References
- NaiduBVRajeshPBDevelopments in the management of patients with lung cancer in the United Kingdom have improved quality of careProc Am Thorac Soc2008581681919017735
- RobinsonTEJanssenAHarnettPEmbedding continuous quality improvement processes in multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: exploring the boundaries between quality and implementation scienceAust Health Rev2017413291296
- PillayBWoottenACCroweHThe impact of multidisciplinary team meetings on patient assessment, management and outcomes in oncology settings: a systematic review of the literatureCancer Treat Rev201642567226643552
- KhanSADavidsonBRGoldinRDGuidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma: an updateGut2012611657166922895392
- LambBWBrownKFNagpalKQuality of care management decisions by multidisciplinary cancer teams: a systematic reviewAnn Surg Oncol2011182116212521442345
- ButowPHarrisonJDChoyETHealth professional and consumer views on involving breast cancer patients in the multidisciplinary discussion of their disease and treatment planCancer20071101937194417823912
- TaylorCAtkinsLRichardsonATarrantRRamirezAJMeasuring the quality of MDT working: an observational approachBMC Cancer20122912:202
- WadsworthCALimATaylor-RobinsonSDThe risk factors and diagnosis of cholangiocarcinomaHepatol Int2013737739326201772
- AnsmannLKowalskiCPfaffHPatient participation in multidisciplinary tumor conferencesBreast20142386586925301777
- LambBWTaylorCLambJNFacilitators and barriers to teamworking and patient centeredness in multidisciplinary cancer teams: findings of a national studyAnn Surg Oncol20132014081416
- TaylorCFinnegan-JohnJGreenJ“No decision about me without me” in the context of cancer multidisciplinary team meetings: a qualitative interview studyBMC Health Serv Res20141448825339192
- HahlwegPHoffmannJHärterMIn absentia: an exploratory study of how patients are considered in multidisciplinary cancer team meetingsPLoS One201510e013992126441328