References
- Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990–2014. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0148343. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148343
- Kenny LC, Lavender T, McNamee R, O’Neill SM, Mills T, Khashan AS. Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcome: evidence from a large contemporary cohort. PLoS One. 2013;8:e56583. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056583
- Crane JM, Murphy P, Burrage L, Hutchens D. Maternal and perinatal outcomes of extreme obesity in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013;35(7):606–611. doi:10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30879-3
- Biswas A, Su LL, Mattar C. Caesarean section for preterm birth, and breech presentation and twin pregnancies. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27:209–219. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.09.002
- Chen I, Opiyo N, Tavender E, et al. Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;9. Art. No.: CD005528. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005528.pub3
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin no. 205. Vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133:e110–27. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003078
- Society of Obstetricians and Gynecologists of Canada. Clinical Practice Guideline No. 155. Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous Caesarean birth. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2019;41:992–1011.
- Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Birth after previous cesarean birth Green-top Guideline No. 45; 2015. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg45/. Accessed April, 2020.
- McMahon MJ, Luther ER, Bowes WA. Comparison of a trial of labor with an elective second cesarean section. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:689–695. doi:10.1056/NEJM199609053351001
- Gyamfi C, Juhasz G, Gyamfi P, Stone JL. Increased success of trial of labor after previous vaginal birth after cesarean. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;104:715–719. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000139516.43748.1b
- Mercer BM, Gilbert S, Landon MB, et al. Labor outcomes with increasing number of prior vaginal births after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:285–291. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31816102b9
- Landon MB, Grobman WA. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. In: Landon MB, Driscoll DA, Jauniaux ERM, Galan HL, Grobman WA, Berghella VM, editors. Gabbe’s Obstetrics Essentials: Normal and Problem Pregnancies. Elsevier; 2018:145–150.
- Takeya A, Adachi E, Takahashi Y, et al. Trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) in Japan: rates and complications. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020;301:995–1001. doi:10.1007/s00404-020-05492-8
- Triebwasser JE, Kamdar NS, Langen ES, et al. Hospital contribution to variation in rates of vaginal birth after cesarean. J Perinatol. 2019;39:904–910. doi:10.1038/s41372-019-0373-2
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare 2018. Australia’s mothers and babies 2016-in brief. Perinatal statistics series no. 34. Cat. no. PER 97. Canberra: AIHW. Available from: https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/7a8ad47e-8817-46d3-9757-44fe975969c4/aihw-per-97.pdf.aspx?inline=true. Accessed June, 2020.
- Nilsson C, Lalor J, Begley C, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: views of women from countries with low VBAC rates. Women Birth. 2017;30:481–490. doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2017.04.009
- Lipschuetz M, Guedalia J, Rottenstreich A, et al. Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean deliveries using machine learning. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222:613.e1–16. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2019.12.267
- Lundgren I, Morano S, Nilsson C, Sinclair M, Begley C. Cultural perspectives on vaginal birth after previous cesarean section in countries with high and low rates - A hermeneutic study. Women Birth. 2020;33:e339–e347. doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2019.07.300