Surfactin-Loaded ĸ-Carrageenan Oligosaccharides Entangled Cellulose Nanofibers as a Versatile Vehicle Against Periodontal Pathogens

References

• Nascimento PC, Castro MML, Magno MB, et al. Association between periodontitis and cognitive impairment in adults: a systematic review. Front Neurol. 2019;10(323):1–9. doi:10.3389/fneur.2019.0032330761061
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aminu N, Chan S-Y, Yam M-F, Toh S-M. A dual-action chitosan-based nanogel system of triclosan and flurbiprofen for localised treatment of periodontitis. Int J Pharm. 2019;570:118659. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.11865931493495
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arigbede AO, Babatope BO, Bamidele MK. Periodontitis and systemic diseases: a literature review. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2012;16(4):487–491. doi:10.4103/0972-124X.10687823493942
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoare A, Soto C, Rojas-Celis V, Bravo D. Chronic inflammation as a link between periodontitis and carcinogenesis. Mediators Inflamm. 2019;2019:1–14. doi:10.1155/2019/1029857
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helal O, Göstemeyer G, Krois J, Fawzy El Sayed K, Graetz C, Schwendicke F. Predictors for tooth loss in periodontitis patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46(7):699–712. doi:10.1111/jcpe.1311831025366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiranjeevi T, Prasad OH, Prasad UV, et al. Identification of microbial pathogens in periodontal disease and diabetic patients of south indian population. Bioinformation. 2014;10(4):241–245. doi:10.6026/9732063001024124966528
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winning L, Linden GJ. Periodontitis and systemic disease. BDJ Team. 2015;2(10):15163. doi:10.1038/bdjteam.2015.163
   Google Scholar
• Teughels W, Dhondt R, Dekeyser C, Quirynen M. Treatment of aggressive periodontitis. Periodontol. 2014;65(1):107–133. doi:10.1111/prd.12020
   Google Scholar
• Li S, Zhu D, Li K, Yang Y, Lei Z, Zhang Z. Soybean curd residue: composition, utilization, and related limiting factors. ISRN Ind Eng. 2013;2013:1–8. doi:10.1155/2013/423590
   Google Scholar
• Torki A, Khalaji-Pirbalouty V, Lorigooini Z, Rafieian-Kopaei M, Sadeghimanesh A, Rabiei Z. Anchusa italica extract: phytochemical and neuroprotective evaluation on global cerebral ischemia and reperfusion. Braz J Pharm. 2018;54:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Ravindran L, Sreekala MS, Thomas S. Novel processing parameters for the extraction of cellulose nanofibres (CNF) from environmentally benign pineapple leaf fibres (PALF): structure-property relationships. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;131:858–870. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.03.13430904530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan AC. Cellulose: the structure slowly unravels. Cellulose. 1997;4(3):173–207. doi:10.1023/A:1018431705579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash Menon M, Selvakumar R, Suresh Kumar P, Ramakrishna S. Extraction and modification of cellulose nanofibers derived from biomass for environmental application. RSC Adv. 2017;7(68):42750–42773. doi:10.1039/C7RA06713E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin N, Dufresne A. Nanocellulose in biomedicine: current status and future prospect. Eur Polym J. 2014;59:302–325. doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.07.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan K, Heo S, Foo M, Chew IM, Yoo C. An insight into nanocellulose as soft condensed matter: challenge and future prospective toward environmental sustainability. Sci Total Environ. 2019;650:1309–1326. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.40230308818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giri J, Adhikari R. A brief review on extraction of nanocellulose and its application. BIBECHANA. 2012;9:81–87. doi:10.3126/bibechana.v9i0.7179
   Google Scholar
• Chandra J, George N, Narayanankutty SK. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibrils from areca nut husk fibre. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;142:158–166. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.01.01526917386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hossain M, Zaman H, Rahman T. Derivation of nanocellulose from native rice husk. Chem Eng Res Bull. 2018;20:1–19. doi:10.3329/cerb.v20i1.36926
   Google Scholar
• Morán J, Alvarez V, Cyras V, Vázquez A. Extraction of cellulose and preparation of nanocellulose from sisal fibers. Cellulose. 2008;15:149–159. doi:10.1007/s10570-007-9145-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halib N, Perrone F, Cemazar M, et al. Potential applications of nanocellulose-containing materials in the biomedical field. Materials (Basel). 2017;10(8):1–31. doi:10.3390/ma10080977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trache D. Nanocellulose as a promising sustainable material for biomedical applications. AIMS Mat Sci. 2018;5:201–205. doi:10.3934/matersci.2018.2.201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espino-Pérez E, Domenek S, Belgacem N, Sillard C, Bras J. Green process for chemical functionalization of nanocellulose with carboxylic acids. Biomacromolecules. 2014;15(12):4551–4560. doi:10.1021/bm501345825353612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Missoum K, Belgacem MN, Bras J. Nanofibrillated cellulose surface modification: a review. Materials (Basel). 2013;6(5):1745–1766. doi:10.3390/ma605174528809240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalsoom Khan A, Saba AU, Nawazish S, et al. Carrageenan based bionanocomposites as drug delivery tool with special emphasis on the influence of ferromagnetic nanoparticles. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2017;2017:1–13. doi:10.1155/2017/8158315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu G, Guan H, Ioanoviciu AS, et al. Structural studies on κ-carrageenan derived oligosaccharides. Carbohydr Res. 2002;337(5):433–440. doi:10.1016/S0008-6215(02)00009-511861017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azizi S, Mohamad R, Abdul Rahim R, Mohammadinejad R, Bin Ariff A. Hydrogel beads bio-nanocomposite based on kappa-carrageenan and green synthesized silver nanoparticles for biomedical applications. Int J Biol Macromol. 2017;104:423–431. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.06.01028591593
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng Y, Huang M, Sun D, et al. Dual physically cross-linked κ-carrageenan-based double network hydrogels with superior self-healing performance for biomedical application. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(43):37544–37554. doi:10.1021/acsami.8b1538530296052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen W-C, Juang R-S, Wei Y-H. Applications of a lipopeptide biosurfactant, surfactin, produced by microorganisms. Biochem Eng J. 2015;103:158–169. doi:10.1016/j.bej.2015.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isa MHM, Shannaq MAHF, Mohamed N, et al. Antibacterial activity of surfactin produced by b.Subtillis msh1. Tran Sci Technol. 2017;4:402–407.
   Google Scholar
• Meena KR, Sharma A, Kanwar SS. Therapeutics. Antitumoral and antimicrobial activity of surfactin extracted from bacillus subtilis klp2015. Int J Pept Res Ther. 2019;1–11:423–433. Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Priyadarsini S, Mukherjee S, Mishra M. Nanoparticles used in dentistry: a review. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2018;8(1):58–67. doi:10.1016/j.jobcr.2017.12.00429556466
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horwitz W. Official Methods of Analysis of Aoac International. Gaithersburg, MD: AOAC International; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Maryana R, Ma’rifatun D, Wheni AI, Satriyo KW, Rizal WA. Alkaline pretreatment on sugarcane bagasse for bioethanol production. Energy Procedia. 2014;47:250–254. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2014.01.221
   Google Scholar
• Thiripura Sundari M, Ramesh A. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from the aquatic weed water hyacinth—eichhornia crassipes. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;87(2):1701–1705. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.09.076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang B, Sain M. Isolation of nanofibers from soybean source and their reinforcing capability on synthetic polymers. Compos Sci Technol. 2007;67(11–12):2521–2527. doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.006.12.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulandari WT, Rochliadi A, Arcana IM. Nanocellulose prepared by acid hydrolysis of isolated cellulose from sugarcane bagasse. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng. 2016;107:1–8. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/107/1/012045
   Google Scholar
• Zain NFM, Yusop SM, Ahmad I. Preparation and characterization of cellulose and nanocellulose from pomelo (citrus grandis) albedo. J Nutr Food Sci. 2014;5:226–233.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Huang H. Preparation and characterization of cellulose composite hydrogels from tea residue and carbohydrate additives. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;147:226–233. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.03.10027178928
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghaderi-Ghahfarokhi M, Barzegar M, Sahari MA, Azizi MHJF, Technology B. Nanoencapsulation approach to improve antimicrobial and antioxidant activity of thyme essential oil in beef burgers during refrigerated storage. Food Bioprocess Tech. 2016;9(7):1187–1201. doi:10.1007/s11947-016-1708-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun L, Chen Y, Zhou Y, et al. Preparation of 5-fluorouracil-loaded chitosan nanoparticles and study of the sustained release in vitro and in vivo. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2017;12(5):418–423. doi:10.1016/j.ajps.2017.04.00232104354
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mubarak MQE, Hassan AR, Hamid AA, Kalil S, Isa MHM. A simple and effective isocratic HPLC method for fast identification and quantification of surfactin. Sains Malays. 2015;44:1–6. doi:10.17576/jsm-2015-4401-16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alara OR, Abdurahman NH, Olalere OA. Optimization of microwave-assisted extraction of flavonoids and antioxidants from vernonia amygdalina leaf using response surface methodology. Food Bioprod Pro. 2018;107:36–48. doi:10.1016/j.fbp.2017.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palaksha M, Ahmed M, Das S. Antibacterial activity of garlic extract on streptomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli solely and in synergism with streptomycin. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2010;1(1):12–15. doi:10.4103/0976-9668.7166622096329
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hwang YY, Ramalingam K, Bienek DR, Lee V, You T, Alvarez R. Antimicrobial activity of nanoemulsion in combination with cetylpyridinium chloride in multidrug-resistant acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57(8):3568–3575. doi:10.1128/AAC.02109-1223669390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurunathan S, Han JW, Kwon D-N, Kim J-H. Enhanced antibacterial and anti-biofilm activities of silver nanoparticles against gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2014;9(1):373. doi:10.1186/1556-276X-9-37325136281
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kong Z-L, Johnson A, Ko F-C, He J-L, Cheng S-C. Effect of cistanche tubulosa extracts on male reproductive function in streptozotocin⁻nicotinamide-induced diabetic rats. Nutrients. 2018;10(10):1–22. doi:10.3390/nu10101562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel S, Mishra P. Thymoquinone inhibits biofilm formation and has selective antibacterial activity due to ros generation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102(4):1955–1967. doi:10.1007/s00253-018-8736-829356869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Loh K-C, Sarvanantharajah S, Tong YW, Wang C-H, Dai Y. Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of soybean curd residue for methane production: characterizing bacterial and methanogen communities and their correlations with organic loading rate and operating temperature. Bioresour Technol. 2019;288:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li B, Qiao M, Lu F. Composition, nutrition, and utilization of okara (soybean residue). Food Rev Int. 2012;28(3):231–252. doi:10.1080/87559129.2011.595023
   Google Scholar
• Vong WC, Au Yang KLC, Liu S-Q. Okara (soybean residue) biotransformation by yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. Int J of Food Microbiol. 2016;235:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2016.06.03927391864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventura-Cruz S, Tecante A. Extraction and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from rose stems (rosa spp.). Carbohydr Polym. 2019;220:53–59. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2019.05.05331196550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yano H, Omura H, Honma Y, Okumura H, Sano H, Nakatsubo FJC. Designing cellulose nanofiber surface for high density polyethylene reinforcement. Cellulose. 2018;25(6):3351–3362. doi:10.1007/s10570-018-1787-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sankalia MG, Mashru RC, Sankalia JM, Sutariya VB. Physicochemical characterization of papain entrapped in ionotropically cross-linked kappa-carrageenan gel beads for stability improvement using Doehlert shell design. J Pharm Sci. 2006;95(9):1994–2013. doi:10.1002/jps.2066516850431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stetefeld J, McKenna SA, Patel TR. Dynamic light scattering: a practical guide and applications in biomedical sciences. Biophys Rev. 2016;8(4):409–427. doi:10.1007/s12551-016-0218-628510011
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gurpreet K, Singh SK. Review of nanoemulsion formulation and characterization techniques. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2018;80:781–789. doi:10.4172/pharmaceutical-sciences.1000422
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee S. DLS and zeta potential – what they are and what they are not? J Control Release. 2016;235:337–351. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.06.01727297779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honary S, Zahir F. Effect of zeta potential on the properties of nano-drug delivery systems - a review (part 1). Trop J Pharm Res. 2013;12:255–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi M, Bhattacharyya A. Characterization techniques for nanotechnology applications in textiles. Indian J Fibre Text Res. 2008;33:304–317.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma R, Bisen DP, Shukla U, Sharma BG. X-ray diffraction: a powerful method of characterizing nanomaterials. Recent Res Sci Technol. 2012;42:77–79.
