Minimal important difference and responsiveness of 2-minute walk test performance in people with COPD undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation

References

• SinghSJPuhanMAAndrianopoulosVAn official systematic review of the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society: measurement properties of field walking tests in chronic respiratory diseaseEur Respir J20144461447147825359356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HollandASpruitMTroostersTAn official European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society technical standard: field walking tests in chronic respiratory diseaseEur Respir J20144461428144625359355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SteinerMHolzhauer-BarrieJLoweDPulmonary Rehabilitation: Steps to Breathe Better. National Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Audit Programme: Clinical Audit of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Services in England and Wales 2015National Clinical Audit ReportLondonRoyal College of Physicians2016
   Google Scholar
• OsadnikCRBorgesRCMcDonaldCFCarvalhoCRHollandAETwo 6-minute walk tests are required during hospitalisation for acute exacerbation of COPDCOPD201613328829226643192
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BorgesRCCarvalhoCRPhysical activity in daily life in Brazilian COPD patients during and after exacerbationCOPD20129659660223244169
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BrooksDDavisAMNaglieGThe feasibility of six-minute and two-minute walk tests in in-patient geriatric rehabilitationCan J Aging200726215916217613447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BrooksDParsonsJTranDThe two-minute walk test as a measure of functional capacity in cardiac surgery patientsArch Phys Med Rehabil20048591525153015375829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlfanoLLowesLDvorchikIThe 2-min walk test is sufficient for evaluating walking abilities in sporadic inclusion body myositisNeuromuscul Disord201424322222624342281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PidalaJChaiXMartinPHand grip strength and 2-minute walk test in chronic graft-versus-host disease assessment: analysis from the chronic GVHD consortiumBiol Blood Marrow Transplant201319696797223542686
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EiserNWillsherDDoreCJReliability, repeatability and sensitivity to change of externally and self-paced walking tests in COPD patientsRespir Med200397440741412693802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeungASChanKKSykesKChanKSReliability, validity, and responsiveness of a 2-min walk test to assess exercise capacity of COPD patientsChest2006130111912516840391
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GloecklRTeschlerSJaroschIChristleJWHitzlWKennKComparison of two- and six-minute walk tests in detecting oxygen desaturation in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease – a randomized crossover trialChron Respir Dis2016133256263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung DiseaseGlobal Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease2017 Available from: www.goldcopd.orgAccessed 19 May 2017
   Google Scholar
• WilliamsJESinghSSewellLGuyattGMorganMDevelopment of a self-reported chronic respiratory questionnaire (CRQ-SR)Thorax2001561295495911713359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JaeschkeRSingerJGuyattGMeasurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important differenceControl Clin Trials19891044074152691207
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• HollandAHillCRasekabaTLeeANaughtonMMcDonaldCUpdating the minimal important difference for six-minute walk distance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseArch Phys Med Rehabil201091222122520159125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CaugheyGRougheadEEVitryAIMcDermottRAShakibSGilbertALComorbidity in the elderly with diabetes: identification of areas of potential treatment conflictsDiabetes Res Clin Pract201087338539319923032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organisation Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics MethodologyATC/DDD Index 2017Oslo2017 Available from: https://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/Accessed 19 May 2017
   Google Scholar
• CohenJA power primerPsychol Bull1992112115515919565683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JonesPEstimation and application of the minimum clinically important difference in COPDLancet Respir Med20142316716924621674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RevickiDHaysRCellaDSloanJRecommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomesJ Clin Epidemiol200861210210918177782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchünemannHJPuhanMGoldsteinRJaeschkeRGuyattGMeasurement properties and interpretability of the chronic respiratory disease questionnaire (CRQ)COPD200521818917136967
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BeatonDBoersMWellsGMany faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future researchCurr Opin Rheumatol200214210911411845014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PinTPsychometric properties of 2-minute walk test: a systematic reviewArch Phys Med Rehabil20149591759177524814460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YukselEKalkanSCekmeceSUnverBKaratosunVAssessing minimal detectable changes and test-retest reliability of the timed up and go test and the 2-minute walk test in patients with total knee arthroplastyJ Arthroplasty201732242643027639305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HiengkaewVJitareeKChaiyawatPMinimal detectable changes of the Berg Balance Scale, Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale, timed “up & go” test, gait speeds, and 2-minute walk test in individuals with chronic stroke with different degrees of ankle plantarflexor toneArch Phys Med Rehabil20129371201120822502805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolwijk-SwusteJMBeelenALankhorstGJNolletFCARPA Study GroupSF36 physical functioning scale and 2-minute walk test advocated as core qualifiers to evaluate physical functioning in patients with late-onset sequelae of poliomyelitisJ Rehabil Med200840538739418461265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HollandAENiciLThe return of the minimum clinically important difference for 6-minute-walk distance in chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseAm J Respir Crit Care Med2013187433534123418323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BohannonRWCrouchRMinimal clinically important difference for change in 6-minute walk test distance of adults with pathology: a systematic reviewJ Eval Clin Pract201723237738127592691
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PuhanMAMadorMJHeldUGoldsteinRGuyattGHSchunemannHJInterpretation of treatment changes in 6-minute walk distance in patients with COPDEur Respir J200832363764318550610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KamperSJMaherCGMackayGGlobal rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for designJ Man Manip Ther200917316317020046623
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SchwartzCEPowellVERapkinBDWhen global rating of change contradicts observed change: examining appraisal processes underlying paradoxical responses over timeQual Life Res201726484785727722830
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchmittJDi FabioRPThe validity of prospective and retrospective global change criterion measuresArch Phys Med Rehabil200586122270227616344022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GuyattGHNormanGRJuniperEFGriffithLEA critical look at transition ratingsJ Clin Epidemiol200255990090812393078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KamperSOsteloRKnolDMaherCde VetHHancockMGlobal perceived effect scales provided reliable assessments of health transition in people with musculoskeletal disorders, but ratings are strongly influenced by current statusJ Clin Epidemiol201063776076620056385
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RiesALMinimally clinically important difference for the UCSD Shortness of Breath Questionnaire, Borg Scale and Visual Analogue ScaleCOPD20052110511017136970
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CecinsNLandersHJenkinsSCommunity-based pulmonary rehabilitation in a non-healthcare facility is feasible and effectiveChron Respir Dis201714131027315829
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar