Deep Learning in Prediction of Late Major Bleeding After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

References

• Mack MJ, Leon MB, Thourani VH, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a balloon-expandable valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(18):1695–1705. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1814052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popma JJ, Deeb GM, Yakubov SJ, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding valve in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(18):1706–1715. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1816885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(17):1597–1607. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1008232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack MJ, et al. Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(17):1609–1620. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1514616
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangieri A, Montalto C, Poletti E, et al. Thrombotic versus bleeding risk after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74(16):2088–2101. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.1032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kibler M, Marchandot B, Messas N, et al. Primary hemostatic disorders and late major bleeding after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(18):2139–2148. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.2143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honda Y, Yamawaki M, Araki M, et al. Impact of HAS-BLED score to predict trans femoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement outcomes. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;92(7):1387–1396. doi:10.1002/ccd.27596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarese EP, Zhang Z, Kubica J, et al. Development and validation of a practical model to identify patients at risk of bleeding after TAVR. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(11):1196–1206. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein BA, Navar AM, Carter RE. Moving beyond regression techniques in cardiovascular risk prediction: applying machine learning to address analytic challenges. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(23):1805–1814. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Suarez DF, Kim Y, Villablanca P, et al. Machine learning prediction models for in-hospital mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2019;12(14):1328–1338. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes B, Pilz M, Reich C, et al. Machine learning-based risk prediction of intrahospital clinical outcomes in patients undergoing TAVI. Clin Res Cardiol. 2021;110(3):343–356. doi:10.1007/s00392-020-01691-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopes RR, van Mourik MS, Schaft EV, et al. Value of machine learning in predicting TAVI outcomes. Neth Heart J. 2019;27(9):443–450. doi:10.1007/s12471-019-1285-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agasthi P, Ashraf H, Pujari SH, et al. Artificial intelligence trumps TAVI(2)-SCORE and CoreValve score in predicting 1-year mortality post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2021;24:33–41. doi:10.1016/j.carrev.2020.08.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penso M, Pepi M, Fusini L, et al. Predicting long-term mortality in TAVI patients using machine learning techniques. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2021;8(4):44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature. 2015;521(7553):436–444. doi:10.1038/nature14539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching T, Zhu X, Garmire LX. Cox-nnet: an artificial neural network method for prognosis prediction of high-throughput omics data. PLoS Comput Biol. 2018;14(4):e1006076. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D, Jing Z, He K, Garmire LX. Cox-nnet v2. 0: improved neural-network-based survival prediction extended to large-scale EMR data. Bioinformatics. 2021;37(17):2772–2774. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btab046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzman JL, Shaham U, Cloninger A, Bates J, Jiang T, Kluger Y. DeepSurv: personalized treatment recommender system using a Cox proportional hazards deep neural network. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18(1):24. doi:10.1186/s12874-018-0482-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moons KG, Altman DG, Reitsma JB, et al. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(1):W1–73. doi:10.7326/M14-0698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappetein AP, Head SJ, Généreux P, et al. Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the valve academic research consortium-2 consensus document. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(19):2403–2418. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Généreux P, Cohen DJ, Mack M, et al. Incidence, predictors, and prognostic impact of late bleeding complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(24):2605–2615. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2014.08.052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stekhoven DJ, Bühlmann P. MissForest–non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(1):112–118. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chawla NV, Bowyer KW, Hall LO, Kegelmeyer WP. SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J Artif Intell Res. 2002;16:321–357. doi:10.1613/jair.953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingma DP, Adam: BJ. A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv Preprint arXiv:14126980; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kokhlikyan N, Miglani V, Martin M, et al. Captum: a unified and generic model interpretability library for pytorch. arXiv Preprint arXiv:200907896; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Steyerberg EW, Vergouwe Y. Towards better clinical prediction models: seven steps for development and an ABCD for validation. Eur Heart J. 2014;35(29):1925–1931. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehu207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin PC, Harrell JFE, van Klaveren D. Graphical calibration curves and the integrated calibration index (ICI) for survival models. Stat Med. 2020;39(21):2714–2742. doi:10.1002/sim.8570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith GC, Seaman SR, Wood AM, Royston P, White IR. Correcting for optimistic prediction in small data sets. Am J Epidemiol. 2014;180(3):318–324. doi:10.1093/aje/kwu140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bello GA, Dawes TJW, Duan J, et al. Deep learning cardiac motion analysis for human survival prediction. Nat Mach Intell. 2019;1:95–104. doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0019-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Piccolo R, Pilgrim T, Franzone A, et al. Frequency, timing, and impact of access-site and non-access-site bleeding on mortality among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(14):1436–1446. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2017.04.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trimaille A, Marchandot B, Park S-H, Schini-Kerth V, Morel O. The difficult balance between thrombosis and bleeding after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a translational review. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2020;113(4):263–275. doi:10.1016/j.acvd.2019.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranasinghe MP, Peter K, McFadyen JD. Thromboembolic and bleeding complications in transcatheter aortic valve implantation: insights on mechanisms, prophylaxis and therapy. J Clin Med. 2019;8(2):280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanaroff AC, Manandhar P, Holmes DR, et al. Peripheral artery disease and transcatheter aortic valve replacement outcomes. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(10):e005456. doi:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• She Y, Jin Z, Wu J, et al. Development and validation of a deep learning model for non-small cell lung cancer survival. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(6):e205842. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuo K, Purushotham S, Jiang B, et al. Survival outcome prediction in cervical cancer: cox models vs deep-learning model. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(4):381.e381–381.e314. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2018.12.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Raj B. On the origin of deep learning. arXiv Preprint arXiv:170207800; 2017.
   Google Scholar