   Google Scholar
• Chirayil CJ, Joy J, Mathew L, Mozetic M, Koetz J, Thomas S. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibrils from helicteres isora plant. Ind Crop Prod. 2014;59:27–34. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.04.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentim R, Andrade S, Dos Santos M, et al. Composite based on biphasic calcium phosphate (ha/β-TCP) and nanocellulose from the açaí tegument. Materials (Basel). 2018;11:1–16. doi:10.3390/ma11112213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abraham E, Deepa B, Pothan LA, et al. Extraction of nanocellulose fibrils from lignocellulosic fibres: a novel approach. Carbohyd Polym. 2011;86(4):1468–1475. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamaming J, Hashim R, Leh CP, Sulaiman O, Sugimoto T, Nasir M. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from parenchyma and vascular bundle of oil palm trunk (elaeis guineensis). Carbohydr Polym. 2015;134:534–540. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.01726428155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeni M, Favero D, Pacheco K, Ana Grisa MC. Preparation of microcellulose (MCC) and nanocellulose (NCC) from eucalyptus kraft ssp pulp. Polym Sci. 2016;1:1–5. doi:10.4172/2471-9935.100007
   Google Scholar
• Şen M, Erboz EN. Determination of critical gelation conditions of κ-carrageenan by viscosimetric and ft-ir analyses. Food Res Int. 2010;43(5):1361–1364. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2010.03.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liew JWY, Loh KS, Ahmad A, Lim KL, Wan Daud WR. Synthesis and characterization of modified κ-carrageenan for enhanced proton conductivity as polymer electrolyte membrane. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):e0185313–e0185313. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.018531328957374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iijima M, Hatakeyama T, Hatakeyama H. Gel-sol-gel transition of kappa–carrageenan and methylcellulose binary systems studied by differential scanning calorimetry. Thermochim Acta. 2014;596:63–69. doi:10.1016/j.tca.2014.09.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan S, Zakaria S, Chia CH, Chen RS, Ellis AV, Kaco H. Highly porous regenerated cellulose hydrogel and aerogel prepared from hydrothermal synthesized cellulose carbamate. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0173743–e0173743. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.017374328296977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahuguna A, Khan I, Bajpai VK, Chul S. MTT assay to evaluate the cytotoxic potential of a drug. Bangladesh J Pharmacol. 2017;12:115–118. doi:10.3329/bjp.v12i2.30892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaiswal M, Dudhe R, Sharma PK. Nanoemulsion: an advanced mode of drug delivery system. 3 Biotech. 2015;5(2):123–127. doi:10.1007/s13205-014-0214-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vogel R, Pal AK, Jambhrunkar S, et al. High-resolution single particle zeta potential characterisation of biological nanoparticles using tunable resistive pulse sensing. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):17479. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-14981-x29234015
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shen S, Wu Y, Liu Y, Wu D. High drug-loading nanomedicines: progress, current status, and prospects. Int J Nanomed. 2017;12:4085–4109. doi:10.2147/IJN.S132780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa M, Dantas IT, Feitosa FX, et al. Performance of a biosurfactant produced by bacillus subtilis lami005 on the formation of oil/biosurfactant/water emulsion: study of the phase behaviour of emulsified systems. Braz J Chem Eng. 2014;31:613–623. doi:10.1590/0104-6632.20140313s00002766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Faria AF, Teodoro-Martinez DS, de Oliveira Barbosa GN, et al. Production and structural characterization of surfactin (c14/leu7) produced by bacillus subtilis isolate lsfm-05 grown on raw glycerol from the biodiesel industry. Process Biochem. 2011;46(10):1951–1957. doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2011.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen J, Bross P. A cellular viability assay to monitor drug toxicity. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;648:303–311.20700722
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gasque K, Al-Ahj LP, Oliveira RC, Magalhães AC. Cell density and solvent are critical parameters affecting formazan evaluation in mtt assay. Braz Arch Biol Technol. 2014;57:381–385. doi:10.1590/S1516-89132014005000007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jo HY, Kim Y, Park HW, et al. The unreliability of mtt assay in the cytotoxic test of primary cultured glioblastoma cells. Exp Neurobiol. 2015;24(3):235–245. doi:10.5607/en.2015.24.3.23526412973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panariti A, Miserocchi G, Rivolta I. The effect of nanoparticle uptake on cellular behavior: disrupting or enabling functions? Nanotechnol Sci Appl. 2012;5:87–100. doi:10.2147/NSA.S2551524198499
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang Y-W, Cambre M, Lee H-J. The toxicity of nanoparticles depends on multiple molecular and physicochemical mechanisms. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(12):2702. doi:10.3390/ijms18122702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Z, Bertin R, Froldi G. Ec50 estimation of antioxidant activity in DPPH assay using several statistical programs. Food Chem. 2013;138(1):414–420. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.11.00123265506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Yang B, Wu Y, et al. Structural characterization and antioxidant activities of κ-carrageenan oligosaccharides degraded by different methods. Food Chem. 2015;178:311–318. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.01.10525704717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balouiri M, Sadiki M, Ibnsouda SK. Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: a review. J Pharm Anal. 2016;6(2):71–79. doi:10.1016/j.jpha.2015.11.00529403965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haney EF, Trimble MJ, Cheng JT, Vallé Q, Hancock REW. Critical assessment of methods to quantify biofilm growth and evaluate antibiofilm activity of host defence peptides. Biomolecules. 2018;8(2):1–22. doi:10.3390/biom8020029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corte L, Casagrande Pierantoni D, Tascini C, Roscini L, Cardinali G. Biofilm specific activity: a measure to quantify microbial biofilm. Microorganisms. 2019;7(3):1–14. doi:10.3390/microorganisms7030073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed MA, Nasr M, Elkhatib WF, Eltayeb WN. In vitro evaluation of antimicrobial activity and cytotoxicity of different nanobiotics targeting multidrug resistant and biofilm forming staphylococci. J BioMed Res Int. 2018;2018:1–7. doi:10.1155/2018/7658238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong KS, Cheow YL, Lee SM. The role of reactive oxygen species in the antimicrobial activity of pyochelin. J Adv Res. 2017;8(4):393–398. doi:10.1016/j.jare.2017.05.00728580180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neeraja M, Lakshmi V, Padmasri C, Padmaja K. Utility of acridine orange staining for detection of bacteria from positive blood cultures. J Microbiol Methods. 2017;139:215–217. doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2017.06.01428625706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Chen G, Qiang S, et al. Intensifying soluble dietary fiber production and properties of soybean curd residue via autoclaving treatment. Bioresour Technol Rep. 2019;7:100203. doi:10.1016/j.biteb.2019.100203
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole DK. Characteristics and use of okara, the soybean residue from soy milk production - a review. J Agric Food Chem. 1999;47(2):363–371. doi:10.1021/jf980754l10563901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasai N, Murata A, Inui H, Sakamoto T, Kahn RI. Enzymatic high digestion of soybean milk residue (okara). J Agric Food Chem. 2004;52(18):5709–5716. doi:10.1021/jf035067v15373413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phanthong P, Reubroycharoen P, Hao X, Xu G, Abudula A, Guan G. Nanocellulose: extraction and application. Carbon Resour Convers. 2018;1(1):32–43. doi:10.1016/j.crcon.2018.05.004
   Google Scholar
• Trifol J, Sillard C, Plackett D, Szabo P, Bras J, Daugaard AEJC. Chemically extracted nanocellulose from sisal fibres by a simple and industrially relevant process. Cellulose. 2017;24(1):107–118. doi:10.1007/s10570-016-1097-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam M, Mahbubul Alam M, Zoccola M. Review on modification of nanocellulose for application in composites. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol. 2013;2(10):5444–5451.
   Google Scholar
• Börjesson M, Westman G. Crystalline nanocellulose — preparation, modification, and properties. IntechOpen. 2015;159–191.
   Google Scholar
• Habibi Y. Key advances in the chemical modification of nanocelluloses. Chem Soc Rev. 2014;43(5):1519–1542. doi:10.1039/C3CS60204D24316693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Zhao X, Gao Y, Yin J, Bai M, Wang F. Green synthesis of gold nanoparticles using carrageenan oligosaccharide and their in vitro antitumor activity. Mar Drugs. 2018;16(8):277. doi:10.3390/md16080277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu X, Jiang X, Aubree E, Boulenguer P, Critchley AT. Preparation and in vivo. antitumor activity of κ-carrageenan oligosaccharides. Pharm Biol. 2006;44(9):646–650. doi:10.1080/13880200601006848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Huang S, Li L. Thermoreversible gelation and viscoelasticity of κ-carrageenan hydrogels. J Rheol. 2016;60(2):203–214. doi:10.1122/1.4938525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochas C, Geissler E. Measurement of dynamic light scattering intensity in gels. Macromolecules. 2014;47(22):8012–8017. doi:10.1021/ma501882d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaszuba M, McKnight D, Connah MT, McNeil-Watson FK, Nobbmann U. Measuring sub nanometre sizes using dynamic light scattering. J Nanoparticle Res. 2008;10(5):823–829. doi:10.1007/s11051-007-9317-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradhan S, Hedberg J, Blomberg E, Wold S, Odnevall Wallinder I. Effect of sonication on particle dispersion, administered dose and metal release of non-functionalized, non-inert metal nanoparticles. J Nanoparticle Res. 2016;18(9):285. doi:10.1007/s11051-016-3597-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agwuncha S, Anusionwu C, Owonubi S, Rotimi Sadiku E, Busuguma UA, Ibrahim I. Extraction of Cellulose Nanofibers and Their Eco/Friendly Polymer Composites. Springer; 2019:37–64.
   Google Scholar
• Rahimi M, Brown RJ, Tsuzuki T, Rainey T. A comparison of cellulose nanocrystals and cellulose nanofibres extracted from bagasse using acid and ball milling methods. Adv Nat Sci-Nanosci. 2016;7:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Clogston J, Patri AK. Zeta potential measurement. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;697:63–70.21116954
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nagarajan KJ, Balaji AN, Ramanujam NR. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanocrystals from saharan aloe vera cactus fibers. Int J Polym Anal Ch. 2018;1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leite ALMP, Zanon CD, Menegalli FC. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibers from cassava root bagasse and peelings. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;157:962–970. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.04827988015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosgoeller W, Prassl R, Zimmer A. Chapter seventeen - nanoparticle-mediated treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Methods Enzymol. 2012;508:325–354.22449934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danaei M, Dehghankhold M, Ataei S, et al. Impact of particle size and polydispersity index on the clinical applications of lipidic nanocarrier systems. Pharmaceutics. 2018;10(2):1–17. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics10020057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vernon-Parry KD. Scanning electron microscopy: an introduction. III-Vs Rev. 2000;13(4):40–44.
