Fabrication of Submicro-Nano Structures on Polyetheretherketone Surface by Femtosecond Laser for Exciting Cellular Responses of MC3T3-E1 Cells/Gingival Epithelial Cells

References

• Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials. 2007;28(32):4845–4869. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torstrick FB, Lin ASP, Potter D, et al. Porous PEEK improves the bone-implant interface compared to plasma-sprayed titanium coating on PEEK. Biomaterials. 2018;185:106–116. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian Y, Ding SY, Peng H, et al. Osteoblast growth behavior on porous-structure titanium surface. Appl Surf Sci. 2012;261:25–30. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2012.07.035
   Google Scholar
• Wang CY, Wang SN, Yang YY, et al. Bioinspired, biocompatible and peptide-decorated silk fibroin coatings for enhanced osteogenesis of bioinert implant. J Biomater Sci Polymer Edition. 2018;29:1595–1611. doi:10.1080/09205063.2018.1477316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung HD, Jang TS, Lee JE, Park SJ, Son Y, Park SH. Enhanced bioactivity of titanium-coated polyetheretherketone implants created by a high-temperature 3D printing process. Biofabrication. 2019;11:045014. doi:10.1088/1758-5090/ab376b
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jeon C, Oh KC, Park KH, Moon HS. Effects of ultraviolet treatment and alendronate immersion on osteoblast-like cells and human gingival fibroblasts cultured on titanium surfaces. Sci Rep. 2019;9:2581. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-39355-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rupp F, Liang L, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Scheideler L, Huttig F. Surface characteristics of dental implants: a review. Dental Materials. 2018;34(1):40–57. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2017.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knaus J, Schaffarczyk D, Colfen H. On the Future Design of Bio-Inspired Polyetheretherketone Dental Implants. Macromol Biosci. 2019;20:1900239. doi:10.1002/mabi.201900239
   Google Scholar
• Mahjoubi H, Buck E, Manimunda P, et al. Surface phosphonation enhances hydroxyapatite coating adhesion on polyetheretherketone and its osseointegration potential. Acta Biomaterialia. 2017;47:149–158. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2016.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raina DB, Larsson D, Sezgin EA, Isaksson H, Tagil M, Lidgren L. Biomodulation of an implant for enhanced bone-implant anchorage. Acta Biomaterialia. 2019;96:619–630. doi:10.1016/j.actbio
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu X, Li YL, Wang LX, et al. Triple-functional polyetheretherketone surface with enhanced bacteriostasis and anti-inflammatory and osseointegrative properties for implant application. Biomaterials. 2019;212:98–114. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.05.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoro F, Zhao WT, Joubert LM, et al. Revealing the Cell-Material Interface with Nanometer Resolution by Focused Ion Beam/Scanning Electron Microscopy. ACS Nano. 2017;11:8320–8328. doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b03494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim JY, Donahue HJ. Cell sensing and response to micro- and nanostructured surfaces produced by chemical and topographic patterning. Tissue Eng. 2007;13(8):1879–1891. doi:10.1089/ten.2006.0154
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patelli A, Mussano F, Brun P, et al. Nanoroughness, Surface Chemistry, and Drug Delivery Control by Atmospheric Plasma Jet on Implantable Devices. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10:39512–39523. doi:10.1021/acsami.8b15886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng QW, Yuan B, Chen XN, et al. Regulation of surface micro/nano structure and composition of polyetheretherketone and their influence on the behavior of MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblasts. J Mater Chem B. 2019;7(37):5713–5724. doi:10.1039/c9tb00943d
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gittens RA, McLachlan T, Olivares-Navarrete R, et al. The effects of combined micron-/submicron-scale surface roughness and nanoscale features on cell proliferation and differentiation. Biomaterials. 2011;32(13):3395–3403. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.01.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee BEJ, Exir H, Weck A, Grandfield K. Characterization and evaluation of femtosecond laser-induced sub-micron periodic structures generated on titanium to improve osseointegration of implants. Appl Surf Sci. 2018;441:1034–1042. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.119
   Google Scholar
• Chen P, Aso T, Sasaki R, et al. Adhesion and differentiation behaviors of mesenchymal stem cells on titanium with micrometer and nanometer-scale grid patterns produced by femtosecond laser irradiation. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2018;106(10):2735–2743. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.36503
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hasan A, Saxena V, Pandey LM. Surface Functionalization of Ti6Al4V via Self-assembled Monolayers for Improved Protein Adsorption and Fibroblast Adhesion. Langmuir. 2018;34(11):3494–3506. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.7b03152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon BS, Kim S, Kim HE, Jang TS. Hierarchical micro-nano structured Ti6Al4V surface topography via two-step etching process for enhanced hydrophilicity and osteoblastic responses. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017;73:90–98. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2016.12.064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Kim G. Three-Dimensional Hierarchical Nanofibrous Collagen Scaffold Fabricated Using Fibrillated Collagen and Pluronic F-127 for Regenerating Bone Tissue. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(42):35801–35811. doi:10.1021/acsami.8b14088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan B, Cheng QW, Zhao R, et al. Comparison of osteointegration property between PEKK and PEEK: effects of surface structure and chemistry. Biomaterials. 2018;170:116–126. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.04.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee JH, Jang HL, Lee KM, et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the bioactivity of hydroxyapatite-coated polyetheretherketone biocomposites created by cold spray technology. Acta Biomaterialia. 2013;9(4):6177–6187. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2012.11.030
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu XM, Liu XC, Wei J, Ma J, Deng F, Wei SC. Nano-TiO2/PEEK bioactive composite as a bone substitute material: in vitro and in vivo studies. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:1215–1225. doi:10.2147/IJN.S28101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velasco-Ortega E, Alfonso-Rodriguez CA, Monsalve-Guil L, et al. Relevant aspects in the surface properties in titanium dental implants for the cellular viability. Mater Sci Eng C. 2016;64:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2016.03.049
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andrukhov O, Huber R, Shi B, et al. Proliferation, behavior, and differentiation of osteoblasts on surfaces of different microroughness. Dental Materials. 2016;32:1374–1384. doi:10.1016/j.dental
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qiu JJ, Guo JS, Geng H, Qian WH, Liu XY. Three-dimensional porous graphene nanosheets synthesized on the titanium surface for osteogenic differentiation of rat bone mesenchymal stem cells. Carbon. 2017;125:227–235. doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2017.09.064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotchkiss KM, Reddy GB, Hyzy SL, Schwartz Z, Boyan BD, Olivares-Navarrete R. Titanium surface characteristics, including topography and wettability, alter macrophage activation. Acta Biomaterialia. 2016;31:425–434. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2015.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chappuis V, Maestre L, Burki A, et al. Osseointegration of ultrafine-grained titanium with a hydrophilic nano-patterned surface: an in vivo examination in miniature pigs. Biomater Sci. 2018;6:2448–2459. doi:10.1039/c8bm00671g
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Staehlke S, Lehnfeld J, Schneider A, Nebe JB, Muller R. Terminal chemical functions of polyamidoamine dendrimer surfaces and its impact on bone cell growth. Mater Sci Eng C. 2019;101:190–203. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2019.03.073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang R, Zhang L, Huang L, Zhu JX. Enhanced in-vitro osteoblastic functions on beta-type titanium alloy using surface mechanical attrition treatment. Mater Sci Eng C. 2019;97:688–697. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2018.12.082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang RH, Jiang Y, Fang JC, Zhang LF. Cell membrane-derived nanomaterials for biomedical applications. Biomaterials. 2017;128:69–83. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.02.041
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zollinger AJ, Smith ML. Fibronectin, the extracellular glue. Matrix Biology. 2017;60–61:27–37. doi:10.1016/j.matbio.2016.07.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan Z, Liu P, Liang YN, et al. Investigation of osteogenic responses of Fe-incorporated micro/nano-hierarchical structures on titanium surfaces. J Mater Chem B. 2018;6(9):1359–1372. doi:10.1039/c7tb03071a
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hunter A, Archer CW, Walker PS, Blunn GW. Attachment and proliferation of osteoblasts and fibroblasts on biomaterials for orthopaedic use. Biomaterials. 1995;16(4):287–295. doi:10.1016/0142-9612(95)93256-D
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murphy CM, Haugh MG, O’Brien FJ. The effect of mean pore size on cell attachment, proliferation and migration in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2010;31:461–466. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagherifard S, Hickey DJ, de Luca AC, et al. The influence of nanostructured features on bacterial adhesion and bone cell functions on severely shot peened 316L stainless steel. Biomaterials. 2015;73:185–197. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.09.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawadi G, Vayssiere B, Dunn F, Baron R, Roman-Roman S. BMP-2 controls alkaline phosphatase expression and osteoblast mineralization by a Wnt autocrine loop. J Bone Mineral Res. 2003;18(10):1842–1853. doi:10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.10.1842
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang HN, Li YB, Zuo Y, Li JH, Ma SS, Cheng L. Biocompatibility and osteogenesis of biomimetic nano-hydroxyapatite/polyamide composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2007;28(22):3338–3348. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.04.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu C, Bai HT, Hu Q, Gao TL, Bai YS. Enhanced proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 pre-osteoblasts on graphene oxide-impregnated PLGA-gelatin nanocomposite fibrous membranes. RSC Adv. 2017;7:8886–8897. doi:10.1039/c6ra26020a
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaPointe VLS, Fernandes AT, Bell NC, Stellacci F, Stevens MM. Nanoscale Topography and Chemistry Affect Embryonic Stem Cell Self-Renewal and Early Differentiation. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2013;2:1644–1650. doi:10.1002/adhm.201200382
   Google Scholar
• Kumar G, Waters MS, Farooque TM, Young MF, Simon CG. Freeform fabricated scaffolds with roughened struts that enhance both stem cell proliferation and differentiation by controlling cell shape. Biomaterials. 2012;33(16):4022–4030. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.02.048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar