77
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Research

Environmental attitudes towards wine tourism

, &
Pages 13-26 | Published online: 03 Mar 2010

References

  • Hart R. Growth, environment and culture – encompassing competing ideologies in one ‘new growth’ model. Ecol Econ. 2002;40(2): 253–267.
  • European Commission. Protecting the environment and economic growth: trade-off or growth-enhancing structural adjustment? 2008. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/publication7726_en.pdf. Accessed on April 15, 2009.
  • Dunlap R. The state of environmentalism in the US Gallup News Service. 2007. Available from: http://www.gallup.com/poll/27256/State-Environmentalism-US.aspx. Accessed on April 14, 2009.
  • GFK. Americans reach environmental turning point: Companies need to catch up. Custom Research North America. 2007 Available from: http:// www.prnewswine.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?acct=104&story=/www.story/08-22-207/00046497348$edate#linktoppagebottom. Accessed on August 25, 2008.
  • Vermeir I, Verbeke W. Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer attitude-behavior intention gap. J Agric Environ Ethics. 2006;19:169–194.
  • Barber N, Taylor C, Strick S. Wine consumers environmental knowledge and attitudes: Influence on willingness to purchase. International Journal of Wine Research. 2009;1(1):59–72.
  • Diamantopoulos A, Schlegelmilch BB, Sinkovics RR, Bohlen GM. Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. J Bus Res. 2003;56(6):465–480.
  • Kilbourne WE, Beckmann SC. Review and critical assessment of research on marketing and the environment. Journal of Marketing Management. 1998;14(6):513–532.
  • Prakash A. Greening the firm – the politics of corporate environmentalism. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
  • Samdahl DM, Robertson R. Social determinants of environmental concern: Specification and tests of the model. Environ Behav. 1995;21(1):57–81.
  • Guagnano G, Markee N. Regional differences in the sociodemographic determinants of environmental concern. Popul Environ. 1995;17(2):135–149.
  • Jones RF, Dunlap RE. The social bases of environmental concern: Have they changed over time. Rural Sociol. 1992;57(1):28–47.
  • Mohai P. Women and the environment: An examination of the gender gap in environmental concern and activism. Soc Nat Resour. 1992;5:1–19.
  • Kollmuss A, Agyeman J. Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research. 2002;8(3):239–260.
  • Dolnicar S. Insight into sustainable tourists in Austria: Data based a priori segmentation approach. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2004;12(3):209–218.
  • Hall MC, Johnson G, Mitchell R. Wine tourism and regional development. In: Hall MC, Sharples L, Cambourne B, editors. Wine Tourism Around the World: Development, management and markets. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2000. p. 196–225.
  • Marshall R, Cordano M, Silverman M. The greening of the Californian wine industry: Implications for regulators and industry associations. Journal of Wine Research. 2005;16(2):151–169.
  • Kazim A. Towards a wider adoption of environmental responsibility in the hotel sector. International Journal of Hotel and Tourism Administration. 2007;8(2):25–49.
  • Baughman AT, Brown EJ, Brummet W, Dramko JM, Goldstein JH, Hooper BE. California Winemaking Impact Assessment. Master’s Thesis. Santa Barbara, CA: University of California, Santa Barbara; 2000.
  • Marshall R, Cordano M, Silverman M. Exploring individual and institutional drivers of proactive environmentalism in the US wine industry. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2005;14:92–109.
  • Inskeep E. Tourism Planning: An integrated and sustainable development approach. New York, NY: Wiley; 1991.
  • McKenney A. Number of US Wineries Tops 6,100. Wine Business Monthly. February 19, 2009. Available from: http://www.winebusiness.com/wbm/?go=getArticle&dataId=62895. Accessed on July 15, 2009.
  • Hall M, Macionis N. Wine tourism in Australia and New Zealand. In: Butler R, Hall M, Jenkins J, editors. Tourism and Recreation in Rural Areas. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 1998. p. 197–224.
  • Getz D. Explore Wine Tourism: Management, development and destinations. New York; NY: Cognizant;2000.
  • Thach L. Trends in wine tourism. Wine Business Monthly, August 15, 2007. Available from: http://www.winebusiness.com/wbm/?go=getArticle&dataId=50125. Accessed on July 19;2009.
  • Poitras L, Getz D. Sustainable wine tourism: The host community perspective. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. 2006;14(5):425–448.
  • Dodd T, Yuan J, Adams C, Kolyesnikova N. Motivations of young people for visiting wine festivals. Event Management. 2006:10:1–11.
  • Frochot I. Wine tourism in France: A paradox? In: Hall M, Sharples L, Cambourne B, Macionis N, editors. Wine Tourism Around the World: Development, management and markets. Oxford, UK: Butterworth– Heinemann; 2000. p.67–80.
  • Hall M. Wine tourism in New Zealand. In: Kearsley G, editor. Proceedings of Tourism Down Under II: Towards a more sustainable tourism. Dunedin, New Zealand: Centre for Tourism, University of Otago; 1996. p.109–119.
  • Ali-Knight J, Charters S. Education in a West Australian wine tourism context. International Journal of Wine Marketing. 1999;11(1):7–18.
  • Isaykina E. Defining the Target Market and Motivations for Visiting the Grapefest Wine Festival in Grapevine, Texas. Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University; 2001.
  • Getz D, Brown G. Critical success factors for wine tourism regions: A demand analysis. Tourism Management. 2006;27(1):146–158.
  • Nowak L, Thach L, Olsen J. Wowing the Millennials: Creating brand equity in the wine industry. Journal of Product and Brand Management. 2006;15(5):316–323.
  • Sharpley R. Ecotourism: A consumption perspective. Journal of Ecotourism. 2006;5(1/2):7–22.
  • Fraj E, Martinez E. Environmental values and lifestyles as determining factors of ecological consumer behaviour: An empirical analysis. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 2006;36(3):133–144.
  • Torgler B, Garcia-Valinas M, Macintyre A. Differences in preference towards the environment: The impact of a gender, age and parental effect. Discussion paper 221. Brisbane, Australia: QUT School of Economics and Finance; 2008:1–37.
  • Barber N. How Self-Confidence and Knowledge Effects the Sources of Information Selected During Purchase Situations. Published dissertation. Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University; 2008.
  • Kolyesnikova N, Dodd TH, Wilcox JB. Gender differences as antecedents to reciprocal consumer behaviour. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 2009;26(3):200–213.
  • Yuan J, So SI, Chakravarty S. To wine or not to wine: Profiling a wine enthusiast for a successful list. Journal of Nutrition in Recipe and Menu Development. 2005;3(3/4):63–79.
  • Zaichkowsky JL. Measuring the involvement construct. J Consum Res. 1985;12:341–352.
  • Martin B, Simmintiras A. Determination of green purchase behaviour: A review of the literature and an agenda for further research, in Marketing: Unity and diversity, Proceedings of the 1994 Marketing Educators Group Conference. 1994:628–637.
  • Amyx D, DeJong P, Lin X, Chakrabotry G, Wiener L. Influencers of purchase intentions for ecologically safe products: An exploratory study. Marketing Theory and Applications, Proceedings of the 1994 AMA Winter Educators Conference. 1994:341–347.
  • Eagly A, Chaiken S. The Psychology of Attitudes. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace; 1993.
  • Arcury T. Environmental attitude and environmental knowledge. Hum Organ. 1990;49(4):300–304.
  • Bradley J, Waliczek T, Zajicek J. Relationship between environmental knowledge and environmental attitude of high school students. J Environ Educ. 1999;30:17–22.
  • Tulgan B, Martin CA. Managing Generation Y: Global citizens born in the late seventies and early eighties. Amherst, MA: HRD Press; 2001.
  • Lee E, Mathur A, Moschis G, Strautman J. The Maturing Marketplace: Buying habits of baby boomers and their parents. Westport, CT: Quorum Books; 2000.
  • Mohai P, Twight BW. Age and environmentalism: An elaboration of the Buttel model using national survey evidence. Soc Sci Q. 1987;68(4):798–815.
  • Chang C. The influence of masculinity and femininity in different advertising processing contexts: An accessibility perspective. Sex Roles. 2006;55(5):345–356.
  • Palan KM. Gender identity in consumer behaviour research: A literature review and research agenda. Academy of Marketing Science Review. 2001;10:1–31.
  • Henderson KA. One size doesn’t fit all: The meanings of women’s leisure. Journal of Leisure Research. 1996;28(3):139–154.
  • Davidson DJ, Freudenburg WR. Gender and environmental risk concerns: A review and analysis of available research. Environ Behav. 1996;28(3):302–339.
  • Hunter L, Hatch A, Johnson A. Cross-national gender variation in environmental behaviours. Soc Sci Q. 2004;85:677–694.
  • Zelezny LC, Chua PP, Aldrich C. Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. J Soc Issues. 2000;56:443–457.
  • US Census. United States Department of Commerce, Regional Designations. 2008. Available from: http://www.census.gov/. Accessed on July 8, 2009.
  • Leiserowitz A. Global Warming in the American mind: The roles of affect, imagery, and worldviews in risk perception, policy preferences and behavior. Published dissertation. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon; 2003.
  • Environmental Protection Agency. Effects of acid rain – forests. Available from: http://www.epa.gov/acidrain/effects/forests.html. Accessed July 22, 2009.
  • Reiner DM, Curry TE, de Figueiredo MA, et al. American exceptionalison? Similarities and differences in national attitudes toward energy policy and global warning. Environ Sci Tech. 2006;40:2093–2098.
  • Dodd T, Laverie D, Wilcox J, Duhan D. Differential effects of experience, subjective knowledge, and objective knowledge on sources of information used in consumer wine purchasing. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research. 2005;29(1):3–19.
  • Milfont T, Duckitt J. The structure of environmental attitudes: A first-and second-order confirmatory factor analysis. J Environ Psychol. 2004;24:289–303.
  • Dunlap R, Van Liere KD, Mertig A, Jones RE. Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. J Soc Issues. 2000;56:425–442.
  • Churchill GA. Basic Marketing Research. 5th ed. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western; 2004.
  • Hair J, Anderson R, Tatham R, Black W. Multivariate Data Analysis. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1998.
  • Motto K, Fisher L. US Wine Demographics Report. St. Helena, CA: The Wine Business Center; 2000.
  • Howell SE, Laska LB. The changing face of the environmental coalition: A research note. Environ Behav. 1992;24:134–144.
  • Bazoche P, Deola C, Soler L. An experimental study of wine consumers’ willingness to pay for environmental characteristics. 2008. 12th Congress of the European Association of Agriculture Economists. Available from: http://www.legrenelle-environment.fr/grenelle-environment. Accessed on April 15, 2009.