Synergistic Effect of Micro-Nano-Hybrid Surfaces and Sr Doping on the Osteogenic and Angiogenic Capacity of Hydroxyapatite Bioceramics Scaffolds

References

• Nikolova MP, Chavali MS. Recent advances in biomaterials for 3D scaffolds: a review. Bioact Mater. 2019;4(1):271–292. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2019.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnbull G, Clarke J, Picard F, et al. 3D bioactive composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Bioact Mater. 2018;3(3):278–314. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandi SK, Ghosh SK, Kundu B, et al. Evaluation of new porous β-tri-calcium phosphate ceramic as bone substitute in goat model. Small Rumin Res. 2008;75(2):144–153. doi:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2007.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohner M, Galea L, Doebelin N. Calcium phosphate bone graft substitutes: failures and hopes. J Eur Ceram Soc. 2012;32(11):2663–2671. doi:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.02.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutmacher DW. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials. 2001;21(24):2529–2543. doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastrogiacomo M, Scaglione S, Martinetti R, et al. Role of scaffold internal structure on in vivo bone formation in macroporous calcium phosphate bioceramics. Biomaterials. 2006;27(17):3230–3237. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang BS, Lee CK, Hong KS, et al. Osteoconduction at porous hydroxyapatite with various pore configurations. Biomaterials. 2000;21(12):1291–1298. doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(00)00030-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Q, Lu H, Kawazoe N, et al. Pore size effect of collagen scaffolds on cartilage regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2014;10(5):2005–2013. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2013.12.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia L, Lin K, Jiang X, et al. Enhanced osteogenesis through nano-structured surface design of macroporous hydroxyapatite bioceramic scaffolds via activation of ERK and p38 MAPK signaling pathways. J Mater Chem B. 2013;1(40):5403–5416. doi:10.1039/c3tb20945h
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braux J, Velard F, Guillaume C, et al. A new insight into the dissociating effect of strontium on bone resorption and formation. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(6):2593–2603. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2011.02.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Shui X, Zhang L, et al. Cancellous bone healing around strontium-doped hydroxyapatite in osteoporotic rats previously treated with zoledronic acid. J Biomed Mater Res Part B. 2016;104(3):476–481. doi:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.02.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang SP, Lee T-M, Lui T-S. Biological response of Sr-containing coating with various surface treatments on titanium substrate for medical applications. Appl Surf Sci. 2015;346:554–561. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.03.190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Zhang Y, Yang J, et al. Effects of Sr-HA with different concentrations of strontium on biological behaviour of osteoblast. Chin J Conserv Dent. 2010;20(02):71–75. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1077.2010.01195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullah I, Gloria A, Zhang W, et al. Synthesis and characterization of sintered Sr/Fe-modified hydroxyapatite bioceramics for bone tissue engineering applications. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2020;6(1):375–388. doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao R, Chen S, Zhao W, et al. A bioceramic scaffold composed of strontium-doped three-dimensional hydroxyapatite whiskers for enhanced bone regeneration in osteoporotic defects. Theranostics. 2020;10(4):1572–1589. doi:10.7150/thno.40103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HW, Kim YJ. Fabrication of strontium-substituted hydroxyapatite scaffolds using 3D printing for enhanced bone regeneration. J Mater Sci. 2021;56(2):1–12. doi:10.1007/s10853-020-05391-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia L, Zhang N, Wang X, et al. The synergetic effect of nano-structures and silicon-substitution on the properties of hydroxyapatite scaffolds for bone regeneration. J Mater Chem B. 2016;4(19):3313–3323. doi:10.1039/c6tb00187d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu X, Tang Z, Wu K, et al. Strontium-calcium phosphate hybrid cement with enhanced osteogenic and angiogenic properties for vascularised bone regeneration. J Mater Chem B. 2021;9(30):5982–5997. doi:10.1039/d1tb00439e
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L, Yu F, Li L, et al. Bone marrow stromal cells stimulated by strontium-substituted calcium silicate ceramics: release of exosomal miR-146a regulates osteogenesis and angiogenesis. Acta Biomater. 2021;119(1):444–457. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2020.10.038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin K, Chang J, Liu X, et al. Synthesis of element-substituted hydroxyapatite with controllable morphology and chemical composition using calcium silicate as precursor. Crystengcomm. 2011;13(15):4850–4855. doi:10.1039/c0ce00835d
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Li H, Lin C, et al. Synergetic topography and chemistry cues guiding osteogenic differentiation in bone marrow stromal cells through ERK1/2 and p38 MAPK signaling pathway. Biomater Sci. 2018;6(2):418–430. doi:10.1039/c7bm01044c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia L, Lin K, Jiang X, et al. Effect of nano-structured bioceramic surface on osteogenic differentiation of adipose derived stem cells. Biomaterials. 2014;35(30):8514–8527. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.06.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou D, Zhang Z, He J, et al. Blood vessel formation in the tissue-engineered bone with the constitutively active form of HIF-1α mediated BMSCs. Biomaterials. 2012;33(7):2097–2108. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.11.053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Shen G, Liu C, et al. Enhanced healing of rat calvarial defects with sulfated chitosan-coated calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite/bone morphogenetic protein 2 scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part A. 2012;18(2):185–197. doi:10.1089/ten.TEA.2011.0297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia L, Yin Z, Mao L, et al. Akermanite bioceramics promote osteogenesis, angiogenesis and suppress osteoclastogenesis for osteoporotic bone regeneration. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):22005. doi:10.1038/srep22005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselme K. Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2000;21(7):667–681. doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00242-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colon G, Ward BC, Webster TJ. Increased osteoblast and decreased Staphylococcus epidermidis functions on nanophase ZnO and TiO2. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006;78(3):595–604. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.30789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress S, Neumann A, Weyand B, et al. Stem cell differentiation depending on different surfaces. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2011;126:263–283. doi:10.1007/10_2011_108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramaswamy Y, Roohani I, No YJ, et al. Nature-inspired topographies on hydroxyapatite surfaces regulate stem cells behaviour. Bioact Mater. 2021;6(4):1107–1117. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose S, Fielding G, Tarafder S, et al. Understanding of dopant-induced osteogenesis and angiogenesis in calcium phosphate ceramics. Trends Biotechnol. 2013;31(10):594–605. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad K, Bazaka O, Chua M, et al. Metallic biomaterials: current challenges and opportunities. Materials. 2017;10(8):884. doi:10.3390/ma10080884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray S, Thormann U, Eichelroth M, et al. Strontium and bisphosphonate coated iron foam scaffolds for osteoporotic fracture defect healing. Biomaterials. 2018;157(1):1–16. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.11.049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sila-Asna M, Bunyaratvej A, Maeda S, et al. Osteoblast differentiation and bone formation gene expression in strontium-inducing bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell. Kobe J Med Sci. 2007;53(1–2):25–35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guilak F, Cohen DM, Estes BT, et al. Control of stem cell fate by physical interactions with the extracellular matrix. Cell Stem Cell. 2009;5(1):17–26. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2009.06.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutolf MP, Blau HM. Artificial stem cell niches. Adv Mater. 2009;21(32–33):3255–3268. doi:10.1002/adma.200802582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher OZ, Khademhosseini A, Langer R, et al. Bioinspired materials for controlling stem cell fate. Acc Chem Res. 2010;43(3):419–428. doi:10.1021/ar900226q
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JARCHO MICHAEL. Calcium phosphate ceramics as hard tissue prosthetics. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981;217(157):259–278.
   Google Scholar
• Lin K, Xia L, Gan J, et al. Tailoring the nanostructured surfaces of hydroxyapatite bioceramics to promote protein adsorption, osteoblast growth, and osteogenic differentiation. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2013;5(16):8008–8017. doi:10.1021/am402089w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim H, Camata RP, Lee S, et al. Crystallographic texture in pulsed laser deposited hydroxyapatite bioceramic coatings. Acta Mater. 2007;55(1):131–139. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2006.08.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar