References
- MartinJAHamiltonBESuttonPDVenturaSJMenackerFKirmeyerSBirths: final data for 2004Natl Vital Stat Rep20065511101
- BangdiwalaSIBrownSSCunninghamFGNIH Consensus Development Conference Draft Statement on Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: New InsightsNIH Consens State Sci Statements2010310273 [Epub ahead of print.]
- MenackerFTrends in cesarean rates for first births and repeat cesarean rates for low-risk women: United States, 1990–2003Natl Vital Stat Rep200554418
- MartinJAHamiltonBESuttonPDCenters for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics National Vital Statistics SystemBirths: final data for 2005Natl Vital Stat Rep2007566110318277471
- Lydon-RochelleMTGardellaCCárdenasVEasterlingTRRepeat cesarean delivery: what indications are recorded in the medical chart?Birth200633141116499526
- AllenVMOConnellCMBaskettTFMaternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with induction of labor at termObstet Gynecol2006108228629416880297
- MillerDACholletJAGoodwinTMClinical risk factors for placenta previa-placenta accretaAm J Obstet Gynecol199717712102149240608
- FlammBLGoingsJRLiuYWolde-TsadikGElective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a prospective multicenter studyObstet Gynecol19948369279328190433
- GrobmanWAGilbertSLandonMBOutcomes of induction of labor after one prior cesareanObstet Gynecol20071092 Pt 126226917267822
- McMahonMJLutherERBowesWAJrOlshanAFComparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean sectionN Engl J Med1996335106896958703167
- LandonMBHauthJCLevenoKJNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units NetworkMaternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean deliveryN Engl J Med2004351252581258915598960
- EndresLKBarnhartKSpontaneous second trimester uterine rupture after classical cesareanObstet Gynecol2000965 Pt 280680811094213
- GuiseJMMcDonaghMSOsterweilPNygrenPChanBKHelfandMSystematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean sectionBMJ20043297456192515231616
- WenSWRusenIDWalkerMMaternal Health Study Group, Canadian Perinatal Surveillance SystemComparison of maternal mortality and morbidity between trial of labor and elective cesarean section among women with previous cesarean deliveryAm J Obstet Gynecol200419141263126915507951
- ACOG Practice bulletin no. 115: vaginal birth after previous cesarean deliveryObstet Gynecol20101162 Pt 145046320664418
- MercerBMGilbertSLandonMBNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units NetworkLabor outcomes with increasing number of prior vaginal births after cesarean deliveryObstet Gynecol20081112 Pt 128529118238964
- MakohaFWFelimbanHMFathuddienMARoomiFGhabraTMultiple cesarean section morbidityInt J Gynaecol Obstet200487322723215548394
- SilverRMLandonMBRouseDJNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units NetworkMaternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveriesObstet Gynecol200610761226123216738145
- GuiseJMEdenKEmeisCVaginal birth after cesarean: new insightsEvid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep)2010139720629481
- CostantineMMFoxKByersBDValidation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean deliveryObstet Gynecol200911451029103320168103
- GrobmanWALaiYLandonMBNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network (MFMU)Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean deliveryObstet Gynecol2007109480681217400840
- GrobmanWALaiYLandonMBDoes information available at admission for delivery improve prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean?Am J Perinatol2009261069370119813165
- GrobmanWALaiYLandonMBEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units NetworkCan a prediction model for vaginal birth after cesarean also predict the probability of morbidity related to a trial of labor?Am J Obstet Gynecol2009200156. e1e618822401
- PeacemanAMGersnoviezRLandonMBNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units NetworkThe MFMU Cesarean Registry: impact of fetal size on trial of labor success for patients with previous cesarean for dystociaAm J Obstet Gynecol200619541127113117000245
- LandonMBLeindeckerSSpongCYNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units NetworkThe MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean deliveryAm J Obstet Gynecol20051933 Pt 21016102316157104
- BujoldEGauthierRJShould we allow a trial of labor after a previous cesarean for dystocia in the second stage of labor?Obstet Gynecol200198465265511576583
- BaisJMvan der BordenDMPelMVaginal birth after caesarean section in a population with a low overall caesarean section rateEur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol200196215816211384799
- ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins–ObstetricsACOG practice bulletin. Diagnosis and management of preeclampsia and eclampsia. Number 33, Jan 2002Obstet Gynecol200299115916716175681
- WhitePPregnancy complicating diabetesAm J Med19497560961615396063
- LeibermanJRFraserDWeitzmanSGlezermanMBirthweight curves in southern Israel populationsIsr J Med Sci19932941982038155098