelings of” being-seen”. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson H, MacDonald B, Kerse N, Broadbent E. The psychosocial effects of a companion robot: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2013;14(9):661–667. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2013.02.00723545466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd CD, Taggart W, Turkle S. A sociable robot to encourage social interaction among the elderly. Proceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. IEEE; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson H, Broadbent E, MacDonald B. Group sessions with Paro in a nursing home: structure, observations and interviews. Australas J Ageing. 2016;35(2):106–112. doi:10.1111/ajag.1219926059390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell DW. UCLA loneliness scale (version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure. J Pers Assess. 1996;66(1):20–40. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_28576833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson TP, Garrity TF, Stallones L. Psychometric evaluation of the Lexington attachment to pets scale (LAPS). Anthrozoös. 1992;5(3):160–175. doi:10.2752/089279392787011395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess. 1988;52(1):30–41. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ando T, Osada H, Kodama Y. Constriction of a new loneliness scale and correlated of loneliness middle aged and Aged. J Yokohama Univ Hum Sci. 2000;3:19–27.
   Google Scholar
• Norbeck JS. The Norbeck social support questionnaire. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1984;20(5):45–57.6536338
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berscheid E, Snyder M, Omoto AM. The relationship closeness inventory: assessing the closeness of interpersonal relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989;57(5):792–807. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mordoch E, Osterreicher A, Guse L, Roger K, Thompson G. Use of social commitment robots in the care of elderly people with dementia: a literature review. Maturitas. 2013;74(1):14–20. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.10.01523177981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuley E, Blissmer B, Marquez DX, Jerome GJ, Kramer AF, Katula J. Social relations, physical activity, and well-being in older adults. Prev Med. 2000;31(5):608–617. doi:10.1006/pmed.2000.074011071843
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibarra F, Baez M, Cernuzzi L, Casati F. A systematic review on technology-supported interventions to improve old-age social wellbeing: loneliness, social isolation, and connectedness. J Healthc Eng. 2020;2020:1–14. doi:10.1155/2020/2036842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattan M, Kime N, Bagnall A. The use of telephone befriending in low level support for socially isolated older people–an evaluation. Health Soc Care Commun. 2011;19(2):198–206. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2010.00967.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo S, Grippo AJ, London S, Goossens L, Cacioppo JT. Loneliness: clinical import and interventions. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015;10(2):238–249. doi:10.1177/174569161557061625866548
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Creswell JD, Irwin MR, Burklund LJ, et al. Mindfulness-based stress reduction training reduces loneliness and pro-inflammatory gene expression in older adults: a small randomized controlled trial. Brain Behav Immun. 2012;26(7):1095–1101. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2012.07.00622820409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martina C, Stevens NL. Breaking the cycle of loneliness? Psychological effects of a friendship enrichment program for older women. Aging Ment Health. 2006;10(5):467–475. doi:10.1080/1360786060063789316938682
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martina CM, Stevens NL, Westerhof GJ. Change and stability in loneliness and friendship after an intervention for older women. Ageing Soc. 2018;38(3):435–454. doi:10.1017/S0144686X16001008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakadoi Y. Usefulness of animal type robot assisted therapy for autism spectrum disorder in the child and adolescent psychiatric ward. JSAI International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence; Springer; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Wagemaker E, Dekkers TJ, van Rentergem A, Joost A, Volkers KM, Huizenga HM. Advances in mental health care: five N= 1 studies on the effects of the robot seal Paro in adults with severe intellectual disabilities. J Ment Health Res Intellect Disabil. 2017;10(4):309–320. doi:10.1080/19315864.2017.1320601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong S, Breazeal C, Logan D, Weinstock P. Huggable: impact of embodiment on promoting verbal and physical engagement for young pediatric inpatients. 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN); IEEE; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Jeong S, Logan DE, Goodwin MS, et al. A social robot to mitigate stress, anxiety, and pain in hospital pediatric care. Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Extended Abstracts. New York: Association for Computing Machinery; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Weibel M, Nielsen MKF, Topperzer MK, et al. Back to school with telepresence robot technology: a qualitative pilot study about how telepresence robots help school‐aged children and adolescents with cancer to remain socially and academically connected with their school classes during treatment. Nurs Open. 2020;7(4):988–997. doi:10.1002/nop2.47132587717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nojavanasghari B, Hughes CE, Morency L. Exceptionally social: design of an avatar-mediated interactive system for promoting social skills in children with autism. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery; New York; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ke F, Im T. Virtual-reality-based social interaction training for children with high-functioning autism. J Educ Res. 2013;106(6):441–461. doi:10.1080/00220671.2013.832999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause-Parello CA. Pet ownership and older women: the relationships among loneliness, pet attachment support, human social support, and depressed mood. Geriatr Nurs. 2012;33(3):194–203. doi:10.1016/j.gerinurse.2011.12.00522321806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause-Parello CA. The mediating effect of pet attachment support between loneliness and general health in older females living in the community. J Community Health Nurs. 2008;25(1):1–14. doi:10.1080/0737001070183628618444062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draper H, Sorell T. Ethical values and social care robots for older people: an international qualitative study. Ethics Inf Technol. 2017;19(1):49–68. doi:10.1007/s10676-016-9413-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar