References
- CobbMDMacoubrieJPublic perceptions about nanotechnology: risks, benefits and trustJ Nanopart Res20046395405
- ChoiSJLeeJJeongJChoyJ-HToxicity evaluation of inorganic nanoparticles: considerations and challengesMol Cell Toxicol20139205210
- OberdörsterGMaynardADonaldsonKILSI Research Foundation/Risk Science Institute Nanomaterial Toxicity Screening Working GroupPrinciples for characterizing the potential human health effects from exposure to nanomaterials: elements of a screening strategyPart Fibre Toxicol20052816209704
- European CommissionScientific Committee On Emerging and Newly Identified Health RisksBrusselsEuropean Commission2006 Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/health/archive/ph_risk/committees/04_scenihr/docs/scenihr_o_003b.pdfAccessed July 15, 2014
- National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network. [homepage on the Internet]Education & Training Available from: http://www.nnin.org/education-trainingAccessed November 4, 2014
- Project on Emerging NanotechnologiesHave Yourself a Merry “Nano” ChristmasWashington, DCProject on Emerging Nanotechnologies2006 Available from: http://www.nanotechproject.org/process/assets/files/6004/112706nanotechnology_xmasproducts.pdfAccessed July 15, 2014
- http://www.wilsoncenter.org [homepage on the Internet]Washington, DCWoodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars updated 2014Accessed July 15, 2014
- European CommissionEurobarometer: Europeans, Science and TechnologyBrusselsEuropean Commission2001 Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/research/press/2001/pr0612en-report.pdfAccessed July 15, 2014
- LeeCJScheufeleDALewensteinBVPublic attitudes toward emerging technologies: examining the interactive effects of cognitions and affect on public attitudes toward nanotechnologySci Commun2005272240267
- Smiley SmithSEHosgoodHDMichelsonESStoweMHAmericans’ nanotechnology risk perceptionJ Ind Ecol2008123459473
- GaskellGTen EyckTJacksonJVeltriGPublic attitudes to nanotechnology in Europe and the United StatesNat Mater20043849615286746
- European CommissionReport on the European Commission’s Public Online Consultation: Towards a Strategic Nanotechnology Action Plan (SNAP) 2010–2015BrusselsEuropean Commission2010 Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/research/consultations/snap/report_en.pdfAccessed July 15, 2014
- CurrallSCKingEBLaneNMaderaJTurnerSWhat drives public acceptance of nanotechnology?Nat Nanotechnol20061315315518654170
- BramanDKahanDMSlovicPGastilJCohenGLAffect, values, and nanotechnology risk perceptions: an experimental investigation [webpage on the Internet]George Washington University Law Faculty Publications and Other Works. Paper 2072007 Available from: http://scholarship.law.gwu.edu/faculty_publications/207Accessed July 15, 2014
- BurriRVBellucciSPublic perception of nanotechnologyJ Nanopart Res2008103387391
- GuptaNFischerARHvan der LansIAFrewerLJFactors influencing societal response of nanotechnology: an expert stakeholder analysisJ Nanopart Res201214585722822302
- PriestSGreenhalghTKramerVRisk perceptions starting to shift? US citizens are forming opinions about nanotechnologyJ Nanopart Res2010121112021170130
- VandermoereFBlanchemancheSBiebersteinAMaretteSRoosenJThe public understanding of nanotechnology in the food domain: the hidden role of views on science, technology, and naturePublic Underst Sci201120219520621657134
- AllumNSturgisPTabouraziDBrunton-SmithIScience knowledge and attitudes across cultures: a meta-analysisPublic Underst Sci20081713554
- SturgisPAllumNScience in society: re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudesPublic Underst Sci20041315574