Randomized comparative study of left versus right radial approach in the setting of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction

References

• ArchboldRARobinsonNMSchillingRJRadial artery access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary interventionBMJ2004329746344344615321904
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AgostoniPBiondi-ZoccaiGGde BenedictisMLRadial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional proceduresSystematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trialsJ Am Coll Cardiol200444234935615261930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RaoSVOuFSWangTYTrends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data RegistryJACC Cardiovasc Interv20081437938619463333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JollySSAmlaniSHamonMYusufSMehtaSRRadial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trialsAm Heart J2009157113214019081409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BurzottaFTraniCMazzariMAVascular complications and access crossover in 10,676 transradial percutaneous coronary proceduresAm Heart J2012163223023822305841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ArzamendiDLyHQTanguayJFEffect on bleeding, time to revascularization, and one-year clinical outcomes of the radial approach during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctionAm J Cardiol2010106214815420598995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DominiciMDilettiRMiliciCLeft radial versus right radial approach for coronary artery catheterization: a prospective comparisonJ Interv Cardiol201225220320922272568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SciahbasiARomagnoliEBurzottaFTransradial approach (left vs right) and procedural times during percutaneous coronary procedures: TALENT studyAm Heart J2011161117217921167351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PellicaFTraniCBiondi-ZoccaiGGProspective Registry of Vascular Access in Interventions in Lazio Region (PREVAIL) Study GroupComparison of the feasibility and effectiveness of transradial coronary angiography via right versus left radial artery approaches (from the PREVAIL Study)Am J Cardiol2012110677177522651876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HuHFuQChenWWangDHuaXChenBA prospective randomized comparison of left and right radial approach for percutaneous coronary angiography in Asian populationsClin Interv Aging2014996396825018624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NavareseEPDe LucaGCastriotaFLow-molecular-weight heparins vs. unfractionated heparin in the setting of percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a meta-analysisJ Thromb Haemost20119101902191521777368
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OchiaiMIsshikiTToyoizumiHEfficacy of transradial primary stenting in patients with acute myocardial infarctionAm J Cardiol1999836966968A1010190421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WeaverANHendersonRAGilchristICEttingerSMArterial access and door-to-balloon times for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients presenting with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarctionCatheter Cardiovasc Interv201075569569920146306
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LouvardYLudwigJLefèvreTTransradial approach for coronary angioplasty in the setting of acute myocardial infarction: a dual-center registryCatheter Cardiovasc Interv200255220621111835648
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ValsecchiOMusumeciGVassilevaASafety, feasibility and efficacy of transradial primary angioplasty in patients with acute myocardial infarctionItal Heart J20034532933412848090
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• VorobcsukAKónyiAAradiDTransradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction: systematic overview and meta-analysisAm Heart J2009158581482119853703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WuCJFangHYChengCIThe safety and feasibility of bilateral radial approach in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary interventionInt Heart J201152313113821646733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BurzottaFDe VitaMLefevreTTommasinoALouvardYTraniCRadial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions on chronic total occlusions: technical issues and data reviewCatheter Cardiovasc Interv2014831475723832527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NorgazTGorguluSDagdelenSA randomized study comparing the effectiveness of right and left radial approach for coronary angiographyCatheter Cardiovasc Interv201280226026422334420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CannonCPGibsonCMLambrewCTRelationship of symptom-onset-to-balloon time and door-to-balloon time with mortality in patients undergoing angioplasty for acute myocardial infarctionJAMA2000283222941294710865271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De LucaGSuryapranataHOttervangerJPAntmanEMTime delay to treatment and mortality in primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: every minute of delay countsCirculation2004109101223122515007008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LarsenPShahSWaxmanSComparison of procedural times, success rates, and safety between left versus right radial arterial access in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctionCatheter Cardiovasc Interv2011781384420939041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SciahbasiARomagnoliETraniCEvaluation of the “learning curve” for left and right radial approach during percutaneous coronary proceduresAm J Cardiol2011108218518821530937
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar