A Comprehensive Review of Microbial Biofilms on Contact Lenses: Challenges and Solutions

References

• Bispo P, Haas W, Gilmore M. Biofilms in infections of the eye. Pathogens. 2015;4(1):111–136. doi:10.3390/pathogens4010111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoiby N, Bjarnsholt T, Moser C, et al. ESCMID guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of biofilm infections 2014. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21(Suppl 1):S1–25. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2014.10.024
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Campolo A, Pifer R, Shannon P, Crary M. Microbial adherence to contact lenses and pseudomonas aeruginosa as a model organism for microbial keratitis. Pathogens. 2022;11(11):1383. doi:10.3390/pathogens11111383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donlan RM. Biofilms and device-associated infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7(2):277–281. doi:10.3201/eid0702.010226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESCMID Study Group for Biofilms – ESGB. Available from: http://www.escmid.org/research_projects/study_groups/biofilms/presentations_publications/. Accesed October 15, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Teweldemedhin M, Gebreyesus H, Atsbaha AH, Asgedom SW, Saravanan M. Bacterial profile of ocular infections: a systematic review. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017;17(1). doi:10.1186/s12886-017-0612-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borroni D, Paytuví-Gallart A, Sanseverino W, et al. Exploring the healthy eye microbiota niche in a multicenter study. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(18):10229. doi:10.3390/ijms231810229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha-de-Lossada C, Mazzotta C, Gabrielli F, et al. Ocular surface microbiota in naïve keratoconus: a multicenter validation study. J Clin Med. 2023;12(19):6354. doi:10.3390/jcm12196354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borroni D, Rocha de Lossada C, Mazzotta C, Sánchez-González JM, Papa F, Gabrielli F. Ocular microbiome evaluation in dry eye disease and meibomian gland dysfunction: values of variables. Exp Eye Res. 2023;236:109656. doi:10.1016/j.exer.2023.109656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballesteros-Sánchez A, Sánchez-González JM, Borrone MA, Borroni D, Rocha-de-lossada C. The influence of lid-parallel conjunctival folds and conjunctivochalasis on dry eye symptoms with and without contact lens wear: a review of the literature. Ophthalmol Ther. 2024;13(3):651–670. doi:10.1007/s40123-023-00877-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriyana AS, Hofling-Lima AL. Contact lens-associated microbial keratitis. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2008;71(6 Supl):32–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayak N, Satpathy G, Vajpayee RB, Mrudula S. Phenotypic and plasmid pattern analysis of Staphylococcus epidermidis in bacterial keratitis. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2007;55(1):9–13. PMID: 17189880. doi:10.4103/0301-4738.29488
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borlace L, Stapleton F, Matheson M, Dart JK. Bacterial biofilm on contact lenses and lens storage cases in wearers with microbial keratitis. J Appl Microbiol. 1998;84(5):827–838. PMID: 9674137. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.1998.00418.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flemming HC, Wingender J, Szewzyk U, Steinberg P, Rice SA, Kjelleberg S. Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14(9):563–575. doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2016.94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder MJ, Tapleton FS, Evans E, Dart JKG. Biofilm-related infections in ophthalmology. Eye. 1995;9:102–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent M, Quintero J, Perry HD, Rynerson JM. Biofilm Theory for Lid Margin and Dry Eye Disease. IntechOpen; 2019. doi:10.5772/intechopen.89969
   Google Scholar
• Kim J, Park HD, Chung S. Microfluidic approaches to bacterial biofilm formation. Molecules. 2012;17(8):9818–9834. doi:10.3390/molecules17089818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Bian Z, Wang Y. Biofilm formation and inhibition mediated by bacterial quorum sensing. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2022;106(19–20):6365–6381. PMID: 36089638. doi:10.1007/s00253-022-12150-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donlan RM. Biofilms: microbial Life on Surfaces. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8(9):881–890. doi:10.3201/eid0809.020063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Licker M, Moldovan R, Hogea E, et al. Microbial biofilm in human health - an updated theoretical and practical insight. Rev Rom Med Lab. 2017;25(1):9–26. doi:10.1515/rrlm-2017-0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoica P, Chifiriuc MC, Rapa M, Lazăr V. Overview of biofilm-related problems in medical devices. In: Biofilms and Implantable Medical Devices. Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. (nu gasesc revista in pub med); 2017. doi10.1016/B978-0-08-100382-4.00001-0
   Google Scholar
• Dosler S, Hacioglu M, Yilmaz FN, Oyardi O. Biofilm modelling on the contact lenses and comparison of the in vitro activities of multipurpose lens solutions and antibiotics. PeerJ. 2020;8:e9419. doi:10.7717/peerj.9419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslova E, Eisaiankhongi L, Sjöberg F, McCarthy RR. Burns and biofilms: priority pathogens and in vivo. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2021;7(73). doi:10.1038/s41522-021-00243-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Willcox MDP, Bahatheg G, Carnt N, et al. Biofilms and contact lenses: problems and solutions. Microbiol Aust. 2023;44(2):96–99. doi:10.1071/MA23027
   Google Scholar
• Syed HA, Sherwani SK, Siddiqui TR, Bashir A, Shahana U. Drug resistance profile and biofilm forming potential of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from contact lenses in Karachi-Pakistan. BMC Ophthalmol. 2013;13:57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szczotka-Flynn LB, Imamura Y, Chandra J, et al. Increased resistance of contact lens-related bacterial biofilms to antimicrobial activity of soft contact lens care solutions. Cornea. 2009;28(8):918–926. doi:10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181a81835
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva NBS, Marques LA, Roder DDB. Diagnosis of biofilm infections: current methods used, challenges and perspectives for the future. J Appl Microbiol. 2021;131:2148–2160. doi:10.1111/jam.15049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toc DA, Csapai A, Popa F, et al. Easy and affordable: a new method for the studying of bacterial biofilm formation. Cells. 2022;11:4119. doi:10.3390/cells11244119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeters E, Nelis HJ, Coenye T. Comparison of multiple methods for quantification of microbial biofilms grown in microtiter plates. J Microbiol Methods. 2008;72:157–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer M, Triggs GJ, Krauss TF. Optical sensing of microbial life on surfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82:1362–1371. doi:10.1128/AEM.03001-15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Z, Liang Y, Lin S, et al. Crystal violet and XTT assay on staphylococcus aureus biofilm quantification. Curr Microbiol. 2016. doi:10.1007/s00284-016-1081-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allkja J, Bjarnsholt T, Coenye T, et al. Minimum information guideline for spectrophotometric and fluorometric methods to assess biofilm formation in microplates. Biofilm. 2020;2:100010. doi:10.1016/j.bioflm.2019.100010
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coenye T, Goeres D, Van Bambeke F, Bjarnsholt T. Should standardized susceptibility testing for microbial biofilms be introduced in clinical practice? Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24. doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2018.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coenye T, Kjellerup B, Stoodley P, Bjarnsholt T. the 2019 biofilm bash participants. The future of biofilm research – report on the “2019 Biofilm Bash”. Biofilm. 2020;2:100012. doi:10.1016/j.bioflm.2019.100012
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hasby Saad MA, Khalil HSM. Biofilm testing of microbiota: an essential step during corneal scrap examination in Egyptian acanthamoebic keratitis cases. Parasitol Int. 2018;67(5):556–564. doi:10.1016/j.parint.2018.05.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitnova AV, Svetozarskiy SN. Modern technologies in diagnosis of fungal keratitis (Review). Sovrem Tekhnologii Med. 2023;15(2):73–84. doi:10.17691/stm2023.15.2.07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skryabina YV, Astakhov YS, Konenkova YS, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of fungal keratitis. Part I. Ophthal Rep. 2018;11(3):63–73. doi:10.3892/or.2017.6107
   Google Scholar
• Soliman W, Fathalla AM, El-Sebaity DM, Al-Hussaini AK. Spectral domain anterior segment optical coherence tomography in microbial keratitis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013;251(2):549–553. doi:10.1007/s00417-012-2086-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin X, Jin H, Shi Y, Zhang N, Zhang H. Clinical observation of corneal endothelial plaques with fungal and bacterial keratitis by anterior segment optical coherence tomography and in vivo confocal microscopy. Cornea. 2022;41(11):1426–1432. doi:10.1097/ICO.0000000000002912
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behera HS, Srigyan D. Evaluation of polymerase chain reaction over routine microbial diagnosis for the diagnosis of fungal keratitis. Optom Vis Sci. 2021;98(3):280–284. doi:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pouyeh B, Galor A, Miller D, Alfonso EC. New horizons in one of ophthalmology’s challenges: fungal keratitis. Expert Rev Ophthalmol. 2011;6(5):529–540. doi:10.1586/eop.11.58
   Google Scholar
• Thomas PA. Fungal infections of the cornea. Eye. 2003;17(8):852–862. doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6700557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shigeyasu C, Yamada M, Aoki K, et al. Metagenomic analysis for detecting Fusarium solani in a case of fungal keratitis. J Infect Chemother. 2018;24(8):664–668. doi:10.1016/j.jiac.2017.12.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalitha P, Prajna NV, Sikha M, et al. Evaluation of metagenomic deep sequencing as a diagnostic test for infectious keratitis. Ophthalmology. 2021;128(3):473–475. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.07.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohilla R, Meena S, Mohanty A, et al. Etiological spectrum of infectious keratitis in the era of MALDI-TOF-MS at a tertiary care hospital. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020;9(9):4576–4581. doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_630_20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sharma S, Kunimoto DY, Gopinathan U, et al. Evaluation of corneal scraping smear examination methods in the diagnosis of bacterial and fungal keratitis: a survey of eight years of laboratory experience. Cornea. 2002;21(7):643–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ananthi S, Chitra T, Bini R, Prajna NV, Lalitha P, Dharmalingam K. Comparative analysis of the tear protein profile in mycotic keratitis patients. Mol Vis. 2008;14:500–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren Z, Liu Q, Wang Y, Dong Y, Huang Y. Diagnostic information profiling and evaluation of causative fungi of fungal keratitis using high-throughput internal transcribed spacer sequencing. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1640. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-58245-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole N, Hume EBH, Vijay AK, Sankaridurg P, Kumar N, Willcox MDP. In vivo performance of melimine as an antimicrobial coating for contact lenses in models of CLARE and CLPU. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(1):390–395. doi:10.1167/iovs.09-4068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan SA, Lee CS. Recent progress and strategies to develop antimicrobial contact lenses and lens cases for different types of microbial keratitis. Acta Biomater. 2020;113:101–118. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2020.06.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willcox MDP, Hume EBH, Vijay AK, Petcavich R. Ability of silver-impregnated contact lenses to control microbial growth and colonization. J Optom. 2010;3(3):143–148. doi:10.1016/S1888-4296(10)70020-0
   Google Scholar
• Nahum Y, Israeli R, Mircus G, et al. Antibacterial and physical properties of a novel sonochemical-assisted Zn-CuO contact lens nanocoating. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2019;257:95–100. doi:10.1007/s00417-018-4172-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan SA, Shahid S, Mahmood T, Lee CS. Contact lenses coated with hybrid multifunctional ternary nanocoatings (Phytomolecule-coated ZnO nanoparticles: Gallic Acid: tobramycin) for the treatment of bacterial and fungal keratitis. Acta Biomater. 2021;128:262–276. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2021.04.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kharaghani D, Dutta D, Gitigard P, et al. Development of antibacterial contact lenses containing metallic nanoparticles. Polym Test. 2019;79:106034. doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrillo F, Pignataro D, Lavano MA, et al. Current evidence on the ocular surface microbiota and related diseases. Microorganisms. 2020;8(7):1033. doi:10.3390/microorganisms8071033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang MC, Chern E. Ocular surface microbiota: ophthalmic infectious disease and probiotics. Front Microbiol. 2022. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.952473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chisari G, Chisari EM, Borzi AM, et al. Aging eye microbiota in dry eye syndrome in patients treated with Enterococcus faecium and Saccharomyces boulardii. Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2017;12(2):99–105. doi:10.2174/1574884712666170704145046
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cavuoto KM, Galor A, Banerjee S. Ocular surface microbiome alterations are found in both eyes of individuals with unilateral infectious keratitis. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021;10(2):19. doi:10.1167/tvst.10.2.19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang M-C, Chern E. More than antibiotics: latest therapeutics in the treatment and prevention of ocular surface infections. J Clin Med. 2022;11:4195. doi:10.3390/jcm11144195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kugadas A, Christiansen SH, Sankaranarayanan S, et al. Impact of microbiota on resistance to ocular pseudomonas aeruginosa-induced keratitis. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12(9):e1005855. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1005855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ophthalmic optics — Contact lens care products — Microbiological requirements and test methods for products and regimens for hygienic management of contact lenses. Available from: https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:14729:ed-1:v1:en. Accessed May 8, 2024.
   Google Scholar