232
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Evaluation of Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) Domains in the Assessment of the Quality of Life in Patients with Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 719-728 | Received 03 May 2023, Accepted 04 Jul 2023, Published online: 18 Jul 2023

References

  • Chen YP, Chan ATC, Le QT, Blanchard P, Sun Y, Ma J. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Lancet. 2019;394(10192):64–80. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)30956-0
  • Hu CY, Wang WM, Chu XH, Ren ZH, Lyu J. Global, regional, and national burden of nasopharyngeal carcinoma from 1990 to 2017-results from the global burden of disease study 2017. Head Neck. 2020;42(11):3243–3252. doi:10.1002/hed.26378
  • Luo SD, Chen WC, Wu CN, et al. Low-dose aspirin use significantly improves the survival of late-stage NPC: a propensity score-matched cohort study in Taiwan. Cancers. 2020;12(6):1551. doi:10.3390/cancers12061551
  • Hsin CH, Tseng HC, Lin HP, Chen TH. Post-irradiation otitis media, rhinosinusitis, and their interrelationship in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated by IMRT. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273(2):471–477. doi:10.1007/s00405-015-3518-8
  • Talmi YP, Horowitz Z, Bedrin L, et al. Quality of life of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients. Cancer. 2002;94(4):1012–1017. doi:10.1002/cncr.10342
  • Chie WC, Hong RL, Lai CC, Ting LL, Hsu MM. Quality of life in patients of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: validation of the Taiwan Chinese version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-H&N35. Qual Life Res. 2003;12(1):93–98. doi:10.1023/a:1022070220328
  • Bian X, Song T, Wu S. Outcomes of xerostomia-related quality of life for nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated by IMRT: based on the EORTC QLQ-C30 and H&N35 questionnaires. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2015;15(1):109–119. doi:10.1586/14737140.2015.961427
  • Tsai WL, Chien CY, Huang HY, Liao KC, Fang FM. Prognostic value of quality of life measured after treatment on subsequent survival in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(4):715–723. doi:10.1007/s11136-012-0213-8
  • Bjordal K, Hammerlid E, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, et al. Quality of life in head and neck cancer patients: validation of the European organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire-H&N35. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17(3):1008. doi:10.1200/jco.1999.17.3.1008
  • Tong MC, Lo PS, Wong KH, et al. Development and validation of the functional assessment of cancer therapy nasopharyngeal cancer subscale. Head Neck. 2009;31(6):738–747. doi:10.1002/hed.21023
  • Su Y, C-w M, Cheng W-Q, et al. Development and validation of quality of life scale of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: the QOL-NPC (version 2). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016;14. doi:10.1186/s12955-016-0480-0
  • Hsu MY, Jiang RS, Hsin CH, Liang KL. Validation of the Taiwanese version of the 22-item sino-nasal outcome test. J Taiwan Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;48(1):55–63. doi:10.6286/2013.48.1.55
  • Hopkins C, Gillett S, Slack R, Lund VJ, Browne JP. Psychometric validity of the 22-item Sinonasal outcome test. Clin Otolaryngol. 2009;34(5):447–454. doi:10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.01995.x
  • Ayoub N, Walgama E, Thamboo A, Nayak JV, Hwang PH. Efficacy of endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis following primary radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2017;7(11):1045–1051. doi:10.1002/alr.22002
  • Li W, Lu H, Liu J, et al. Quality of life following salvage endoscopic nasopharyngectomy in patients with recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a prospective study. Front Oncol. 2020;10. doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.00437
  • DeConde AS, Bodner TE, Mace JC, Smith TL. Response shift in quality of life after endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;140(8):712–719. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2014.1045
  • Sedaghat AR, Gray ST, Caradonna SD, Caradonna DS. Clustering of chronic rhinosinusitis symptomatology reveals novel associations with objective clinical and demographic characteristics. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2015;29(2):100–105. doi:10.2500/ajra.2015.29.4140
  • Crump RT, Liu G, Janjua A, Sutherland JM. Analyzing the 22-item Sino-Nasal outcome test using item response theory. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2016;6(9):914–920. doi:10.1002/alr.21770
  • Feng AL, Wesely NC, Hoehle LP, et al. A validated model for the 22-item Sino-Nasal outcome test subdomain structure in chronic rhinosinusitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2017;7(12):1140–1148. doi:10.1002/alr.22025
  • Khan AH, Reaney M, Guillemin I, et al. Development of Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) domains in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Laryngoscope. 2021. doi:10.1002/lary.29766
  • Young YH, Hsieh T. Eustachian tube dysfunction in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma, pre- and post-irradiation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1992;249(4):206–208. doi:10.1007/bf00178470
  • McCoul ED, Anand VK, Christos PJ. Validating the clinical assessment of eustachian tube dysfunction: the Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Questionnaire (ETDQ-7). Laryngoscope. 2012;122(5):1137–1141. doi:10.1002/lary.23223
  • Lee C-T, Lin C-Y, Tsai M-C, Strong C, Lin Y-C. Psychometric evaluation and wording effects on the Chinese version of the parent-proxy Kid-KINDL. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016;14(1):123. doi:10.1186/s12955-016-0526-3
  • Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociol Methods Res. 1992;21(2):230–258. doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005
  • Trizano-Hermosilla I, Alvarado JM. Best alternatives to cronbach’s alpha reliability in realistic conditions: congeneric and asymmetrical measurements. Front Psychol. 2016;7. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00769
  • Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–163. doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
  • Akoglu H. User’s guide to correlation coefficients. Turk J Emerg Med. 2018;18(3):91–93. doi:10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001
  • Fisher RA. Frequency distribution of the values of the correlation coefficient in samples from an indefinitely large population. Biometrika. 1915;10(4):507–521.
  • Fisher RA. On the’probable error’of a coefficient of correlation deduced from a small sample. Metron. 1921;1:1–32.
  • McCoul ED, Anand VK, Bedrosian JC, Schwartz TH. Endoscopic skull base surgery and its impact on sinonasal-related quality of life. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2012;2(2):174–181. doi:10.1002/alr.21008
  • Vandekerckhove J, Matzke D, Wagenmakers E-J. Model comparison and the principle of parsimony. In: The Oxford Handbook of Computational and Mathematical Psychology. Oxford University Press; 2015:300–319.
  • Busemeyer JR, Wang Z, Townsend JT, Eidels A. The Oxford Handbook of Computational and Mathematical Psychology. Oxford University Press; 2015:300–319.
  • Chan YW, Chow VLY, Wei WI. Quality of life of patients after salvage nasopharyngectomy for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer. 2012;118(15):3710–3718. doi:10.1002/cncr.26719
  • Hammerlid E, Bjordal K, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, et al. A prospective study of quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. Part I: at diagnosis. Laryngoscope. 2001;111(4 Pt 1):669–680. doi:10.1097/00005537-200104000-00021
  • Liao KC, Chuang HC, Chien CY, et al. Quality of life as a mediator between cancer stage and long-term mortality in nasopharyngeal cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Cancers. 2021;13(20):5063. doi:10.3390/cancers13205063