Smart nanomedicine agents for cancer, triggered by pH, glutathione, H₂O₂, or H₂S

References

• Wang L, Huo M, Chen Y, et al. Tumor microenvironment-enabled nanotherapy. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018;7(8):1701156. doi:10.1002/adhm.201701156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatt AP, Redinbo MR, Bultman SJ. The role of the microbiome in cancer development and therapy. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(4):326–344. doi:10.3322/caac.2139828481406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin SY, Zhang AQ, Cheng SX, et al. Drug self-delivery systems for cancer therapy. Biomaterials. 2017;112:234–247. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.01627768976
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong H, Dong Z, Liu Y, et al. Engineering of multifunctional nano-micelles for combined photothermal and photodynamic therapy under the guidance of multimodal imaging. Adv Funct Mater. 2014;24(41):6492–6502. doi:10.1002/adfm.201401451
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim C, Favazza C, Wang LV. In vivo photoacoustic tomography of chemicals: high-resolution functional and molecular optical imaging at new depths. Chem Rev. 2010;110(5):2756–2782. doi:10.1021/cr900266s20210338
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Zerda A, Kim J-W, Galanzha EI, et al. Advanced contrast nanoagents for photoacoustic molecular imaging, cytometry, blood test and photothermal theranostics. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2011;6(5):346–369. doi:10.1002/cmmi.45522025336
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maji SK, Sreejith S, Joseph J, et al. Upconversion nanoparticles as a contrast agent for photoacoustic imaging in live mice. Adv Mater. 2014;26(32):5633–5638. doi:10.1002/adma.20140083124913756
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qian C, Feng P, Yu J, et al. Anaerobe-inspired anticancer nanovesicles. Angew Chem-Int Edit. 2017;56(10):2588–2593. doi:10.1002/anie.201611783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Bu W, Ni D, et al. Synthesis of iron nanometallic glasses and their application in cancer therapy by a localized Fenton reaction. Angew Chem-Int Edit. 2016;55(6):2101–2106. doi:10.1002/anie.201510031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu W, Gao Y, Jiao Y, et al. Carbon nano-dots as a fluorescent and colorimetric dual-readout probe for the detection of arginine and Cu2+ and its logic gate operation. Nanoscale. 2017;9(32):11545–11552. doi:10.1039/c7nr02336g28770932
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu L, Mendoza-Garcia A, Li Q, et al. Organic phase syntheses of magnetic nanoparticles and their applications. Chem Rev. 2016;116(18):10473–10512. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b0068727355413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian Q, Tang M, Sun Y, et al. Hydrophilic flower-like CuS superstructures as an efficient 980 nm laser-driven photothermal agent for ablation of cancer cells. Adv Mater. 2011;23(31):3542–3547. doi:10.1002/adma.20110129521735487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Shi J. Hollow-structured mesoporous materials: chemical synthesis, functionalization and applications. Adv Mater. 2014;26(20):3176–3205. doi:10.1002/adma.20130531924687906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Li C, Liu Y, et al. Gold nanoclusters-based nanoprobes for simultaneous fluorescence imaging and targeted photodynamic therapy with superior penetration and retention behavior in tumors. Adv Funct Mater. 2015;25(8):1314–1325. doi:10.1002/adfm.201403095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Shi J. Chemistry of mesoporous organosilica in nanotechnology: molecularly organic–inorganic hybridization into frameworks. Adv Mater. 2016;28(17):3235–3272. doi:10.1002/adma.20150514726936391
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sun C-Y, Qin C, Wang C-G, et al. Chiral nanoporous metal-organic frameworks with high porosity as materials for drug delivery. Adv Mater. 2011;23(47):5629–5632. doi:10.1002/adma.20110253822095878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai Y, Xu C, Sun X, et al. Nanoparticle design strategies for enhanced anticancer therapy by exploiting the tumour microenvironment. Chem Soc Rev. 2017;46(12):3830–3852. doi:10.1039/c6cs00592f28516983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilhelm S, Tavares AJ, Dai Q, et al. Analysis of nanoparticle delivery to tumours. Nat Rev Mater. 2016;1:16014. doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.14
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torchilin V. Tumor delivery of macromolecular drugs based on the EPR effect. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2011;63(3):131–135. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2010.03.01120304019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogbomo SM, Shi W, Wagh NK, et al. 177Lu-labeled HPMA copolymers utilizing cathepsin B and S cleavable linkers: synthesis, characterization and preliminary in vivo investigation in a pancreatic cancer model. Nucl Med Biol. 2013;40(5):606–617. doi:10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2013.01.01123622691
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang C, Soenen SJ, Rejman J, et al. Magnetic electrospun fibers for cancer therapy. Adv Funct Mater. 2012;22(12):2479–2486. doi:10.1002/adfm.201102171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv D, Wang R, Tang G, et al. Ecofriendly electrospun membranes loaded with visible-light-responding nanoparticles for multifunctional usages: highly efficient air filtration, dye scavenging, and bactericidal activity. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(13):12880–12889. doi:10.1021/acsami.9b0150830869859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma B, Wang S, Liu F, et al. Self-assembled copper–amino acid nanoparticles for in situ glutathione “and” H2O2 sequentially triggered chemodynamic therapy. J Am Chem Soc. 2019;141(2):849–857. doi:10.1021/jacs.8b0871430541274
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Y, Aimetti AA, Langer R, et al. Bioresponsive materials. Nat Rev Mater. 2016;2:16075. doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Wu W, Li R-Q, et al. Peptide-based multifunctional nanomaterials for tumor imaging and therapy. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28(50):1804492. doi:10.1002/adfm.201804492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reina-Campos M, Moscat J, Diaz-Meco M. Metabolism shapes the tumor microenvironment. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2017;48:47–53. doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2017.05.00628605656
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Liu X, Yuan H, et al. Therapeutic remodeling of the tumor microenvironment enhances nanoparticle delivery. Adv Sci. 2019;6(5):1802070. doi:10.1002/advs.201802070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang R, Yan F, Chen Y. Exogenous physical irradiation on titania semiconductors: materials chemistry and tumor-specific nanomedicine. Adv Sci. 2018;5(12):1801175. doi:10.1002/advs.v5.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ju E, Dong K, Liu Z, et al. Tumor microenvironment activated photothermal strategy for precisely controlled ablation of solid tumors upon NIR irradiation. Adv Funct Mater. 2015;25(10):1574–1580. doi:10.1002/adfm.201403885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang K, Zhu L, Nie L, et al. Visualization of protease activity in vivo using an activatable photo-acoustic imaging probe based on CuS nanoparticles. Theranostics. 2014;4(2):134–141. doi:10.7150/thno.721724465271
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ma T, Zhang P, Hou Y, et al. “Smart” nanoprobes for visualization of tumor microenvironments. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018;7(20):1800391. doi:10.1002/adhm.201800391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swietach P, Vaughan-Jones RD, Harris AL. Regulation of tumor pH and the role of carbonic anhydrase 9. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2007;26(2):299–310. doi:10.1007/s10555-007-9064-017415526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thews O, Gassner B, Kelleher DK, et al. Impact of extracellular acidity on the activity of P-glycoprotein and the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutic drugs. Neoplasia. 2006;8(2):143–152. doi:10.1593/neo.0569716611407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du JZ, Du X-J, Mao CQ, et al. Tailor-made dual pH-sensitive polymer–doxorubicin nanoparticles for efficient anticancer drug delivery. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133(44):17560–17563. doi:10.1021/ja207150n21985458
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Zhou K, Huang G, et al. A nanoparticle-based strategy for the imaging of a broad range of tumours by nonlinear amplification of microenvironment signals. Nat Mater. 2013;13:204. doi:10.1038/nmat381924317187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo DL, Sun PZ, Consolino L, et al. A general MRI-CEST ratiometric approach for pH imaging: demonstration of in vivo pH mapping with iobitridol. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136(41):14333–14336. doi:10.1021/ja505931325238643
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wencel D, Kaworek A, Abel T, et al. Optical sensor for real-time pH monitoring in human tissue. Small. 2018;14(51):1803627. doi:10.1002/smll.201803627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi W, Li X, Ma H. A tunable ratiometric pH sensor based on carbon nanodots for the quantitative measurement of the intracellular pH of whole cells. Angew Chem-Int Edit. 2012;51(26):6432–6435. doi:10.1002/anie.201202533
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Ni D, Liu Y, et al. Magnesium silicide nanoparticles as a deoxygenation agent for cancer starvation therapy. Nat Nanotechnol. 2017;12:378. doi:10.1038/nnano.2016.28028068318
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lu J, Sun J, Li F, et al. Highly sensitive diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma using pH-responsive iron oxide nanocluster assemblies. J Am Chem Soc. 2018;140(32):10071–10074. doi:10.1021/jacs.8b0416930059219
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu Y, Qu Z, Cao H, et al. pH switchable nanoassembly for imaging a broad range of malignant tumors. ACS Nano. 2017;11(12):12446–12452. doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b0648329195042
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin J, Xin P, An L, et al. Fe3O4–ZIF-8 assemblies as pH and glutathione responsive T2–T1 switching magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent for sensitive tumor imaging in vivo. Chem Commun. 2019;55(4):478–481. doi:10.1039/C8CC08943D
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Q, Liu X, Chen J, et al. A self-assembled albumin-based nanoprobe for in vivo ratiometric photoacoustic pH imaging. Adv Mater. 2015;27(43):6820–6827. doi:10.1002/adma.20150319426418312
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yin T, Wang L, Yin L, et al. Co-delivery of hydrophobic paclitaxel and hydrophilic AURKA specific siRNA by redox-sensitive micelles for effective treatment of breast cancer. Biomaterials. 2015;61:10–25. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.02225996409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mo R, Gu Z. Tumor microenvironment and intracellular signal-activated nanomaterials for anticancer drug delivery. Mater Today. 2016;19(5):274–283. doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2015.11.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye G, Jiang Y, Yang X, et al. Smart nanoparticles undergo phase transition for enhanced cellular uptake and subsequent intracellular drug release in a tumor microenvironment. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(1):278–289. doi:10.1021/acsami.7b1597829260563
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zheng H, Zhang Y, Liu L, et al. One-pot synthesis of metal–organic frameworks with encapsulated target molecules and their applications for controlled drug delivery. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138(3):962–968. doi:10.1021/jacs.5b1172026710234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Li Q, Liu R, et al. A versatile prodrug strategy to in situ encapsulate drugs in MOF nanocarriers: a case of cytarabine-IR820 prodrug encapsulated ZIF-8 toward chemo-photothermal therapy. Adv Funct Mater. 2018;28(35):1802830. doi:10.1002/adfm.201802830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang C, Soenen SJ, Rejman J, et al. Stimuli-responsive electrospun fibers and their applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2011;40(5):2417–2434. doi:10.1039/c0cs00181c21390366
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gao S, Tang G, Hua D, et al. Stimuli-responsive bio-based polymeric systems and their applications. J Mater Chem B. 2019;7(5):709–729. doi:10.1039/C8TB02491J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hua D, Liu Z, Wang F, et al. pH responsive polyurethane (core) and cellulose acetate phthalate (shell) electrospun fibers for intravaginal drug delivery. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;151:1240–1244. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.06.06627474676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong W, Zhou H, Zhang C, et al. An amino acid-based gelator for injectable and multi-responsive hydrogel. Chin Chem Lett. 2017;28(11):2125–2128. doi:10.1016/j.cclet.2017.09.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reshetnyak YK, Andreev OA, Lehnert U, et al. Translocation of molecules into cells by pH-dependent insertion of a transmembrane helix. Pans. 2006;103(17):6460–6465. doi:10.1073/pnas.0601463103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ling D, Park W, Park SJ, et al. Multifunctional tumor pH-sensitive self-assembled nanoparticles for bimodal imaging and treatment of resistant heterogeneous tumors. J Am Chem Soc. 2014;136(15):5647–5655. doi:10.1021/ja410828724689550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Z, Fan W, Tang W, et al. Near-infrared semiconducting polymer brush and pH/GSH-responsive polyoxometalate cluster hybrid platform for enhanced tumor-specific phototheranostics. Angew Chem-Int Edit. 2018;57(43):14101–14105. doi:10.1002/anie.201808074
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Choi J, Bang D, et al. Convertible organic nanoparticles for near-infrared photothermal ablation of cancer cells. Angew Chem-Int Edit. 2011;50(2):441–444. doi:10.1002/anie.201005075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng F, Hennink WE, Zhong Z. Reduction-sensitive polymers and bioconjugates for biomedical applications. Biomaterials. 2009;30(12):2180–2198. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.02619200596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao W, Hu J, Gao W. Glucose oxidase–polymer nanogels for synergistic cancer-starving and oxidation therapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(28):23528–23535. doi:10.1021/acsami.7b0681428650613
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang X, Cai X, Yu A, et al. Redox-sensitive self-assembled nanoparticles based on alpha-tocopherol succinate-modified heparin for intracellular delivery of paclitaxel. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2017;496:311–326. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2017.02.03328237749
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Liu H, Shu X, et al. A reduction-degradable polymer prodrug for cisplatin delivery: preparation, in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Colloid Surf B Biointerfaces. 2015;136:160–167. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.09.01026387067
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duda F, Kieke M, Waltz F, et al. Highly biocompatible behaviour and slow degradation of a LDH (layered double hydroxide)-coating on implants in the middle ear of rabbits. J Mater Sci-Mater Med. 2015;26(1):9. doi:10.1007/s10856-014-5334-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin AD, Kiick KL. Reversible maleimide–thiol adducts yield glutathione-sensitive poly(ethylene glycol)–heparin hydrogels. Polym Chem. 2013;4(1):133–143. doi:10.1039/C2PY20576A23766781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan Z, Gui L, Zheng J, et al. GSH-activated light-up near-infrared fluorescent probe with high affinity to αvβ3 integrin for precise early tumor identification. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(37):30994–31007. doi:10.1021/acsami.8b0984130141897
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yuan D, Ding L, Sun Z, et al. MRI/Fluorescence bimodal amplification system for cellular GSH detection and tumor cell imaging based on manganese dioxide nanosheet. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1747. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-20110-z29379132
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gaspar VM, Baril P, Costa EC, et al. Bioreducible poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline)–PLA–PEI-SS triblock copolymer micelles for co-delivery of DNA minicircles and doxorubicin. J Control Release. 2015;213:175–191. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.07.01126184050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo Z, Cai K, Hu Y, et al. Redox-responsive molecular nanoreservoirs for controlled intracellular anticancer drug delivery based on magnetic nanoparticles. Adv Mater. 2012;24(3):431–435. doi:10.1002/adma.20110345822180323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao N, Jin J, Wang H, et al. Design of bis-spiropyran ligands as dipolar molecule receptors and application to in vivo glutathione fluorescent probes. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132(2):725–736. doi:10.1021/ja908215t20030359
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang J, Sun X, Mao W, et al. Tumor redox heterogeneity-responsive prodrug nanocapsules for cancer chemotherapy. Adv Mater. 2013;25(27):3670–3676. doi:10.1002/adma.20130092923740675
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu L, Chen Y, Wu M, et al. “Manganese extraction” strategy enables tumor-sensitive biodegradability and theranostics of nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc. 2016;138(31):9881–9894. doi:10.1021/jacs.6b0429927441571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend DM, Tew KD, Tapiero H. The importance of glutathione in human disease. Biomed Pharmacother. 2003;57(3):145–155.12818476
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsui H, Oaki Y, Imai H. Tunable photochemical properties of a covalently anchored and spatially confined organic polymer in a layered compound. Nanoscale. 2016;8(21):11076–11083. doi:10.1039/c6nr02368a27228179
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deng R, Xie X, Vendrell M, et al. Intracellular glutathione detection using MnO2-nanosheet-modified upconversion nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133(50):20168–20171. doi:10.1021/ja210077422107163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai W, Wang J, Liu H, et al. Gold nanorods@metal-organic framework core-shell nanostructure as contrast agent for photoacoustic imaging and its biocompatibility. J Alloy Compd. 2018;748:193–198. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Shin T-H, Cheon J, et al. Recent developments in magnetic diagnostic systems. Chem Rev. 2015;115(19):10690–10724. doi:10.1021/cr500698d26258867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong F, Cheng L, Yang N, et al. Bimetallic oxide MnMoOX nanorods for in vivo photoacoustic imaging of GSH and tumor-specific photothermal therapy. Nano Lett. 2018;18(9):6037–6044. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0293330141945
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu Y, Yang Z, Huang X, et al. Glutathione-responsive self-assembled magnetic gold nanowreath for enhanced tumor imaging and imaging-guided photothermal therapy. ACS Nano. 2018;12(8):8129–8137. doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b0298030001110
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li J, Ke W, Wang L, et al. Self-sufficing H2O2-responsive nanocarriers through tumor-specific H2O2 production for synergistic oxidation-chemotherapy. J Control Release. 2016;225:64–74. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.01.02926806789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Zhen W, Jin L, et al. All-in-one theranostic nanoagent with enhanced reactive oxygen species generation and modulating tumor microenvironment ability for effective tumor eradication. ACS Nano. 2018;12(5):4886–4893. doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b0189329727164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Zhao K, Bu W, et al. Marriage of scintillator and semiconductor for synchronous radiotherapy and deep photodynamic therapy with diminished oxygen dependence. Angew Chem-Int Edit. 2015;54(6):1770–1774. doi:10.1002/anie.201408472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Zhen W, Wang Y, et al. One-dimensional Fe2P acts as a Fenton agent in response to NIR II light and ultrasound for deep tumor synergetic theranostics. Angew Chem-Int Edit. 2019;58(8):2407–2412. doi:10.1002/anie.201813702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao S, Lin H, Zhang H, et al. Nanocatalytic tumor therapy by biomimetic dual inorganic nanozyme-catalyzed cascade reaction. Adv Sci. 2019;6(3):1801733. doi:10.1002/advs.201801733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan W, Bu W, Shen B, et al. Intelligent MnO2 nanosheets anchored with upconversion nanoprobes for concurrent pH-/H2O2-responsive UCL imaging and oxygen-elevated synergetic therapy. Adv Mater. 2015;27(28):4155–4161. doi:10.1002/adma.20140514126058562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang R, Chen Y, Huo M, et al. Sequential catalytic nanomedicine augments synergistic chemodrug and chemodynamic cancer therapy. Nanoscale Horiz. 2019. doi:10.1039/C9NH00008A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng F, Tu Y, van Hest JCM, et al. Self-guided supramolecular cargo-loaded nanomotors with chemotactic behavior towards cells. Angew Chem-Int Edit. 2015;54(40):11662–11665. doi:10.1002/anie.201504186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napoli A, Valentini M, Tirelli N, et al. Oxidation-responsive polymeric vesicles. Nat Mater. 2004;3:183. doi:10.1038/nmat108114991021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma N, Li Y, Xu H, et al. Dual redox responsive assemblies formed from diselenide block copolymers. J Am Chem Soc. 2010;132(2):442–443. doi:10.1021/ja908124g20020681
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhammad F, Wang A, Miao L, et al. Synthesis of oxidant prone nanosilver to develop H2O2 responsive drug delivery system. Langmuir. 2015;31(1):514–521. doi:10.1021/la503922j25486873
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang X, Zhuang J, Chung SW, et al. Hypoxia-tropic protein nanocages for modulation of tumor- and chemotherapy-associated hypoxia. ACS Nano. 2019;13(1):236–247. doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b0539930576113
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yu W, Liu T, Zhang M, et al. O2 economizer for inhibiting cell respiration to combat the hypoxia obstacle in tumor treatments. ACS Nano. 2019;13(2):1784–1794. doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b0785230698953
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• He Z, Xiao Y, Zhang J-R, et al. In situ formation of large pore silica–mnO2 nanocomposites with H+/H2O2 sensitivity for O2-elevated photodynamic therapy and potential MR imaging. Chem Commun. 2018;54(24):2962–2965. doi:10.1039/C7CC09532E
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bokare AD, Choi W. Review of iron-free fenton-like systems for activating H2O2 in advanced oxidation processes. J Hazard Mater. 2014;275:121–135. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.04.05424857896
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Tian J, He W, et al. H2O2-activatable and O2-evolving nanoparticles for highly efficient and selective photodynamic therapy against hypoxic tumor cells. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137(4):1539–1547. doi:10.1021/ja511420n25574812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Wang F, Liu C, et al. Nanozyme decorated metal–organic frameworks for enhanced photodynamic therapy. ACS Nano. 2018;12(1):651–661. doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b0774629290107
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tang Z, Liu Y, He M, et al. Chemodynamic therapy: tumour microenvironment-mediated Fenton and Fenton-like reactions. Angew Chem-Int Edit. 2019;58(4):946–956. doi:10.1002/anie.201805664
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huo M, Wang L, Chen Y, et al. Tumor-selective catalytic nanomedicine by nanocatalyst delivery. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):357. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00424-828842577
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tang Z, Zhang H, Liu Y, et al. Antiferromagnetic pyrite as the tumor microenvironment-mediated nanoplatform for self-enhanced tumor imaging and therapy. Adv Mater. 2017;29(47):1701683. doi:10.1002/adma.201700681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong Z, Feng L, Chao Y, et al. Amplification of tumor oxidative stresses with liposomal fenton catalyst and glutathione inhibitor for enhanced cancer chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Nano Lett. 2019;19(2):805–815. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0390530592897
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu P, Wang Y, An L, et al. Ultrasmall WO3–x@γ-poly-l-glutamic acid nanoparticles as a photoacoustic imaging and effective photothermal-enhanced chemodynamic therapy agent for cancer. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(45):38833–38844. doi:10.1021/acsami.8b1567830351904
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin L-S, Song J, Song L, et al. Simultaneous Fenton-like ion delivery and glutathione depletion by MnO2-based nanoagent to enhance chemodynamic therapy. Angew Chem-Int Edit. 2018;57(18):4902–4906. doi:10.1002/anie.201712027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashfi K. The role of hydrogen sulfide in health and disease. Biochem Pharmacol. 2018;149:1–4. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2018.02.03029501583
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen Y, Zhu C, Yang Z, et al. A ratiometric fluorescent probe for rapid detection of hydrogen sulfide in mitochondria. Angew Chem-Int Edit. 2013;52(6):1688–1691. doi:10.1002/anie.201207701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renga B. Hydrogen sulfide generation in mammals: the molecular biology of cystathionine-β-synthase (CBS) and Cystathionine-γ-Lyase (CSE). Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets. 2011;10(2):85–91.21275900
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin VS, Chen W, Xian M, et al. Chemical probes for molecular imaging and detection of hydrogen sulfide and reactive sulfur species in biological systems. Chem Soc Rev. 2015;44(14):4596–4618. doi:10.1039/c4cs00298a25474627
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong J, Xia L, Huang Q, et al. Cyanine-based NIR fluorescent probe for monitoring H2S and imaging in living cells and in vivo. Talanta. 2018;184:109–114. doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2018.03.00629674020
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou X, Lee S, Xu Z, et al. Recent progress on the development of chemosensors for gases. Chem Rev. 2015;115(15):7944–8000. doi:10.1021/cr500567r25651137
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lippert AR, New EJ, Chang CJ. Reaction-based fluorescent probes for selective imaging of hydrogen sulfide in living cells. J Am Chem Soc. 2011;133(26):10078–10080. doi:10.1021/ja203661j21671682
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang F, Xu G, Gu X, et al. Realizing highly chemoselective detection of H2S in vitro and in vivo with fluorescent probes inside core-shell silica nanoparticles. Biomaterials. 2018;159:82–90. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.01.00929316454
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hong J, Zhou E, Gong S, et al. A red to near-infrared fluorescent probe featuring a super large stokes shift for light-up detection of endogenous H2S. Dyes Pigment. 2019;160:787–793. doi:10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao C, Zhang X, Li K, et al. Förster resonance energy transfer switchable self-assembled micellar nanoprobe: ratiometric fluorescent trapping of endogenous H2S generation via fluvastatin-stimulated upregulation. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137(26):8490–8498. doi:10.1021/jacs.5b0324826070091
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xu G, Yan Q, Lv X, et al. Imaging of colorectal cancers using activatable nanoprobes with second near-infrared window emission. Angew Chem-Int Edit. 2018;57(14):3626–3630. doi:10.1002/anie.201712528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi B, Gu X, Fei Q, et al. Photoacoustic probes for real-time tracking of endogenous H2S in living mice. Chem Sci. 2017;8(3):2150–2155. doi:10.1039/c6sc04703c28507667
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Szabo C, Coletta C, Chao C, et al. Tumor-derived hydrogen sulfide, produced by cystathionine-β-synthase, stimulates bioenergetics, cell proliferation, and angiogenesis in colon cancer. PANS. 2013;110(30):12474–12479. doi:10.1073/pnas.1306241110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan C, Repici A. Recent advances in diagnostic colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening: an update for radiologists. Am J Roentgenol. 2017;209(1):88–93. doi:10.2214/AJR.17.1786328379726
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ge R, Lin M, Li X, et al. Cu2+-loaded polydopamine nanoparticles for magnetic resonance imaging-guided pH- and near-infrared-light-stimulated thermochemotherapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(23):19706–19716. doi:10.1021/acsami.7b0558328553876
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li Z, Wang N, Lin Z, et al. Room-temperature high-performance H2S sensor based on porous CuO nanosheets prepared by hydrothermal method. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8(32):20962–20968. doi:10.1021/acsami.6b0289327447694
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ma Y, Li X, Li A, et al. H2S-activable MOF nanoparticle photosensitizer for effective photodynamic therapy against cancer with controllable singlet-oxygen release. Angew Chem-Int Edit. 2017;56(44):13752–13756. doi:10.1002/anie.201708005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An L, Wang X, Rui X, et al. The in situ sulfidation of Cu2O by endogenous H2S for colon cancer theranostics. Angew Chem-Int Edit. 2018;57(48):15782–15786. doi:10.1002/anie.201810082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar