Age-specific cancer survival in Estonia: recent trends and data quality

References

• BrennerHArndtVRecent increase in cancer survival according to age: higher survival in all age groups, but widening age gradientCancer Causes Control200415990391015577292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QuagliaATavillaAShackLThe cancer survival gap between elderly and middle-aged patients in Europe is wideningEur J Cancer20094561006101619121578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BaburinAAareleidTPadrikPValvereVInnosKTime trends in population-based breast cancer survival in Estonia: analysis by age and stageActa Oncol201453222623423767956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CapocacciaRGattaGRoazziPThe EUROCARE-3 database: methodology of data collection, standardisation, quality control and statistical analysisAnn Oncol200314Suppl 5v14v2714684498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrennerHHakulinenTImplications of incomplete registration of deaths on long-term survival estimates from population-based cancer registriesInt J Cancer2009125243243719422045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AdamsJAudisioRAWhiteMFormanDAge-related variations in progression of cancer at diagnosis and completeness of cancer registry dataSurg Oncol200413417517915615653
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RahuMEstoniaParkinDMMuirCSWhelanSLGaoY-TFerlayJPowellJCancer Incidence in Five Continents, Vol VIILyon, FranceInternational Agency for Research on Cancer1997569573
   Google Scholar
• RahuMMcKeeMEpidemiological research labelled as a violation of privacy: the case of EstoniaInt J Epidemiol200837367868218304955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• InnosKBaburinAAareleidTCancer patient survival in Estonia 1995–2009 time trends and data qualityCancer Epidemiol201433825325824726824
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• InnosKRahuMRahuKFeasibility of cohort studies in EstoniaOccup Environ Med199956749950210472323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EdererFHeiseHInstructions to IBM 650 Programmers in Processing Survival Computations. Methodological Note 10Bethesda, MDEnd Results Evaluation Section, National Cancer Institute1959
   Google Scholar
• BrennerHGefellerOHakulinenTPeriod analysis for ‘up-to-date’ cancer survival data: theory, empirical evaluation, computational realisation and applicationsEur J Cancer200440332633514746849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrennerHRachetBHybrid analysis for up-to-date long-term survival rates in cancer registries with delayed recording of incident casesEur J Cancer200440162494250115519525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CorazziariIQuinnMCapocacciaRStandard cancer patient population for age standardising survival ratiosEur J Cancer200440152307231615454257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DickmanPWCovielloEHillsMEstimating and modelling relative survivalSTATA J2015151186215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GondosAHolleczekBArndtVStegmaierCZieglerHBrennerHTrends in population-based cancer survival in Germany: to what extent does progress reach older patients?Ann Oncol20071871253125917470450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De AngelisRSantMColemanMPCancer survival in Europe 1999–2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE-5 – a population- based studyLancet Oncol2014151233424314615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GattaGCapocacciaRSantMUnderstanding variations in survival for colorectal cancer in Europe: a EUROCARE high resolution studyGut200047453353810986214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LavelleKDowningAThomasJLawrenceGFormanDOliverSEAre lower rates of surgery amongst older women with breast cancer in the UK explained by co-morbidity?Br J Cancer201210771175118022878370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LavelleKToddCMoranAHowellABundredNCampbellMNon-standard management of breast cancer increases with age in the UK: a population based cohort of women ≥65 yearsBr J Cancer20079681197120317387342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de RijkeJMSchoutenLJSchoutenHCJagerJJKoppejanAGvan den BrandtPAAge-specific differences in the diagnostics and treatment of cancer patients aged 50 years and older in the province of Limburg, The NetherlandsAnn Oncol1996776776858905025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AudisioRABozzettiFGennariRThe surgical management of elderly cancer patients; recommendations of the SIOG surgical task forceEur J Cancer200440792693815093567
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SilcocksPSurvival of death certificate initiated registrations: selection bias, incomplete trace-back or higher mortality?Br J Cancer200695111576157817117185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrennerHJansenLRestriction to period of interest improves informative value of death certificate only proportions in period analysis of cancer survivalJ Clin Epidemiol Epub3142015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PollockAMVickersNWhy are a quarter of all cancer deaths in south-east England registered by death certificate only? Factors related to death certificate only registrations in the Thames Cancer Registry between 1987 and 1989Br J Cancer19957136376417880750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RobinsonDSankilaRHakulinenTMøllerHInterpreting international comparisons of cancer survival: the effects of incomplete registration and the presence of death certificate only cases on survival estimatesEur J Cancer200743590991317300929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ColemanMPGattaGVerdecchiaAEUROCARE-3 summary: cancer survival in Europe at the end of the 20th centuryAnn Oncol200314Suppl 5v128v14914684503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VercelliMQuagliaACasellaCRelative survival in elderly cancer patients in Europe. EUROCARE Working GroupEur J Cancer19983414 Spec2264227010070297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SøgaardMThomsenRWBossenKSSørensenHTNørgaardMThe impact of comorbidity on cancer survival: a reviewClin Epidemiol20135Suppl 132924227920
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LavelleKMoranAHowellABundredNCampbellMToddCOlder women with operable breast cancer are less likely to have surgeryBr J Surg200794101209121517590857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen-HeijnenMLHoutermanSLemmensVELouwmanMWMaasHACoeberghJWPrognostic impact of increasing age and co-morbidity in cancer patients: a population-based approachCrit Rev Oncol Hematol200555323124015979890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BouchardyCRapitiEFiorettaGUndertreatment strongly decreases prognosis of breast cancer in elderly womenJ Clin Oncol200321193580358712913099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LewisJHKilgoreMLGoldmanDPParticipation of patients 65 years of age or older in cancer clinical trialsJ Clin Oncol20032171383138912663731
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EltingLSCooksleyCBekeleBNGeneralizability of cancer clinical trial results: prognostic differences between participants and nonparticipantsCancer2006106112452245816639738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SantMAllemaniCCapocacciaRStage at diagnosis is a key explanation of differences in breast cancer survival across EuropeInt J Cancer2003106341642212845683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OutzenMBrassoKMartinussenNProstate cancer in Denmark 1978–2009 – trends in incidence and mortalityActa Oncol201352483183622809166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DillmanROMcClureSESteadily improving survival in lung cancerClin Lung Cancer201415533133725028337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar