Delay in surgery, risk of hospital-treated infections and the prognostic impact of comorbidity in hip fracture patients. A Danish nationwide cohort study, 2005–2016

References

• Pedersen AB, Ehrenstein V, Szepligeti SK, et al. Thirty-five-year trends in first-time hospitalization for hip fracture, 1-year mortality, and the prognostic impact of comorbidity: a Danish nationwide cohort study, 1980-2014. Epidemiology. 2017;28(6):898–905. doi:10.1097/EDE.000000000000072928767515
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen AB, Ehrenstein V, Szepligeti SK, Sørensen HT. Hip fracture, comorbidity, and the risk of myocardial infarction and stroke: a Danish nationwide cohort study, 1995-2015. J Bone Miner Res. 2017;32(12):2339–2346. doi:10.1002/jbmr.324228833527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rademakers LM, Vainas T, van Zutphen SW, Brink PR, van Helden SH. Pressure ulcers and prolonged hospital stay in hip fracture patients affected by time-to-surgery. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2007;33(3):238–244. doi:10.1007/s00068-007-6212-826814486
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan SK, Kalra S, Khanna A, Thiruvengada MM, Parker MJ. Timing of surgery for hip fractures: a systematic review of 52 published studies involving 291,413 patients. Injury. 2009;40(7):692–697. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2009.01.01019450802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Alvarez F, Al-Ghanem R, Garcia-Alvarez I, Lopez-Baisson A, Bernal M. Risk factors for postoperative infections in patients with hip fracture treated by means of Thompson arthroplasty. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2010;50(1):51–55. doi:10.1016/j.archger.2009.01.00919233490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simunovic N, Devereaux PJ, Sprague S, et al. Effect of early surgery after hip fracture on mortality and complications: systematic review and meta-analysis. Cmaj. 2010;182(15):1609–1616. doi:10.1503/cmaj.09222020837683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moja L, Piatti A, Pecoraro V, et al. Timing matters in hip fracture surgery: patients operated within 48 hrs have better outcomes. A meta-analysis and meta-regression of over 190,000 patients. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46175. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.004617523056256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordero J, Maldonado A, Iborra S. Surgical delay as a risk factor for wound infection after a hip fracture. Injury. 2016;47(Suppl 3):S56–S60. doi:10.1016/S0020-1383(16)30607-627692108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly-Pettersson P, Samuelsson B, Muren O, et al. Waiting time to surgery is correlated with an increased risk of serious adverse events during hospital stay in patients with hip-fracture: a cohort study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2017;69:91–97. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.02.00328189926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klestil T, Roder C, Stotter C, et al. Impact of timing of surgery in elderly hip fracture patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):13933 018-32098-7. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-32098-730224765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byun SE, Shon HC, Kim JW, Kim HK, Sim Y. Risk factors and prognostic implications of aspiration pneumonia in older hip fracture patients: a multicenter retrospective analysis. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2019;19(2):119–123. doi:10.1111/ggi.1355930556343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Healt and Clinical Excellence. NICE Quality Standard 16. Hip fracture in adults. 2017; Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs16. Accessed 801, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Pincus D, Ravi B, Wasserstein D, et al. Association between wait time and 30-day mortality in adults undergoing hip fracture surgery. JAMA. 2017;318(20):1994–2003. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.1760629183076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dansk Tværfaglig Register for Hoftenære Lårbensbrud. National årsrapport 2017. 2017; Available from: https://www.sundhed.dk/content/cms/62/4662_hofte-fraktur-%C3%A5rsrapport_2017.pdf. Accessed 613, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Mainz J, Hansen AM, Palshof T, Bartels PD. National quality measurement using clinical indicators: the Danish National Indicator Project. J Surg Oncol. 2009;99(8):500–504. doi:10.1002/jso.2119219466740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristensen PK, Thillemann TM, Søballe K, Johnsen SP. Are process performance measures associated with clinical outcomes among patients with hip fractures? A population-based cohort study. Int J Qual Health Care. 2016;28(6):698–708. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzw09327591269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt M, Pedersen L, Sørensen HT. The Danish civil registration system as a tool in epidemiology. Eur J Epidemiol. 2014;29(8):541–549. doi:10.1007/s10654-014-9930-324965263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt M, Schmidt SA, Sandegaard JL, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sørensen HT. The Danish national patient registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol. 2015;7:449–490. doi:10.2147/CLEP.S9112526604824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannesdottir SA, Horvath-Puho E, Ehrenstein V, Schmidt M, Pedersen L, Sørensen HT. Existing data sources for clinical epidemiology: the Danish national database of reimbursed prescriptions. Clin Epidemiol. 2012;4:303–313. doi:10.2147/CLEP.S3758723204870
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moran CG, Wenn RT, Sikand M, Taylor AM. Early mortality after hip fracture: is delay before surgery important? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87(3):483–489. doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.0179615741611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majumdar SR, Beaupre LA, Johnston DW, Dick DA, Cinats JG, Jiang HX. Lack of association between mortality and timing of surgical fixation in elderly patients with hip fracture: results of a retrospective population-based cohort study. Med Care. 2006;44(6):552–559. doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000215812.13720.2e16708004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smektala R, Endres HG, Dasch B, et al. The effect of time-to-surgery on outcome in elderly patients with proximal femoral fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008;9:171 2474-9-171. doi10.1186/1471-2474-9-8719114019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar