Research Progress of Design Drugs and Composite Biomaterials in Bone Tissue Engineering

References

• Chande S, Bergwitz CJNr C. Role of phosphate sensing in bone and mineral metabolism. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;14(11):637–655. doi:10.1038/s41574-018-0076-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farokhi M, Mottaghitalab F, Shokrgozar M, Ou K, Mao C, Hosseinkhani HJ. Importance of dual delivery systems for bone tissue engineering. J Control Release. 2016;225:152–169. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.01.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi JQ, Yu TQ, Hu BY, Wu HW, Ouyang HW. Current biomaterial-based bone tissue engineering and translational medicine. Review. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(19):20. 10233. doi:10.3390/ijms221910233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose S, Sarkar NJ. Natural medicinal compounds in bone tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 2020;38(4):404–417. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashirina A, Yao Y, Liu Y, Leng JJ. Biopolymers as bone substitutes: a review. Biomater Sci. 2019;7(10):3961–3983. doi:10.1039/c9bm00664h
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amini Z, Lari R. A systematic review of decellularized allograft and xenograft-derived scaffolds in bone tissue regeneration. Review. Tissue Cell. 2021;69:101494. doi:10.1016/j.tice.2021.101494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolaou VS, Giannoudis PV. History of osteochondral allograft transplantation. Article. Inj Int J Care Inj. 2017;48(7):1283–1286. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2017.05.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo L, Liang Z, Yang L, et al. The role of natural polymers in bone tissue engineering. J J Control Release. 2021;338:571–582. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.08.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Du T, Ruan C, Niu X. Bioinspired mineralized collagen scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Bioact Mater. 2021;6(5):1491–1511. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin D, Wang N, You X, Zhang A, Chen X, Liu Y. Collagen-based biocomposites inspired by bone hierarchical structures for advanced bone regeneration: ongoing research and perspectives. Biomater Sci. 2022;10(2):318–353. doi:10.1039/d1bm01294k
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Wang Y, Yan J, et al. Pharmaceutical electrospinning and 3D printing scaffold design for bone regeneration. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;174:504–534. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2021.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bow A, Anderson D, Dhar M. Commercially available bone graft substitutes: the impact of origin and processing on graft functionality. Drug Metab Rev. 2019;51(4):533–544. doi:10.1080/03602532.2019.1671860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn H, JJBr O. Review of bone graft and bone substitutes with an emphasis on fracture surgeries. Biomater Res. 2019;23:9. doi:10.1186/s40824-019-0157-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hou Y, Xie W, Achazi K, et al. Injectable degradable PVA microgels prepared by microfluidic technology for controlled osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Acta Biomater. 2018;77:28–37. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2018.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suliman S, Sun Y, Pedersen TO, et al. In vivo host response and degradation of copolymer scaffolds functionalized with nanodiamonds and bone morphogenetic protein 2. Adv Healthc Mater. 2016;5(6):730–742. doi:10.1002/adhm.201500723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao Q, Liu Y, Selvaratnam B, Koodali RT, Sun H. Mesoporous silicate nanoparticles/3D nanofibrous scaffold-mediated dual-drug delivery for bone tissue engineering. J Control Release. 2018;279:69–78. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.04.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris J, Lafuente-Gómez N, Cabañas M, Román J, Peña J, Vallet-Regí M. Fabrication of a nanoparticle-containing 3D porous bone scaffold with proangiogenic and antibacterial properties. Acta Biomater. 2019;86:441–449. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.01.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen S, Shi Y, Zhang X, Ma J. Evaluation of BMP-2 and VEGF loaded 3D printed hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds with enhanced osteogenic capacity in vitro and in vivo. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020;112:110893. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2020.110893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De-Paula MMM, Afewerki S, Viana BC, Webster TJ, Lobo AO, Marciano FR. Dual effective core-shell electrospun scaffolds: promoting osteoblast maturation and reducing bacteria activity. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019;103:109778. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2019.109778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu YS, Wong PC, Jang JS, Chen CH, Wu SH. Combining Mg-Zn-Ca bulk metallic glass with a mesoporous silica nanocomposite for bone tissue engineering. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(5). doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics14051078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastegar A, Mahmoodi M, Mirjalili M, Nasirizadeh N. Platelet-rich fibrin-loaded PCL/chitosan core-shell fibers scaffold for enhanced osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Article. Carbohydr Polym. 2021;269:15. 118351. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filova E, Rampichova M, Litvinec A, et al. A cell-free nanofiber composite scaffold regenerated osteochondral defects in miniature pigs. Int J Pharm. 2013;447(1–2):139–149. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.02.056
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen Y, Wu T, Huang S, et al. Sustained release SDF-1alpha/TGF-beta1-loaded silk fibroin-porous gelatin scaffold promotes cartilage repair. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2019;11(16):14608–14618. doi:10.1021/acsami.9b01532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteiro N, Ribeiro D, Martins A, et al. Instructive nanofibrous scaffold comprising runt-related transcription factor 2 gene delivery for bone tissue engineering. Article. ACS Nano. 2014;8(8):8082–8094. doi:10.1021/nn5021049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li T, Peng MZ, Yang ZZ, et al. 3D-printed IFN-gamma-loading calcium silicate-beta-tricalcium phosphate scaffold sequentially activates M1 and M2 polarization of macrophages to promote vascularization of tissue engineering bone. Article. Acta Biomater. 2018;71:96–107. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2018.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang CZ, Wang YH, Lin CW, et al. Combination of a bioceramic scaffold and simvastatin nanoparticles as a synthetic alternative to autologous bone grafting. Article. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(12):19. 4099. doi:10.3390/ijms19124099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesan N, Liyanage ADT, Castro-Nunez J, et al. Biodegradable polymerized simvastatin stimulates bone formation. Acta Biomater. 2019;93:192–199. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.04.059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Tang Y, Zhao K, et al. Sequential release of double drug (graded distribution) loaded gelatin microspheres/PMMA bone cement. J Mater Chem B. 2021;9(2):508–522. doi:10.1039/d0tb01452d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daryasari MP, Telgerd MD, Karami MH, et al. Poly-l-lactic acid scaffold incorporated chitosan-coated mesoporous silica nanoparticles as pH-sensitive composite for enhanced osteogenic differentiation of human adipose tissue stem cells by dexamethasone delivery. Article. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2019;47(1):4020–4029. doi:10.1080/21691401.2019.1658594
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou X, Liu P, Nie W, et al. Incorporation of dexamethasone-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles into mineralized porous biocomposite scaffolds for improving osteogenic activity. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;149:116–126. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han XY, Sun MJ, Chen B, et al. Lotus seedpod-inspired internal vascularized 3D printed scaffold for bone tissue repair. Article. Bioact Mater. 2021;6(6):1639–1652. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.11.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng X, Cheng G, Xing X, et al. Controlled release of adenosine from core-shell nanofibers to promote bone regeneration through STAT3 signaling pathway. J Controlled Release. 2020;319:234–245. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.12.048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumathra M, Munusamy MA, Alarfaj AA, Rajan M. Osteoblast response to vitamin D3 loaded cellulose enriched hydroxyapatite Mesoporous silica nanoparticles composite. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;103:858–868. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2018.04.078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Li Q, Li H, et al. An effective dual-factor modified 3D-printed PCL scaffold for bone defect repair. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2020;108(5):2167–2179. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.34555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Bai YJ, Pan JJ, et al. A hybrid 3D-printed aspirin-laden liposome composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Article. J Mat Chem B. 2019;7(4):619–629. doi:10.1039/c8tb02756k
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monavari M, Homaeigohar S, Fuentes-Chandía M, et al. 3D printing of alginate dialdehyde-gelatin (ADA-GEL) hydrogels incorporating phytotherapeutic icariin loaded mesoporous SiO-CaO nanoparticles for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng. 2021;131:112470. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2021.112470
   Google Scholar
• Lai Y, Cao H, Wang X, et al. Porous composite scaffold incorporating osteogenic phytomolecule icariin for promoting skeletal regeneration in challenging osteonecrotic bone in rabbits. Biomaterials. 2018;153:1–13. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.10.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin S, Gao J, Yang R, et al. A baicalin-loaded coaxial nanofiber scaffold regulated inflammation and osteoclast differentiation for vascularized bone regeneration. Bioact Mater. 2022;8:559–572. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.06.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamali A, Oryan A, Hosseini S, et al. Cannabidiol-loaded microspheres incorporated into osteoconductive scaffold enhance mesenchymal stem cell recruitment and regeneration of critical-sized bone defects. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019;101:64–75. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2019.03.070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar N, Bose S. Liposome-encapsulated curcumin-loaded 3D printed scaffold for bone tissue engineering. ACS Appl Mat Interfaces. 2019;11(19):17184–17192. doi:10.1021/acsami.9b01218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji C, Bi L, Li J, Fan J. Salvianolic acid B-loaded chitosan/hydroxyapatite scaffolds promotes the repair of segmental bone defect by angiogenesis and osteogenesis. Int J Nanomed. 2019;14:8271–8284. doi:10.2147/ijn.S219105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Wang R, Chen S, et al. Heparan sulfate loaded polycaprolactone-hydroxyapatite scaffolds with 3D printing for bone defect repair. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;148:153–162. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.01.109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumian Ł, Tiainen H, Cibor U, et al. Ceramic scaffolds enriched with gentamicin loaded poly(lactide-co-glycolide) microparticles for prevention and treatment of bone tissue infections. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016;69:856–864. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2016.07.065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng T, Qu H, Zhang G. Osteogenic and antibacterial properties of vancomycin-laden mesoporous bioglass/PLGA composite scaffolds for bone regeneration in infected bone defects. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2018;46(8):1935–1947. doi:10.1080/21691401.2017.1396997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira M, Rzhepishevska O, Grenho L, et al. Levofloxacin-loaded bone cement delivery system: highly effective against intracellular bacteria and Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Int J Pharm. 2017;532(1):241–248. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.08.089
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang H, Liu J, Tao S, et al. Tetracycline-grafted PLGA nanoparticles as bone-targeting drug delivery system. Int J Nanomed. 2015;10:5671–5685. doi:10.2147/ijn.S88798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Wu V, Pernal S, Uskoković V. Self-setting calcium phosphate cements with tunable antibiotic release rates for advanced antimicrobial applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8(12):7691–7708. doi:10.1021/acsami.6b01160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigham A, Aghajanian AH, Behzadzadeh S, et al. Nanostructured magnetic Mg2SiO4-CoFe2O4 composite scaffold with multiple capabilities for bone tissue regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019;99:83–95. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang W, Gao M, Lou J, et al. Integrating silicon/zinc dual elements with PLGA microspheres in calcium phosphate cement scaffolds synergistically enhances bone regeneration. J Mater Chem B. 2020;8(15):3038–3049. doi:10.1039/c9tb02901j
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohnke M, Pfitzenreuter S, Mogwitz B, et al. Strontium release from Sr(2+)-loaded bone cements and dispersion in healthy and osteoporotic rat bone. J Control Release. 2017;262:159–169. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.07.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao F, Peng XY, Yang F, Ke QF, Zhu ZH, Guo YP. Gadolinium-doped mesoporous calcium silicate/chitosan scaffolds enhanced bone regeneration ability. Article. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019;104:11. 109999. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2019.109999
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng XY, Hu M, Liao F, et al. La-Doped mesoporous calcium silicate/chitosan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Article. Biomater Sci. 2019;7(4):1565–1573. doi:10.1039/c8bm01498a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtuldu F, Mutlu N, Michalek M, et al. Cerium and gallium containing mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles for bone regeneration: bioactivity, biocompatibility and antibacterial activity. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2021;124:112050. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2021.112050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh B, Pramanik K. Generation of bioactive nano-composite scaffold of nanobioglass/silk fibroin/carboxymethyl cellulose for bone tissue engineering. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2018;29(16):2011–2034. doi:10.1080/09205063.2018.1523525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin CY, Chang YH, Li KC, et al. The use of ASCs engineered to express BMP2 or TGF-beta3 within scaffold constructs to promote calvarial bone repair. Biomaterials. 2013;34(37):9401–9412. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tevlin R, desJardins-Park H, Huber J, DiIorio SE, Longaker MT, Wan DC. Musculoskeletal tissue engineering: adipose derived stromal cell implementation for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Biomaterials. 2022;286:121544. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi X, Zhang J, Yuan H, et al. Exosomes secreted by human-induced pluripotent stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells repair critical-sized bone defects through enhanced angiogenesis and osteogenesis in osteoporotic rats. Int J Biol Sci. 2016;12(7):836–849. doi:10.7150/ijbs.14809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie J, Peng C, Zhao Q, et al. Osteogenic differentiation and bone regeneration of iPSC-MSCs supported by a biomimetic nanofibrous scaffold. Acta Biomater. 2016;29:365–379. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2015.10.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Shi J, Xie M, et al. Recapitulation of cartilage/bone formation using iPSCs via biomimetic 3D rotary culture approach for developmental engineering. Biomaterials. 2020;260:120334. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans ND, Gentleman E, Chen X, Roberts CJ, Polak JM, Stevens MM. Extracellular matrix-mediated osteogenic differentiation of murine embryonic stem cells. Biomaterials. 2010;31(12):3244–3252. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamie Z, Tran GT, Vyzas G, et al. Stem cells combined with bone graft substitutes in skeletal tissue engineering. Review. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2012;12(6):713–729. doi:10.1517/14712598.2012.679652
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, Chang H, Hou Y, et al. Lentivirus-mediated microRNA-26a overexpression in bone mesenchymal stem cells facilitates bone regeneration in bone defects of calvaria in mice. Mol Med Rep. 2018;18(6):5317–5326. doi:10.3892/mmr.2018.9596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng Y, Zhou H, Gu P, Fan X. Repair of canine medial orbital bone defects with miR-31-modified bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(9):6016–6023. doi:10.1167/iovs.14-14977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordukalo-Nikšić T, Kufner V, Vukičević S. The role of BMPs in the regulation of osteoclasts resorption and bone remodeling: from experimental models to clinical applications. Front Immunol. 2022;13:869422. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2022.869422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi C, Zhang H, Louie K, Mishina Y, Sun HJ. BMP signaling mediated by BMPR1A in osteoclasts negatively regulates osteoblast mineralization through suppression of Cx43. J Cell Biochem. 2017;118(3):605–614. doi:10.1002/jcb.25746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noori A, Ashrafi S, Vaez-Ghaemi R, Hatamian-Zaremi A, Webster TJ. A review of fibrin and fibrin composites for bone tissue engineering. Int J Nanomed. 2017;12:4937–4961. doi:10.2147/ijn.S124671
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen R, Yu Y, Zhang W, et al. Tuning the bioactivity of bone morphogenetic protein-2 with surface immobilization strategies. Acta Biomater. 2018;80:108–120. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2018.09.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolci L, Panzavolta S, Torricelli P, et al. Modulation of Alendronate release from a calcium phosphate bone cement: an in vitro osteoblast-osteoclast co-culture study. Int J Pharm. 2019;554:245–255. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.11.023
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dolci L, Panzavolta S, Albertini B, et al. Spray-congealed solid lipid microparticles as a new tool for the controlled release of bisphosphonates from a calcium phosphate bone cement. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2018;122:6–16. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2017.10.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang ZC, Yang C, Ding X, Hedrick JL, Wang W, Yang YJ. Carboxylic acid-functionalized polycarbonates as bone cement additives for enhanced and sustained release of antibiotics. J Controlled Release. 2021;329:871–881. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.10.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia B, Deng Y, Lv Y, Chen G. Stem cell recruitment based on scaffold features for bone tissue engineering. Biomater Sci. 2021;9(4):1189–1203. doi:10.1039/d0bm01591a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao Z, Song Z, Huang J, et al. The scaffold microenvironment for stem cell based bone tissue engineering. Biomater Sci. 2017;5(8):1382–1392. doi:10.1039/c7bm00146k
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noreikaitė A, Antanavičiūtė I, Mikalayeva V, et al. Scaffold design for artificial tissue with bone marrow stem cells. Medicina. 2017;53(3):203–210. doi:10.1016/j.medici.2017.07.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qureshi A, Doyle A, Chen C, et al. Photoactivated miR-148b-nanoparticle conjugates improve closure of critical size mouse calvarial defects. Acta Biomater. 2015;12:166–173. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2014.10.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arriaga M, Ding M, Gutierrez A, Chew S. The application of microRNAs in biomaterial scaffold-based therapies for bone tissue engineering. Biotechnol J. 2019;14(10):e1900084. doi:10.1002/biot.201900084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li N, Jiang C, Zhang XD, et al. Preparation of an rhBMP-2 loaded mesoporous bioactive glass/calcium phosphate cement porous composite scaffold for rapid bone tissue regeneration. Article. J Mat Chem B. 2015;3(43):8558–8566. doi:10.1039/c5tb01423a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babaie E, Bhaduri SB. Fabrication aspects of porous biomaterials in orthopedic applications: a review. Review. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2018;4(1):1–39. doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen XN, Fan HY, Deng XW, et al. Scaffold structural microenvironmental cues to guide tissue regeneration in bone tissue applications. Review. Nanomaterials. 2018;8(11):15. 960. doi:10.3390/nano8110960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Wang L, Zhang W, Zhang M, Luo ZP. Synchronization of calcium sulphate cement degradation and new bone formation is improved by external mechanical regulation. Article. J Orthop Res. 2015;33(5):685–691. doi:10.1002/jor.22839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao DY, Zhu TT, Li J, et al. Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)-based composite bone-substitute materials. Review. Bioact Mater. 2021;6(2):346–360. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.08.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesan J, Kim SK. Nano-hydroxyapatite composite biomaterials for bone tissue engineering-a review. Review. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2014;10(10):3124–3140. doi:10.1166/jbn.2014.1893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan B, Wang ZW, Zhao Y, et al. In vitro and in vivo study of a novel nanoscale demineralized bone matrix coated PCL/beta-TCP scaffold for bone regeneration. Article. Macromol Biosci. 2021;21(3):11. 2000336. doi:10.1002/mabi.202000336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagherifard A, Yekta FJ, Aghdam HA, et al. Improvement in osseointegration of tricalcium phosphate-zircon for orthopedic applications: an in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2020;58(8):1681–1693. doi:10.1007/s11517-020-02157-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballouze R, Marahat MH, Mohamad S, Saidin NA, Kasim SR, Ooi JP. Biocompatible magnesium-doped biphasic calcium phosphate for bone regeneration. Review. J Biomed Mater Res Part B. 2021;109(10):1426–1435. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.34802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Rashidy AA, Roether JA, Harhaus L, Kneser U, Boccaccini AR. Regenerating bone with bioactive glass scaffolds: a review of in vivo studies in bone defect models. Review. Acta Biomater. 2017;62:1–28. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pei BQ, Wang W, Dunne N, Li XM. Applications of carbon nanotubes in bone tissue regeneration and engineering: superiority, concerns, current advancements, and prospects. Review. Nanomaterials. 2019;9(10):1501. doi:10.3390/nano9101501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian WM, Vahid MH, Sun YL, et al. Investigation on the effect of functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotubes on the mechanical properties of epoxy glass composites: experimental and molecular dynamics simulation. J Mater Res Technol. 2021;12:1931–1945. doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.03.104
   Google Scholar
• Sahmani S, Saber-Samandari S, Khandan A, Aghdam MM. Nonlinear resonance investigation of nanoclay based bio-nanocomposite scaffolds with enhanced properties for bone substitute applications. J Alloys Compd. 2019;773:636–653. doi:10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertz A, Bruce IJ. Inorganic materials for bone repair or replacement applications. Review. Nanomedicine. 2007;2(6):899–918. doi:10.2217/17435889.2.6.899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao DQ, Zhang JW, Zhang CD, et al. The role of calcium phosphate surface structure in osteogenesis and the mechanisms involved. Review. Acta Biomater. 2020;106:22–33. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.12.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi Y, Yamamoto M, Tabata Y. Osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in biodegradable sponges composed of gelatin and beta-tricalcium phosphate. Article. Biomaterials. 2005;26(17):3587–3596. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.09.046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginebra MP, Traykova T, Planell JA. Calcium phosphate cements as bone drug delivery systems: a review. Review. J Control Release. 2006;113(2):102–110. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose S, Tarafder S. Calcium phosphate ceramic systems in growth factor and drug delivery for bone tissue engineering: a review. Review. Acta Biomater. 2012;8(4):1401–1421. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2011.11.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabrejos-Azama J, Alkhraisat MH, Rueda C, et al. Magnesium substitution in brushite cements: efficacy of a new biomaterial loaded with vancomycin for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus infections. Article. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016;61:72–78. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy M, Bandyopadhyay A, Bose S. In vitro antimicrobial and biological properties of laser assisted tricalcium phosphate coating on titanium for load bearing implant. Article. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2009;29(6):1965–1968. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2009.03.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher M, Reither L, Thomas J, et al. Calcium phosphate bone cement/mesoporous bioactive glass composites for controlled growth factor delivery. Article. Biomater Sci. 2017;5(3):578–588. doi:10.1039/c6bm00903d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mistry S, Roy S, Maitra NJ, et al. A novel, multi-barrier, drug eluting calcium sulfate/biphasic calcium phosphate biodegradable composite bone cement for treatment of experimental MRSA osteomyelitis in rabbit model. Article. J Control Release. 2016;239:169–181. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.08.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Gareta E, Hua J, Knowles JC, Blunn GW. Comparison of mesenchymal stem cell proliferation and differentiation between biomimetic and electrochemical coatings on different topographic surfaces. Article. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2013;24(1):199–210. doi:10.1007/s10856-012-4789-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surmenev RA. A review of plasma-assisted methods for calcium phosphate-based coatings fabrication. Review. Surf Coat Technol. 2012;206(8–9):2035–2056. doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sia IG, Berbari EF. Osteomyelitis. Article. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2006;20(6):1065–1081. doi:10.1016/j.berh.2006.08.014
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schafer P, Fink B, Sandow D, Margull A, Berger I, Frommelt L. Prolonged bacterial culture to identify late periprosthetic joint infection: a promising strategy. Article. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47(11):1403–1409. doi:10.1086/592973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee RJ, Springer ML, Blanco-Bose WE, Shaw R, Ursell PC, Blau HM. VEGF gene delivery to myocardium - deleterious effects of unregulated expression. Article. Circulation. 2000;102(8):898–901. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.102.8.898
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucas-Aparicio J, Manchon A, Rueda C, et al. Silicon-calcium phosphate ceramics and silicon-calcium phosphate cements: substrates to customize the release of antibiotics according to the idiosyncrasies of the patient. Article. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020;106:8. 110173. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2019.110173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pastorino D, Canal C, Ginebra MP. Drug delivery from injectable calcium phosphate foams by tailoring the macroporosity-drug interaction. Article. Acta Biomater. 2015;12:250–259. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2014.10.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy CM, Schindeler A, Gleeson JP, et al. A collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffold allows for binding and co-delivery of recombinant bone morphogenetic proteins and bisphosphonates. Article. Acta Biomater. 2014;10(5):2250–2258. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2014.01.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohner M, Lemaitre J, Merkle HP, Gander B. Control of gentamicin release from a calcium phosphate cement by admixed poly(acrylic acid). Article. J Pharm Sci. 2000;89(10):1262–1270. doi:10.1002/1520-6017(200010)89:10<1262::Aid-jps4>3.0.Co;2-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manchon A, Alkhraisat M, Rueda-Rodriguez C, et al. Silicon calcium phosphate ceramic as novel biomaterial to simulate the bone regenerative properties of autologous bone. Article. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2015;103(2):479–488. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.35196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aparicio JL, Rueda C, Manchon A, et al. Effect of physicochemical properties of a cement based on silicocarnotite/calcium silicate on in vitro cell adhesion and in vivo cement degradation. Article. Biomed Mater. 2016;11(4):15. 045005. doi:10.1088/1748-6041/11/4/045005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanein D, Geiger B, Addadi L. Fibronectin adsorption to surfaces of hydrated crystals - an analysis of the importance of bound water in protein substrate interactions. Article. Langmuir. 1993;9(4):1058–1065. doi:10.1021/la00028a030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flade K, Lau C, Mertig M, Pompe W. Osteocalcin-controlled dissolution-reprecipitation of calcium phosphate under biomimetic conditions. Article. Chem Mat. 2001;13(10):3596–3602. doi:10.1021/cm011063z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas A, Jones F. Biological surface science. Editorial material. J Phys Condes Matter. 2004;16(26):1.
   Google Scholar
• Eivazzadeh-Keihan R, Chenab KK, Taheri-Ledari R, et al. Recent advances in the application of mesoporous silica-based nanomaterials for bone tissue engineering. Review. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020;107:15. 110267. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2019.110267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He CL, Nie W, Feng W. Engineering of biomimetic nanofibrous matrices for drug delivery and tissue engineering. Article. J Mat Chem B. 2014;2(45):7828–7848. doi:10.1039/c4tb01464b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao JF, Qu Y, Chu BY, Zhang XN, Qian ZY. Biodegradable CSMA/PECA/graphene porous hybrid scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. Article. Sci Rep. 2015;5:16. 09879. doi:10.1038/srep09879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao JF, Shi K, Ding QX, Qu Y, Luo F, Qian ZY. Recent developments in scaffold-guided cartilage tissue regeneration. Article. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2014;10(10):3085–3104. doi:10.1166/jbn.2014.1934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu KX, Chen B, Nie W, et al. Electrophoretic deposition of dexamethasone-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles onto Poly(L-Lactic Acid)/Poly(epsilon-Caprolactone) composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Article. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8(6):4137–4148. doi:10.1021/acsami.5b11879
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou XJ, Weng WZ, Chen B, et al. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles/gelatin porous composite scaffolds with localized and sustained release of vancomycin for treatment of infected bone defects. Article. J Mat Chem B. 2018;6(5):740–752. doi:10.1039/c7tb01246b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu WY, Wu CT, Chen JZ, Xiao Y. Nanotechnology in the targeted drug delivery for bone diseases and bone regeneration. Review. Int J Nanomed. 2013;8:13. doi:10.2147/ijn.S44393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavakol S, Nikpour MR, Hoveizi E, et al. Investigating the effects of particle size and chemical structure on cytotoxicity and bacteriostatic potential of nano hydroxyapatite/chitosan/silica and nano hydroxyapatite/chitosan/silver; as antibacterial bone substitutes. Article. J Nanopart Res. 2014;16(10):13. 2622. doi:10.1007/s11051-014-2622-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding YP, Yao QQ, Li W, Schubert DW, Boccaccini AR, Roether JA. The evaluation of physical properties and in vitro cell behavior of PHB/PCL/sol-gel derived silica hybrid scaffolds and PHB/PCL/fumed silica composite scaffolds. Article. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2015;136:93–98. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2015.08.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou J, Lin H, Fang TL, et al. The repair of large segmental bone defects in the rabbit with vascularized tissue engineered bone. Article. Biomaterials. 2010;31(6):1171–1179. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.10.043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen LH, Annabi N, Nikkhah M, et al. Vascularized bone tissue engineering: approaches for potential improvement. Article. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2012;18(5):363–382. doi:10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabafrooz V, Mozafari M, Vashaee D, Tayebi L. Electrospun nanofibers: from filtration membranes to highly specialized tissue engineering scaffolds. Review. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2014;14(1):522–534. doi:10.1166/jnn.2014.9195
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandes JS, Gentile P, Pires RA, Reis RL, Hatton PV. Multifunctional bioactive glass and glass-ceramic biomaterials with antibacterial properties for repair and regeneration of bone tissue. Review. Acta Biomater. 2017;59:2–11. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2017.06.046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reffitt DM, Ogston N, Jugdaohsingh R, et al. Orthosilicic acid stimulates collagen type 1 synthesis and osteoblastic differentiation in human osteoblast-like cells in vitro. Article. Bone. 2003;32(2):127–135. doi:10.1016/s8756-3282(02)00950-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Zhou XJ, He CL. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles for tissue-engineering applications. Review. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed. 2019;11(6):22. e1573. doi:10.1002/wnan.1573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlisle EM. Silicon: a possible factor in bone calcification. Science. 1970;167(3916):279. doi:10.1126/science.167.3916.279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlisle EM. Silicon: an essential element for the chick. Nutr Rev. 2009;40(7):210–213. doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.1982.tb05313.x
   Google Scholar
• Zhang QQ, Qin M, Zhou XJ, et al. Porous nanofibrous scaffold incorporated with S1P loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles and BMP-2 encapsulated PLGA microspheres for enhancing angiogenesis and osteogenesis. Article. J Mat Chem B. 2018;6(42):6731–6743. doi:10.1039/c8tb02138d
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li HW, Gu JS, Shah LA, et al. Bone cement based on vancomycin loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticle and calcium sulfate composites. Article. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2015;49:210–216. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2014.12.082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui W, Liu QQ, Yang L, et al. Sustained delivery of BMP-2-related peptide from the true bone ceramics/hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles scaffold for bone tissue regeneration. Article. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2018;4(1):211–221. doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slowing II, Vivero-Escoto JL, Wu CW, Lin VSY. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles as controlled release drug delivery and gene transfection carriers. Review. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60(11):1278–1288. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2008.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cauda V, Onida B, Platschek B, Muhlstein L, Bein T. Large antibiotic molecule diffusion in confined mesoporous silica with controlled morphology. Article. J Mater Chem. 2008;18(48):5888–5899. doi:10.1039/b805395b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai CY, Trewyn BG, Jeftinija DM, et al. A mesoporous silica nanosphere-based carrier system with chemically removable CdS nanoparticle caps for stimuli-responsive controlled release of neurotransmitters and drug molecules. Article. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125(15):4451–4459. doi:10.1021/ja028650l
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trewyn BG, Slowing II, S G, Chen HT, Lin VSY. Synthesis and functionalization of a mesoporous silica nanoparticle based on the sol-gel process and applications in controlled release. Review. Acc Chem Res. 2007;40(9):846–853. doi:10.1021/ar600032u
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Matos MBC, Piedade AP, Alvarez-Lorenzo C, Concheiro A, Braga MEM, de Sousa HC. Dexamethasone-loaded poly(epsilon-caprolactone)/silica nanoparticles composites prepared by supercritical CO2 foaming/mixing and deposition. Article. Int J Pharm. 2013;456(2):269–281. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.08.042
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhou XJ, Feng W, Qiu KX, et al. BMP-2 derived peptide and dexamethasone incorporated mesoporous silica nanoparticles for enhanced osteogenic differentiation of bone mesenchymal stem cells. Article. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7(29):15777–15789. doi:10.1021/acsami.5b02636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Zhang GL, Qi F, et al. Enhanced bone regeneration using an insulin-loaded nano-hydroxyapatite/collagen/PLGA composite scaffold. Article. Int J Nanomed. 2018;13:117–127. doi:10.2147/ijn.S150818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharadwaz A, Jayasuriya AC. Recent trends in the application of widely used natural and synthetic polymer nanocomposites in bone tissue regeneration. Review. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020;110:30. 110698. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2020.110698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryadko A, Surmeneva M, Surmenev RJP. Review of hybrid materials based on polyhydroxyalkanoates for tissue engineering applications. Polymers. 2021;13(11). doi:10.3390/polym13111738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Liu YZ, Long T, et al. Mesoporous bioactive glass as a drug delivery system: fabrication, bactericidal properties and biocompatibility. Article. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2013;24(8):1951–1961. doi:10.1007/s10856-013-4960-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu M, Zhang LX, He QJ, Zhao JJ, Guo LM, Shi JL. Mesoporous bioactive glass-coated poly(L-lactic acid) scaffolds: a sustained antibiotic drug release system for bone repairing. Article. J Mater Chem. 2011;21(4):1064–1072. doi:10.1039/c0jm02179b
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farzin A, Etesami SA, Goodarzi A, Ai J. A facile way for development of three-dimensional localized drug delivery system for bone tissue engineering. Article. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019;105:13. 110032. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2019.110032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang JZ, You ML, Ding ZQ, Ye WB. A review of emerging bone tissue engineering via PEG conjugated biodegradable amphiphilic copolymers. Review. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019;97:1021–1035. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bose S, Sarkar N, Banerjee D. Effects of PCL, PEG and PLGA polymers on curcumin release from calcium phosphate matrix for in vitro and in vivo bone regeneration. Article. Mater Today Chem. 2018;8:110–120. doi:10.1016/j.mtchem.2018.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SS, Park MS, Jeon O, Choi CY, Kim BS. Poly(lactide-co-glycolide)/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Article. Biomaterials. 2006;27(8):1399–1409. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.08.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subhapradha N, Abudhahir M, Aathira A, Srinivasan N, Moorthi A. Polymer coated mesoporous ceramic for drug delivery in bone tissue engineering. Review. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;110:65–73. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.11.146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ke XY, Ng VWL, Ono RJ, et al. Role of non-covalent and covalent interactions in cargo loading capacity and stability of polymeric micelles. Article. J Control Release. 2014;193:9–26. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.06.061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh SH, Kang SG, Kim ES, Cho SH, Lee JH. Fabrication and characterization of hydrophilic poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)/poly(vinyl alcohol) blend cell scaffolds by melt-molding particulate-leaching method. Article. Biomaterials. 2003;24(22):4011–4021. doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00284-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Yang GJ, Johnson BN, Jia XF. Three-dimensional (3D) printed scaffold and material selection for bone repair. Review. Acta Biomater. 2019;84:16–33. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2018.11.039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta V, Khan Y, Berkland CJ, Laurencin CT, Detamore MS. Microsphere-based scaffolds in regenerative engineering. In: Yarmush ML, editor. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering. Vol. 19. Annual Reviews; 2017:135–161.
   Google Scholar
• He J, Lin ZD, Hu XL, et al. Biocompatible and biodegradable scaffold based on polytrimethylene carbonate-tricalcium phosphate microspheres for tissue engineering. Article. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2021;204:9. 111808. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie ZP, Liu X, Jia WT, Zhang CQ, Huang WH, Wang JQ. Treatment of osteomyelitis and repair of bone defect by degradable bioactive borate glass releasing vancomycin. Article. J Control Release. 2009;139(2):118–126. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.06.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loca D, Sokolova M, Locs J, Smirnova A, Irbe Z. Calcium phosphate bone cements for local vancomycin delivery. Article. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2015;49:106–113. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2014.12.075
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calasans-Maia MD, Barboza CA, Soriano-Souza CA, et al. Microspheres of alginate encapsulated minocycline-loaded nanocrystalline carbonated hydroxyapatite: therapeutic potential and effects on bone regeneration. Article. Int J Nanomed. 2019;14:4559–4571. doi:10.2147/ijn.S201631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai B, Zou Q, Zuo Y, et al. Injectable gel constructs with regenerative and anti-infective dual effects based on assembled chitosan microspheres. Article. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(30):25099–25112. doi:10.1021/acsami.8b06648
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen XF, Zhang YX, Gu Y, et al. Sequential and sustained release of SDF-1 and BMP-2 from silk fibroin-nanohydroxyapatite scaffold for the enhancement of bone regeneration. Article. Biomaterials. 2016;106:205–216. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.08.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkineni AR, Luo YX, Schumacher M, Nies B, Lode A, Gelinsky M. 3D plotting of growth factor loaded calcium phosphate cement scaffolds. Article. Acta Biomater. 2015;27:264–274. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2015.08.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soriano-Souza C, Valiense H, Mavropoulos E, et al. Doxycycline containing hydroxyapatite ceramic microspheres as a bone-targeting drug delivery system. Article. J Biomed Mater Res Part B. 2020;108(4):1351–1362. doi:10.1002/jbm.b.34484
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginebra MP, Canal C, Espanol M, Pastorino D, Montufar EB. Calcium phosphate cements as drug delivery materials. Review. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64(12):1090–1110. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.01.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruhe PQ, Boerman OC, Russel RGM, Spauwen PHM, Mikos AG, Jansen JA. Controlled release of rhBMP-2 loaded Poly(DL-lactic-co-glycolic acid)/calcium phosphate cement composites in vivo. In: Nakamura T, Yamashita K, Neo M, editors. Bioceramics 18, Pts 1 and 2. Trans Tech Publications Ltd; 2006:973–976.
   Google Scholar
• Lanao RPF, Bosco R, Leeuwenburgh SCG, et al. RANKL delivery from calcium phosphate containing PLGA microspheres. Article. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013;101(11):3123–3130. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.34623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkhraisat MH, Rueda C, Cabrejos-Azama J, et al. Loading and release of doxycycline hyclate from strontium-substituted calcium phosphate cement. Article. Acta Biomater. 2010;6(4):1522–1528. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2009.10.043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farzin A, Fathi M, Emadi R. Multifunctional magnetic nanostructured hardystonite scaffold for hyperthermia, drug delivery and tissue engineering applications. Article. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017;70:21–31. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2016.08.060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habraken W, Wolke JGC, Jansen JA. Ceramic composites as matrices and scaffolds for drug delivery in tissue engineering. Review. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2007;59(4–5):234–248. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2007.03.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong DY, Shi YB, Gao Y, Fu MG, Kong SL, Lin GM. Preparation of BMP-2 loaded MPEG-PCL microspheres and evaluation of their bone repair properties. Article. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;130:9. 110516. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu X, Shen GY, Shang Q, et al. A naringin-loaded gelatin-microsphere/nano-hydroxyapatite/silk fibroin composite scaffold promoted healing of critical-size vertebral defects in ovariectomised rat. Article. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;193:510–518. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.10.036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawashita M. Development and evaluation of the properties of functional ceramic microspheres for biomedical applications. Review. J Ceram Soc Jpn. 2018;126(1):1–7. doi:10.2109/jcersj2.17192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen MQ, Wang X, Ye ZY, Zhang Y, Zhou Y, Tan WS. A modular approach to the engineering of a centimeter-sized bone tissue construct with human amniotic mesenchymal stem cells-laden microcarriers. Article. Biomaterials. 2011;32(30):7532–7542. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.06.054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan ZY, Wei PF, Huang YQ, et al. Injectable PLGA microspheres with tunable magnesium ion release for promoting bone regeneration. Article. Acta Biomater. 2019;85:294–309. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2018.12.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bi YG, Lin ZT, Deng ST. Fabrication and characterization of hydroxyapatite/sodium alginate/chitosan composite microspheres for drug delivery and bone tissue engineering. Article. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019;100:576–583. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2019.03.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan M, Ma Y, Tan HP, et al. Covalent and injectable chitosan-chondroitin sulfate hydrogels embedded with chitosan microspheres for drug delivery and tissue engineering. Article. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017;71:67–74. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2016.09.068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He J, Hu XL, Cao JF, et al. Chitosan-coated hydroxyapatite and drug-loaded polytrimethylene carbonate/polylactic acid scaffold for enhancing bone regeneration. Article. Carbohydr Polym. 2021;253:9. 117198. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng RY, Liu LL, Xiang Y, et al. Advanced liposome-loaded scaffolds for therapeutic and tissue engineering applications. Review. Biomaterials. 2020;232:17. 119706. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elizondo E, Moreno E, Cabrera I, et al. Liposomes and other vesicular systems: structural characteristics, methods of preparation, and use in nanomedicine. In: Villaverde A, editor. Nanoparticles in Translational Science and Medicine. Elsevier Academic Press Inc; 2011:1–52.
   Google Scholar
• Dubnika A, Egle K, Skrinda-Melne M, Skadins I, Rajadas J, Salma I. Development of vancomycin delivery systems based on autologous 3D platelet-rich fibrin matrices for bone tissue engineering. Article. Biomedicines. 2021;9(7):19. 814. doi:10.3390/biomedicines9070814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimaraes D, Cavaco-Paulo A, Nogueira E. Design of liposomes as drug delivery system for therapeutic applications. Review. Int J Pharm. 2021;601:15. 120571. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120571
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li J, Wang XL, Zhang T, et al. A review on phospholipids and their main applications in drug delivery systems. Review. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2015;10(2):81–98. doi:10.1016/j.ajps.2014.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu LL, Xiang Y, Wang Z, et al. Adhesive liposomes loaded onto an injectable, self-healing and antibacterial hydrogel for promoting bone reconstruction. Article. NPG Asia Mater. 2019;11(1):18. 81. doi:10.1038/s41427-019-0185-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bangham AD, Horne RW. Negative staining of phospholipids + their structural modification by-surface active agents as observed in electron microscope. Article. J Mol Biol. 1964;8(5):660. doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(64)80115-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble GT, Stefanick JF, Ashley JD, Kiziltepe T, Bilgicer B. Ligand-targeted liposome design: challenges and fundamental considerations. Review. Trends Biotechnol. 2014;32(1):32–45. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2013.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deshpande PP, Biswas S, Torchilin VP. Current trends in the use of liposomes for tumor targeting. Review. Nanomedicine. 2013;8(9):1509–1528. doi:10.2217/nnm.13.118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteiro N, Martins A, Pires R, et al. Immobilization of bioactive factor-loaded liposomes on the surface of electrospun nanofibers targeting tissue engineering. Article. Biomater Sci. 2014;2(9):1195–1209. doi:10.1039/c4bm00069b
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee CS, Hsu GCY, Sono T, Lee M, James AW. Development of a biomaterial scaffold integrated with osteoinductive oxysterol liposomes to enhance hedgehog signaling and bone repair. Article. Mol Pharm. 2021;18(4):1677–1689. doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.0c01136
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amler E, Filova E, Buzgo M, et al. Functionalized nanofibers as drug-delivery systems for osteochondral regeneration. Review. Nanomedicine. 2014;9(7):1083–1094. doi:10.2217/nnm.14.57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang D, Miller SC, Kopeckova P, Kopecek J. Bone-targeting macromolecular therapeutics. Review. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57(7):1049–1076. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2004.12.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang GL, Mostafa NZ, Incani V, Kucharski C, Uludag H. Bisphosphonate-decorated lipid nanoparticles designed as drug carriers for bone diseases. Article. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2012;100A(3):684–693. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.34002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mickova A, Buzgo M, Benada O, et al. Core/shell nanofibers with embedded liposomes as a drug delivery system. Meeting abstract. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2012;6:35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monteiro N, Martins A, Ribeiro D, et al. On the use of dexamethasone-loaded liposomes to induce the osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Article. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2015;9(9):1056–1066. doi:10.1002/term.1817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pornpattananangkul D, Olson S, Aryal S, et al. Stimuli-responsive liposome fusion mediated by gold nanoparticles. Article. ACS Nano. 2010;4(4):1935–1942. doi:10.1021/nn9018587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vo TN, Kasper FK, Mikos AG. Strategies for controlled delivery of growth factors and cells for bone regeneration. Review. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64(12):1292–1309. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.01.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodle MC, Scaria P. Cationic liposomes and nucleic acids. Review. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci. 2001;6(1):78–84. doi:10.1016/s1359-0294(00)00091-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storrie H, Mooney DJ. Sustained delivery of plasmid DNA from polymeric scaffolds for tissue engineering. Review. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2006;58(4):500–514. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2006.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni M, Greiser U, O’Brien T, Pandit A. Liposomal gene delivery mediated by tissue-engineered scaffolds. Review. Trends Biotechnol. 2010;28(1):28–36. doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2009.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clare K, Hardwick SJ, Carpenter KLH, Weeratunge N, Mitchinson MJ. Toxicity of oxysterols to human monocyte-macrophages. Article. Atherosclerosis. 1995;118(1):67–75. doi:10.1016/0021-9150(95)05594-m
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J, Brust TF, Lee HJ, Lee SC, Watts VJ, Yeo Y. Polydopamine-based simple and versatile surface modification of polymeric nano drug carriers. Article. ACS Nano. 2014;8(4):3347–3356. doi:10.1021/nn405809c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahoo S, Ang LT, Goh JCH, Toh SL. Growth factor delivery through electrospun nanofibers in scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. Article. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2010;93A(4):1539–1550. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.32645
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui ZK, Kim S, Baljon JJ, et al. Design and characterization of a therapeutic non-phospholipid liposomal nanocarrier with osteoinductive characteristics to promote bone formation. Article. ACS Nano. 2017;11(8):8055–8063. doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b02702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee CS, Kim S, Fan JB, Hwang HS, Aghaloo T, Lee M. Smoothened agonist sterosome immobilized hybrid scaffold for bone regeneration. Article. Sci Adv. 2020;6(17):11. eaaz7822. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaz7822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui ZK, Fan JB, Kim S, et al. Delivery of siRNA via cationic Sterosomes to enhance osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Article. J Control Release. 2015;217:42–52. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.08.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang M, Kang J, Le Thi P, et al. Three-dimensional printable gelatin hydrogels incorporating graphene oxide to enable spontaneous myogenic differentiation. ACS Macro Lett. 2021;10(4):426–432. doi:10.1021/acsmacrolett.0c00845
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bendtsen S, Quinnell S, Wei MJJobmr PA. Development of a novel alginate-polyvinyl alcohol-hydroxyapatite hydrogel for 3D bioprinting bone tissue engineered scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2017;105(5):1457–1468. doi:10.1002/jbm.a.36036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai X, Gao MZ, Syed S, Zhuang J, Xu XY, Zhang XQ. Bioactive hydrogels for bone regeneration. Review. Bioact Mater. 2018;3(4):401–417. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2018.05.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li JY, Mooney DJ. Designing hydrogels for controlled drug delivery. Review. Nat Rev Mater. 2016;1(12):17. 16071. doi:10.1038/natrevmats.2016.71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du XW, Zhou J, Shi JF, Xu B. Supramolecular hydrogelators and hydrogels: from soft matter to molecular biomaterials. Review. Chem Rev. 2015;115(24):13165–13307. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YM, Park MR, Song SC. Injectable polyplex hydrogel for localized and long-term delivery of siRNA. Article. ACS Nano. 2012;6(7):5757–5766. doi:10.1021/nn300842a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Thambi T, Phan VHG, Lee DS. Modularly engineered alginate bioconjugate hydrogel as biocompatible injectable scaffold for in situ biomineralization. Article. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;233:11. 115832. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.115832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Kang M, Jeon S, et al. 3D bioprinting of human mesenchymal stem cells-laden hydrogels incorporating MXene for spontaneous osteodifferentiation. Heliyon. 2023;9(3):e14490. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitragotri S, Anderson DG, Chen XY, et al. Accelerating the translation of nanomaterials in biomedicine. Article. ACS Nano. 2015;9(7):6644–6654. doi:10.1021/acsnano.5b03569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang L, Jiang YC, Stiadle J, et al. Electrospun nanofibrous thermoplastic polyurethane/poly(glycerol sebacate) hybrid scaffolds for vocal fold tissue engineering applications. Article. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019;94:740–749. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2018.10.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye KQ, Kuang HZ, You ZW, Morsi Y, Mo XM. Electrospun nanofibers for tissue engineering with drug loading and release. Review. Pharmaceutics. 2019;11(4):17. 182. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics11040182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moarrefzadeh A, Morovvati M, Angili S, Smaisim G, Khandan A, Toghraie DJ. Fabrication and finite element simulation of 3D printed poly L-lactic acid scaffolds coated with alginate/carbon nanotubes for bone engineering applications. Int J Biol Macromol. 2023;224:1496–1508. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.10.238
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sadeghi A, Moztarzadeh F, Mohandesi JA. Investigating the effect of chitosan on hydrophilicity and bioactivity of conductive electrospun composite scaffold for neural tissue engineering. Article. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;121:625–632. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venugopal E, Rajeswaran N, Sahanand KS, Bhattacharyya A, Rajendran S. In vitro evaluation of phytochemical loaded electrospun gelatin nanofibers for application in bone and cartilage tissue engineering. Article. Biomed Mater. 2019;14(1):11. 015004. doi:10.1088/1748-605X/aae3ef
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dang HP, Shabab T, Shafiee A, et al. 3D printed dual macro-, microscale porous network as a tissue engineering scaffold with drug delivering function. Article. Biofabrication. 2019;11(3):16. 035014. doi:10.1088/1758-5090/ab14ff
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding YP, Li W, Zhang F, et al. Electrospun fibrous architectures for drug delivery, tissue engineering and cancer therapy. Review. Adv Funct Mater. 2019;29(2):35. 1802852. doi:10.1002/adfm.201802852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iranmanesh P, Ehsani A, Khademi A, et al. Application of 3D bioprinters for dental pulp regeneration and tissue engineering (porous architecture). Transp Porous Media. 2022;142(1–2):265–293. doi:10.1007/s11242-021-01618-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Do AV, Khorsand B, Geary SM, Salem AK. 3D printing of scaffolds for tissue regeneration applications. Review. Adv Healthc Mater. 2015;4(12):1742–1762. doi:10.1002/adhm.201500168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qu MY, Wang CR, Zhou XW, et al. Multi-dimensional printing for bone tissue engineering. Review. Adv Healthc Mater. 2021;10(11):23. 2001986. doi:10.1002/adhm.202001986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye KQ, Liu DH, Kuang HZ, et al. Three-dimensional electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds displaying bone morphogenetic protein-2-derived peptides for the promotion of osteogenic differentiation of stem cells and bone regeneration. Article. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2019;534:625–636. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2018.09.071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai Y, Li Y, Cao H, et al. Osteogenic magnesium incorporated into PLGA/TCP porous scaffold by 3D printing for repairing challenging bone defect. Biomaterials. 2019;197:207–219. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.01.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wroblewska-Krepsztul J, Rydzkowski T, Michalska-Pozoga I, Thakur VK. Biopolymers for biomedical and pharmaceutical applications: recent advances and overview of alginate electrospinning. Review. Nanomaterials. 2019;9(3):23. 404. doi:10.3390/nano9030404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao YJ, Zhao YP, Guan JJ, et al. Electrospun fibers: an innovative delivery method for the treatment of bone diseases. Review. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2020;17(7):993–1005. doi:10.1080/17425247.2020.1767583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Windbergs M. Influence of polymer composition and drug loading procedure on dual drug release from PLGA:PEG electrospun fibers. Article. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018;124:71–79. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2018.08.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva JC, Udangawa RN, Chen JL, et al. Kartogenin-loaded coaxial PGS/PCL aligned nanofibers for cartilage tissue engineering. Article. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020;107:12. 110291. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2019.110291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho MS, Silva JC, Udangawa RN, et al. Co-culture cell-derived extracellular matrix loaded electrospun microfibrous scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Article. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019;99:479–490. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2019.01.127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar