The impact of the lymph node density on overall survival in patients with Wilms’ tumor: a SEER analysis

References

• BirchJMBreslowNEpidemiologic features of Wilms tumorHematol Oncol Clin North Am199596115711788591959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BreslowNOlshanABeckwithJBGreenDMEpidemiology of Wilms tumorMed Pediatr Oncol19932131721817680412
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MetzgerMLDomeJSCurrent therapy for Wilms’ tumorOncologist2005101081582616314292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SredniSTGaddSHuangCCSubsets of very low risk Wilms tumor show distinctive gene expression, histologic, and clinical featuresClin Cancer Res200915226800680919903788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GreenDMBreslowNEBeckwithJBTreatment with nephrectomy only for small, stage I/favorable histology Wilms’ tumor: a report from the National Wilms’ Tumor Study GroupJ Clin Oncol200119173719372411533093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrundyPEBreslowNELiSLoss of heterozygosity for chromosomes 16q and lp is an adverse prognostic factor in favorable histology Wilms tumor. A report from the National Wilms Tumor Study GroupJ Clin Oncol200523297312732116129848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PanZHeHTangLLoss of heterozygosity on chromosome 16q increases relapse risk in Wilms’ tumor: a meta-analysisOncotarget2017839664676647529029528
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DomeJSFernandezCVMullenEAChildren’s Oncology Group’s 2013 blueprint for research: renal tumorsPediatr Blood Cancer2013606994100023255438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pritchard-JonesKBergeronCde CamargoBOmission of doxorubicin from the treatment of stage II-III, intermediate-risk Wilms’ tumour (SIOP WT 2001): an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trialLancet201538699991156116426164096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhuSLiuGFuWHuJFuKJiaWAxl promotes the proliferation, invasion and migration of Wilms’ tumor and can be used as a prognostic factorOnco Targets Ther20171095596328243131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhugeYCheungMCYangRKoniarisLGNevilleHLSolaJEImproved survival with lymph node sampling in Wilms tumorJ Surg Res20111672e199e20321324394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LiQGLiDWZhuoCHCaiGXCaiSJMetastatic lymph node ratio can further stratify prognosis in rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative radiotherapy: a population-based analysisTumour Biol20143576389639524668545
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BergerACSigurdsonERLeVoyerTColon cancer survival is associated with decreasing ratio of metastatic to examined lymph nodesJ Clin Oncol200523248706871216314630
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ParkIJChoiGSJunSHNodal stage of stage iii colon cancer: the impact of metastatic lymph node ratioJ Surg Oncol2009100324024319330780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PeschaudFBenoistSJulieCThe ratio of metastatic to examined lymph nodes is a powerful independent prognostic factor in rectal cancerAnn Surg200824861067107319092352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RosenbergRFriederichsJSchusterTPrognosis of patients with colorectal cancer is associated with lymph node ratio: a single-center analysis of 3,026 patients over a 25-year time periodAnn Surg2008248696897819092341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SaltzmanAFCarrascoAJrAminiAPatterns of lymph node sampling and the impact of lymph node density in favorable histology Wilms tumor: an analysis of the national cancer databaseJ Pediatr Urol Epub20171031 pii: S1477-5131(17):30436-30439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangSGaoWCChenSSPrimary site surgery for metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma improves survival outcomes: an analysis of a population-based databaseOnco Targets Ther2017105311531529184417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) ProgramSEER*Stat database: incidence–SEER 18 Regs research data + Hurricane Katrina impacted Louisiana cases, Nov 2016 Sub (1973–2014)–linked to county attributes–Total U.S., 1969–2015 countiesNational Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Surveillance Systems Branch released April 2017, based on the November 2016 submission
   Google Scholar
• EbrahimiAClarkJRZhangWJLymph node ratio as an independent prognostic factor in oral squamous cell carcinomaHead Neck20113391245125120967874
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HongHRRohJLChoKJChoiSHNamSYKimSYPrognostic value of lymph node density in high-grade salivary gland cancersJ Surg Oncol2015111678478925640975
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OngWZhaoRLuiBPrognostic significance of lymph node density in squamous cell carcinoma of the tongueHead Neck201638Suppl 1e859e86625917601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HungYSChangSCLiuKHA prognostic model based on lymph node metastatic ratio for predicting survival outcome in gastric cancer patients with N3b subclassificationAsian J Surg Epub20171213 S1015-S9584(17)30493-30501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AmriRKlosCLBordeianouLBergerDLThe prognostic value of lymph node ratio in colon cancer is independent of resection lengthAm J Surg2016212225125727156798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MarchetAMocellinSAmbrosiAThe ratio between metastatic and examined lymph nodes (N ratio) is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer regardless of the type of lymphadenectomy: results from an Italian multicentric study in 1853 patientsAnn Surg2007245454355217414602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangWXuDZLiYFTumor-ratio e metastasis staging system as an alternative to the 7th edition UICC TNM system in gastric cancer after D2 resection e results of a singleinstitution study of 1343 Chinese patientsAnn Oncol20112292049205621310759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangJDangPRautCPComparison of a lymph node ratio-based staging system with the 7th AJCC system for gastric cancer: analysis of 18,043 patients from the SEER databaseAnn Surg2012255347848522330040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• XuDZGengQRLongZJPositive lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer after d2 resection regardless of the examined number of lymph nodesAnn Surg Oncol200916231932619050970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SunZZhuGLLuCThe impact of N-ratio in minimizing stage migration phenomenon in gastric cancer patients with insufficient number or level of lymph node retrieved: results from a Chinese mono-institutional study in 2159 patientsAnn Oncol200920589790519179553
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DasariBVRobertsKJHodsonJA model to predict survival following pancreaticoduodenectomy for malignancy based on tumour site, stage and lymph node ratioHPB (Oxford)201618433233827037202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DasariBVRobertsKJHodsonJPrognostic value of the metastatic lymph node ratio in patients with resectable carcinoma of ampulla of vaterMedicine (Baltimore)20159442e185926496337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’AngioGJEvansABreslowNThe treatment of Wilms’ tumor: results of the Second National Wilms’ Tumor StudyCancer1981479230223116164480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’AngioGJBreslowNBeckwithJBTreatment of Wilms’ tumor. Results of the Third National Wilms’ Tumor StudyCancer19896423493602544249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GreenDMBreslowNEBeckwithJBComparison between singledose and divided–dose administration of dactinomyein and doxorttbiein for patients with Wilms’ tumor: a report from the National Wilms’ Tumor Study GroupJ Clin Oncol19981612372459440748
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AliANDiazRShuHKPaulinoACEsiashviliNA Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program comparison of adult and pediatric Wilms’ tumorCancer201211892541255121918969
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VujanićGMSandstedtBHarmsDRevised International Society of Paediatric Oncology (SIOP) working classification of renal tumors of childhoodMed Pediatr Oncol2002382798211813170
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KalapurakalJADomeJSPerlmanEJManagement of Wilms’ tumour: current practice and future goalsLancet Oncol200451374614700607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar