Predicting Sarcopenia of Female Elderly from Physical Activity Performance Measurement Using Machine Learning Classifiers

References

• BaumgartnerRN, StauberPM, McHughD, KoehlerKM, GarryPJ. Cross-sectional age differences in body composition in persons 60 + years of age. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995;50A(6):M307–M316. doi:10.1093/gerona/50a.6.m307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BaumgartnerRN, KoehlerKM, GallagherD, et al. Epidemiology of sarcopenia among the elderly in New Mexico. Am J Epidemiol. 1998;147(8):755–763. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a0095209554417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ParkHM. Current status of sarcopenia in Korea: a focus on Korean geripausal women. Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2018;22(2):52–61. doi:10.4235/agmr.2018.22.2.5232743248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IhR. Epidemiologic and methodologic problems in determining nutritional status of older persons. Proceedings of a conference. Albuquerque, New Mexico, October 19-21,1988. Am J Clin Nutr. 1989;50(5 Suppl):1121–1235.
   Google Scholar
• ChenL-K, WooJ, AssantachaiP, et al. Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 consensus update on sarcopenia diagnosis and treatment. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020;21(3):300.e2–307.e2. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2019.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz-JentoftAJ, BahatG, BauerJ, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48(1):16–31. doi:10.1093/ageing/afy16930312372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GreeneBR, DohenyEP, O’HalloranA, Anne KennyR. Frailty status can be accurately assessed using inertial sensors and the TUG test. Age Ageing. 2014;43(3):406–411. doi:10.1093/ageing/aft17624212918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ConiA, AncumJMV, BergquistR, et al. Comparison of standard clinical and instrumented physical performance tests in discriminating functional status of high-functioning people aged 61(-)70 years old. Sensors. 2019;19. doi:10.3390/s19030449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LepetitK, MansourKB, LetocartA, et al. Optimized scoring tool to quantify the functional performance during the sit-to-stand transition with a magneto-inertial measurement unit. Clin Biomech. 2019;69:109–114. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.07.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BuisseretF, CatinusL, GrenardR, et al. Timed up and go and six-minute walking tests with wearable inertial sensor: one step further for the prediction of the risk of fall in elderly nursing home people. Sensors. 2020;20(11):3207. doi:10.3390/s20113207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZarzecznyR, Nawrat-SzoltysikA, PolakA, et al. Aging effect on the instrumented Timed-Up-and-Go test variables in nursing home women aged 80-93 years. Biogerontology. 2017;18(4):651–663. doi:10.1007/s10522-017-9717-528634926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PodsiadloD, RichardsonS. The timed “Up & Go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39(2):142–148. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x1991946
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laboratories ATSCoPSfCPF. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(1):111–117. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102.12091180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KoV, NaylorJM, HarrisIA, CrosbieJ, YeoAE. The six-minute walk test is an excellent predictor of functional ambulation after total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:145. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-14-14523617377
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BoxerR, KleppingerA, AhmadA, AnnisK, HagerD, KennyA. The 6-minute walk is associated with frailty and predicts mortality in older adults with heart failure. Congest Heart Fail. 2010;16(5):208–213. doi:10.1111/j.1751-7133.2010.00151.x20887617
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• PahorM. Mobility and functional outcomes for sarcopenia trials. J Frailty Aging. 2015;4(3):123–124.26568949
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BeyeaJ, McGibbonCA, SextonA, NobleJ, O’ConnellC. Convergent validity of a wearable sensor system for measuring sub-task performance during the timed up-and-go test. Sensors. 2017;17:4. doi:10.3390/s17040934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe-NilssenR, HelbostadJL. Estimation of gait cycle characteristics by trunk accelerometry. J Biomech. 2004;37(1):121–126. doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(03)00233-114672575
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KobayashiH, KakihanaW, KimuraT. Combined effects of age and gender on gait symmetry and regularity assessed by autocorrelation of trunk acceleration. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11:109. doi:10.1186/1743-0003-11-10924993146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-RamirezA, MartinikorenaI, GomezM, et al. Frailty assessment based on trunk kinematic parameters during walking. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2015;12:48. doi:10.1186/s12984-015-0040-626003560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MenzHB, LordSR, FitzpatrickRC. Acceleration patterns of the head and pelvis when walking on level and irregular surfaces. Gait Posture. 2003;18(1):35–46. doi:10.1016/s0966-6362(02)00159-512855299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BellancaJL, LowryKA, VanswearingenJM, BrachJS, RedfernMS. Harmonic ratios: a quantification of step to step symmetry. J Biomech. 2013;46(4):828–831. doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2012.12.00823317758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MartinikorenaI, Martinez-RamirezA, GomezM, et al. Gait variability related to muscle quality and muscle power output in frail nonagenarian older adults. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17(2):162–167. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2015.09.01526577625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PincusSM. Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88(6):2297–2301. doi:10.1073/pnas.88.6.229711607165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GuyonI, ElisseeffA. An introduction to variable and feature selection. J Mach Learn Res. 2003;3:1157–1182.
   Google Scholar
• SaeysY, InzaI, LarranagaP. A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics. Bioinformatics. 2007;23(19):2507–2517. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm34417720704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AttalF, MohammedS, DedabrishviliM, ChamroukhiF, OukhellouL, AmiratY. Physical human activity recognition using wearable sensors. Sensors. 2015;15(12):31314–31338. doi:10.3390/s15122985826690450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GadelhaAB, NeriSGR, de OliveiraRJ, et al. Severity of sarcopenia is associated with postural balance and risk of falls in community-dwelling older women. Exp Aging Res. 2018;44(3):258–269. doi:10.1080/0361073x.2018.144959129558320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KurzI, OddssonL, MelzerI. Characteristics of balance control in older persons who fall with injury–a prospective study. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013;23(4):814–819. doi:10.1016/j.jelekin.2013.04.00123669557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KimJK, BaeMN, LeeKB, HongSG. Identification of patients with sarcopenia using gait parameters based on inertial sensors. Sensors. 2021;21:5. doi:10.3390/s21051786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BourdenasT, SlomanM. Towards Self-Healing in Wireless Sensor Networks. Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks; Berkeley, USA; IEEE; 2009.
   Google Scholar