Quality of Life After Treatment for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Vaginal Pessary versus Surgery

References

• Barber MD, Maher CF. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogyn J. 2013;24:1783–1790. doi:10.1007/s00192-013-2169-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuenchompoonut V, Bunyavejchevin S, Wisawasukmongchol W, Taechakraichana N. Prevalence of genital prolapse in Thai menopausal women (using new standardization classification). J Med Assoc Thai. 2005;88:1–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haylen BT, Maher CF, Barber MD, et al. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Int Urogyn J. 2016;27:165–194. doi:10.1007/s00192-015-2932-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Q, Shu H, Dai Z. Effect of pelvic floor dysfunction on sexual function and quality of life in Chinese women of different ages: an observational study. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2019;19:299–304. doi:10.1111/ggi.13618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt C, Janse van Vuuren EC. Dysfunction, activity limitations, participation restriction and contextual factors in South African women with pelvic organ prolapse. S Afr J Physiother. 2019;75:933–940. doi:10.4102/sajp.v75i1.933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anantawat T, Manonai J, Wattanayingcharoenchai R, Sarit-apirak S. Impact of a vaginal pessary on the quality of life in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Asian Biomed. 2016;10:249–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugge C, Adams EJ, Gopinath D, et al. Pessaries (mechanical devices) for managing pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;11:CD004010. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004010.pub4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Urogynecologic Society. INTERIM UPDATE: this practice bulletin is updated as highlighted to reflect the US Food and Drug Administration order to stop the sale of transvaginal synthetic mesh products for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Pelvic organ prolapse. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2019;25:397–408. doi:10.1097/SPV.0000000000000794
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lone F, Thakar R, Sultan AH. One-year prospective comparison of vaginal pessaries and surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using the validated ICIQ-VS and ICIQ-UI (SF) questionnaire. Int Urogyn J. 2015;26:1305–1312. doi:10.1007/s00192-015-2686-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdool Z, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Oliver RS. Prospective evaluation of outcome of vaginal pessaries versus surgery in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogyn J. 2011;22:273–278. doi:10.1007/s00192-010-1340-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coolen AWM, Troost S, Mol BWJ, Roovers JWR, Bongers MY. Primary treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: pessary use versus prolapse surgery. Int Urogyn J. 2018;29:99–107. doi:10.1007/s00192-017-3372-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miceli A, Dueñas-Diez JL. Effectiveness of ring pessaries versus vaginal hysterectomy for advanced pelvic organ prolapse. A cohort study. Int Urogynecol J. 2019;30:2161–2169. doi:10.1007/s00192-019-03919-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung VW, Wohlrab KJ, Madsen A, Raker C. Patient-reported goal attainment and comprehensive functioning outcomes after surgery compared with pessary for pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215:659.e1–659.e7. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2016.06.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamik MM, Rogers RG, Qualls CR, Komesu YM. Goal attainment after treatment in patients with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209:488.e1–488.e5. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2013.06.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber MD, Walters MD, Cundiff GW; PESSRI Trial Group. Responsiveness of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI) and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ) in women undergoing vaginal surgery and pessary treatment for pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;194:1492–1498. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Boer TA, Gietelink DA, Vierhout ME. Discrepancies between physician interview and a patient self-assessment questionnaire after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogyn J. 2008;19:1349–1352. doi:10.1007/s00192-008-0656-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price N, Jackson SR, Avery K, Brookes ST, Abrams P. Development and psychometric evaluation of the ICIQ vaginal symptoms questionnaire: the ICIQ-VS. BJOG. 2006;113:700–712. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00938.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digesu GA, Khullar V, Cardozo L, Robinson D, Salvatore S. P-QOL: a validated questionnaire to assess the symptoms and quality of life of women with urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2005;16:176–181. doi:10.1007/s00192-004-1225-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhu C, Swift S, Moloney GS, Drake MJ. How to use the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system. Neurourol Urodyn. 2018;37:39–43. doi:10.1002/nau.23740
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sriwat W, Manonai J, Sillaphakit C, Sarit-apirak S, Chittacharoen A. Validation of the Thai version of ICIQ-VS (international consultation on incontinence questionnaire -vaginal symptoms) in Thai women. Rama Med J. 2016;39:1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Manchana T, Bunyavejchevin S. Validation of the Prolapse Quality of Life (P-QOL) questionnaire in Thai version. Int Urogyn J. 2010;21:985–993. doi:10.1007/s00192-010-1107-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodner-Adler B, Bodner K, Stinglmeier A, et al. Prolapse surgery versus vaginal pessary in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: which factors influence the choice of treatment? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;299:773–777. doi:10.1007/s00404-019-05046-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung VW, Rogers RG, Barber MD, Clark MA. Conceptual framework for patient-important outcomes for pelvic organ prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn. 2014;33:414–419. doi:10.1002/nau.22397
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Vlaev I, King D, Mayer E, Darzi A, Dolan P. Subjective well-being and the measurement of quality in healthcare. Soc Sci Med. 2013;99:27–34. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.09.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cichowski S, Grzybowska ME, Halder GE, et al. International urogynecology consultation: patient reported outcome measures (PROs) use in the evaluation of patients with pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33(10):2603–2631. doi:10.1007/s00192-022-05315-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albuquerque Coelho SC, Castro EB, Juliato CR. Female pelvic organ prolapse using pessaries: systematic review. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:1797–1803. doi:10.1007/s00192-016-2991-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar