From under the shadows: developing awareness in a conventional market with a product less recognized

References

• Grewal DL, Michael ED. Marketing. New York, NY; McGraw-Hill Companies Inc; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Orth UR, Wolf MM, Dodd TH. Dimensions of wine region equity and their impact on consumer preferences. The Journal of product and Brand Management. 2005;14(2/3):88–97.
   Google Scholar
• Wilcox JB, Laverie, Debbie A, et al. Facets of brand equity and brand survival: a longitudinal examination. International Journal of Wine Marketing. 2008:20(3):202–214.
   Google Scholar
• Kotler P, Gertner D. Country as brand, product and beyond: A place marketing and brand management perspective. Brand Management. 2002;9(4/5):249–261.
   Google Scholar
• Mowle J, Merrilees B. A functional and symbolic perspective to branding Australian SME wineries. Journal of product and Brand Management. 2005;14(4):220–227.
   Google Scholar
• Lockshin L, Spawton AL. Using involvement and brand equity to develop a wine tourism strategy. International Journal of Wine Marketing. 2001;13(1):72–81.
   Google Scholar
• Nowak LI, Washburn JH. Building brand equity: Consumer reactions to proactive environmental policies by the winery. International Journal of Wine Marketing. 2002;14(3);5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Reid M. Building strong brands through the management of integrated marketing communications, International Journal of Wine Marketing. 2002;14(3):37–52.
   Google Scholar
• Aaker DA. Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing on the Value of a Brand Name. New York, NY: The Free Press; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Orth UR. Consumer personality and other factors in situational brand choice variation Brand Management. 2005;13(2):115–133.
   Google Scholar
• Bhat S, Reddy SK. ‘Symbolic and functional positioning of brands. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 1998;15(1):32–43.
   Google Scholar
• Orth UR, Firbasova Z. The role of consumer ethnocentrism in food product evaluation. Agribusiness. 2003;19(1):137–153.
   Google Scholar
• LaRoche M, Papadopoulos N, Heslop L, Bergeron J. Effects of subcultural differences on country and product evaluations. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 2003;2(3):232–237.
   Google Scholar
• Baiabanis G, Diamantopoulos A. Domestic country bias, country of origin effect, and consumer ethnocentrism. Academy of Marketing Science Journal. 2004;32(1):80–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pharr J. Synthesizing country-of-origin research from the last decade: Is the concept still salient in an era of global brands? Journal of Marketing. 2005;34–45.
   Google Scholar
• Verlegh PW, Steenkamp JM. A review and meta-analysis of country-oforigin research. Journal of Economic psychology. 1999;20(5):521–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney J, Soutar G. Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing. 2001;77(2):203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vazquez R, del Rio AB, Iglesias V. Consumer-based brand equity: development and validation of a measurement instrument. Journal of Marketing Management. 2002;18(1/2):27–48.
   Google Scholar
• Barber N, Almanza B, Donovan J. Motivational factors of gender, income and age on selecting a bottle of wine. International Journal of Wine Marketing. 2006;18(3);218–232.
   Google Scholar
• Keller KL. Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing. 1993;57(1):1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell VW, Walsh G. Gender differences in German consumer decision making styles. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 2004;3(4):331–346.
   Google Scholar
• Hall J, Shaw M, Lascheit J, Robertson N (2000). Gender differences in a modified perceived value construct for intangible products. ANZMAC 2000 Visionary Marketing for the 21st Century: Facing the Challenge. Accessed 11 February 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Wine Market Council 2006. Wine market council consumer tracking study–2006. Available from: http://www.winemarketcouncil.com/ Accessed 5 March 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Barber N. How self-confidence and knowledge effects the sources of information selected during purchase situations. Published dissertation, Lubbock, TX: Texas Tech University; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Motto Kryla Fisher L. US Wine Demographics Report. St. Helena, CA; The Wine Business Center, 25;2000.
   Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulosa A, Schlegelmilchb B, Sinkovicsd B, Bohlen G. Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research. 2003;56:465–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US Census. 2008. United States Department of Commerce, Regional Designations. Available from: http://www.census.gov/Retrieved July 8, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Guagnano GA, Markee N. Regional differences in the sociodemographic. Determinants of environmental concern. population and Environment. 1995;17(2):135–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair J, Anderson R, Tatham R, Black W. Multivariate Data Analysis. (5th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Ryu K, Jang S. The effect of environmental perceptions on behavioral intentions through emotions: The case of upscale restaurants. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research. 2007;3(1):56–72.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbing D, Anderson J. Monte Carlo evaluations of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. In: Bollen KA, and Long JS (Ed), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications. 1993:40–65.
   Google Scholar
• Green S, Salkind N. Using SpSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data. (4th Ed). Upper Saddle Ridge, NJ: Pearson/ Prentice Hall. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Kline R. principles and practice of structural equation modeling. (2nd ed). (pp. 12–13 sample size, (pp. 47–95 structural equation modeling and model specifications). NY: Guilford Press. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick B, Fidell L, (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics. Structural Equation Modeling. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon; 2001:653–771.
   Google Scholar