103
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

The combination of high bacterial count and positive biofilm formation is associated with the inflammation of pressure ulcers

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 1-7 | Published online: 05 Feb 2019

References

  • Khor HM, Tan J, Saedon NI, et al. Determinants of mortality among older adults with pressure ulcers. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2014;59(3):536–541.
  • Braga IA, Pirett CC, Ribas RM, Gontijo Filho PP, Diogo Filho A. Bacterial colonization of pressure ulcers: assessment of risk for bloodstream infection and impact on patient outcomes. J Hosp Infect. 2013;83(4):314–320.
  • National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel and Pan Pacific Pressure Injury Alliance. Prevention and Treatment of Pressure Ulcers: Clinical Practice Guideline. 2nd ed. Haesler E, editor. Perth, WA: Cambridge Media; 2014.
  • Wolcott RD, Hanson JD, Rees EJ, et al. Analysis of the chronic wound microbiota of 2,963 patients by 16S rDNA pyrosequencing. Wound Repair Regen. 2016;24(1):163–174.
  • Gardner SE, Hillis SL, Heilmann K, Segre JA, Grice EA. The neuropathic diabetic foot ulcer microbiome is associated with clinical factors. Diabetes. 2013;62(3):923–930.
  • Malone M, Johani K, Jensen SO, et al. Next generation DNA sequencing of tissues from infected diabetic foot ulcers. EBioMedicine. 2017;21:142–149.
  • Hamada R, Suehiro J, Nakano M, Kikutani T, Konishi K. Development of rapid oral bacteria detection apparatus based on dielectrophoretic impedance measurement method. IET Nanobiotechnol. 2011;5(2):25–31.
  • Nakagami G, Yoshida S, Matsumoto M, et al. A new objective evaluation method for PU cleansing using a rapid bacteria counting system. J Wound Care. 2013;22(5):278–281.
  • Nakagami G, Mori M, Yoshida M, et al. Inter-rater and intra-rater reliability outcomes of a rapid bacteria counting system with pressure ulcer samples. J Wound Care. 2017;26(Supp 2):S27–S31.
  • Wolcott RD, Rhoads DD. A study of biofilm-based wound management in subjects with critical limb ischaemia. J Wound Care. 2008;17(4):145–155.
  • Nakagami G, Schultz G, Gibson DJ, et al. Biofilm detection by wound blotting can predict slough development in pressure ulcers: a prospective observational study. Wound Repair Regen. 2017;25(1):131–138.
  • Nakagami G, Sanada H, Iizaka S, et al. Predicting delayed pressure ulcer healing using thermography: a prospective cohort study. J Wound Care. 2010;19(11):465–470.
  • Matsui Y, Furue M, Sanada H, et al. Development of the DESIGN-R with an observational study: an absolute evaluation tool for monitoring pressure ulcer wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2011;19(3):309–315.
  • Sanada H, Moriguchi T, Miyachi Y, et al. Reliability and validity of DESIGN, a tool that classifies pressure ulcer severity and monitors healing. J Wound Care. 2004;13(1):13–18.
  • Konya C, Sanada H, Sugama J, et al. Skin debris and micro-organisms on the periwound skin of pressure ulcers and the influence of periwound cleansing on microbial flora. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2005;51(1):50–59.
  • Konya C, Sanada H, Sugama J, Okuwa M, Kitagawa A. Does the use of a cleanser on skin surrounding pressure ulcers in older people promote healing? J Wound Care. 2005;14(4):169–171.
  • Omar A, Wright J, Schultz G, Burrell R, Nadworny P. Microbial biofilms and chronic wounds. Microorganisms. 2017;5(1):9.
  • Loesche M, Gardner SE, Kalan L, et al. Temporal stability in chronic wound microbiota is associated with poor healing. J Invest Dermatol. 2017;137(1):237–244.