118
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

MDCT-Based Radiomics Features for the Differentiation of Serous Borderline Ovarian Tumors and Serous Malignant Ovarian Tumors

, , , , , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 329-336 | Published online: 12 Jan 2021

References

  • Prat J. Pathology of borderline and invasive cancers. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;41:15–30. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2016.08.00728277307
  • Damak T, Ben Hassouna J, Chargui R, et al. Borderline tumors of the ovary. Tunis Med. 2014;92(6):411–416.25741843
  • Lheureux S, Gourley C, Vergote I, et al. Epithelial ovarian cancer. Lancet. 2019;393(10177):1240–1253. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32552-230910306
  • Javadi S, Ganeshan DM, Qayyum A, et al. Ovarian cancer, the revised FIGO staging system, and the role of imaging. Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206(6):1351–1360. doi:10.2214/AJR.15.1519927042752
  • Forstner R. Radiological staging of ovarian cancer: imaging findings and contribution of CT and MRI. Eur Radiol. 2007;17(12):3223–3235. doi:10.1007/s00330-007-0736-517701180
  • Zhao SH, Qiang JW, Zhang GF, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for differentiating borderline from malignant epithelial tumours of the ovary: pathological correlation. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(9):2292–2299. doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3236-424871335
  • Yu X, Liu Y, Jiao J, et al. Evaluation of ovarian tumors with multidetector computed tomography and tumor markers: differentiation of Stage I serous borderline tumors and Stage I serous malignant tumors presenting as solid-cystic mass. Med Sci Monit. 2020;26. doi:10.12659/MSM.924497
  • Grabowska-Derlatka L, Derlatka P, Palczewski P, et al. Differentiation of ovarian cancers from borderline ovarian tumors on the basis of evaluation of tumor vascularity in multi–row detector computed tomography—comparison with histopathology. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013;23(9):1597–1602. doi:10.1097/IGC.0b013e3182a80a4124172096
  • Denewar FA, Takeuchi M, Urano M, et al. Multiparametric MRI for differentiation of borderline ovarian tumors from stage I malignant epithelial ovarian tumors using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2017;91:116–123. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.04.00128629557
  • Nougaret S, Lakhman Y, Molinari N, et al. CT features of ovarian tumors: defining key differences between serous borderline tumors and low-grade serous carcinomas. Am J Roentgenol. 2018;210(4):918–926. doi:10.2214/AJR.17.1825429489407
  • Lambin P, Leijenaar RTH, Deist TM, et al. Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14(12):749–762. doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.14128975929
  • He X, Zhang H, Zhang T, et al. Predictive models composed by radiomic features extracted from multi-detector computed tomography images for predicting low- and high- grade clear cell renal cell carcinoma: A STARD-compliant article. Medicine. 2019;98(2):e13957. doi:10.1097/MD.000000000001395730633175
  • Peng J, Zhang J, Zhang Q, et al. A radiomics nomogram for preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion risk in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2018:121–127. doi:10.5152/dir.2018.1746729770763
  • Huang Y, Liu Z, He L, et al. Radiomics signature: a potential biomarker for the prediction of disease-free survival in early-Stage (I or II) non-small cell lung cancer. Radiology. 2016;281(3):947–957. doi:10.1148/radiol.201615223427347764
  • van Griethuysen JJM, Fedorov A, Parmar C, et al. Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype. Cancer Res. 2017;77(21):e104–e107. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-033929092951
  • Park SY, Oh YT, Jung DC. Differentiation between borderline and benign ovarian tumors: combined analysis of MRI with tumor markers for large cystic masses (≥5 cm). Acta Radiol. 2015;57(5):633–639. doi:10.1177/028418511559726626231948
  • Thomassin-Naggara I, Daraï E, Cuenod CA, et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: A useful tool for characterizing ovarian epithelial tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;28(1):111–120. doi:10.1002/jmri.2137718581400
  • Li YA, Qiang JW, Ma FH, et al. MRI features and score for differentiating borderline from malignant epithelial ovarian tumors. Eur J Radiol. 2018;98:136–142. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.11.01429279152
  • Thomassin-Naggara I, Aubert E, Rockall A, et al. Adnexal masses: development and preliminary validation of an MR imaging scoring system. Radiology. 2013;267(2):432–443. doi:10.1148/radiol.1312116123468574
  • Van Calster B, Van Hoorde K, Valentin L, et al. Evaluating the risk of ovarian cancer before surgery using the ADNEX model to differentiate between benign, borderline, early and advanced stage invasive, and secondary metastatic tumours: prospective multicentre diagnostic study. BMJ. 2014;349:g5920. doi:10.1136/bmj.g592025320247
  • Tsili AC, Argyropoulou MI. Adnexal incidentalomas on multidetector CT: how to manage and characterise. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019:1–8.
  • Nougaret S, Tardieu M, Vargas HA, et al. Ovarian cancer: an update on imaging in the era of radiomics. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2019;100(10):647–655. doi:10.1016/j.diii.2018.11.00730555018
  • Horvat N, Bates DDB, Petkovska I. Novel imaging techniques of rectal cancer: what do radiomics and radiogenomics have to offer? A literature review. Abdom Radiol. 2019;44(11):3764–3774. doi:10.1007/s00261-019-02042-y
  • Davnall F, Yip CS, Ljungqvist G, et al. Assessment of tumor heterogeneity: an emerging imaging tool for clinical practice? Insights Imaging. 2012;3(6):573–589. doi:10.1007/s13244-012-0196-623093486
  • Bektas CT, Kocak B, Yardimci AH, et al. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: machine learning-based quantitative computed tomography texture analysis for prediction of fuhrman nuclear grade. Eur Radiol. 2019;29(3):1153–1163. doi:10.1007/s00330-018-5698-230167812
  • Kurman RJ, Carcangiu ML, Herrington CS, Young RH, eds. WHO Classification of Tumours of Female Reproductive Organs. 4th ed. Vol. 6 Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press; 2014
  • Berenguer R, Pastor-Juan MDR, Canales-Vázquez J, et al. Radiomics of CT features may be nonreproducible and redundant: influence of CT acquisition parameters. Radiology. 2018;288(2):407–415. doi:10.1148/radiol.201817236129688159