The Intention of Inhaled Medication Adherence Scale (IMAS): The Development of a New Instrument for Assessing Inhaled Medication Adherence Among Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Using Theory of Planned Behavior

References

• Agustí A, Vogelmeier C, Faner R. COPD 2020: changes and challenges. Am J Physiol. 2020;319(5):L879–L883. doi:10.1152/ajplung.00429.2020
   Google Scholar
• Blanco I, Diego I, Bueno P, et al. Geographical distribution of COPD prevalence in the Americas. COPD. 2018;15(4):317–325. doi:10.1080/15412555.2018.1481936
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin W-C, Huang T-Y, Liu C-Y, Yeh M-L, C-H Y, Hwang S-L. Validation of the clinical COPD questionnaire in Taiwan. COPD. 2016;13(3):360–366. doi:10.3109/15412555.2015.1094456
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wold Health Organization. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/chronic-obstructive-pulmonary-disease-(copd). Accessed July 25, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Alqahtani JS, Oyelade T, Aldhahir AM, et al. Prevalence, severity and mortality associated with COPD and smoking in patients with COVID-19: a rapid systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2020;15(5):e0233147. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng S-L, Lin C-H, Chu K-A, et al. Update on guidelines for the treatment of COPD in Taiwan using evidence and GRADE system-based recommendations. J Formosan Med Assoc. 2021;120(10):1821–1844. doi:10.1016/j.jfma.2021.06.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich R, Logue M. Feasibility of using the test for adherence to inhalers tool and tailoring education to the individual with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Nurse Practit. 2017;13(10):e481–e483. doi:10.1016/j.nurpra.2017.07.025
   Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Zhong N-S, Li X, et al. Tiotropium in early-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(10):923–935. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1700228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humenberger M, Horner A, Labek A, et al. Adherence to inhaled therapy and its impact on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). BMC Pulm Med. 2018;18(1):1–6. doi:10.1186/s12890-018-0724-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin C-Y, Scheerman JF, Yaseri M, Pakpour AH, Webb TL. A cluster randomised controlled trial of an intervention based on the health action process approach for increasing fruit and vegetable consumption in Iranian adolescents. Psychol Health. 2017;32(12):1449–1468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin C-Y, Strong C, Scott AJ, Broström A, Pakpour AH, Webb TL. A cluster randomized controlled trial of a theory-based sleep hygiene intervention for adolescents. Sleep. 2018;41(11):zsy170. doi:10.1093/sleep/zsy061.448
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy G, Medin DL. The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychol Rev. 1985;92(3):289–316. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.92.3.289
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh KH. Verification of a theory of planned behavior model of medication adherence in Korean adults: focused on moderating effects of optimistic or present bias. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1–12. doi:10.1186/s12889-021-11460-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q-H H, Zheng J, Liu J-L, Wang J, You L-M. Predictors of medication adherence of patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention: a structural equation modeling based on the extended theory of planned behavior. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2022;37(4):350–358. doi:10.1097/JCN.0000000000000755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopelowicz A, Zarate R, Wallace CJ, Liberman RP, Lopez SR, Mintz J. Using the theory of planned behavior to improve treatment adherence in Mexican Americans with schizophrenia. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015;83(5):985. doi:10.1037/a0039346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin C-Y, Updegraff JA, Pakpour AH. The relationship between the theory of planned behavior and medication adherence in patients with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behavi. 2016;61:231–236. doi:10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.05.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich A, Brandes K, Mullan B, Hagger MS. Theory of planned behavior and adherence in chronic illness: a meta-analysis. J Behav Med. 2015;38:673–688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şanlıtürk D, Ayaz-Alkaya S. The effect of a theory of planned behavior education program on asthma control and medication adherence: a randomized controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021;9(9):3371–3379. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2021.03.060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godin G, Kok G. The theory of planned behavior: a review of its applications to health-related behaviors. Am J Health Promot. 1996;11(2):87–98. doi:10.4278/0890-1171-11.2.87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Contemp Sociol. 1977;5:6–244.
   Google Scholar
• Madden TJ, Ellen PS, Ajzen I. A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1992;18(1):3–9. doi:10.1177/0146167292181001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. Constructing a theory of planned behavior questionnaire: conceptual and methodological considerations. Amherst, MA; 2006: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(5):489–497. doi:10.1002/nur.20147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh HW, Balla JR, McDonald RP. Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: the effect of sample size. Psychol Bull. 1988;103(3):391. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990;107(2):238. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT, MacCallum RC, Strahan EJ. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychol Methods. 1999;4(3):272. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson Education Limited; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes: cronbach’s Alpha. Br Med J. 1997;314(7080):572. doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7080.572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Market Res. 1981;18(1):39–50. doi:10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ab Hamid M, Sami W, Sidek MM. Discriminant Validity Assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker Criterion versus HTMT Criterion. IOP Publishing; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Rosseel Y. lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw. 2012;48(2):1–36. doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revelle W, Revelle MW. Package ‘psych’. Comprehens R Arch Net. 2015;337:338.
   Google Scholar
• Schriesheim CA, Eisenbach RJ. An exploratory and confirmatory factor-analytic investigation of item wording effects on the obtained factor structures of survey questionnaire measures. J Manage. 1995;21(6):1177–1193. doi:10.1177/014920639502100609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon WR, Kumar A, Mulani N. Offending estimates in covariance structure analysis: comments on the causes of and solutions to Heywood cases. Psychol Bull. 1987;101(1):126. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm P. Social desirability bias. In: Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing. John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2010. doi10.1002/9781444316568.wiem02057
   Google Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. Oxford University Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Naumann A, Hochweber J, Klieme E. A psychometric framework for the evaluation of instructional sensitivity. Educ Asses. 2016;21(2):89–101. doi:10.1080/10627197.2016.1167591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reise SP, Waller NG. Item response theory and clinical measurement. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2009;5(1):27–48. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153553
   PubMedGoogle Scholar