155
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Development and Validation of a Preoperative CT-Based Nomogram to Differentiate Invasive from Non-Invasive Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma in Solitary Pulmonary Nodules

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , & show all
Pages 1195-1208 | Published online: 20 Mar 2022

References

  • She Y, Zhao L, Dai C, et al. Development and validation of a nomogram to estimate the pretest probability of cancer in Chinese patients with solid solitary pulmonary nodules: a multi-institutional study. J Surg Oncol. 2017;116(6):756–762. doi:10.1002/jso.24704
  • Wu YJ, Liu YC, Liao CY, Tang EK, Wu FZ. A comparative study to evaluate CT-based semantic and radiomic features in preoperative diagnosis of invasive pulmonary adenocarcinomas manifesting as subsolid nodules. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):66. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-79690-4
  • Chen X, Feng B, Chen Y, et al. A CT-based radiomics nomogram for prediction of lung adenocarcinomas and granulomatous lesions in patient with solitary sub-centimeter solid nodules. Cancer Imaging. 2020;20(1):45. doi:10.1186/s40644-020-00320-3
  • Tang EK, Chen CS, Wu CC, et al. Natural history of persistent pulmonary subsolid nodules: long-term observation of different interval growth. Heart Lung Circ. 2019;28(11):1747–1754. doi:10.1016/j.hlc.2018.08.015
  • Hsu HT, Tang EK, Wu MT, et al. Modified lung-RADS improves performance of screening LDCT in a population with high prevalence of non-smoking-related lung cancer. Acad Radiol. 2018;25(10):1240–1251. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2018.01.012
  • Wu FZ, Chen PA, Wu CC, et al. Semiquantative visual assessment of sub-solid pulmonary nodules <==3 cm in differentiation of lung adenocarcinoma spectrum. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):15790. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-16042-9
  • Wu FZ, Huang YL, Wu CC, et al. Assessment of selection criteria for low-dose lung screening CT among Asian ethnic groups in Taiwan: from mass screening to specific risk-based screening for non-smoker lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer. 2016;17(5):e45–e56. doi:10.1016/j.cllc.2016.03.004
  • Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noguchi M, et al. International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society: international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma: executive summary. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2011;8(5):381–385. doi:10.1513/pats.201107-042ST
  • Wang L, Shen W, Xi Y, Liu S, Zheng D, Jin C. Nomogram for predicting the risk of invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma for pure ground-glass nodules. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105(4):1058–1064. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.11.012
  • Huang L, Lin W, Xie D, et al. Development and validation of a preoperative CT-based radiomic nomogram to predict pathology invasiveness in patients with a solitary pulmonary nodule: a machine learning approach, multicenter, diagnostic study. Eur Radiol. 2021:32(3):1983–1996.
  • Feng B, Chen X, Chen Y, et al. Differentiating minimally invasive and invasive adenocarcinomas in patients with solitary sub-solid pulmonary nodules with a radiomics nomogram. Clin Radiol. 2019;74(7):570e571–570 e511. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2019.03.018
  • Qiu T, Ru X, Yin K, Yu J, Song Y, Wu J. Two nomograms based on CT features to predict tumor invasiveness of pulmonary adenocarcinoma and growth in pure GGN: a retrospective analysis. Jpn J Radiol. 2020;38(8):761–770. doi:10.1007/s11604-020-00957-x
  • Okamura K, Takayama K, Izumi M, Harada T, Furuyama K, Nakanishi Y. Diagnostic value of CEA and CYFRA 21-1 tumor markers in primary lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2013;80(1):45–49. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.01.002
  • Primrose JN, Perera R, Gray A, et al. Effect of 3 to 5 years of scheduled CEA and CT follow-up to detect recurrence of colorectal cancer: the FACS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;311(3):263–270. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.285718
  • Yang Q, Zhang P, Wu R, Lu K, Zhou H. Identifying the best marker combination in CEA, CA125, CY211, NSE, and SCC for lung cancer screening by combining ROC curve and logistic regression analyses: Is it feasible? Dis Markers. 2018;2018:2082840. doi:10.1155/2018/2082840
  • Song X, Wang S, Wang Z, Cao WJ, Chen FJN. Serum CYFRA21-1 as an effective tumor biomarker for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Neoplasma. 2015;62(1):124–129. doi:10.4149/neo_2015_016
  • Liu J, Xu H, Qing H, et al. Comparison of radiomic models based on low-dose and standard-dose CT for prediction of adenocarcinomas and benign lesions in solid pulmonary nodules. Front Oncol. 2020;10:634298. doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.634298
  • Feng B, Chen X, Chen Y, et al. Solitary solid pulmonary nodules: a CT-based deep learning nomogram helps differentiate tuberculosis granulomas from lung adenocarcinomas. Eur Radiol. 2020;30(12):6497–6507. doi:10.1007/s00330-020-07024-z
  • Suzuki K, Saji H, Aokage K, et al. Comparison of pulmonary segmentectomy and lobectomy: safety results of a randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;158(3):895–907. doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.03.090
  • Duan XQ, Wang XL, Zhang LF, et al. Establishment and validation of a prediction model for the probability of malignancy in solid solitary pulmonary nodules in northwest China. J Surg Oncol. 2021;123(4):1134–1143. doi:10.1002/jso.26356
  • Liu G, Xu Z, Zhang Y, et al. Machine-learning-derived nomogram based on 3D radiomic features and clinical factors predicts progression-free survival in lung adenocarcinoma. Front Oncol. 2021;11:692329. doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.692329
  • Gurney JW, Lyddon DM, McKay JA. Determining the likelihood of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules with bayesian analysis. Part II. Application. Radiology. 1993;186(2):415–422. doi:10.1148/radiology.186.2.8421744