106
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Demographic and comorbidity predictors of adherence to diagnostic colonoscopy in the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: a nationwide cross-sectional study

, , &
Pages 1733-1742 | Published online: 23 Nov 2018

References

  • GLOBOCANColorectal Cancer Estimated Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide in 2012 Available from: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_cancer.aspx?cancer=colorectalAccessed 13th March 2015
  • GarborgKHolmeØLøbergMKalagerMAdamiHOBretthauerMCurrent status of screening for colorectal cancerAnn Oncol20132481963197223619033
  • HewitsonPGlasziouPWatsonETowlerBIrwigLCochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (hemoccult): an updateAm J Gastroenterol200810361541154918479499
  • Directorate-General for Health and Consumers (European Commission), Executive Agency for Health and Consumers, World Health OrganizationEuropean Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Colorectal Cancer Screening and DiagnosisSegnanNPatnickJvon KarsaLLuxembourgPublications Office of the European Union2010
  • EtzioniDAYanoEMRubensteinLVMeasuring the quality of colorectal cancer screening: the importance of follow-upDis Colon Rectum20064971002101016673056
  • MeesterRGZauberAGDoubeniCAConsequences of increasing time to colonoscopy examination after positive result from fecal colorectal cancer screening testClin Gastroenterol Hepatol2016141014451451.e827211498
  • CorleyDAJensenCDQuinnVPAssociation between time to colonoscopy after a positive fecal test result and risk of colorectal cancer and cancer stage at diagnosisJAMA2017317161631164128444278
  • BlomJKilpeläinenSHultcrantzRTörnbergSFive-year experience of organized colorectal cancer screening in a Swedish population -increased compliance with age, female gender, and subsequent screening roundJ Med Screen201421314415025070434
  • MorrisSBaioGKendallESocioeconomic variation in uptake of colonoscopy following a positive faecal occult blood test result: a retrospective analysis of the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening ProgrammeBr J Cancer2012107576577122864455
  • LissDTBrownTLeeJYDiagnostic colonoscopy following a positive fecal occult blood test in community health center patientsCancer Causes Control201627788188727228991
  • Dupont-LucasCDejardinODancourtVLaunayLLaunoyGGuittetLSocio-geographical determinants of colonoscopy uptake after faecal occult blood testDig Liver Dis201143971472021530429
  • FerratELe BretonJVeerabudunKColorectal cancer screening: factors associated with colonoscopy after a positive faecal occult blood testBr J Cancer201310961437144423989948
  • MansouriDMcMillanDCGrantYCrightonEMHorganPGThe impact of age, sex and socioeconomic deprivation on outcomes in a colorectal cancer screening programmePLoS One201386e6606323776606
  • JørgensenODKronborgOFengerCA randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer using faecal occult blood testing: results after 13 years and seven biennial screening roundsGut2002501293211772963
  • ThomsenMKNjorSHRasmussenMValidity of data in the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening DatabaseClin Epidemiol2017910511128255255
  • Tværregional koordinationsgruppe for tarmkræftscreening. Manual for implementering og drift af tvaerregional tarmkraeftscreening version 3. [Cross-regional coordination group for colorectal cancer screening. 2017. Manual for implementation and running of cross-regional colorectal cancer screening version 3]2017 Available from: http://www.regionshospitalet-randers.dk/siteassets/afdelinger/afdeling-for-folkeundersogelser/pdf-episerver/retningslinjer/2017_03_10-manual-for-drift-af-tvarregional-tarmkraftscreening---version-3.pdfAccessed November 5, 2018 Danish
  • SchmidtMPedersenLSørensenHTThe Danish Civil Registration System as a tool in epidemiologyEur J Epidemiol201429854154924965263
  • AndersenTFMadsenMJørgensenJMellemkjoerLOlsenJHThe Danish National Hospital Register. A valuable source of data for modern health sciencesDan Med Bull199946326326810421985
  • LyngeESandegaardJLReboljMThe Danish national patient registerScand J Public Health2011397 Suppl303321775347
  • SchmidtMSchmidtSASandegaardJLEhrensteinVPedersenLSørensenHTThe Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potentialClin Epidemiol2015744949026604824
  • CharlsonMEPompeiPAlesKLMacKenzieCRA new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validationJ Chronic Dis19874053733833558716
  • ThygesenSKChristiansenCFChristensenSLashTLSørensenHTThe predictive value of ICD-10 diagnostic coding used to assess Charlson comorbidity index conditions in the population-based Danish National Registry of PatientsBMC Med Res Methodol2011118321619668
  • Steering group for the Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening database, Competence Center for epidemiology and biostatistics North. Dansk tarmkræftscreeningsdatabase Pilotrapport 2014 [Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening Database pilot report 2014]2015 Available from: https://www.sundhed.dk/content/cms/45/61245_tarmkr%C3%A6ft.pdfAccessed November 5, 2018 Danish
  • UK Colorectal Cancer Screening Pilot GroupResults of the first round of a demonstration pilot of screening for colorectal cancer in the United KingdomBMJ200432913315237087
  • BlomJKilpeläinenSHultcrantzRTörnbergSFive-year experience of organized colorectal cancer screening in a Swedish population - increased compliance with age, female gender, and subsequent screening roundJ Med Screen201421314415025070434
  • Ministry of HealthBEK nr 1749 af 21/12/2006 Historisk. Bekendt-gørelse om behandling af patienter med livstruende kræftsygdomme m.v. - retsinformation.dk. [BEK no 1749 of 21/12/2006 historical. Consolidation Act of treatment of patients with life threatening cancer diseases];2005 Available from: https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2015/584Accessed November 5, 2018 Danish
  • ProbstHBHussainZBAndersenOCancer patient pathways in Den-mark as a joint effort between bureaucrats, health professionals and politicians–a national Danish projectHealth Policy20121051657022136810
  • Sundhedsstyrelsen Maksimale ventetider for kræft og hjertesygdomme april 2014 [National Board of Health. Maximum waiting times for cancer and heart diseases April 2014] Available from: https://sund-hedsstyrelsen.dk/da/nyheder/2014/maksimale-ventetider-for-kraeft-og-hjertesygdomme-april-2014Accessed May 31, 2015 Danish
  • Sundhedsstyrelsen. Maksimale ventetider for patienter med kræft- og hjertesygdomme maj 2014 [National Board of Health. Maximum waiting times for cancer and heart diseases May 2014]2014 Available from: https://sundhedsstyrelsen.dk/da/nyheder/2014/maksimale-ventetider-for-patienter-med-kraeft-og-hjertesygdomme-maj-2014Accessed May 31, 2015
  • Sundhedsstyrelsen. Maksimale ventetider: 204 overskridelser i juni 2014 (opdateret); [National Board of Health. Maximum waiting times: 204 exceedances in June 2014 (updated)]2014 Available from: https://sundhedsstyrelsen.dk/da/nyheder/2014/maksimale-ventetider-203-overskridelser-i-juni-2014Accessed May 31, 2015
  • RasmussenMTybjergJDansk tarmkraeftscreeningsdatabase Årsrap-port 2016 Første 34 måneder af 1. nationale screeningsrunde Hvorfra udgår rapporten Kontaktperson for DTS i Regionernes Kliniske Kvalitet-sudviklingsprogram (RKKP). [Danish Colorectal Cancer Screening Database yearly report First 34 months of 1st national screening round. Regional Clinical Qualitydevelopment Program]2017 Available from: http://www.regionshospitalet-randers.dk/siteassets/afdelinger/afdeling-for-folkeundersogelser/pdf-episerver/retningslinjer/20171221_dtsarsrap-port-2016_offentlig-version.pdfAccessed November 5, 2018 Danish
  • CarlsonCMKirbyKACasadeiMAPartinMRKistlerCEWalterLCLack of follow-up after fecal occult blood testing in older adults: inappropriate screening or failure to follow up?Arch Intern Med2011171324925620937917
  • PartinMRGravelyAABurgessJFJrContribution of patient, physician, and environmental factors to demographic and health variation in colonoscopy follow-up for abnormal colorectal cancer screening test resultsCancer2017123183502351228493543
  • ChubakJGarciaMPBurnett-HartmanANPROSPR consortiumTime to Colonoscopy after Positive Fecal Blood Test in Four U.S. Health Care SystemsCancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev201625234435026843520
  • AalykkeCKoloskopiovervågning af patienter med kronisk inflammatorisk tarmsygdom (IBD) med henblik på udvikling af dysplasi og kolorektal cancer. [Colonoscopy monitoring of patients with chronic inflamatory bowel disease (IBD) for development of dysplasia and colorectal cancer]2014 Available from: https://www.dsgh.dk/images/guidelines/pdfversion/ibdkrc_dsgh_guideline.pdfAccessed November 5, 2018 Danish
  • VasenBülow;Leeds Castle Polyposis GroupGuidelines for the surveillance and management of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP): a world wide survey among 41 registriesColorectal Dis19991421422123577809
  • MarmotMFrielSBellRHouwelingTAJTaylorSOn behalf of the Commission on Social Determinants of HealthClosing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of healthFinal Report of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health2008
  • DedingUHenigASSallingATorp-PedersenCBøggildHSociodemographic predictors of participation in colorectal cancer screeningInt J Colorectal Dis20173281117112428501944
  • LarsenMBMikkelsenEMRasmussenMSociodemographic characteristics of nonparticipants in the Danish colorectal cancer screening program: a nationwide cross-sectional studyClin Epidemiol2017934535428721099
  • HurtadoJLBacigalupeACalvoMSocial inequalities in a population based colorectal cancer screening programme in the Basque CountryBMC Public Health201515102126438240
  • SelbyKBaumgartnerCLevinTRInterventions to improve follow-up of positive results on fecal blood tests: a systematic reviewAnn Intern Med2017167856557529049756