Retrospective Analysis of Pregnancy Outcomes Following External Cephalic Version for Breech Presentation

References

• Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom S. Williams Obstetrics. 25 ed. Vol.12. People’s Medical Publishing House; 2020:468–469.
   Google Scholar
• Shen Y, Lin JH, Lin QD, et al. Influencing factors of cesarean section rate in some areas of china and analysis of operation indications. J Pract Obstetrics Gynecol. 2011;27(03):183–187.
   Google Scholar
• Guo Z, Zhang RX, Guo HJ, et al. Contrast analysis of rate and indications for cesarean section from 1990 to 2009. Maternal Child Health Care China. 2012;27(20):3089–3092.
   Google Scholar
• Molina G, Weiser TG, Lipsitz SR, et al. Relationship between cesarean delivery rate and maternal and neonatal mortality. JAMA. 2023;314(21):2263–2270. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.15553
   Google Scholar
• Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR; Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2000;356(9239):1375–1383. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02840-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Libretti A, Surico D, Corsini C, Aquino CI, Fracon S, Remorgida V. YouTube™ as a source of information on acupuncture for correction of breech presentation. Cureus. 2023;15(2):e35182. doi:10.7759/cureus.35182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie X, Kong BH, Duan T. Obstetrics and Gynecology[M]. 9 ed. Vol.7. People’s Medical Publishing House; 2018:198.
   Google Scholar
• Lee R, Anat L, Yuval F, et al. Efficacy of a second external cephalic version (ECV) after a successful first external cephalic version with subsequent spontaneous reinversion to breech presentation: a retrospective cohort study. Arch Gynecol Obstetrics. 2021;303:911–916. doi:10.1007/s00404-020-05819-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grootscholten K, Kok M, Oei SG, Mol BWJ, van der Post JA External cephalic version-related risks: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:1143–1151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cegolon L, Mastrangelo G, Maso G, Dal Pozzo G, et al. Understanding factors leading to primary cesarean section and vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in the friuli-venezia giulia region (north-eastern Italy), 2005–2015. Scientific Reports. 2021;10:380 (2020). doi:10.1038/s41598-019-57037-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cegolon L, Mastrangelo G, Heymann WC, Dal Pozzo G, Ronfani L, Barbone F. A systematic evaluation of hospital performance of childbirth delivery modes and associated factors in the Friuli venezia Giulia region (North-Eastern Italy), 2005-2015. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):19442. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-55389-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baxi Laxmi. External cephalic version: acog practice bulletin, number 221. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(5):e203–e212. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003837
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sentilhes L, Schmitz T, Azria E, et al. Breech presentation: Clinical Practice Guidelines From The French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;252:599–604. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.03.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussin OA, Mahmoud MA, Abdel Fattah MM. External cephalic version and reducing the incidence of term breech presentation: Green-top Guideline No. 20a. BJOG. 2017;124(7):e178–e192. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.14466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R. Cephalic version by postural management for breech presentation. Cochrane Data Base Syst Rev. 2012;10(10):CD000051. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000051.pub2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hussin OA, Mahmoud MA, Abdel-Fattah MM. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term: predictors of success, and impact on the rate of caesarean section. East Mediterr Health J. 2013;19(2):162–166. doi:10.26719/2013.19.2.162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;10:CD000083. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000083.pub2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins S, Ellaway P, Harrington D, Pandit M, Impey LW. The complications of external cephalic version: results from 805 consecutive attempts. BJOG. 2007;114(5):636–638. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01271.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macharey G, Ulander VM, Heinonen S, Kostev K, Nuutila M, Väisänen-Tommiska M. Risk factors and outcomes in “well-selected” vaginal breech deliveries: a retrospective observational study. J Perinat Med. 2017;45(3):291–297. doi:10.1515/jpm-2015-0342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Hu J, Wang X, Zhang H, Liu J. Moxibustion and other acupuncture point stimulation methods to treat breech presentation: a systematic review of clinical trials. Chin Med. 2009;4:4. doi:10.1186/1749-8546-4-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• He DM, Lu J, Huang M. Clinical study on auricular acupressure therapy cooperate with self-correcting method to correct breech presentation. Fujian Univ Trad Chin Med. 2011;6. doi:10.1186/1749-8546-6-27
   Google Scholar
• Lei H, Li G, Zou L, et al. A central study of the national composition ratio of cesarean section rate and indications of cesarean section. Chin J Obstet Gyneco. 2014;49(10):728–735.
   Google Scholar
• Goffinet F, Azria E, Kayem G, et al. Re: the risks of planned vaginal breech delivery versus planned caesarean section for term breech birth: a meta-analysis including observational studies: let’s avoid simplistic radicalism when reality is complex. BJOG. 2016;123(1):145–147. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.13734
   PubMedGoogle Scholar