   Google Scholar
• Gauvin R. Review of transmission electron microscopy for the characterization of materials. SPIE. 1997;10291:200–229.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel-da-Silva AL, Pinto F, Lopes-da-Silva JA, Trindade T, Goodfellow BJ, Gil AM. Rheological behavior of thermoreversible κ-carrageenan/nanosilica gels. J Colloid Interf Sci. 2008;320(2):575–581. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2008.01.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rani A, Monga S, Bansal M, Sharma A. Bionanocomposites reinforced with cellulose nanofibers derived from sugarcane bagasse. Polym Compos. 2018;39(S1):E55–E64. doi:10.1002/pc.24112
   Google Scholar
• Jung Y-S, Lee B-H, Yoo S-H, Gomez-Casati DF. Physical structure and absorption properties of tailor-made porous starch granules produced by selected amylolytic enzymes. PLoS One. 2017;12(7):1–14. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thommes M, Baert L, van ’T Klooster G, et al. Improved bioavailability of darunavir by use of κ-carrageenan versus microcrystalline cellulose as pelletisation aid. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2009;72(3):614–620. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2009.03.00419303929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petit C, Batool F, Bugueno IM, Schwint P, Benkirane-Jessel N, Huck O. Contribution of statins towards periodontal treatment: a review. Mediat Inflamm. 2019;2019:1–33. doi:10.1155/2019/6367402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lasserre JF, Brecx MC, Toma S. Oral microbes, biofilms and their role in periodontal and peri-implant diseases. Materials (Basel). 2018;11(10):1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rafiei M, Kiani F, Sayehmiri F, Sayehmiri K, Sheikhi A, Zamanian Azodi M. Study of porphyromonas gingivalis in periodontal diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2017;31(1):62. doi:10.14196/mjiri.31.6229445691
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• How KY, Song KP, Chan KG. Porphyromonas gingivalis: an overview of periodontopathic pathogen below the gum line. Front Microbiol. 2016;7:53. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.0005326903954
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama M, Ohara N. Molecular mechanisms of porphyromonas gingivalis-host cell interaction on periodontal diseases. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2017;53(4):134–140. doi:10.1016/j.jdsr.2017.06.00129201258
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dani S, Prabhu A, Chaitra KR, Desai NC, Patil SR, Rajeev R. Assessment of streptococcus mutans in healthy versus gingivitis and chronic periodontitis: a clinico-microbiological study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2016;7(4):529–534. doi:10.4103/0976-237X.19411427994423
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laosuwan K, Epasinghe DJ, Wu Z, Leung WK, Green DW, Jung HS. Comparison of biofilm formation and migration of streptococcus mutans on tooth roots and titanium miniscrews. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2018;4(2):40–47. doi:10.1002/cre2.10129744214
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharnow AM, Solinski AE, Wuest WM, Targeting S. mutans biofilms: a perspective on preventing dental caries. Med Chem Comm. 2019;10(7):1057–1067. doi:10.1039/C9MD00015A
   Google Scholar
• Joe MM, Bradeeba K, Parthasarathi R, et al. Development of surfactin based nanoemulsion formulation from selected cooking oils: evaluation for antimicrobial activity against selected food associated microorganisms. J Taiwan Inst Chem. 2012;43(2):172–180. doi:10.1016/j.jtice.2011.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalaby KS, Soliman ME, Casettari L, et al. Determination of factors controlling the particle size and entrapment efficiency of noscapine in PEG/PLA nanoparticles using artificial neural networks. Int J Nanomedicine. 2014;9:4953–4964. doi:10.2147/IJN.S6873725364252
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bo S, Min Z, Jing S, Zhibin H, Pedram F, Yonghao N. Applications of cellulose-based materials in sustained drug delivery systems. Curr Med Chem. 2019;26(14):2485–2501. doi:10.2174/092986732466617070514330828685683
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta D. Methods for determination of antioxidant capacity: a review. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2015;6:546–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ndlovu T, Rautenbach M, Vosloo JA, Khan S, Khan W. Characterisation and antimicrobial activity of biosurfactant extracts produced by bacillus amyloliquefaciens and pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from a wastewater treatment plant. AMB Express. 2017;7(1):108. doi:10.1186/s13568-017-0363-828571306
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson C, Lukowicz R, Merchant S, et al. Quantitative and qualitative assessment methods for biofilm growth: a mini-review. Res Rev J Eng Technol. 2017;6(4):1–42.
   Google Scholar
• Moryl M, Spętana M, Dziubek K, et al. Antimicrobial, antiadhesive and antibiofilm potential of lipopeptides synthesised by bacillus subtilis, on uropathogenic bacteria. Acta biochim Pol. 2015;62:725–732. doi:10.18388/abp.2015_112026505130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memar MY, Ghotaslou R, Samiei M, Adibkia K. Antimicrobial use of reactive oxygen therapy: current insights. Infect Drug Resist. 2018;11:567–576. doi:10.2147/IDR.S14239729731645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar