Post Traumatic Growth for Gestational Diabetic Patients During COVID-19: Role of Partner Supportive Communication and Family Environment

References

• Justman N, Shahak G, Gutzeit O, et al. Lockdown with a price: the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on prenatal care and perinatal outcomes in a tertiary care center. Israel Med Assoc J. 2020;22(9):533–537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasmussen SA, Smulian JC, Lednicky JA, Wen TS, Jamieson DJ. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and pregnancy: what obstetricians need to know. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(5):415–426. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz DL. Leveraging the Exit of Diabesity: we suffer from obesity and diabetes because we eat too much and exercise too little. Solving the problem is hard but not complicated. IEEE Pulse. 2014;5(3):18–21. doi:10.1109/MPUL.2014.2309574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecchetto C, Aiello M, Gentili C, Ionta S, Osimo SA. Increased emotional eating during COVID-19 associated with lockdown, psychological and social distress. Appetite. 2021;160:105122. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serván PR. Obesity and diabetes. Nutr Hosp. 2013;28(5):138–143.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Zhang Y, Huo S, et al. Emotional eating in pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic and its association with dietary intake and gestational weight gain. Nutrients. 2020;12(8):2250. doi:10.3390/nu12082250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalra S. Diabesity. J Pak Med Assoc. 2013;63(4):532–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedullo AL, Schiattarella A, Morlando M, et al. Mediterranean diet for the prevention of gestational diabetes in the Covid-19 era: implications of Il-6 in diabesity. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(3):1213. doi:10.3390/ijms22031213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Mascio D. Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes of Pregnant Women with SARS-COV-2 infection. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;57:232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkafrawi D, Joseph J, Schiattarella A, Rodriguez B, Sisti G. Intrauterine transmission of COVID-19 in Pregnancy: case report and review of literature. Acta Bio Med. 2020;91(3):e2020041.
   Google Scholar
• Lee KW, Ching SM, Ramachandran V, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of gestational diabetes mellitus in Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):1–20. doi:10.1186/s12884-018-2131-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riaz M, Nawaz A, Masood SN, Fawwad A, Basit A, Shera A. Frequency of gestational diabetes mellitus using DIPSI criteria, a study from Pakistan. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2019;7(2):218–221. doi:10.1016/j.cegh.2018.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sürücü HA, Besen DB, Duman M, Erbil EY. Coping with stress among pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus. J Caring Sci. 2018;7(1):9. doi:10.15171/jcs.2018.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schiattarella A, Lombardo M, Morlando M, Rizzo G. The impact of a plant-based diet on gestational diabetes: a review. Antioxidants. 2021;10(4):557. doi:10.3390/antiox10040557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan TA, Xiang AH, Page KA. Gestational diabetes mellitus: risks and management during and after pregnancy. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2012;8(11):639–649. doi:10.1038/nrendo.2012.96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koerner AF, Schrodt P. An introduction to the special issue on family communication patterns theory. J Fam Commun. 2014;14(1):1–15. doi:10.1080/15267431.2013.857328
   Google Scholar
• Priem JS, Solomon DH. Emotional support and physiological stress recovery: the role of support matching, adequacy, and invisibility. Commun Monogr. 2015;82(1):88–112. doi:10.1080/03637751.2014.971416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones SM, Wirtz JG. How does the comforting process work? An empirical test of an appraisal-based model of comforting. Hum Commun Res. 2006;32(3):217–243. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00274.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordova MJ, Cunningham LL, Carlson CR, Andrykowski MA. Posttraumatic growth following breast cancer: a controlled comparison study. Health Psychol. 2001;20(3):176. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.20.3.176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayawickreme E, Blackie LE. Post–traumatic growth as positive personality change: evidence, controversies and future directions. Eur J Pers. 2014;28(4):312–331. doi:10.1002/per.1963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park CL. Making sense of the meaning literature: an integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychol Bull. 2010;136(2):257. doi:10.1037/a0018301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick MA, Koerner AF. Family communication schemata: effects on children’s resiliency. In: The Evolution of Key Mass Communication Concepts: Honoring Jack M McLeod. 2005:115–139.
   Google Scholar
• Tian X, Solomon DH. Grief and post-traumatic growth following miscarriage: the role of meaning reconstruction and partner supportive communication. Death Stud. 2020;44(4):237–247. doi:10.1080/07481187.2018.1539051
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG. The posttraumatic growth inventory: measuring the positive legacy of trauma. J Trauma Stress. 1996;9(3):455–471. doi:10.1002/jts.2490090305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson DH, Wilson M. Family Satisfaction Scale. Minneapolis, MN: Life Innovations; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Olson DH, Gorall DM, Tiesel JW. Faces IV package. Minneapolis, MN: Life Innovations. 39; 2004;12–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF Jr, Sarstedt M, Hopkins L, Kuppelwieser VG. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): an emerging tool in business research. Eur Busi Rev. 2014;26:106–121.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF Jr, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Gudergan SP. Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. saGe publications; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Celsi M, Ortinau DJ, Bush RP. Essentials of Marketing Research. Vol. 2. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Marketing Res. 1981;18(1):39–50. doi:10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henseler J, Hubona G, Ray PA. Using PLS path modeling in new technology research: updated guidelines. Ind Manag Data Syst. 2016;116(1):2–20. doi:10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6(1):1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Smith D, Reams R, Hair JF Jr. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): a useful tool for family business researchers. J Fam Bus Strategy. 2014;5(1):105–115. doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon AH, Rahman IA. SEM-PLS analysis of inhibiting factors of cost performance for large construction projects in Malaysia: perspective of clients and consultants. Sci World J. 2014;2014:1–9. doi:10.1155/2014/165158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin WW. Commentary: issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. JSTOR. 1998;22:vii–xvi.
   Google Scholar
• Kalman ME, Monge P, Fulk J, Heino R. Motivations to resolve communication dilemmas in database-mediated collaboration. Communic Res. 2002;29(2):125–154. doi:10.1177/0093650202029002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Set correlation and contingency tables. Appl Psychol Meas. 1988;12(4):425–434. doi:10.1177/014662168801200410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siahkal SF, Javadifar N, Najafian M, Iravani M, Zakerkish M, Heshmati R. The psychosocial challenges associated with gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Prim Care Diabetes. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.pcd.2021.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatima SS, Rehman R, Alam F, Madhani S, Chaudhry B, Khan TA. Gestational diabetes mellitus and the predisposing factors. J Pak Med Assoc. 2017;67(2):261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiPietro JA. Maternal stress in pregnancy: considerations for fetal development. J Adolesc Health. 2012;51(2):S3–S8. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.04.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaptein S, Evans M, McTavish S, et al. The subjective impact of a diagnosis of gestational diabetes among ethnically diverse pregnant women: a qualitative study. Can J Diabetes. 2015;39(2):117–122. doi:10.1016/j.jcjd.2014.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen KK, Dahl-Petersen IK, Jensen DM, et al. Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a co-produced, complex, health promotion intervention for women with prior gestational diabetes and their families: the Face-it study. Trials. 2020;21(1):1–12. doi:10.1186/s13063-020-4062-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barskova T, Oesterreich R. Post-traumatic growth in people living with a serious medical condition and its relations to physical and mental health: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(21):1709–1733. doi:10.1080/09638280902738441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svetina M, Nastran K. Family relationships and post-traumatic growth in breast cancer patients. Psychiatr Danub. 2012;24(3):298–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledbetter AM. Family communication patterns and communication competence as predictors of online communication attitude: evaluating a dual pathway model. J Fam Commun. 2010;10(2):99–115. doi:10.1080/15267431003595462
   Google Scholar
• Chipuer HM, Villegas T. Comparing the second‐order factor structure of the Family Environment Scale across husbands’ and wives’ perceptions of their family environment. Fam Process. 2001;40(2):187–198. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2001.4020100187.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar