76
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Exploring factors that might influence primary-care provider discussion of and recommendation for prostate and colon cancer screening

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 179-190 | Published online: 17 May 2018

References

  • HarrisRPWiltTJQaseemAA value framework for cancer screening: advice for high-value care from the American College of PhysiciansAnn Intern Med20151621071271725984846
  • BhatiaRSLevinsonWShorttSMeasuring the effect of choosing wisely: an integrated framework to assess campaign impact on low-value careBMJ Qual Saf2015248523531
  • SheridanSLHarrisRPWoolfSHShared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. a suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task ForceAm J Prev Med2004261566614700714
  • CasselCKGuestJAChoosing wisely: helping physicians and patients make smart decisions about their careJAMA2012307171801180222492759
  • SchwartzALLandonBEElshaugAGChernewMEMcWilliamsJMMeasuring low-value care in MedicareJAMA Intern Med201417471067107624819824
  • SchwartzLMWoloshinSFowlerFJJrWelchHGEnthusiasm for cancer screening in the United StatesJAMA20042911717814709578
  • PrasadVVandrossAToomeyCA decade of reversal: an analysis of 146 contradicted medical practicesMayo Clin Proc201388879079823871230
  • ElshaugAGWattAMMundyLWillisCDOver 150 potentially low-value health care practices: an Australian studyMed J Aust20121971055656023163685
  • WiltTJHarrisRPQaseemAScreening for cancer: advice for high-value care from the American College of PhysiciansAnn Intern Med20151621071872525984847
  • SchreudersEHRucoARabeneckLColorectal cancer screening: a global overview of existing programmesGut201564101637164926041752
  • NavarroMNicolasAFerrandezALanasAColorectal cancer population screening programs worldwide in 2016: an updateWorld J Gastroenterol201723203632364228611516
  • LinJSPiperMAPerdueLAScreening for colorectal cancer: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task ForceJAMA2016315232576259427305422
  • Force USPSTProstate cancer screening draft recommendations2017 Available from: https://screeningforprostatecancer.orgAccessed March 8, 2018
  • GomellaLGLiuXSTrabulsiEJScreening for prostate cancer: the current evidence and guidelines controversyCan J Urol20111855875588322018148
  • MoyerVAScreening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statementAnn Intern Med2012157212013422801674
  • TangVLShiYFungKClinician factors associated with prostate-specific antigen screening in older veterans with limited life expectancyJAMA Intern Med2016176565466127042937
  • KistlerCEKirbyKALeeDCasadeiMAWalterLCLong-term outcomes following positive fecal occult blood test results in older adults: benefits and burdensArch Intern Med2011171151344135121555655
  • SchonbergMALeveilleSGMarcantonioERPreventive health care among older women: missed opportunities and poor targetingAm J Med20081211197498118954844
  • RoyceTJHendrixLHStokesWAAllenIMChenRCCancer screening rates in individuals with different life expectanciesJAMA Intern Med2014174101558156525133746
  • BellizziKMBreslauESBurnessAWaldronWPrevalence of cancer screening in older, racially diverse adults: still screening after all these yearsArch Intern Med2011171222031203722158573
  • YabroffKRKlabundeCNYuanGAre physicians’ recommendations for colorectal cancer screening guideline-consistent?J Gen Intern Med201126217718420949328
  • NodoraJNMartzWDAshbeckELPrimary care physician compliance with colorectal cancer screening guidelinesCancer Causes Control20112291277128721710193
  • TasianGECooperbergMRCowanJEProstate specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: knowledge of, attitudes towards, and utilization among primary care physiciansUrol Oncol201230215516020800514
  • PetittiDBTeutschSMBartonMBSawayaGFOckeneJKDeWittTUpdate on the methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: insufficient evidenceAnn Intern Med2009150319920519189910
  • LeeSJBoscardinWJStijacic-CenzerIConell-PriceJO’BrienSWalterLCTime lag to benefit after screening for breast and colorectal cancer: meta-analysis of survival data from the United States, Sweden, United Kingdom, and DenmarkBMJ2013346e844123299842
  • WalterLCLindquistKNugentSImpact of age and comorbidity on colorectal cancer screening among older veteransAnn Intern Med2009150746547319349631
  • WalterLCBertenthalDLindquistKKonetyBRPSA screening among elderly men with limited life expectanciesJAMA2006296192336234217105796
  • WalterLCFungKZKirbyKA5-Year downstream outcomes following prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening in older menJAMA Intern Med20131731086687323588999
  • WalterLCCovinskyKECancer screening in elderly patients: a framework for individualized decision makingJAMA2001285212750275611386931
  • FraenkelLFriedTRIndividualized medical decision making: necessary, achievable, but not yet attainableArch Intern Med2010170656656920308644
  • PollackCENoronhaGGreenGEBhavsarNACarterHBPrimary care providers’ response to the US Preventive Services Task Force draft recommendations on screening for prostate cancerArch Intern Med2012172866867022529237
  • KeitzSAStechuchakKMGrambowSCKoropchakCMTulskyJABehind closed doors: management of patient expectations in primary care practicesArch Intern Med2007167544545217353491
  • LewisCLGriffithJPignoneMPGolinCPhysicians’ decisions about continuing or stopping colon cancer screening in the elderly: a qualitative studyJ Gen Intern Med200924781682119437080
  • GogineniKShumanKLChinnDGablerNBEmanuelEJPatient demands and requests for cancer tests and treatmentsJAMA Oncol201511333926182301
  • PollackCEPlatzEABhavsarNAPrimary care providers’ perspectives on discontinuing prostate cancer screeningCancer2012118225518552422517310
  • PearsonSDGoldmanLOravEJTriage decisions for emergency department patients with chest pain: do physicians’ risk attitudes make the difference?J Gen Intern Med199510105575648576772
  • SirovichBEWoloshinSSchwartzLMToo little? Too much? Primary care physicians’ views on US health care: a brief reportArch Intern Med2011171171582158521949169
  • SheridanSLSutkowi-HemstreetABarclayCA comparative effectiveness trial of alternate formats for presenting benefits and harms information for low-value screening services: a randomized clinical trialJAMA Intern Med20161761314126720730
  • HoddinottSNBassMJThe Dillman total design survey methodCan Fam Physician1986322366236821267217
  • DresselhausTRPeabodyJWLeeMWangMMLuckJMeasuring compliance with preventive care guidelines: standardized patients, clinical vignettes, and the medical recordJ Gen Intern Med2000151178278811119170
  • PeabodyJWLuckJGlassmanPDresselhausTRLeeMComparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring qualityJAMA2000283131715172210755498
  • DillmanDAMail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method2nd edHoboken (NJ)Wiley2007
  • ThorpeCRyanBMcLeanSLHow to obtain excellent response rates when surveying physiciansFam Pract2009261656819074758
  • GuerraCEGimottyPASheaJAPagánJASchwartzJSArmstrongKEffect of guidelines on primary care physician use of PSA screening: results from the Community Tracking Study physician surveyMed Decis Making200828568168918556635
  • PerryUndem Research/CommunicationUnnecessary tests and procedures in the health care system2014 Available from: http://www.choosingwisely.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Final-Choosing-Wisely-Survey-Report.pdfAccessed March 8, 2018
  • HaggertyJTudiverFBrownJBHerbertCCiampiAGuibertRPatients’ anxiety and expectations: how they influence family physicians’ decisions to order cancer screening testsCan Fam Physician2005511658165916926946
  • CohnJAWangCELakemanJCPrimary care physician PSA screening practices before and after the final U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendationUrol Oncol201432141e23e30
  • CabanaMDRandCSPoweNRWhy don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvementJAMA1999282151458146510535437
  • SabbatiniAKTilburtJCCampbellEGSheelerRDEggintonJSGooldSDControlling health costs: physician responses to patient expectations for medical careJ Gen Intern Med20142991234124124871228
  • HeflinMTPollakKIKuchibhatlaMNBranchLGOddoneEZThe impact of health status on physicians’ intentions to offer cancer screening to older womenJ Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci200661884485016912103
  • CooperGSFortinskyRHHapkeRLandefeldCSPrimary care physician recommendations for colorectal cancer screening: patient and practitioner factorsArch Intern Med199715717194619509308506
  • HaggstromDAKlabundeCNSmithJLYuanGVariation in primary care physicians’ colorectal cancer screening recommendations by patient age and comorbidityJ Gen Intern Med2013281182422653380
  • HoffmanRMPapenfussMRBullerDBMoonTEAttitudes and practices of primary care physicians for prostate cancer screeningAm J Prev Med19961242772818874692
  • TudiverFBrownJBMedvedWMaking decisions about cancer screening when the guidelines are unclear or conflictingJ Fam Pract200150868268711509162
  • LeachCRKlabundeCNAlfanoCMSmithJLRowlandJHPhysician over-recommendation of mammography for terminally ill womenCancer20121181273721681736
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and QualityNon-recommended prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening in older men: percentage of men 70 years and older who were screened unnecessarily for prostate cancer using PSA-based screening2016 Available from: https://www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/summaries/summary/50442Accessed March 9, 2018
  • DamschroderLJAronDCKeithREKirshSRAlexanderJALoweryJCFostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation scienceImplement Sci200945019664226
  • PaternitiDAFancherTLCipriCSTimmermansSHeritageJKravitzRLGetting to “no”: strategies primary care physicians use to deny patient requestsArch Intern Med2010170438138820177043
  • CarpenterDMGerykLLChenATNaglerRHDieckmannNFHanPKConflicting health information: a critical research needHealth Expect20161961173118226709206
  • LevinsonWKallewaardMBhatiaRSWolfsonDShorttSKerrEA‘Choosing Wisely’: a growing international campaignBMJ Qual Saf2015242167174
  • MamedeSSplinterTAvan GogTRikersRMSchmidtHGExploring the role of salient distracting clinical features in the emergence of diagnostic errors and the mechanisms through which reflection counteracts mistakesBMJ Qual Saf2012214295300
  • DoranTMaurerKARyanAMImpact of provider incentives on quality and value of health careAnnu Rev Public Health20173844946527992731
  • YabroffKRZapkaJKlabundeCNSystems strategies to support cancer screening in U.S. primary care practiceCancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev201120122471247921976292
  • StaceyDLégaréFColNFDecision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisionsCochrane Database Syst Rev20144CD001431
  • LantzPMEvansWDMeadHAlvarezCStewartLKnowledge of and attitudes toward evidence-based guidelines for and against clinical preventive services: results from a national surveyMilbank Q2016941517626994709
  • CarmanKLMaurerMYegianJMEvidence that consumers are skeptical about evidence-based health careHealth Aff (Millwood)20102971400140620522522
  • BarryMJWescottPHReiflerEJChangYMoultonBWReactions of potential jurors to a hypothetical malpractice suit alleging failure to perform a prostate-specific antigen testJ Law Med Ethics200836239640218547208
  • HseeCKZhangJGeneral evaluability theoryPerspect Psychol Sci20105434335526162182
  • WackerbarthSBTarasenkoYNJoyceJMHaistSAPhysician colorectal cancer screening recommendations: an examination based on informed decision makingPatient Educ Couns2007661435017098393
  • McQueenABartholomewLKGreisingerAJBehind closed doors: physician-patient discussions about colorectal cancer screeningJ Gen Intern Med200924111228123519763699