Methane emissions and climatic warming risk from hydraulic fracturing and shale gas development: implications for policy

References

• Energy Information Agency. Annual Energy Outlook 2015. Washington, DC: United States Department of Energy, Energy Information Agency; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• British Petroleum. BP Energy Outlook 2035. London: British Petroleum; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• ExxonMobil. The Outlook for Energy: A View to 2040. Irving, TX: ExxonMobil; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes D. Energy: a reality check on the shale gas revolution. Nature. 2013;494:307–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes D. Drilling Deeper: A Reality Check for US Government Forecasts for a Lasting Tight Oil and Shale Gas Boom. Santa Rosa, CA: Post Carbon Institute; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth RW, Ingraffea A. Should fracking stop? Yes, it is too high risk. Nature. 2011;477:271–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colburn T, Kwiatkowski C, Schultz K, Bachran M. Natural gas operations from a public health perspective. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 2011;17:1039–1056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US EPA. Assessment of the Potential Impacts of Hydraulic Fracturing for Oil and Gas on Drinking Water Resources (External Review Draft), EPA/600/R-15/047. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Vinciguerra T, Yao S, Joseph Dadzie J, et al. Regional air quality impacts of hydraulic fracturing and shale natural gas activity: evidence from ambient VOC observations. Atmos Environ. 2015;110:144–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pétron G. Air pollution issues associated with shale gas production. Bridge. 2014;44(2):19–27.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth RW, Santoro R, Ingraffea A. Methane and the greenhouse gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations. Clim Change Lett. 2011;106:679–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howarth RW. A bridge to nowhere: methane emissions and the greenhouse gas footprint of natural gas. Energy Sci Eng. 2014;2:47–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weingarten M, Ge S, Godt JW, Bekins BA, Rubinstein JL. High-rate injection is associated with the increase in US mid-continent seismicity. Science. 2015;348:1336–1340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamberger M, Oswald R. The Real Cost of Fracking: How America’s Shale Gas Boom Is Threatening Our Families, Pets, and Food. Boston, MA: Beacon Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Macy PG, Breech R, Chernaik M, et al. Air concentrations of volatile compounds near oil and gas production: a community-based exploratory study. Environ Health. 2014;13:82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie LM, Guo R, Witter RZ, Savitz DA, Newman LS, Adgate JL. Birth outcomes and maternal residential proximity to natural gas development in rural Colorado. Environ Health Perspect. 2014;122:412–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adgate JL, Goldstein BD, McKenzie LM. Potential public health hazards, exposures and health effects from unconventional natural gas development. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48:8307–8320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jemielita T, Gerton GL, Neidell M, et al. Unconventional gas and oil drilling is associated with increased hospital utilization rates. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0131093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EnergyFromShale.org. What is Fracking? 2015. Available from: http://www.energyfromshale.org/articles/what-fracking?gclid=CLK_tYT5tMYCFcYkgQodC-gM6Q. Accessed June 29, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Caulton DR, Shepson PB, Santoro RL, et al. Toward a better understanding and quantification of methane emissions from shale gas development. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:6237–6242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geman B. Obama, in Speech, Defends “All of the Above Energy Plan”. National Journal; 2014. Available from: http://www.nationaljournal.com/state-of-the-union-2014/obama-in-speech-defends-all-of-the-above-energy-plan-20140128. Accessed June 29, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hayhoe K, Kheshgi HS, Jain AK, Wuebbles DJ. Substitution of natural gas for coal: climatic effects of utility sector emissions. Clim Change. 2002;54:107–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Shires T, Lev-On M. Characterizing Pivotal Sources of Methane Emissions from Unconventional Natural Gas Production: Summary and Analysis of API and ANGA Survey Responses. Washington, DC: American Petroleum Institute; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Karion A, Sweeney C, Pétron G, et al. Methane emissions estimate from airborne measurements over a western United States natural gas field. Geophys Res Lett. 2013;40:4393–4397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Inspector General. EPA Needs to Improve Air Emissions Data for the Oil and Natural Gas Production Sector. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Miller SM, Wofsy SC, Michalak AM, et al. Anthropogenic emissions of methane in the United States. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:20018–20022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pétron G, Frost G, Miller BT, et al. Hydrocarbon emissions characterization in the Colorado front range – a pilot study. J Geophys Res. 2012;117:D04304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen DT, VTorres VM, Thomas K, et al. Measurements of methane emissions at natural gas production sites in the United States. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:17768–17773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt AF, Heath GA, Kort EA, et al. Methane leaks from North American natural gas systems. Science. 2014;343:733–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etiope GK, Lassey R, Klusman RW, Boschi E. Reappraisal of the fossil methane budget and related emission from geologic sources. Geophys Res Lett. 2008;35(9):L09307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassey R, Lowe D, Smith A. The atmospheric cycling of radiomethane and the ‘fossil fraction’ of the methane source. Atmos Chem Phys. 2007;7:2141–2149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschke S, Bousquet P, Ciais P, et al. Three decades of global methane sources and sinks. Nat Geosci. 2013;6:813–823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Energy Information Agency. International Energy Statististics. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (AR4), Working Group 1, The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Schneising O, Burrows JP, Dickerson RR, Buchwitz M, Reuters M, Bovensmann H. Remote sensing of fugitive emissions from oil and gas production in North American tight geological formations. Earths Future. 2014;2:548–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Energy Information Agency. Drilling Productivity Report for Key Tight Oil and Shale Gas Regions, August 2015. Washington, DC: US Department of Energy; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Howard T, Ferrarab TW, Townsend-Small A. Sensor transition failure in the high flow sampler: implications for methane emission inventories of natural gas infrastructure. J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2015;65:856–862.
   Google Scholar
• Howard T. University of Texas study underestimates national methane emissions inventory at natural gas production sites due to instrument sensor failure. Energy Sci Eng. 2015; DOI:10.1002/ese3.81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peischl J, Ryerson TB, Aikin KC, et al. Quantifying atmospheric methane emissions from the Haynesville, Fayetteville, and Northeastern Marcellus shale gas production regions. J Geophys Res Atmos. 2015;120:2119–2139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pétron G, Karion A, Sweeney C, et al. A new look at methane and nonmethane hydrocarbon emissions from oil and natural gas operations in the Colorado Denver-Julesburg Basin. J Geophys Res Atmos. 2014;119:6836–6852.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter W. This Chart Shows the True Collapse of Fracking in the US. Business Insider; 2015. Available from: http://www.businessinsider.com/this-chart-shows-the-true-collapse-of-fracking-in-the-us-2015-3. Accessed June 29, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Lelieveld J, Lechtenböhmer S, Assonov SS, et al. Greenhouse gases: low methane leakage from gas pipelines. Nature. 2005;434:841–842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cathles LM, Brown L, Taam M, Hunter A. A commentary on “The greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas in shale formations” by RW Howarth, R Santoro, and Anthony Ingraffea. Clim Change. 2012;113:525–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson T, Valle JE, Riera-Palou X. Modeling the relative GHG emissions of conventional and shale gas production. Environ Sci Technol. 2011;45:10757–10764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Environment Programme and World Meteorological Organization. Integrated Assessment of Black Carbon and Tropospheric Ozone: Summary for Decision Makers. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Shindell D, Kuylenstierna JC, Vignati E, et al. Simultaneously mitigating near-term climate change and improving human health and food security. Science. 2012;335:183–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen J, Sato M. Greenhouse gas growth rates. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:16109–16114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen J, Sato M, Kharecha P, Russell G, Lea DW, Siddall M. Climate change and trace gases.. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2007;365:1925–1954.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey JM. Surprise Side Effect of Shale Gas Boom: A Plunge in US Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Forbes; 2012. Available from: http://www.forbes.com/sites/energysource/2012/12/07/surprise-side-effect-of-shale-gas-boom-a-plunge-in-u-s-greenhouse-gas-emissions/. Accessed June 29, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Feng K, Davis SJ, Sun L, Hubacek K. Drivers of the US CO2 emissions 1997–2013. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7714.
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC Second Assessment, Climate Change; 1995. Nairobi: World Meteorological Organization and United Nations Environment Programme; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Protection Agency. Oil and natural gas sector: reconsideration of additional provisions of new source performance standards; final rule. 40 CFR part 60. Fed Regist. 2014;79(250):79018–79041.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson MZ, Howarth RW, Delucchi MA, et al. Examining the feasibility of converting New York State’s all-purpose energy infrastructure to one using wind, water, and sunlight. Energy Policy. 2013;57:585–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson MZ, Delucch MA, Ingraffea AR, et al. A roadmap for repowering California for all purposes with wind, water, and sunlight. Energy. 2014;73:875–889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The New York Times Editorial Board. The case for a carbon tax. The New York Times; 2015. Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/07/opinion/the-case-for-a-carbon-tax.html?_r=0. Accessed June 29, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• International Monetary Fund. How Large Are Global Energy Subsidies? IMF Working Paper Number 15/105. Washington, DC: The International Monetary Fund; 2015.
   Google Scholar