First Report of bla_OXA-677 with Enhanced Meropenem-Hydrolyzing Ability in Pseudomonas aeruginosa in China

References

• Moradali MF, Ghods S, Rehm BH. Pseudomonas aeruginosa lifestyle: a paradigm for adaptation, survival, and persistence. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017;7:39. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2017.0003928261568
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez A, Gato E, Perez-Llarena J, et al. High incidence of MDR and XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates obtained from patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia in Greece, Italy and Spain as part of the MagicBullet clinical trial. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019;74(5):1244–1252. doi:10.1093/jac/dkz03030753505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin D, Wu S, Yang Y, et al. Results from the China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network (CHINET) in 2017 of the in vitro activities of ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam against clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63(4):e02431–18. doi:10.1128/AAC.02431-1830617091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tacconelli E, Carrara E, Savoldi A, et al. Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018;18(3):318–327. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30753-329276051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu F, Guo Y, Zhu D, et al. CHINET surveillance of bacterial resistance: results of 2020. Chin J Infect Chemother. 2021;21(04):377–387.
   Google Scholar
• Shen J, Pan Y, Fang Y. Role of the outer membrane protein OprD2 in carbapenem-resistance mechanisms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. PLoS One. 2015;10(10):e0139995. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.013999526440806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livermore DM. Multiple mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: our worst nightmare? Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34(5):634–640. doi:10.1086/33878211823954
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Causapé C, Cabot G, Del Barrio-Tofiño E, Oliver A. The versatile mutational resistome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:685. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.0068529681898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antunes NT, Lamoureaux TL, Toth M, et al. Class D β-lactamases: are they all carbapenemases? Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(4):2119–2125. doi:10.1128/AAC.02522-1324468778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arca-Suárez J, Lasarte-Monterrubio C, Rodiño-Janeiro B, et al. Molecular mechanisms driving the in vivo development of OXA-10-mediated resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam during treatment of XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021;76(1):91–100. doi:10.1093/jac/dkaa39633083833
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Luca F, Benvenuti M, Carboni F, et al. Evolution to carbapenem-hydrolyzing activity in noncarbapenemase class D β-lactamase OXA-10 by rational protein design. Proc Natl Acad Sci Am. 2011;108(45):18424–18429. doi:10.1073/pnas.1110530108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu B, Tong M, Zhao W, et al. Prevalence and characterization of class I integrons among pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from patients in Nanjing, China. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(1):241–243. doi:10.1128/JCM.01318-0617122024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farajnia S, Ansarin K, Mohsenchian A. Prevalence of OXA-2 and OXA-10 type ESBL and class I integron among Acinetobacter baumannii strains isolated from patients in Tabriz–North West Iran. Int J Infect Dis. 2012;16:e414. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2012.05.56722497962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon EJ, Jeong SH. Class D beta-lactamases. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021;76(4):836–864. doi:10.1093/jac/dkaa51333382875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotsakis SD, Flach C, Razavi M, Larsson DGJ. Characterization of the first OXA-10 natural variant with increased carbapenemase activity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63(1). doi:10.1128/AAC.01817-18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 11.0; 2021. Available from: http://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints/. Accessed December 13, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Del Barrio-Tofino E, Lopez-Causape C, Oliver A, et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa epidemic high-risk clones and their association with horizontally-acquired β-lactamases: 2020 update. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;56(6):106196. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.10619633045347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porto A, Ayala J, Gutkind G, Di Conza J. A novel OXA-10–like β-lactamase is present in different Enterobacteriaceae. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010;66(2):228–229. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2009.09.01019833470
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu M, Ma J, Jia W, Li W. Antimicrobial resistance and molecular characterization of gene cassettes from class 1 Integrons inPseudomonas aeruginosa strains. Microb Drug Resist. 2020;26(6):670–676. doi:10.1089/mdr.2019.040632407190
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juan C, Zamorano L, Pérez JL, Ge Y, Oliver A. Activity of a new antipseudomonal cephalosporin, CXA-101 (FR264205), against carbapenem-resistant and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(2):846–851. doi:10.1128/AAC.00834-0919933793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qing Y, Cao K, Fang Z, et al. Outbreak of PER-1 and diversity of β-lactamases among ceftazidime-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical isolates. J Med Microbiol. 2014;63(3):386–392. doi:10.1099/jmm.0.069427-024398232
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu T, Yang H, Li J, et al. Novel chromosome-borne accessory genetic elements carrying multiple antibiotic resistance genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:638087. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2021.63808733816340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livermore DM. Of Pseudomonas, porins, pumps and carbapenems. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001;47(3):247–250. doi:10.1093/jac/47.3.24711222556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vercheval L, Bauvois C, Di Paolo A, et al. Three factors that modulate the activity of class D β-lactamases and interfere with the post-translational carboxylation of Lys70. Biochem J. 2010;432(3):495–506. doi:10.1042/BJ2010112221108605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maveyraud L, Golemi D, Kotra LP, et al. Insights into class D beta-lactamases are revealed by the crystal structure of the OXA-10 enzyme from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Structure. 2000;8(12):1289–1298. doi:10.1016/S0969-2126(00)00534-711188693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiros HKS, Thomassen AM, Samuelsen Ø, et al. Structural insights into the enhanced carbapenemase efficiency of OXA‐655 compared to OXA‐10. Febs Open Bio. 2020;10(9):1821–1832. doi:10.1002/2211-5463.12935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortiz De La Rosa J, Nordmann P, Poirel L. ESBLs and resistance to ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftolozane/tazobactam combinations in Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2019;74(7):1934–1939. doi:10.1093/jac/dkz14931225611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar