Colonic polyps: inheritance, susceptibility, risk evaluation, and diagnostic management

References

• LongoDLApproach to the patient with cancerFauciASBraunwaldEKasperDLHauserSLLongoDLJamesonJLLoscalzoJHarrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine17th edNew YorkMcGraw-Hill Professional2008
   Google Scholar
• NeriEGiustiPBattollaLColorectal cancer: role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopyRadiology200222361561912034925
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MayerRJGastrointestinal tract cancerFauciASBraunwaldEKasperDLHauserSLLongoDLJamesonJLLoscalzoJHarrison’s Principles of Internal Medicine17th edNew York, NYMcGraw-Hill Professional2008
   Google Scholar
• JemalASiegelRWardEHaoYXuJThunMJCancer statistics, 2009CA Cancer J Clin20095922524919474385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FerlayJBrayFSankilaRParkinDMEUCAN: Cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence in the European Union 1997, version 4.0IARC CancerBase No 4LyonIARCPress1999
   Google Scholar
• MooreHGColorectal cancer: what should patients and families be told to lower the risk of colorectal cancer?Surg Oncol Clin N Am20101969371020883947
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De CamposFGPerezROImperialeARSeidVENahasSCCecconelloIEvaluating causes of death in familial adenomatous polyposisJ Gastrointest Surg2010141943194920676788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HadleyDWJenkinsJFSteinbergSMPerceptions of cancer risks and predictors of colon and endometrial cancer screening in women undergoing genetic testing for Lynch syndromeJ Clin Oncol20082694895418281669
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PandeMAmosCIOsterwischDRGenetic variation in genes for the xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes CYP1A1, EPHX1, GSTM1, GSTT1, and GSTP1 and susceptibility to colorectal cancer in Lynch syndromeCancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev2008172393240118768509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PandeMAmosCIEngCFrazierMLInteractions between cigarette smoking and selected polymorphisms in xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes in risk for colorectal cancer: A case-only analysisMol Carcinog20104997498020886582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GiovannucciEAn updated review of the epidemiological evidence that cigarette smoking increases risk of colorectal cancerCancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev20011072573111440957
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DuWLiWYLuRFangJYFolate and fiber in the prevention of colorectal cancer: between shadows and the lightWorld J Gastroenterol20101692192620180229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MizoueTTanakaKTsujiIResearch Group for the Development and Evaluation of Cancer Prevention Strategies in JapanAlcohol drinking and colorectal cancer risk: an evaluation based on a systematic review of epidemiological evidence among the Japanese populationJpn J Clin Oncol20063658259716870695
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ParkJYDahmCCKeoghRHAlcohol intake and risk of colorectal cancer: results from the UK Dietary Cohort ConsortiumBr J Cancer201010374775620648013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacariMBiniEJCT colonography: where have we been and where are we going?Radiology200523781983316237143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of RadiologyACR Appropriateness Criteria ^® Colorectal Cancer Screening http://www.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories/quality_safety/app_criteria/pdf/ExpertPanelonGastrointestinalImaging/ColorectalScreeningCancer-Doc4.aspxAccessed Nov 15, 2010
   Google Scholar
• LevinBLiebermanDAMcFarlandBScreening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of RadiologyCA Cancer J Clin20085813016018322143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TurnerJRThe gastrointestinal tractKumarVAbbasAKFaustoNAsterJCRobbins and Cotran Pathologic Basis of DiseaseProfessional Edition, 8th edPhiladelphia, PASaundersElsevier2009
   Google Scholar
• StrykerSJWolffBGCulpCELibbeSDIlstrupDMMacCartyRLNatural history of untreated colonic polypsGastroenterology198793100910133653628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HewettDGKahiCJRexDKDoes colonoscopy work?J Natl Compr Canc Netw20108677620064290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SmithRACokkinidesVBrooksDSaslowDBrawleyOWCancer screening in the United States, 2010: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screeningCA Cancer J Clin2010609911920228384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZhuMMXuXTNieFTongJLXiaoSDRanZHComparison of immunochemical and guaiac-based fecal occult blood test in screening and surveillance for advanced colorectal neoplasms: a meta-analysisJ Dig Dis20101114816020579218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SinghHNugentZDemersAABernsteinCNRate and predictors of early/missed colorectal cancers after colonoscopy in Manitoba: a population-based studyAm J Gastroenterol20101052588259620877348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WinawerSJStewartETZauberAGA comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. National Polyp Study Work GroupN Engl J Med20003421766177210852998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RockeyDCPaulsonENiedzwieckiDAnalysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparisonLancet200536530531115664225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VosFMvan GelderRESerlieIWThree-dimensional display modes for CT Colonography: conventional 3D virtual colonoscopy versus unfolded cube projectionRadiology200322887888512954902
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KimSHLeeJMEunHWTwo-versus three-dimensional colon evaluation with recently developed virtual dissection software for CT colonographyRadiology200724485286417709833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TaylorSALaghiALeferePHalliganSStokerJEuropean Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonographyEur Radiol20071757557916967260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FaggioniLNeriECerriFTuriniFBartolozziCIntegrating image processing in PACSEur J Radiol2009 Jul 18 [Epub ahead of print]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HalliganSAltmanDGTaylorSACT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reportingRadiology200523789390416304111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MulhallBPVeerappanGRJacksonJLMeta-analysis: computed tomographic colonographyAnn Intern Med200514263565015838071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PickhardtPJChoiJRHwangIComputed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adultsN Engl J Med20033492191220014657426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacariMBiniEJJacobsSLClinical significance of missed polyps at CT ColonographyAJR Am J Roentgenol200418312713415208126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HirofujiYAoyamaTKoyamaSKawauraCFujiiKEvaluation of patient dose for barium enemas and CT colonography in JapanBr J Radiol20098221922719064598
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KemerinkGJBorstlapACWFrantzenSchultzFWZoeteliefJvan EngelshovenJMPatient and occupational dosimetry in double contrast barium enema examinationsBr J Radiol20017442042811388990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NeriEFaggioniLCerriFCT colonography versus doublecontrast barium enema for screening of colorectal cancer: comparison of radiation burdenAbdom Imaging20103559660119777290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SugiyamaAOhashiYGomiAColorectal screening with single scan CT colonography in childrenPediatr Surg Int20072398799017665204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission of Radiological ProtectionInternational Commission on Radiological Protection publication no. 60SmithHAnnals of the ICRP 21 (no. 1–3OxfordPergamon Press1991
   Google Scholar
• YoshidaHDachmanAHCAD techniques, challenges, and controversies in computed tomographic colonographyAbdom Imaging200530264115647868
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• TaylorSAHalliganSBurlingDComputer-assisted reader software versus expert reviewers for polyp detection on CT colonographyAm J Roentgenol200618669670216498097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HalliganSAltmanDGMallettSComputed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detectionGastroenterology20061311690169917087934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BurlingDHalliganSAtchleyJCT colonography: interpretative performance in a non-academic environmentClin Radiol20076242442917398266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ThomasSAtchleyJHigginsonAAudit of the introduction of CT colonography for detection of colorectal carcinoma in a non-academic environment and its implications for the national bowel cancer screening programmeClin Radiol20096414214719103343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SlaterATaylorSATamEReader error during CT colonography: causes and implications for trainingEur Radiol2006162275228316703308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PickhardtPJLeeADTaylorAJPrimary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screening CT colonographyAJR Am J Roentgenol20071891451145618029884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DachmanAHObuchowskiNAHoffmeisterJWEffect of computer-aided detection for CT colonography in a multireader, multicase trialRadiology201025682783520663975
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BakerMEBogoniLObuchowskiNAComputer-aided detection of colorectal polyps: can it improve sensitivity of less-experienced readers? Preliminary findingsRadiology200724514014917885187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NeriEFaggioniLReggeDCT colonography: role of a second reader CAD paradigm in the initial training of radiologistsEur J Radiol2010 Sep 8 [Epub ahead of print]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar