80
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Methodology

Beyond The T/C Ratio: Old And New Anticancer Activity Scores In Vivo

ORCID Icon
Pages 8529-8538 | Published online: 19 Sep 2019

References

  • Bissery MC, Guénard D, Guéritte-Voegelein F, et al. Experimental antitumor activity of taxotere (RP 56976, NSC 628503), a taxol analogue. Cancer Res. 1991;51:4845–4852.1680023
  • Schabel FM, Griswold DP, Laster WR, et al. Quantitative evaluation of anticancer agent activity in experimental animals. Pharmacol Ther Part Chemother Toxicol Metab Inhib. 1977;1:411–435.
  • Skipper HE, Schmidt LH. A manual on quantitative drug evaluation in experimental tumor systems. I. Background, description of criteria, and presentation of quantitative therapeutic data on various classes of drugs obtained in diverse experimental tumor systems. Cancer Chemother Rep. 1962;17:1–143.13913647
  • Wilcox WS, Griswold DP, Laster WR, et al. Experimental evaluation of potenital anticancer agents. XVII. Kinetics of growth and regression after treatment of certain solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Rep. 1965;47:27–39.5829426
  • Dethlefsen LA, ed. Cell Cycle Effects of Drugs. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1986.
  • Mauro F, Spanò M, Teodori L, et al. Cell cycle and effect of antineoplastic drugs: facts and pitfalls. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1983;132C:199–209.6634772
  • Romano M, Frapolli R, Zangarini M, et al. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo biological effects of trabectedin, lurbinectedin (PM01183) and Zalypsis® (PM00104). Int J Cancer. 2013;133:2024–2033. doi:10.1002/ijc.2821323588839
  • Lupi M, Matera G, Natoli C, Colombo V, Ubezio P. The contribution of p53 in the dynamics of cell cycle response to DNA damage interpreted by a mathematical model. Cell Cycle 2007;6:943–950. doi:10.4161/cc.6.8.410317387280
  • Ubezio P, Lupi M, Branduardi D, et al. Quantitative assessment of the complex dynamics of G1, S, and G2-M checkpoint activities. Cancer Res. 2009;69:5234–5240. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-366019509236
  • Lupi M, Cappella P, Matera G, Natoli C, Ubezio P. Interpreting cell cycle effects of drugs: the case of melphalan. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2006;57:443–457. doi:10.1007/s00280-005-0044-116195878
  • Lupi M, Matera G, Branduardi D, et al. Cytostatic and cytotoxic effects of topotecan decoded by a novel mathematical simulation approach. Cancer Res. 2004;64:2825–2832. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-381015087399
  • Ubezio P, Falcetta F, Carrassa L, Lupi M. Integrated experimental and simulation study of the response to sequential treatment with erlotinib and gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7:15492–15506. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.v7i1326909860
  • Falcetta F, Lupi M, Colombo V, Ubezio P, Tucker-Kellogg G. Dynamic rendering of the heterogeneous cell response to anticancer treatments. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9:e1003293. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.100329324146610
  • Forrester HB, Albright N, Ling CC, Dewey WC. Computerized video time-lapse analysis of apoptosis of REC:myc cells X-irradiated in different phases of the cell cycle. Radiat Res. 2000;154:625–639. doi:10.1667/0033-7587(2000)154[0625:CVTLAO]2.0.CO;211096419
  • Forrester HB, Vidair CA, Albright N, et al. Using computerized video time lapse for quantifying cell death of X-irradiated rat embryo cells transfected with c-myc or c-Ha-ras. Cancer Res. 1999;59:931–939.10029087
  • Lee F, Weinmann R. Animal cancer models in anticancer drug discovery and development In: Azmi A, Mohammad RM, editors. Mouse Models of Human Blood Cancers. New York: Springer; 2008:245–258.
  • Zhao Y-Z, Lu C-T, Zhou Z-C, et al. Enhancing chemotherapeutic drug inhibition on tumor growth by ultrasound: an in vivo experiment. J Drug Target. 2011;19:154–160. doi:10.3109/1061186100380183420429773
  • Shoemaker RH. The NCI60 human tumour cell line anticancer drug screen. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:813–823. doi:10.1038/nrc195116990858
  • Wong H, Choo EF, Alicke B, et al. Antitumor activity of targeted and cytotoxic agents in murine subcutaneous tumor models correlates with clinical response. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:3846–3855. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-073822648270
  • Wong H, Vernillet L, Peterson A, et al. Bridging the gap between preclinical and clinical studies using pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling: an analysis of GDC-0973, a MEK inhibitor. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:3090–3099. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-044522496205
  • Houghton PJ, Morton CL, Tucker C, et al. The pediatric preclinical testing program: description of models and early testing results. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2007;49:928–940. doi:10.1002/pbc.2107817066459
  • Cohen AA, Geva-Zatorsky N, Eden E, Page DC. Dynamic proteomics of individual cancer cells in response to a drug. Science. 2008;322:1511–1516. doi:10.1126/science.116634019023046
  • Toettcher JE, Loewer A, Ostheimer GJ, Yaffe MB, Tidor B, Lahav G. Distinct mechanisms act in concert to mediate cell cycle arrest. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:785–790. doi:10.1073/pnas.080619610619139404
  • Falcetta F, Bizzaro F, D’Agostini E, Bani MR, Giavazzi R, Ubezio P. Modeling cytostatic and cytotoxic responses to new treatment regimens for ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2017;77:6759–6769. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-109928951463
  • Bizzaro F, Falcetta F, D’Agostini E, et al. Tumor progression and metastatic dissemination in ovarian cancer after dose-dense or conventional paclitaxel and cisplatin plus bevacizumab. Int J Cancer. 2018;143(9):2187–2199. doi:10.1002/ijc.31596