Establishment and Validation of a Machine Learning-Based Prediction Model for Termination of Pregnancy via Cesarean Section

References

• Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gülmezoglu AM, et al. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007–08. Lancet. 2010;375(9713):490–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke C, Allen R. Complications of cesarean birth: clinical recommendations for prevention and management. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2020;45(2):92–99. doi:10.1097/NMC.0000000000000598
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Chinese Medical Association. Expert consensus on caesarean section (2014). Chin J Gynecol Obstet. 2014;49(10):721–724.
   Google Scholar
• Shi CY, Li BY. Expert consensus on new course of labor and its management (2014). Chin J Gynecol Obstet. 2014;49(7):486.
   Google Scholar
• Chinese Medical Association Perinatal Medicine Branch. Expert consensus on the application of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring. Chin J Perinat Med. 2015;49(7):486–490.
   Google Scholar
• Bergholt T, Skjeldestad FE, Pyykönen A, et al. Maternal age and risk of cesarean section in women with induced labor at term-A Nordic register-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(2):283–289. doi:10.1111/aogs.13743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng R, Tang X, Liu J, Gao Y, Zhong X. Cesarean delivery on maternal request and its influencing factors in Chongqing, China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):384. doi:10.1186/s12884-021-03866-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenabi E, Khazaei S, Bashirian S, Aghababaei S, Matinnia N. Reasons for elective cesarean section on maternal request: a systematic review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(22):3867–3872. doi:10.1080/14767058.2019.1587407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuritani Y, Hayashi S, Yamamoto R, Mitsuda N, Ishii K. Association between maternal height and mode of delivery in nulliparous Japanese women. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020;46:2645–2650. doi:10.1111/jog.14511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li JH, Yang L, Chen Q, Liu J, He Y. A prospective cohort study of the effects of pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain on pregnancy complications and outcomes. Chin J Gynecol Obstet. 2019;54(3):184–188.
   Google Scholar
• McDowell M, Cain MA, Brumley J. Excessive gestational weight gain. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2019;64(1):46–54. doi:10.1111/jmwh.12927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulet SL, Platner M, Joseph NT, et al. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, cesarean delivery, and severe maternal morbidity in an urban safety-net population. Am J Epidemiol. 2020;189(12):1502–1511. doi:10.1093/aje/kwaa135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zehravi M, Maqbool M, Ara I. Correlation between obesity, gestational diabetes mellitus, and pregnancy outcomes: an overview. Int. J Adolesc Med Health. 2021;33(6):339–345. doi:10.1515/ijamh-2021-0058
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ibishi VA, Isjanovska RD. Prelabour rupture of membranes: mode of delivery and outcome. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2015;3(2):237–240. doi:10.3889/oamjms.2015.037
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tolcher MC, Holbert MR, Weaver AL, et al. Predicting cesarean delivery after induction of labor among nulliparous women at term. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;126(5):1059–1068. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao R, Tang PY, Song JF, Qin KL, Wang X, Yan X. Platelet count on preoperative day 1 predicts the long-term responses to laparoscopic splenectomy for Chinese patients with medically refractory idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. BMC Surg. 2018;18(1):108. doi:10.1186/s12893-018-0446-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jain V, Bos H, Bujold E. Guideline No. 402: diagnosis and management of placenta previa. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020;42(7):906–917.e901. doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2019.07.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murtaza K, Chaudhry M, Nazeer S, Malik S. Prevalence-pattern and risk factors of Cesarean section in a multiethnic cohort. Pak J Med Sci. 2021;37(3):711–715. doi:10.12669/pjms.37.3.3186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rottenstreich A, Levin G, Tsur A, Shai D, Meyer R. Chorioamnionitis at latent phase more than doubles the risk for cesarean delivery compared to chorioamnionitis at active phase. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021;303(4):905–910. doi:10.1007/s00404-020-05815-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wen X, Huang B, Liang X. Effect of ropivacaine and sufentanil in epidural labor analgesia. Am J Transl Res. 2021;13(6):7001–7007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao L, Zhang X, Zhu J. Analgesic effects, birth process, and prognosis of pregnant women in normal labor by epidural analgesia using sufentanil in combination with ropivacaine: a retrospective cohort study. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022;2022:1228006. doi:10.1155/2022/1228006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RM, Cyna AM, Cuthbert A. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;5(5):Cd000331. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000331.pub4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han B, Xu M. A comprehensive analysis of continuous epidural analgesia’s effect on labor and neonates in maternal hypertensive disorder patients. Pregnancy Hypertens. 2017;7:33–38. doi:10.1016/j.preghy.2016.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu ZH, He ST, Deng CM, et al. Neuraxial labour analgesia is associated with a reduced risk of maternal depression at 2 years after childbirth: a multicentre, prospective, longitudinal study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019;36(10):745–754. doi:10.1097/EJA.0000000000001058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing Y, Wang X. Changing trend and influencing factors of cesarean section rate of advanced maternal age in a tertiary hospital in Beijing from 2016 to 2019. Chin Med Record. 2020;21(06):49–52.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang JS, Cheng HD, Zhang ZP, et al. Investigation and analysis of cesarean section rate and indications in Shanghai. Chin J Pract Gynecol Obstet. 2019;35(03):325–329.
   Google Scholar
• Kalok A, Zabil SA, Jamil MA, et al. Antenatal scoring system in predicting the success of planned vaginal birth following one previous caesarean section. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;38(3):339–343. doi:10.1080/01443615.2017.1355896
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mooney SS, Hiscock R, Clarke ID, Craig S. Estimating success of vaginal birth after caesarean section in a regional Australian population: validation of a prediction model. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;59(1):66–70. doi:10.1111/ajo.12809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo-Lopezosa P, Hidalgo-Maestre M. Riesgo de rotura uterina en el parto vaginal tras cesárea: revisión sistemática [Risk of uterine rupture in vaginal birth after cesarean: systematic review]. Enferm Clin. 2017;27(1):28–39. Spanish. doi:10.1016/j.enfcli.2016.08.006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chu KH, Chen AC, Tai CJ, Chen SF, Chien LY. Development and validation of the self-efficacy regarding vaginal birth scale. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2017;46(1):e13–e21. doi:10.1016/j.jogn.2016.08.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang E, Hesketh T. Large reductions in cesarean delivery rates in China: a qualitative study on delivery decision-making in the era of the two-child policy. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):405. doi:10.1186/s12884-017-1597-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar