Planned home birth: benefits, risks, and opportunities

References

• Office for National StatisticsBirths in England and Wales by Characteristics of Birth 22012 Available from: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/vsob1/characteristics-of-birth-2--england-and-wales/2012/sb-characteristics-of-birth-2.htmlAccessed February 13, 2015
   Google Scholar
• MacDormanMFMathewsTJDeclercqETrends in Out-of-Hospital Births in the United States, 1990–2012NCHS Data Brief2014 144
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Ministry of Health – Maternity Tables 2011 Available from: http://www.health.govt.nz/publication/maternity-tables-2011#homeAccessed February 13, 2015
   Google Scholar
• de JongeAGeertsCCvan der GoesBYMolBWBuitendijkSENijhuisJGPerinatal mortality and morbidity up to 28 days after birth among 743,070 low-risk planned home and hospital births: a cohort study based on three merged national perinatal databasesBJOG2014 Epub 2014910
   Google Scholar
• LindgrenHRadestadIChristenssonKHildingssonIOutcome of planned home births in Sweden 1992–2005Acta Obstet Gynaecol Scand200887751759
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KataokaYEtoHIidaMOutcomes of independent midwifery attended births in birth centres and home births: a retrospective cohort study in JapanMidwifery20132996597223415360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and WelfareBirths and Newborns 2009 Available from: http://www.stakes.fi/FI/tilastot/aiheittain/Lisaantyminen/synnyttajat/index.htmAccessed February 13, 2015
   Google Scholar
• National Statistics OfficeStatistics Canada–Births 2008 Archived Content Available from: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/84f0210x/2008000/t026-eng.pdfAccessed February 13, 2015
   Google Scholar
• LiZZekiRHilderLSullivanEAAustralia’s Mothers and Babies 2011Perinatal Statistics Series 28 Available from: http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=60129545698Accessed February 13, 2015
   Google Scholar
• BlixEHuitfeldtASØianPStraumBKumleMOutcomes of planned home births and planned hospital births in low-risk women in Norway between 1990 and 2007: a retrospective cohort studySex Reprod Healthcare20123147153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists/Royal College of MidwivesJoint statement No 242007 Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/files/rcog-corp/uploaded-files/%20JointStatmen-tHomebirths2007.pdfAccessed December 22, 2014
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care ExcellenceIntrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth NICE clinical guideline 190122014 Available from: Guidance.nice.org.uk/cg190 Accessed February 13, 2015
   Google Scholar
• American College of Nurse-MidwivesPosition Statement – Home Birth Available from: www.midwife.orgAccessed February 13, 2015
   Google Scholar
• Midwives Alliance of North AmericaHome birth statement2012 Available from:http://mana.org/pdfs/MANAPositionStatements.pdfAccessed December 17, 2014
   Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsCommittee opinion: planned home birthObstet Gynecol2011117242542821252776
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American Academy of PediatricsPolicy statement: planned home birthPediatrics201313110161020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VedamSSchummersLStolKFultonCHome birth: an annotated guide to the literature92012 Available from:http://mana.org/pdfs/HomeBirthAnnotatedGuidetotheLiteratureDec5-2012FINAL.pdfAccessed February 13, 2015
   Google Scholar
• VedamSStollKSchummersLFultonCHome birth: an annotated guide to the literature102013 Available from:http://med-fom-midwifery.sites.olt.ubc.ca/files/2014/01/HomeBirth_Annotat-edGuideToTheLiterature.pdfAccessed January 21, 2015
   Google Scholar
• HildingssonILindgrenHHaglundBRadestadICharacteristics of women giving birth at home in Sweden: a national register studyAm J Obstet Gynecol200619551366137216707081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birthplace in England Collaborative GroupPerinatal and maternal outcomes by planned place of birth for healthy women with low risk pregnancies: the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort studyBMJ2011343d740022117057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DowswellTThorntonJGHewisonJLilfordRJLShould there be a trial of home versus hospital delivery in the United Kingdom? Measuring outcomes other than safety is feasibleBMJ19963127537578605464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HendrixMVan HorkMMoretaDWhy women do not accept randomization for place of birth: feasibility of a RCT in the NetherlandsBJOG200911653754419250365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KennareRMKeirseMRTucierGRChanACPlanned home and hospital births in South Australia 1991–2006: differences in outcomesMJA2010192768020078406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catling-PaulCCoddingtonRLFoureurMJHomerCSPublicly funded homebirth in Australia: a review of maternal and neonatal outcomes over 6 yearsMJA2013198161662023919710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HomerCSThorntonCScarfVLBirthplace in New South Wales, Australia: an analysis of perinatal outcomes using routinely collected dataBMC Pregnancy Childbirth20141420624929250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HuttonEReitsmaAKaufmanKOutcomes associated with planned home and planned hospital births in low-risk women attended by midwives in Ontario, Canada, 2003–2006: a retrospective cohort studyBirth200936318018919747264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JanssenPASaxelLPageLAKleinMCListonRMLeeSKOutcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physicianCMAJ20091816–737738319720688
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HirazumiYSuzukiSPerinatal outcomes of low-risk planned home and hospital births under midwife-led care in JapanJ Obstet Gynaecol Res201339111500150423855717
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de JongAvan der GoesBYRavelliACJPerinatal mortality and morbidity in a nationwide cohort of 529,688 low risk planned home and hospital birthsBJOG20091161177118419624439
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der KooyJPeoranJDe GraffJPPlanned home compared with planned hospital births in the Netherlands: intrapartum and early neonatal death in low-risk pregnanciesObstet Gynecol20111181037104622015871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de JongeAMesmanAJMannienJZwartJJvan DillenJvan RoosmalenJSevere adverse maternal outcomes among low risk women with planned home versus hospital births in the Netherlands: nationwide cohort studyBMJ2013346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DavisDBaddockSPairmanSPlanned place of birth in New Zealand: does it affect mode of birth and intervention rates among low risk women?Birth201138211111921599733
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NoveABerringtonAMatthewsZComparing the odds of postpartum haemorrhage in planned home birth against planned hospital birth: results of an observational study of over 500,000 maternities in the UKBMC Pregnancy Childbirth20121213023157856
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JohnsonKCDavissBOutcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives: large prospective study in North AmericaBMJ20053301416141915961814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrünebaumAMcCulloughLBSapraKJApgar score of zero at five minutes and neonatal seizures or serious neurologic dysfunction in relation to birth settingAm J Obstet Gynecol2013209323:e1e623791692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ChengYWSnowdenJMKingTLSelected perinatal outcomes associated with planned home births in the United StatesAm J Obstet Gynecol20132094325e1325e823791564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CoxKJSchlegelRPaynePTeafDAlbersLOutcomes of planned home births attended by certified nurse-midwives in Southeastern Pennsylvania, 1983–2008J Midwifery Womens Health20135814514923437812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrünebaumAMcCulloughLBSapraKJEarly and total neonatal mortality in relation to birth setting in the United States 2006–2009Am J Obstet Gynecol2014211390.e1e724662716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GrünebaumAMcCulloughLBBrentRLArabinBLevenMIChervenakFAPerinatal risks of planned home births in the United StatesAm J Obstet Gynecol Epub20141015
   Google Scholar
• CheyneyMBovbjergMEversonCGordonWHannibalDVedamSOutcomes of care for 16,924 planned home births in the United States: the Midwives Alliance of North America statistics project, 2004 to 2009J Midwifery Womens Health2014591172724479690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collaborative survey of perinatal loss in planned and unplanned home birthsNorthern Region Perinatal Mortality Survey Coordinating GroupBMJ19963137068130613098942692
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EhrensteinVAssociation of Apgar scores with death and neurologic disabilityClin Epidemiol20091455320865086
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ZollingerTWPrzbylskiMJGamacheREReliability of Indiana birth certificate data compared to medical recordsAnn Epidemiol200616111016039875
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CheyneyMEversonCBurcherPHomebirth transfers in the United States: narratives of risk, fear, and mutual accommodationQual Health Res201424444345624598774
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WaxJRLee LucasFLamontMPinetteMGCartinABlackstoneJMaternal and newborn outcomes in planned home birth vs planned hospital births: a metaanalysisAm J Obstet Gynecol2010203243e1243e820598284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KeirseMJHome birth: gone away, gone astray, and here to stayBirth201037434134621083728
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WiegersTAKeirseMJvan der ZeeJBerghsGAOutcome of planned home and planned hospital births in low risk pregnancies: prospective study in midwifery practices in the NetherlandsBMJ19963137068130913138942693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsSafe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. Obstetric Care Consensus No 1Obstet Gynecol201412369371124553167
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• BernhardCZielinskiRAckersonKEnglishJHome birth after hospital birth: women’s choices and reflectionsJ Midwifery Womens Health201459216016624612335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BoucherDBennettCMcFarlinBFreezeRStaying home to give birth: why women in the United States choose home birthJ Midwifery Womens Health200954211912619249657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CatlingCDahlenHHomerCSThe influences on women who choose publicly-funded home birth in AustraliaMidwifery201430789289824690129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FarrishJVon RobertsonRA qualitative examination of factors that influence birthing options for African American womenCritical Sociology2012402271283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HildingssonIRadestadLindgrenHBirth preferences that deviate from the norm in Sweden: planned home birth versus planned cesarean sectionBirth201028829521083720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JouhkiMChoosing homebirth: the women’s perspectiveWomen Birth2012254e56e6122088677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LindgrenHErlandssonKWomen’s experiences of empowerment in a planned home birth: a Swedish population-based studyBirth201037430931721083723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LindgrenHHildingssonIRådestadIA Swedish interview study: parents’ assessment of risks in home birthsMidwifery2006221152216125827
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MergALCarmoneyPPhenomenological experiences: homebirth after hospital birthInt J Childbirth Ed20122770
   Google Scholar
• Murray-DavisBMcNivenPMcDonaldHMalottAElararLHuttonEWhy home birth? A qualitative study exploring women’s decision making about place of birth in two Canadian provincesMidwifery201228557658122889685
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SjöblomINordströmBEdbergAA qualitative study of women’s experiences of home birth in SwedenMidwifery200622434835516730107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NiuwenhujzeMKane LowLFacilitating women’s choice in maternity careJ Clin Ethics201324327628224282854
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ChervenakFAMcCulloughLBGrünebaumAArabinBLeveneMIBrentRLPlanned home birth in the United States and professionalism: a critical assessmentJ Clin Ethics201324318419124282845
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCourtCRaymentJRanceSSandallJOrganizational strategies and midwives’ readiness to provide care for out of hospital births: an analysis from the Birthplace organizational case studiesMidwifery20122863664522938797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Confederation of Midwives Global Standards for Midwifery Education 2010 Amended 2013 Available from:http://www.internationalmidwives.org/assets/uploads/documents/CoreDocuments/ICM%20Standards%20Guidelines_ammended2013.pdfAccessed February 13, 2015
   Google Scholar
• RooksJMidwifery and Childbirth in America Philadelphia, PATemple University Press1996
   Google Scholar
• BlixEKumleMKjaergaardHØianPLindgrenHTransfer to hospital in planned home births: a systematic reviewBMC Pregnancy Childbirth20141417924886482
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CookDAveryMFrisvoldMFormulating evidence-based guidelines for certified nurse-midwives and certified midwives attending home birthsJ Midwifery Womens Health20145915315924597859
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obstetric Working GroupObstetric Manual: Final Report of the Obstetric Working Group of the National Health Insurance Board of the Netherlands The List of Obstetric IndicationsAmstelveen,NetherlandsRoyal Dutch Association of Midwives2010
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Clinical ExcellenceClinical Guideline 55: Care of Healthy Women and Their Babies During ChildbirthLondon, UKNational Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence 2007
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Ministry of HealthGuidelines for Consultation with Obstetric and Related Medical Services (Referral Guidelines)Wellington,New ZealandMinistry of Health2012
   Google Scholar
• SchroederEPetrouSPatelNCost effectiveness of alternative planned places of birth in women at low risk of complications: evidence from the Birthplace in England national prospective cohort studyBMJ2012344e229222517916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar