The Clinical Approach on Receipt of an Unexpected Laboratory Test Result

References

• Forsman RW. Why is the laboratory an afterthought for managed care organizations? Clin Chem. 1996;42(5):813–816. doi:10.1093/clinchem/42.5.8138653920
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallworth MJ. The ‘70% claim’: what is the evidence base? Ann Clin Biochem. 2011;48:487–488. doi:10.1258/acb.2011.01117722045648
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/pathol-dig-first.pdf. accessed 6 9 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Brigden ML, Heathcote JC. Problems in interpreting laboratory tests. What do unexpected results mean? Postgrad Med. 2000;107:145–146. doi:10.3810/pgm.2000.06.1127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey L. Confronted by an unexpected laboratory result. Am Fam Physician. 2001;64:1281–1282.11601809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundberg G. Critical (panic) value notification: an established laboratory practice policy (parameter). JAMA. 1990;263(5):709. doi:10.1001/jama.1990.034400501030442296129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippi G, Banfi G, Church S, et al. Preanalytical quality improvement. In pursuit of harmony, on behalf of European Federation for clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine (EFLM) Working group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE). Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53:357–370.25490032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi D, Center JR, Eisman JA. Investigation of incidental hypercalcaemia. BMJ. 2009;339:b4613.19933303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• https://bpac.org.nz/BT/2015/April/laboratory-investigations.aspx. Accessed 929, 2020 Accessed 242020
   Google Scholar
• Premawardhana LD. Thyroid testing in acutely ill patients may be an expensive distraction. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2017;27(300):300–307. doi:10.11613/BM.2017.03328694722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilickaya O, Schmickl C, Ahmed A, et al. Customized reference ranges for laboratory values decrease false positive alerts in intensive care unit patients. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e10793. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0107930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankaralingam A, Karim Y, Swaminathan R. Phenindione interferes with measurement of creatinine. Clin Biochem. 2013;46(18):1912–1913. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.08.01724016729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright P, Lock RJ, Unsworth DJ. Immunoglobulin A deficiency on serological coeliac screening: an opportunity for early diagnosis of hypogammaglobulinaemia. Ann Clin Biochem. 2012;49(5):503–504. doi:10.1258/acb.2012.01201122859725
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor D, Durigon M, Davis H, et al. Probability of a false-negative HIV antibody test result during the window period: a tool for pre- and post-test counselling. Int J STD AIDS. 2015;26(4):215–224. doi:10.1177/0956462414542987
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey Y. Abnormal full blood count in the asymptomatic patient. Common sense pathology. Royal College of Pathologists of Australia. Clin Biochem. 2019;1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Misbah SA, Kokkinou V, Jeffery K, et al. The role of the physician in laboratory medicine: a European perspective. J Clin Pathol. 2013;66(5):432–437. doi:10.1136/jclinpath-2012-20104223223566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair D, Spedding A, Young R. Can the laboratory affect the investigation and diagnosis of primary biliary cirrhosis? J Clin Pathol. 2006;59(4):360–362. doi:10.1136/jcp.2005.02893616461570
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne EA, Katbamna R, Scott C, et al. Patients with m2 antibodies: what diagnosis and follow-up are they given? Gut. 2010;59(6):859–860. doi:10.1136/gut.2009.19076920551471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White GH, Farrance I. AACB Uncertainty of Measurement Working Group. Uncertainty of measurement in quantitative medical testing: a laboratory implementation guide. Clin Biochem Rev. 2004;25:S1–S24.18650962
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beck SC, Lock RJ. Uncertainty of measurement: an immunology laboratory perspective. Ann Clin Biochem. 2015;52(1):7–17. doi:10.1177/000456321455106625161319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qureshi BH. EDTA-Dependent Pseudothrombocytopenia. Lab Med. 1998;29(8):471–473. doi:10.1093/labmed/29.8.471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plebani M. Towards a new paradigm in laboratory medicine: the five rights. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016;4:1881–1891.
   Google Scholar
• Plebani M. Laboratory-associated and diagnostic errors: a neglected link. Diagnosis. 2014;1:89–94. doi:10.1515/dx-2013-003029539988
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. CLSI H3-A6 Document. 6th ed. Wayne, PA: Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute; 2007. Procedures for the collection of diagnostic blood specimens by venipuncture; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Simundic AM, Bölenius K, Cadamuro J, et al. Joint EFLM-COLABIOCLI recommendation for venous blood sampling. Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2019;77:131–154.30998194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bain BJ. Bone marrow aspiration. J Clin Pathol. 2001;54(9):657–663. doi:10.1136/jcp.54.9.65711533068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• https://www.rcpath.org/uploads/assets/bb86b370-1545-4c5a-b5826a2c431934f5/The-communication-of-critical-and-unexpected-pathology-results.pdf. Accessed 929, 2020 Accessed 392020]
   Google Scholar
• Howanitz P, Steindel S, Heard N. Laboratory critical values policies and procedures. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002;126:663–669.12033953
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy CL, Poon EG, Karson AS, et al. Patient safety concerns arising from test results that return after hospital discharge. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143(2):121–128. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-143-2-200507190-0001116027454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell CA, Horvath AR. Towards Harmonisation of Critical Laboratory Result Management - Review of the Literature and Survey of Australasian Practices. Clin Biochem Rev. 2012;33:149–160.23267247
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuperman GJ, Teich JM, Tanasijevic MJ, et al. Improving response to critical laboratory results with automation: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999;6(6):512–522. doi:10.1136/jamia.1999.006051210579608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman GJ, Boyle D, Jha A, et al. How promptly are inpatients treated for critical laboratory results? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998;5(1):112–119. doi:10.1136/jamia.1998.00501129452990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridley JW. Essentials of Clinical Laboratory Science. 1st ed. New York: Delmar: Cengage learning; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Price CP, Christenson RH. Evidence-Based Laboratory Medicine: Principles, Practice, and Outcomes. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: AACC Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Dighe A, Jones J, Parham S. Survey of critical value reporting and reduction of false positive critical value reports. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2008;132:1666–1671.18834227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dighe AS, Rao A, Coakley AB, Lewandrowski KB. Analysis of laboratory critical value reporting at a large academic medical center. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006;125(5):758–764. doi:10.1309/R53XVC2U5CH6TNG816707379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippi G, Favaloro EJ. Preanalytical Issues in Hemostasis and Thrombosis Testing. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1646:29–42.28804816
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ang EY, Soh JY, Liew WK, et al. Reliability of acute illness dihydrorhodamine-123 testing for chronic granulomatous disease [published correction appears in Clin Lab. Clin Lab. 2013;59:203–206.23505928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egner W, Swallow K, Lock RJ, Patel D. Falsely low immunoglobulin (Ig)G4 in routine analysis: how not to miss IgG4 disease. Clin Exp Immunol. 2016;186(1):57–63. doi:10.1111/cei.1280527125474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturgeon CM, Viljoen A. Analytical error and interference in immunoassay: minimizing risk. Ann Clin Biochem. 2011;48(5):418–432. doi:10.1258/acb.2011.01107321750113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Silva DA, Halstead AC, Côté AM, Sabr Y, von Dadelszen P, Magee LA. Unexpected random urinary protein: creatinine ratio results-limitations of the pyrocatechol violet-dye method. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13(1):152. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-13-15223865673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sickle cell tests. Lab Tests online. AACC. https://labtestsonline.org.uk/tests/sickle-cell-test. Accessed 9 25, 2020.
   Google Scholar