References
- ThiagamoorthyGJohnsonAThakarRSultanAHNational survey of perineal trauma and its subsequent management in the United KingdomInt Urogynecol J201425121621162724832856
- Gurol-UrganciICromwellDAEdozienLCThird- and fourth-degree perineal tears among primiparous women in England between 2000 and 2012: time trends and risk factorsBJOG20131201516152523834484
- ZetterstromJLópezAAnzénBNormanMHolmströmBMellgrenAAnal sphincter tears at vaginal delivery: risk factors and clinical outcome of primary repairObstet Gynecol1999941212810389712
- OberwalderMConnorJWexnerSDMeta-analysis to determine the incidence of obstetric anal sphincter damageBr J Surg2003901333133714598410
- GlazenerCMALangGWilsonPDHerbisonGPMacarthurCGeeHPostnatal incontinence: a multicentre randomised controlled trial of conservative managementBr J Obstet Gynaecol199810547
- National Health Service Litigation AuthorityTen Years of Maternity Claims: An Analysis of NHS Litigation Authority DataNHSLA2012
- RCOG Greentop guideline 29: The Management of Third- and Fourth-Degree Perineal tears: RCOG June 2015 Available from: www.rcog.org.uk
- AytanHTapisizOLTuncayGAvsarFASevere perineal lacerations in nulliparous women and episiotomy typeEur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol2005121465015950361
- RizkDEAbadirMNThomasLBAbu-ZidanFDeterminants of the length of episiotomy or spontaneous perineal lacerations during vaginal birthInt Urogynecol J200516395400
- GellerEJRobinsonBLMatthewsCAPerineal body length as a risk factor for ultrasound-diagnosed anal sphincter tear at first deliveryInt Urogynecol J20142563163624337585
- DeeringSHCarlsonNStitelyMAllaireADSatinAJPerineal body length and lacerations at deliveryJ Reprod Med20044930631015134158
- FritelXSchaalJPFauconnierABertrandVLevetCPignéAPelvic floor disorders 4 years after first delivery: a comparative study of restrictive versus systematic episiotomyBJOG200811524725217970794
- De VogelJvan der Leeuw-van BeekAGietelinkDThe effect of a mediolateral episiotomy during operative vaginal delivery on the risk of developing obstetrical anal sphincter injuriesAm J Obstet Gynecol2012206404.e1e522425401
- RäisänenSVehviläinen-JulkunenKHeinonenSNeed for and consequences of episiotomy in vaginal birth: a critical approachMidwifery20102634835618804317
- CoatsPMChanKKWilkinsMBeardRJA comparison between midline and mediolateral episiotomiesBr J Obstet Gynaecol1980874084127387941
- SignorelloLBHarlowBLChekosAKRepkeJTMidline episiotomy and anal incontinence: retrospective cohort studyBMJ20003207227869010625261
- EoganMDalyLO’ConnellPRO’HerlihyCDoes the angle of episiotomy affect the incidence of anal sphincter injury?BJOG200611319019416411997
- StedenfeldtMPirhonenJBlixEWilsqaardTVonenBQianPEpisiotomy characteristics and risks for obstetric anal sphincter injury: a case-control studyBJOG201211972473022390647
- FreemanRMHollandsHJBarronLFKapoorDSCutting a mediolateral episiotomy at the correct angle: evaluation of a new device: the episcissors-60Med Devices (Auckl)20147232810.2147/MDER.S60056 eCollection 201424570598
- AndrewsVThakarRSultanAHJonesPWAre mediolateral episiotomies actually mediolateral?BJOG20051121156115816045535
- NaiduMKapoorDSEvansSVinayakaraoLThakarRSultanAHCutting an episiotomy at 60 degrees: how good are we?Int Urogynecol J201526681381610.1007/s00192-015-2625-9 Epub 2015 Feb 625656454
- SilfKWoodheadNKellyJFryerAKettleCIsmailKMEvaluation of accuracy of mediolateral episiotomy incisions using a training modelMidwifery201531119720010.1016/j.midw.2014.08.009 Epub 2014 Sep 225261381
- PatelRPUbaleSMEvaluation of the angled Episcissors-60® epi-siotomy scissors in spontaneous vaginal deliveriesMed Devices (Auckl)20147253256 Published online 2014 Jul 3110.2147/MDER.S6690125114598
- SawantGKumarDRandomized trial comparing episiotomies with Braun-Stadler episiotomy scissors and EPISCISSORS-60®Med Devices (Auckl)20158251254 Published online 2015 Jun 110.2147/MDER.S8336026082666