Quantitative CT Analysis in Patients with Pulmonary Emphysema: Do Calculated Differences Between Full Inspiration and Expiration Correlate with Lung Function?

References

• SinghD, AgustiA, AnzuetoA, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease: the GOLD science committee report 2019. Eur Respir J. 2019;53(5). doi:10.1183/13993003.00164-2019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChoHB, ChaeKJ, JinGY, et al. Structural and functional features on quantitative chest computed tomography in the Korean Asian versus the White American healthy non-smokers. Korean J Radiol. 2019;20(7):1236–1245. doi:10.3348/kjr.2019.008331270987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZaporozhanJ, LeyS, EberhardtR, et al. Paired inspiratory/expiratory volumetric thin-slice CT scan for emphysema analysis: comparison of different quantitative evaluations and pulmonary function test. Chest. 2005;128(5):3212–3220. doi:10.1378/chest.128.5.321216304264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BelzerRB, LewisRJ. The practical significance of measurement error in pulmonary function testing conducted in research settings. Risk Anal. 2019;39(10):2316–2328. doi:10.1111/risa.1331531158315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NishioM, MatsumotoS, TsubakimotoM, et al. Paired inspiratory/expiratory volumetric CT and deformable image registration for quantitative and qualitative evaluation of airflow limitation in smokers with or without COPD. Acad Radiol. 2015;22(3):330–336. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2014.09.01125488694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MadaniA, De MaertelaerV, ZanenJ, GevenoisPA. Pulmonary emphysema: radiation dose and section thickness at multidetector CT quantification - Comparison with macroscopic and microscopic morphometry. Radiology. 2007;243(1):250–257. doi:10.1148/radiol.243106019417392257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeeYK, OhY-M, LeeJ-H, et al. Quantitative assessment of emphysema, air trapping, and airway thickening on computed tomography. Lung. 2008;186(3):157–165. doi:10.1007/s00408-008-9071-018351420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HeusselCP, HerthFJ, KappesJ, et al. Fully automatic quantitative assessment of emphysema in computed tomography: comparison with pulmonary function testing and normal values. Eur Radiol. 2009;19(10):2391–2402. doi:10.1007/s00330-009-1437-z19458953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KoyamaH, OhnoY, NishioM, et al. Three-dimensional airway lumen volumetry: comparison with bronchial wall area and parenchymal densitometry in assessment of airway obstruction in pulmonary emphysema. Br J Radiol. 2012;85(1020):1525–1532. doi:10.1259/bjr/2260241722932062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchroederJD, McKenzieAS, ZachJA, et al. Relationships between airflow obstruction and quantitative CT measurements of emphysema, air trapping, and airways in subjects with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;201(3):W460–W470. doi:10.2214/AJR.12.1010223971478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DirksenA. Monitoring the progress of emphysema by repeat computed tomography scans with focus on noise reduction. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2008;5(9):925–928. doi:10.1513/pats.200804-033QC19056718
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• AshrafH, LoP, ShakerSB, et al. Short-term effect of changes in smoking behaviour on emphysema quantification by CT. Thorax. 2011;66(1):55–60. doi:10.1136/thx.2009.13268820978026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KuhnigkJ-M, DickenV, ZidowitzS, et al. Informatics in radiology (infoRAD): new tools for computer assistance in thoracic CT. Part 1. Functional analysis of lungs, lung lobes, and bronchopulmonary segments. Radiographics. 2005;25(2):525–536. doi:10.1148/rg.25204507015798068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LynchDA. Progress in imaging COPD, 2004–2014. Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2014;1(1):73–82. doi:10.15326/jcopdf.1.1.2014.012528848813
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• WangZM, GuSC, LeaderJK, et al. Optimal threshold in CT quantification of emphysema. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(4):975–984. doi:10.1007/s00330-012-2683-z23111815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LynchDA, AustinJHM, HoggJC, et al. CT-definable subtypes of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a statement of the fleischner society. Radiology. 2015;277(1):192–205. doi:10.1148/radiol.201514157925961632
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WangerJ, ClausenJL, CoatesA, et al. Standardisation of the measurement of lung volumes. Eur Respir J. 2005;26(3):511–522. doi:10.1183/09031936.05.0003500516135736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MillerMR, CrapoR, HankinsonJ, et al. General considerations for lung function testing. Eur Respir J. 2005;26(1):153–161. doi:10.1183/09031936.05.0003450515994402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HochheggerB, AlvesGRT, IrionKL, MoreiraJD, MarchioriED. Emphysema index in a cohort of patients with no recognizable lung disease: influence of age. J Bras Pneumol. 2012;38(4):494–502. doi:10.1590/S1806-3713201200040001222964934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MetsOM, van HulstRA, JacobsC, van GinnekenB, de JongPA. Normal range of emphysema and air trapping on CT in young men. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199(2):336–340. doi:10.2214/AJR.11.780822826394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HetzelJ, BoeckelerM, HorgerM, et al. A new functional method to choose the target lobe for lung volume reduction in emphysema - comparison with the conventional densitometric method. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017;12:2621–2628. doi:10.2147/COPD.S13930428919730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KauczorHU, HeusselCP, FischerB, KlammR, MildenbergerP, ThelenM. Assessment of lung volumes using helical CT at inspiration and expiration: comparison with pulmonary function tests. Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171(4):1091–1095. doi:10.2214/ajr.171.4.97630039763003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HershCP, JacobsonFL, GillR, SilvermanEK. Computed tomography phenotypes in severe, early-onset chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. COPD. 2007;4(4):331–337. doi:10.1080/1541255070160127418027160
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• CavigliE, CamiciottoliG, DiciottiS, et al. Whole-lung densitometry versus visual assessment of emphysema. Eur Radiol. 2009;19(7):1686–1692. doi:10.1007/s00330-009-1320-y19224221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GelbAF, ScheinM, KueiJ, et al. Limited contribution of emphysema in advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993;147(5):1157–1161. doi:10.1164/ajrccm/147.5.11578484625
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AkiraM, ToyokawaK, InoueY, AraiT. Quantitative CT in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: inspiratory and expiratory assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;192(1):267–272. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.395319098209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ScirihaA, Lungaro-MifsudS, ScerriJ, MagroR, CamilleriL, MontefortS. Health status of COPD patients undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation: a comparative responsiveness of the CAT and SGRQ. Chron Respir Dis. 2017;14(4):352–359. doi:10.1177/147997231769462229081264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JonesPW, HardingG, BerryP, WiklundI, ChenWH, Kline LeidyN. Development and first validation of the COPD assessment test. Eur Respir J. 2009;34(3):648–654. doi:10.1183/09031936.0010250919720809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FinchS, LaskaIF, Abo-LeyahH, FardonTC, ChalmersJD. Validation of the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) as an outcome measure in bronchiectasis. Chest. 2019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CastilloE, VinogradskiyY, CastilloR. Robust HU-based CT ventilation from an integrated mass conservation formulation. Med Phys. 2019;46(11):5036–5046. doi:10.1002/mp.1381731514235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar