Three-dimensional/four-dimensional transperineal ultrasound: clinical utility and future prospects

References

• DietzHPPelvic floor trauma following vaginal deliveryCurr Opin Obstet Gynecol200618552853716932048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLanceyJOMorganDMFennerDEComparison of levator ani muscle defects and function in women with and without pelvic organ prolapseObstet Gynecol20071092 Pt 129530217267827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShekKLDietzHPThe effect of childbirth on hiatal dimensionsObstet Gynecol200911361272127819461422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DietzHPPelvic floor ultrasound: a reviewAm J Obstet Gynecol2010202432133420350640
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DietzHPHaylenBTBroomeJUltrasound in the quantification of female pelvic organ prolapseUltrasound Obstet Gynecol200118551151411844174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLanceyJOThe hidden epidemic of pelvic floor dysfunction: achievable goals for improved prevention and treatmentAm J Obstet Gynecol200519251488149515902147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DietzHPUltrasound imaging of the pelvic floor. Part II: three-dimensional or volume imagingUltrasound Obstet Gynecol200423661562515170808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLanceyJOAnatomyTextbook of Female Urology and UrogynaecologyCardozoLStaskinDIsis Medica MediaLondon, UK2001112124
   Google Scholar
• DietzHPShekCClarkeBBiometry of the pubovisceral muscle and levator hiatus by three-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasoundUltrasound Obstet Gynecol200525658058515883982
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DietzHPSteensmaABThe prevalence of major abnormalities of the levator ani in urogynaecological patientsBJOG2006113222523016412002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WeemhoffMVergeldtTFNottenKSerroyenJKampschoerPHRoumenFJAvulsion of puborectalis muscle and other risk factors for cystocele recurrence: a 2-year follow-up studyInt Urogynecol J2012231657121822712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DietzHPQuantification of major morphological abnormalities of the levator aniUltrasound Obstet Gynecol200729332933417323308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DietzHPAbbuAShekKLThe levator-urethra gap measurement: a more objective means of determining levator avulsion?Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol200832794194519035543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PatelDAXuXThomasonADRansomSBIvyJSDeLanceyJOChildbirth and pelvic floor dysfunction: an epidemiologic approach to the assessment of prevention opportunities at deliveryAm J Obstet Gynecol20061951232816579934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DietzHPShekCLevator avulsion and grading of pelvic floor muscle strengthInt Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct200819563363617999021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AbdoolZShekKLDietzHPThe effect of levator avulsion on hiatal dimension and functionAm J Obstet Gynecol2009201189.e189.e519426956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DietzHPBernardoMJKirbyAShekKLMinimal criteria for the diagnosis of avulsion of the puborectalis muscle by tomographic ultrasoundInt Urogynecol J201122669970421107811
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VolloyhaugIWongVShekKLDietzHPDoes levator avulsion cause distension of the genital hiatus and perineal body?Int Urogynecol J20132471161116523184139
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van DelftKSultanAHThakarRSchwertner-TiepelmannNKluiversKThe relationship between postpartum levator ani muscle avulsion and signs and symptoms of pelvic floor dysfunctionBJOG2014121911641171 discussion 117224548759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DietzHPSimpsonJMLevator trauma is associated with pelvic organ prolapseBJOG2008115897998418503571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RaimondoDYoussefAMabroukMPelvic floor muscle dysfunction at 3D/4D transperineal ultrasound in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis: a pilot studyUltrasound Obstet Gynecol Epub2016108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DurneaCMO’ReillyBAKhashanASStatus of the pelvic floor in young primiparous womenUltrasound Obstet Gynecol201546335636225359670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DietzHPShekCDe LeonJSteensmaABBallooning of the levator hiatusUltrasound Obstet Gynecol200831667668018470963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShekKLDietzHPIntrapartum risk factors for levator traumaBJOG2010117121485149220735379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlbrichSBLaterzaRMSkalaCSalvatoreSKoelblHNaumannGImpact of mode of delivery on levator morphology: a prospective observational study with three-dimensional ultrasound early in the postpartum periodBJOG20121191516021985531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChanSSCheungRYYiuAKPrevalence of levator ani muscle injury in Chinese women after first deliveryUltrasound Obstet Gynecol201239670470922045587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassadó GarrigaJPessarrodona IsernAEspuña PonsMFour-dimensional sonographic evaluation of avulsion of the levator ani according to delivery modeUltrasound Obstet Gynecol201138670170621837763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-MejidoJAGutierrez-PalominoLBorreroCValdiviesoPFernandez-PalacinASainz-BuenoJAFactors that influence the development of avulsion of the levator ani muscle in eutocic deliveries: 3-4D transperineal ultrasound studyJ Matern Fetal Neonatal Med201629193183318626634392
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YangJMYangSHHuangWCBiometry of the pubovisceral muscle and levator hiatus in nulliparous Chinese womenUltrasound Obstetrics Gynecol2006285710716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SiafarikasFStaer-JensenJBraekkenIHBøKEnghMELearning process for performing and analyzing 3D/4D transperineal ultrasound imaging and interobserver reliability studyUltrasound Obstet Gynecol201341331231722605574
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MajidaMBraekkenIHUmekWBøKSaltyte BenthJEllstrøm EnghMInterobserver repeatability of three- and four-dimensional transperineal ultrasound assessment of pelvic floor muscle anatomy and functionUltrasound Obstet Gynecol200933556757319402120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van VeelenGASchweitzerKJvan der VaartCHReliability of pelvic floor measurments on three- and four-dimensional ultrasound during and after first pregnancy: implications for trainingUltrasound Obstet Gynecol201342559059523729398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BraekkenIHMajidaMEllstrøm-EnghMDietzHPUmekWBøKTest-retest and intra-observer repeatability of two-, three- and four-dimensional perineal ultrasound of pelvic floor muscle anatomy and functionInt Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct200819222723517599234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChenRSongYJiangLHongXYePThe assessment of voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction by three-dimensional transperineal ultrasonographyArch Gynecol Obstet2011284493193621161256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BraekkenIHMajidaMEnghMEBøKTest-retest reliability of pelvic floor muscle contraction measured by 4D ultrasoundNeurourol Urodyn2009281687318932174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van DelftKThakarRSultanAHPelvic floor muscle contractility: digital assessment vs transperineal ultrasoundUltrasound Obstet Gynecol201545221722225044167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van DelftKWSultanAHThakarRShobeiriSAKluiversKBAgreement between palpation and transperineal and endovaginal ultrasound in the diagnosis of levator ani avulsionInt Urogynecol J2015261333924859796
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DietzHPWongVShekKLA simplified method for determining hiatal biometryAust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol201151654054321951068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YoussefAMontagutiESanlorenzoOA new simple technique for 3-dimensional sonographic assessment of the pelvic floor musclesJ Ultrasound Med2015341657225542941
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YoussefAMontagutiESanlorenzoOReliability of new three-dimensional ultrasound technique for pelvic hiatal area measurementUltrasound Obstet Gynecol201647562963526105710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YoussefACavaleraMPacellaGIs a curved 3D ultrasound reconstruction needed to assess the “warped” pelvic floor plane?Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol Epub2019919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DietzHPBarryCLimYNRaneATwo-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of suburethral slingsUltrasound Obstet Gynecol200526217517915988786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HuangWCYangSHYangJMThree-dimensional transperineal sonographic characteristics of the anal sphincter complex in nulliparous womenUltrasound Obstet Gynecol200730221022017659660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ValskyDVMessingBPetkovaRPostpartum evaluation of the anal sphincter by transperineal three-dimensional ultrasound in primiparous women after vaginal delivery and following surgical repair of third-degree tears by the overlapping techniqueUltrasound Obstet Gynecol200729219520417219371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ValskyDVCohenSMLipschuetzMHochner-CelnikierDYagelSThree-dimensional transperineal ultrasound findings associated with anal incontinence after intrapartum sphincter tears in primiparous womenUltrasound Obstet Gynecol2012391839021845740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FaltinDLBoulvainMIrionOBretonesSStanCWeilADiagnosis of anal sphincter tears by postpartum endosonography to predict fecal incontinenceObstet Gynecol200095564364710775721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzmán RojasRAShekKLLangerSMDietzHPPrevalence of anal sphincter injury in primiparous womenUltrasound Obstet Gynecol201342446146623576493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzmán RojasRAKamisan AtanIShekKLDietzHPAnal sphincter trauma and anal incontinence in urogynecological patientsUltrasound Obstet Gynecol201546336336625766889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YoussefAGhiTPiluGHow to perform ultrasound in labor: assessment of fetal occiput positionUltrasound Obstet Gynecol201341447647823641505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GhiTYoussefAMaroniEIntrapartum transperineal ultrasound assessment of fetal head progression in active second stage of labor and mode of deliveryUltrasound Obstet Gynecol201341443043523288706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YoussefAMaroniECarielloLFetal head-symphysis distance and mode of delivery in the second stage of laborActa Obstet Gynecol Scand201493101011101725040777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GhiTBellussiFEggebøTSonographic assessment of fetal occiput position during the second stage of labor: how reliable is the transperineal approach?J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med201528161985198825316562
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ShererDMMiodovnikMBradleyKSLangerOIntrapartum fetal head position II: comparison between transvaginal digital examination and transabdominal ultrasound assessment during the second stage of laborUltrasound Obstet Gynecol200219326426811896948
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DietzHPLanzaroneVMeasuring engagement of the fetal head: validity and reproducibility of a new ultrasound techniqueUltrasound Obstet Gynecol200525216516815505817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EggebøTMGjessingLKHeienCPrediction of labor and delivery by transperineal ultrasound in pregnancies with prelabor rupture of membranes at termUltrasound Obstet Gynecol200627438739116565994
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HenrichWDudenhausenJFuchsIKämenaATutschekBIntrapartum translabial ultrasound (ITU): sonographic landmarks and correlation with successful vacuum extractionUltrasound Obstet Gynecol200628675376017063455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BarberaAFPombarXPeruginoGLezotteDCHobbinsJCA new method to assess fetal head descent in labor with transperineal ultrasoundUltrasound Obstet Gynecol200933331331919248000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TutschekBBraunTChantraineFHenrichWA study of progress of labour using intrapartum translabial ultrasound, assessing head station, direction, and angle of descentBJOG20111181626921083864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RamphulMOoiPVBurkeGInstrumental delivery and ultrasound: a multicentre randomised controlled trial of ultrasound assessment of the fetal head position versus standard care as an approach to prevent morbidity at instrumental deliveryBJOG201412181029103824720273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PopowskiTPorcherRFortJJavoiseSRozenbergPInfluence of ultrasound determination of fetal head position on mode of delivery: a pragmatic randomized trialUltrasound Obstet Gynecol201546552052525583399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YoussefAPiluGKnowledge, understanding and fetal occiput positionUltrasound Obstet Gynecol201647452352427062977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GhiTMaroniEYoussefAIntrapartum three-dimensional ultrasonographic imaging of face presentations: report of two casesUltrasound Obstet Gynecol201240111711822223511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GhiTYoussefAPiluGMalvasiARagusaAIntrapartum sonographic imaging of fetal head asynclitismUltrasound Obstet Gynecol201239223824021523842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GhiTFarinaAPedrazziARizzoNPelusiGPiluGDiagnosis of station and rotation of the fetal head in the second stage of labor with intrapartum translabial ultrasoundUltrasound Obstet Gynecol200933333133619202576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KalacheKDDückelmannAMMichaelisSALangeJCichonGDudenhausenJWTransperineal ultrasound imaging in prolonged second stage of labor with occipitoanterior presenting fetuses: how well does the ‘angle of progression’ predict the mode of delivery?Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol200933332633019224527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TutschekBTorkildsenEAEggebøTMComparison between ultrasound parameters and clinical examination to assess fetal head station in laborUltrasound Obstet Gynecol201341442542923371409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YoussefAMaroniERagusaAFetal head-symphysis distance: a simple and reliable ultrasound index of fetal head station in laborUltrasound Obstet Gynecol201341441942423124698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YoussefAGhiTAwadEEUltrasound in labor: a caregiver’s perspectiveUltrasound Obstet Gynecol201341446947022807171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YoussefABellussiFMaroniEPiluGRizzoNGhiTUltrasound in labor: is it time for a more simplified approach?Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol201341671071123280777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YoussefABellussiFMontagutiEAgreement between two- and three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound methods for assessment of fetal head-symphysis distance in active laborUltrasound Obstet Gynecol201443218318824006290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GhiTControEFarinaANobileMPiluGThree-dimensional ultrasound in monitoring progression of labor: a reproducibility studyUltrasound Obstet Gynecol201036450050620652931
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DückelmannAMBambergCMichaelisSAMeasurement of fetal head descent using the ‘angle of progression’ on transperineal ultrasound imaging is reliable regardless of fetal head station or ultrasound expertiseUltrasound Obstet Gynecol201035221622220069668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GhiTMaroniEYoussefASonographic pattern of fetal head descent: relationship with duration of active second stage of labor and occiput position at deliveryUltrasound Obstet Gynecol2014441828924496823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EggebøTMHassanWASalvesenKÅTorkildsenEAØstborgTBLeesCCPrediction of delivery mode by ultrasound-assessed fetal position in nulliparous women with prolonged first stage of laborUltrasound Obstet Gynecol201546560661025536955
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GillorMVaisbuchEZaksSBarakOHagayZLevyRTransperineal sonographic assessment of angle of progression as a predictor of a successful vaginal delivery following induction of laborUltrasound Obstet Gynecol201749224024527062415
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PaltieliYNizardJA question of angle of viewUltrasound Obstet Gynecol2009343363364 author reply 364–36619670331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MolinaFSTerraRCarrilloMPPuertasANicolaidesKHWhat is the most reliable ultrasound parameter for assessment of fetal head descent?Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol201036449349920533441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TorkildsenEASalvesenKÅEggebøTMAgreement between two- and three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound methods in assessing fetal head descent in the first stage of laborUltrasound Obstet Gynecol201239331031521630362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BöttcherBRadleySCPelvimetry: changing trends and attitudesJ Obstet Gynaecol200121545946212521797
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huerta-EnochianGSKatzVLFoxLKHamlinJAKollathJPMagnetic resonance-based serial pelvimetry: do maternal pelvic dimensions change during pregnancy?Am J Obstet Gynecol2006194616891694 discussion 1694–169516731086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RozenbergPIs there a role for X-ray pelvimetry in the twenty-first century?Gynecol Obstet Fertil2007351612 French [with English abstract]17188014
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GhiTYoussefAMartelliFA new method to measure the subpubic arch angle using 3-D ultrasoundFetal Diagn Ther201538319519925871360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GhiTYoussefAMartelliFNarrow subpubic arch angle is associated with higher risk of persistent occiput posterior position at deliveryUltrasound Obstet Gynecol201648451151526565728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YoussefAGhiTMartelliFSubpubic arch angle and mode of delivery in low-risk nulliparous womenFetal Diagn Ther201640215015526555940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YoussefASalsiGCataneoIAgreement between two 3D ultrasound techniques for the assessment of the subpubic arch angleJ Matern Fetal Neonatal Med201638315
   Google Scholar
• GilboaYKivilevitchZSpiraMPubic arch angle in prolonged second stage of labor: clinical significanceUltrasound Obstet Gynecol201341444244623001876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• YoussefASalsiGMontagutiEAutomated measurement of the angle of progression in labor: a feasibility and reliability studyFetal Diagn Ther Epub201693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar